Observational study shows that it is feasible to provide neuroprotective treatment for neonatal encephalopathy in low-income countries

AIM

Perinatal asphyxia is one of the most frequent causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and 96% of the burden of neonatal encephalopathy occurs in low-income countries. This study investigated the feasibility of providing neuroprotective treatment for neonatal encephalopathy in low-income countries.

METHODS

Neonates with a gestational age of at least 36 weeks, with signs of perinatal asphyxia, were included in this 2015 observational study in three hospitals in Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Their characteristics were described, including the time to admission and Thompson score on admission.

RESULTS

We found that 42 of 134 patients (31.3%) reached the hospital within six hours of birth with a Thompson score of at least seven on admission. Another 15 patients (11.2%) had a five-minute Apgar score of up to five, without a Thompson score, and were eligible for treatment. Of the 57 (42.5%) eligible patients, 31 were discharged (54.4%), 25 died (43.9%) and one (1.8%) remained in hospital at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

Interventional studies are feasible and necessary, especially in countries where the burden of neonatal encephalopathy is largest. A Thompson score of 7-15 might be a useful entry criterion for neuroprotective treatment in low-income countries.

Mortality among tuberculosis patients in the Democratic Republic of Congo

SETTING

Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.

OBJECTIVE

To identify programmatic interventions for improved survival in patients receiving treatment for tuberculosis (TB) at primary care clinics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort of adult patients initiating anti-tuberculosis treatment between January 2006 and May 2007.

RESULTS

Among 5685 patients, 390 deaths occurred during anti-tuberculosis treatment, of which half (52%) did so during the first 2 months. Patients with smear-negative pulmonary TB were at greater risk of death in the first 2 months of treatment (human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] positive HR 1.49, 95%CI 0.89-2.49; HIV-negative HR 1.77 95%CI 1.06-2.95), but not thereafter. Patients with extra-pulmonary TB were at increased risk of death in the first 2 months of anti-tuberculosis treatment if they were non-HIV-infected (HR 2.42, 95%CI 1.52-3.85), and were half as likely to die during the remainder of treatment (HIV-positive HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.22-0.97; HIV-negative HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.23-0.94). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduced the risk of death by an estimated 36% (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.37-1.11).

CONCLUSION

High mortality in the first months of anti-tuberculosis treatment could be reduced by addressing diagnostic delays, particularly for extra-pulmonary and smear-negative TB cases and, in HIV-infected patients, by initiation of ART soon after starting anti-tuberculosis treatment.

Validation of candidate smear microscopy quality indicators, extracted from tuberculosis laboratory registers

SETTING

Kinshasa Province, Democratic Republic of Congo.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and validate register-based indicators of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy quality.

DESIGN

Selection of laboratories based on reliability and variation in routine smear rechecking results. Calculation of relative sensitivity (RS) compared to recheckers and its correlation coefficient (R) with candidate indicators based on a fully probabilistic analysis incorporating vague prior information using WinBUGS.

RESULTS

The proportion of positive follow-up smears correlated well (median R 0.81, 95% credibility interval [CI] 0.58-0.93), and the proportion of first smear-positive cases fairly (median R 0.70, 95% CI 0.38-0.89) with RS. The proportions of both positive suspect and low positive case smears showed poor correlations (median R 0.27 and -0.22, respectively, with ranges including zero).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of positives in follow-up smears is the most promising indicator of AFB smear sensitivity, while the proportion of positive suspects may be more indicative of accessibility and suspect selection. Both can be obtained from simple reports, and should be used for internal and external monitoring and as guidance for supervision. As proportion of low positive suspect smears and consistency within case series are more difficult to interpret, they should be used only on-site by laboratory professionals. All indicators require more research to define their optimal range in various settings.