A Neonatal ABO non-compatible heart transplant from a circulatory-determined death donor using NRP/Cold storage

BACKGROUND

Donation after Circulatory death is gaining worldwide acceptance. Most protocols regard their first cases to be performed with donor and recipient in the same institution. Few records of children or distant procurement have been published.

METHODS

Our institution was offered a heart from a 3-day-old, 3.4-kg child, blood group A, suffering irreversible encephalopathy. Parents accepted withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and agreed to donation. The donor hospital was located 340 km away. Concomitantly, a 2-month-old, 3.1 kg, blood group type B and with non-compaction ventricles was awaiting for the heart transplant in our unit.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven minutes after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, the heart arrested. Five minutes afterwards, a sternotomy was performed. The supra-aortic vessels were clamped altogether. Aorta and right appendage were cannulated and connected to heart-lung machine. The innominate artery above the clamp was severed. The heart resumed spontaneous rhythm in less than 1 min. Ventilation was restored and extracorporeal circulation was maintained for 32 min. Upon cardiologic arrest, the graft was harvested as routinely. The heart was cold-stored and transported by plane to our Hospital. An orthotopic bicaval transplant was performed. Overall cold ischaemia was 245 min. Ten weeks later, the child was discharged home in good condition.

CONCLUSION

Donation in circulatory death could increase the pool in neonates. Extracorporeal circulation proves successful for procurement in neonates. Distant procurement plus cold storage for donation in circulatory death is feasible. Donation in circulatory death and ABO non-compatible strategies are complementary to each other.

Hybrid Procedures. Opening Doors for Surgeon and Cardiologist Close Collaboration

Background: Collaboration between cardiac surgeons and cardiologists can offer interventions that each specialist may not be able to offer on their own. This type of collaboration has been demonstrated with the hybrid Stage I in patients with hypoplastic heart syndrome. Since that time, a hybrid approach to cardiac interventions has been expanded to an incredible variety of potential indications. Methods: Seventy-one patients were scheduled for a hybrid procedure along 8 years. This was defined as close collaboration between surgeon and cardiologist working together in the same room, either cath-lab (27 patients) or theater (44 patients). Results: Six groups were arbitrarily defined. A: vascular cut-down in the cath-lab (27 neonates); B: bilateral banding (plus ductal stent) in hypoplastic left heart syndrome or alike (15 children); C: perventricular closure of muscular ventricular septal defect (10 cases); D: balloon/stenting of pulmonary branches along with major surgical procedure (12 kids); E: surgical implantation of Melody valve (six patients) and others (F, one case). Two complications were recorded: left ventricular free wall puncture and previous conduit tearing. Both drawbacks were successfully sort out under cardiopulmonary by-pass. Conclusion: Surgeon and cardiologist partnership can succeed where their isolated endeavors are not enough. Hybrid procedures keep on spreading, overcoming initial expectations. As a bridge to biventricular repair or transplant, bilateral banding plus ductal stent sounds interesting. Novel indications can be classified into different groups. Hybrid procedures are not complication-free.