AB1094 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF VACCINES FOR SARS-CoV-2 IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC AND IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES: DATA FROM THE ARGENTINEAN REGISTRY SAR-CoVAC

Background

Currently there is little information on the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated diseases and/or under immunosuppressive treatment in our country, where different types of vaccines and mix regimens are used. For this reason, the Argentine Society of Rheumatology (SAR) with the Argentine Society of Psoriasis (SOARPSO) set out to develop a national register of patients with rheumatic and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) who have received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in order to assess their efficacy and safety in this population.

Objectives

To assess SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatic and IMIDs.

Methods

SAR-CoVAC is a national, multicenter and observational registry. Adult patients with a diagnosis of rheumatic or IMIDs who have been vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 were consecutively included between June 1st and September 17th, 2021. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, underlying rheumatic or IMIDs, treatments received and their modification prior to vaccination and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded. In addition, the date and place of vaccination, type of vaccine applied, scheme and indication will be registered. Finally, adverse events (AE), as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection after the application of the vaccine were documented

Results

A total of 1234 patients were included, 79% were female, with a mean age of 57.8 (SD 14.1) years. The most frequent diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (41.2%), osteoarthritis (14.5%), psoriasis (12.7%) and spondyloarthritis (12.3%). Most of them were in remission (28.5%) and low disease activity (41.4%). At the time of vaccination, 21% were receiving glucocorticoid treatment, 35.7% methotrexate, 29.7% biological (b) Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and 5.4% JAK inhibitors. Before vaccine application 16.9% had had a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Regarding the first dose of the vaccine, the most of the patients (51.1%) received Gam-COVID-Vac, followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (32.8%) and BBIBP-CorV (14.5%). In a lesser proportion, BNT162b2 (0.6%), Ad26.COV2.S (0.2%) and CoronaVac (0.2%) vaccines were used. Almost half of them (48.8%) completed the scheme, 12.5% were mix regimenes, the most frequent being Gam-COVID-Vac / mRNA-1273. The median time between doses was 51days (IQR 53).

More than a quarter (25.9%) of the patients reported at least one AE after the first dose and 15.9% after the second. The flu-like syndrome and local hypersensitivity were the most frequent manifestations. There was one case of mild anaphylaxis. No patient was hospitalized. Altogether, the incidence of AE was 246.5 events/1000 doses. BBIBP-CorV presented significantly lower incidence of AE in comparison with the other types of vaccines. (118.5 events/1000 doses, p<0.002 in all cases)

Regarding efficacy, 63 events of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported after vaccination, 19% occurred before 14 days post-vaccination, 57.1% after the first dose (>14 days) and 23.8% after the second. In most cases (85.9%) the infection was asymptomatic or had an outpatient course and 2 died due to COVID-19.

Conclusion

In this national cohort of patients with rheumatic and IMIDs vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2, the most widely used vaccines were Gam-COVID-Vac and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, approximately half completed the schedule and in most cases homologously. A quarter of the patients presented some AE, while 5.1% presented SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, in most cases mild.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1199 IS PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS A RISK FACTOR FOR SEVERE COVID -19 INFECTION? DATA FROM THE ARGENTINIAN REGISTRY SAR-COVID

Background

Comorbidities, particularly cardio-metabolic disorders, are highly prevalent in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and they were associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which have been associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Whether PsA enhances the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or affects the disease outcome remains to be ascertained.

Objectives

To describe the sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients with PsA with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from the SAR-COVID registry and to identify the variables associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes, comparing them with those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Cross-sectional observational study including patients ≥18 years old, with diagnosis of PsA (CASPAR criteria) and RA (ACR / EULAR 2010 criteria), who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or serology) from the SAR-COVID registry. Recruitment period was between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Sociodemographic variables, comorbidities, and treatments were analyzed. To assess the severity of the infection, the ordinal scale of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)1 was used, and it was considered that a patient met the primary outcome, if they presented criteria of categories 5 or higher on the severity scale. For this analysis, Chi2 test, Fisher’s test, Student’s test or Wilcoxon test, and binomial logistic regression using NIAID>=5 as dependent variable were performed.

Results

A total of 129 PsA patients and 808 with RA were included. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Regarding PsA treatment, 12.4% of PsA were receiving IL-17 inhibitors, 5.4% IL12-23 inhibitors, one patient apremilast and one abatacept. The frequency of NIAID≥5 was comparable between groups (PsA 19.5% vs RA 20.1%; p=0.976). (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with PsA and RA who presented COVID-19 in the SAR-COVID registry.

Psoriatic arthritis (n=129)Rheumatoid arthritis (n=808)P valueTotal (n=937)Age (years), mean (SD)51.7 (12.7)53.1 (12.9)0.23952.9 (12.9)Female72 (55.8)684 (84.7)<0.001756 (80.7)Comorbidities65 (50.4)355 (43.9)0.203420 (44.8) Obesity (BMI ≥30)19 (15.2)102 (13.4)0.692121 (13.7) Morbid obesity (BMI ≥40)1 (0.8)10 (1.3)111 (1.25) Hypertension35 (28.5)205 (26.8)0.783240 (27.0) Diabetes16 (13.0)67 (8.8)0.18883 (9.39) Dyslipidemia24 (19.5)102 (13.5)0.106126 (14.4) Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease5 (11.4)32 (3.9)0.03337 (4.2)Two or more comorbidities55 (42.6)219 (27.1)<0.001274 (29.2)Current smoking4 (3.6)60 (8.4)0.7964 (7.7)High disease activity0 (0)29 (3.8)0.02729 (3.23)Glucocorticoids treatment5 (20.0)95 (60.1)<0.001100 (54.6)Conventional DMARDs47 (36.4)443 (54.8)<0.001490 (52.3)Biologic DMARDs60 (46.5)193 (23.9)<0.001253 (27.0)JAK inhibitors4 (3.10)72 (8.9)0.03876 (8.1)Full recovery of COVID-19105 (84.0)644 (81.7)0.127749 (82.0)COVID-19 complications16 (12.5)68 (8.7)0.22784 (9.2)Death due to COVID-191 (0.8)34 (4.3)0.07435 (3.8)

Notes=values n (%) unless otherwise indicated; BMI: Body Mass Index; DMARDs: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; JAK inhibitors: Janus kinase inhibitors.

PsA patients with NIAID≥5 in comparison with NIAID<5 were older (58.6±11.4 vs 50±12.5; p=0.002), had more frequently hypertension (52.2% vs 23%; p=0.011) and dyslipidemia (39.1% vs 15%; p=0.017). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02–1.11) was associated with a worse outcome of the COVID-19 (NIAID≥5) in patients with PsA, while those who received methotrexate (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.11–0.92) and biological DMARDs (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09–0.78) had a better outcome.

Conclusion

Although PsA patients have a higher frequency of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities than those with RA, the COVID-19 severity was similar. Most of the patients had mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and a low death rate.

References

[1]Beigel JH, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0389 EVOLUTION OF MONOTHERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: IMPACT OF THE RISE OF JAK INHIBITOR

Background

According to different international registries, the frequency of use of biological agents in monotherapy in RA ranges from 12 to 39%. Targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs-Jaki) have shown great efficacy when used as monotherapy. The rationale for this study is based on the fact that the frequency has increased with the appearance of the Jaki.

Objectives

To estimate the frequency and reason of the use of biological drugs (bDMARDs) or tsDMARDs in monotherapy since 2013 (Year the Jaki were available in Argentina). To describe the frequency of monotherapy by treatment class and analyze the differential characteristics.

Methods

Retrospective and cross-sectional multicenter study (10 reference centers from Argentina). Consecutive patients, ≥18 years, diagnosis of RA (ACR / EULAR 2010), who were under treatment with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, started after 2013. Socio-demographic, disease and therapeutic data were collected.

Statistical analysis

descriptive statistics, Chi2 test, Fisher’s exact test, Student’s T test and Mann Whitney were performed, according to the nature of the variables. A p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Total 505 patients were included, 87.7% women, with a mean age 58 years (SD ± 13.5) and disease duration of 13 years (SD ± 7.8). Treatment: TNF blocker 42.1%, JAKi 30.3%, IL-6 blocker 10.9% and other treatments 16.8%.

Since 2013, the frequency of monotherapy was 49% (95% CI: 45-53), in the last visit the current frequency was 41% (95% CI 37-45),of this 40% received JAKi. JAKi and IL-6 blocker were the treatments that were used more frequently in monotherapy vs combination modality (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The main causes of monotherapy were intolerance (39.9%), adverse event (22%), physician’s decision (20.2%) and lack of adherence (17.7%) to DMARDs. Patients who were active workers (64% vs 55%, p <0.05), with higher socioeconomic status (31.4% vs 17.2% p <0.01), better mean HAQ at diagnosis (1.1 vs 1.3, p <0.05) an association was observed with monotherapy. In addition, an association was observed with the use of monotherapy in patients in the 2nd biological line or higher vs 1st line (53% vs 33%, p <0.01), lower polypharmacy (45.6% vs 60%, p <0.02) and a shorter mean time of biological treatment (47 months vs 39 months, p <0.01). These variables were entered in a logistic regression model, the results of the independently associated variables are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.VariablepORCI 95%Employment status (active).0,1911,3270,8682,029Socioeconomic level (medium-high stratum)0,0022,151,3233,494HAQ at diagnosis, M (SD)0,0190,7040,5240,944First Line of biological treatment or Jaki (yes)0,020,4590,30,7Polypharmacy (>4 drugs) (yes)0,0180,6030,3950,918bDMARDs or tsDMARDs exposure time (months)0,0540,9940,9871

Conclusion

The frequency of monotherapy, since the Jaki’s emergence, was 49% (all follow-up) and 41% (current-last visit). Intolerance to cDMARDs doctor and the patient decision were the main cause. The monotherapy use pattern was greater in those who received JAKi and anti IL6. The use of monotherapy was associated with work activity, socioeconomic status, and functional capacity at diagnosis. An association was also observed with less polypharmacy.

References

[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–699.

[2]Emery P, Sebba A, Huizinga TW. Ann Rheum Dis.2013;72(12):1897–904.

[3]F. Sommerfleck et al. Rev Arg Reumatol. 2013;24(4): 30-36

[4]Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ,et al. Arthritis Rheum 2010. 2010;62(9):2569–81.

Disclosure of Interests

Rodrigo Garcia Salinas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, BMS, Jassen, Novartis, boehringer ingelheim, Consultant of: Lilly, Jassen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Fernando Sommerfleck Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Alfredo Vargas Caselles: None declared, Luis Palomino Romero: None declared, Javier Rosa: None declared, Mariana Benegas: None declared, Etel Saturansky: None declared, Pamela Giorgis: None declared, Florencia Martinez: None declared, Marcelo Abdala: None declared, Jimena Sanchez Alcover: None declared, Emma Estela Civit De Garignani: None declared, Gabriela Vanesa Espasa: None declared, Verónica Inés Bellomio: None declared, Juan Manuel Bande: None declared, Silvia Papasidero: None declared, Veronica Saurit: None declared, Leticia Ibañez Zurlo: None declared, Emilio Buschiazzo: None declared

POS1204 SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION AFTER VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES FROM ARGENTINA

Background

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) have been excluded from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. Though data appear to show safety and efficacy, mostly evidence remains in mRNA vaccines. However in our country, adenovirus and inactivated vaccines, as well as heterologous schemes are frequently used.

Objectives

To describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in patients with RD from de the SAR-CoVAC registry and to compare them with patients who got infected before vaccination. Additionally, factors associated with COVID-19 unfavorable outcome were assessed.

Methods

Adult patients with RD who have been vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 were consecutively included between June 1st and December 21st, 2021. Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR o serology) was reported by the treated physician. Infection after an incomplete scheme was defined when the event was diagnosed at least 14 days after first dose; and after a complete scheme when it occurred > 14 days after second dose. Homologous scheme is defined by two same doses of vaccine and heterologous by two different doses. Patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. To compare SARS-CoV-2 infection characteristics in not vaccinated patients, subjects from the SAR-COVID registry, which includes patients with RD and SARS-CoV-2 infection, were matched 2:1 by gender, age and RD.

WHO-Ordinal Scale ≥5 was used to define unfavorable infection outcome. Descriptive statics, Chi2 test, Fischer test, T test and ANOVA were used.

Results

A total of 1350 patients from the SAR COVAC registry were included, 67 (5%) presented SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination. The later were mostly (72%) females with a mean age of 57 (SD 15) years old. The most frequent RD were rheumatoid arthritis (41%), psoriatic arthritis (12%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (10%). At vaccination, most of them (75%) had low disease activity or remission, 19% were taking steroids, 39% methotrexate, 27% bDMARDs and 6% JAK inhibitors.

A total of 11 (16%) patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection <14 days after the first vaccine dose, 39 (58%) after an incomplete scheme and 17 (25 %) following a complete one. In the incomplete scheme group, 59% received Gam-COVID-Vac, 31% ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and 10% BBIBP-CorV; and in patients with complete scheme 47%, 24% and 29%, respectively. No event was reported after a complete heterologous scheme. No significant differences regarding sociodemoghraphic characteristics, RD, disease treatment, type of vaccine and regimen was found between in those with infection and those without it.

After vaccination only 8 (12%) of the patients who got infected had an unfavorable course, 88% of them following an incomplete scheme (5 received Gam-COVID-Vac, 1 ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and 1 BBIBP-CorV) and one subject after a complete homologous Gam-COVID-Vac scheme. Having an unfavorable outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated to: male gender [63% vs 24%, p=0.036], older age [mean 70 years (SD 7) vs 55 years (SD 15), p=0.005], being Caucasian [100% vs 54%, p=0.018], higher education [mean 17 years (SD 4) vs 12 years (SD 4), p=0.010], the presence of comorbidities [100% vs 39%, p=0.001, having pulmonary disease [37% vs 5%, p=0.019], dyslipidemia [63% vs 17%, p=0.011] and arterial hypertension [63% vs 24%, p=0.036], RD, treatments, disease activity and types of vaccines received were comparable between groups.

When comparing patients with and without vaccination prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, those who received at least one dose of vaccine had less frequently severe COVID-19 (12% vs 24%, p=0.067) and presented lower mortality due to COVID-19 (3% vs 6%, p=0.498). However these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

In the SAR-CoVAC registry 5% of the patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, most of them mild and 25% after a complete scheme. Any vaccine was associated with severe COVID-19. When comparing with non-vaccinated patients, those with at least one dose, had less frequently severe disease and died due COVID-19.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1200 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE FIRST AND THE SECOND WAVE OF SARS-COV-2 INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES IN ARGENTINA: DATA FROM THE SAR-COVID REGISTRY

Background

In Argentina we have witnessed two COVID 19 waves between 2020 and 2021. The first wave occurred during the spring of 2020 and it was related to the wild type of the virus, the second occurred during the fall/winter of 2021 when the gamma variant showed a clear predominance. During the first wave, patient with rheumatic diseases showed a higher frequency of hospitalization and mortality (4% vs 0.26%) when compared to the general population1; at that time, however, vaccination was not yet available.

Objectives

To compare sociodemographic and disease characteristics, course and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated/autoinflammatory diseases (IMADs) during the first and second waves in Argentina.

Methods

SAR-COVID is a national, multicenter, longitudinal and observational registry, in which patients ≥18 years of age, with a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or positive serology) were consecutively included since August 2020. For the purpose of this report, only patients with IMADs who had SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave (defined as cases occurred between March 2020 and March 2021) and the second wave (cases occurred between April and August 2021) were examined. Sociodemographic characteristics, disease diagnosis and activity, comorbidities, immunosuppressive treatment and COVID 19 clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes: hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of mechanical ventilation and death were compared among groups. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Variables were compared with Chi squared test and Student T test or Mann Whitney test. Multivariable logistic regression models with forward and backward selection method, using hospitalization, ICU admission and death as dependent variables were carried out.

Results

A total of 1777 patients were included, 1342 from the first wave and 435 of the second one. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 50.7 (14.2) years and 81% were female. Both groups of patients were similar in terms of socio-demographic features, disease diagnosis, disease activity, the use of glucocorticoids ≥ 10 mg/day and the immunosuppressive drugs (Table 1 below). Patients infected during the first wave have higher frequency of comorbidities (49% vs 41%; p= 0.004). Hospitalizations due to COVID 19 (31% vs 20%; p <0.001) and ICU admissions (9% vs 5%; p= 0.009) were higher during the first wave. No differences in the use of mechanical ventilation (16% vs 16%; p= 0.97) nor in the mortality rate (5% vs 4%; p= 0.41) were observed. In the multivariable analysis, after adjusting for demographics, clinical features and immunosuppressive treatment, patients infected during the second wave were 40% less likely to be hospitalized (OR= 0.6, IC95% 0.4-0.8) and to be admitted to the ICU (OR= 0.6, IC95% 0.3-0.9).

Table 1.Variable (% or Mean – SD)First wave(n=1342)Second wave(n=435)p ValueFemale gender81800.7Age (years)51.0 (14.5)50.0 (13.3)0.2Disease diagnosis Rheumatoid arthritis46461 Ankylosing spondylitis10110.8 Systemic lupus erythematosus171850.9 Systemic Scleroderma551 Sjögren´s syndrome650.7 Inflammatory myopathies330.5 Vasculitis430.4Disease activity High430.5Use of immune modulatorsDMARDcs53560.2DMARDts460.1DMARDb82821Use of glucocorticoids ≥10 mg12120.9Comorbidities49410.004

Conclusion

The impact of COVID 19 in Argentina, in terms of mortality in patients with IMADs was still higher compared to the general population during the second wave. However, the frequency of hospitalizations and ICU admissions was lower. These findings could be explained by the introduction of the SARS COV 2 vaccination and, probably, by the cumulative knowledge and management improvement of this infection among physicians.

References

[1]Isnardi CA et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases and SARS-COV-2 infection: data from the argentinean SAR-COVID Registry. Ann Rheum Dis, 2021, suppl 1, 887.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0655 SURVIVAL AND SAFETY OF BIOLOGICAL AND TARGETED SYNTHETIC THERAPIES AS REGARDS TO AGE GROUPS. BIOBADASAR 3.0 REGISTRY

Background

Advances in rheumatology and new therapeutic options have certainly impacted patient survival, changing the age range, from youth to seniors. The differences between the age groups could influence the evolution of the disease and the adverse events (AEs) related to the treatments. There are few real-world data on the safety and efficacy of treatments in different age groups.

Objectives

To evaluate the frequency of AEs and the survival of treatments according to the age in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

Retrospective, observational, multicenter study of real-life data of patients included in the BIOBADASAR 3.0 registry; exposed and not exposed to original biological treatments (b-DMARDs), biosimilars, targeted synthetic drugs (ts-DMARDs). The unexposed group received treatment with conventional disease-modifying drugs (cDMARDs). A Kaplan-Meier and Log Rank Test analysis was performed to study AEs-free survival and treatment in different age groups (young people <25; young adults 25-34; mature adults 34-65; old adults >65). Factors related to treatment survival were evaluated using Cox regression models.

Results

5,297 patients were included, 80.3% female, mean age 43.7 years (SD 15.6) and median disease progression 14.3 [IQR 11.5]. RA 4658 (87.9%); APs 490 (9.25%) and EA 149 (2.8%). The main reason for treatment discontinuation was ineffectiveness, in 624 patients in the exposed group and in 53 (2.5%) patients in control group, followed by the presence of AEs in 352 (11.2%) and 83 (3.9%), respectively (p=0.001).

A mean Charlson Score of 0.268 (SD 0.6) in the exposed group and 0.306 (SD 0.7) in the control group (p=0.095). Median EAs-free survival in the exposed group was 12.5 years [IQR 16.6] while in controls was 28 years [IQR 11], p<0.0001. Median AEs-free survival was 12 years (IQR 11) in young people, 11.5 years [IQR: 4.9] in young adults, 10 years [IQR: 3.25] in mature adults and 7.6 years [IQR: 6] in old adults with a difference statistically significant (p>0.017). The exposed group presented a median treatment survival in years of 11.25 years [IQR: 10] in young people; 12.5 years [IQR: 4.7] in young adults, 7.5 years [IQR: 12.1] in mature adults and 4.5 years [IQR: 1.14] in old adults (p>0.0001). Considering only the first line of treatment, a median survival of 11.5 years [IQR: 10] was evidenced in the age group <25; 12 years [IQR: 2.6] between 25-34 years old, 10 years [IQR: 12] in the group between 34-65 years old and 5.5 years [IQR: 1.14] in the group > 65 years old (p>0.004). (Figure 1). Considering the second line of treatment, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant (p=0.57). In the multivariate regression model for patients with RA, the factors with the greatest impact on treatment survival were female sex (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4), old age (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.008-1.01), treatment with steroids (HR 1.19, 95% CI1.1-1.2) and longer disease duration (HR 1.01, 95% CI1.01 – 1.02).

Conclusion

In the present study we were able to demonstrate a greater occurrence of AEs in old adults and mature adults compared to young people and young adults. Conversely, survival for b-DMARDs and ts-DMARDs were greater in youth and young adults. In patients with RA, female sex, corticosteroid therapy, old aged and longer disease duration were associated with treatment discontinuation.

References

[1]Souto A, et al. Rate of discontinuation and drug survival of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of drug registries and health care databases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(3):523–34.

[2]Ray D, et al. Immune senescence, epigenetics and autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2018 Nov;196:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

[3]Vela P, et al. Influence of age on the occurrence of adverse events in rheumatic patients at the onset of biological treatment: data from the BIOBADASER III register. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02231-x.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0342 OBSTETRIC AND THROMBOTIC ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME: ARE THEY DIFFERENT ENTITIES?

Background:

Several studies showed two main clinical phenotypes of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): thrombotic (TAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS). Although they have the same autoantibody profile, one of them developed thrombosis and other one obstetric morbidity.

Objectives:

To study clinical, demographic and antibody profile in patients with TAPS and OAPS.

Methods:

we retrospectively evaluated TAPS and OAPS patients who were included in Argentine Antiphospholipid antibodies registry. We studied clinical, demographic and antibody profile in both groups.

Results:

238 patients were included in the registry. 201 (84.81%) of them were female. 122 (60.69 %) of them fullfilled APS Sydney classification criteria, 47 (38.52%) TAPS and 52 (42.62%) OAPS. 23 (18.85%) patients had both thrombotic and obstetric events so they were excluded in this analysis.

Arterial Hypertension (HBP) and Hyperlipidemia were more frequent in TAPS versus OAPS. Older age was found in TAPS as well as in association with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There was no difference in antibody profile between the 2 groups, and the Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) was higher in TAPS than OAPS.

18 (38.3%) of TAPS patients had at least 1 pregnancy. Mean number of pregnancies of TAPS was 2.5 (1.10) and 3.84 (1.86) in OAPS. Thrombotic events were not found in TAPS during pregnancy and puerperium. HBP and gestational diabetes (GD) and other pregnancy related comorbidities were found in TAPS.

OAPS (n=52)TAPS (n=47)POAPS(n=52)TAPS(n=18)SLE, n (%)11 (21.2)28 (59.6)0.0002N% (DE)N % (DE)aGAPSS, mean (RIQ)4 (5)8 (5)<0.0001Abortions (<10 weeks)3338.4 (36.2)826.5 (35.3)Age, mean (DE)39.3 (6.24)43.1 (13.5)<0.0001Live Birth3633.5 (28.1)1672.2 (34.7)HBP, n (%)5 (9.6)15 (31.9)0.0121 >37 weeks2116.4 (2.38)1661.1 (31.7)Hyperlipidemia, n (%)4 (7.7)12(25.5)0.0267Prematurity <37 >34 weeks118.76 (1.97)0-GD, n (%)3(5.8)2(4.3)0.9999Prematurity <34 weeks96.37 (1.49)11.39 (5.89)Obesity, n (%)8 (15.4)4 (8.5)0.2912Pre eclampsia >34-<37 weeks10.490 (0.0350)24.63 (0.138)Smoking, n (%)11 (21.1)13 (27.6)0.4019Placental Hematoma31.86 (8.18)12.78 (11.8)Sedentary lifestyle, n (%)16 (30.8)17 (36.2)0.8486Abruptio Placentae21.96 (9.80)24.17 (12.9)Triple Positivity59.648.50.8323 Normal delivery2017.8 (27.9)1447.7 (33.9)Double Positivity11.936.4Cesarean section2217.2 (21.6)211.1 (32.3)Simple Positivity2938.51940.4Urgent Cesarean section139.80 (20.3)412.5 (24.6)GD21.37 (7.49)12.78 (11.8)HBP63.46 (10.3)310.2 (26.3)

Conclusion:

Antibody profile was similar in TAPS and OAPS. However, clinical manifestations and cardiovascular risk were different. These results should be evaluated in prospective studies.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Pleuropulmonary involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a Latin American inception cohort (GLADEL)

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to examine the demographic and clinical features associated with the occurrence of pleuropulmonary manifestations, the predictive factors of their occurrence and their impact on mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Materials and methods

The association of pleuropulmonary manifestations with demographic and clinical features, the predictive factors of their occurrence and their impact on mortality were examined in GLADEL patients by appropriate univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

At least one pleuropulmonary manifestation occurred in 421 of the 1480 SLE patients (28.4%), pleurisy being the most frequent (24.0%). Age at SLE onset ≥30 years (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.10–1.83), the presence of lower respiratory tract infection (OR 3.19; 95% CI 2.05–4.96), non-ischemic heart disease (OR 3.17; 95% CI 2.41–4.18), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.39; 95% CI 2.08–5.54), systemic (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.37–2.91), ocular (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.16–2.14) and renal manifestations (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09–1.83) were associated with pleuropulmonary manifestations, whereas cutaneous manifestations were negatively associated (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29–0.76). Non-ischemic heart disease (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.63–3.09), SDI scores ≥1 (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.10–2.17) and anti-La antibody positivity (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.39–4.57) independently predicted their subsequent occurrence. Cutaneous manifestations were protective of the subsequent occurrence of pleuropulmonary manifestations (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.90). Pleuropulmonary manifestations independently contributed a decreased survival (HR: 2.79 95% CI 1.80–4.31).

Conclusion

Pleuropulmonary manifestations are frequent in SLE, particularly pleuritis. Older age, respiratory tract infection, cardiac, systemic and renal involvement were associated with them, whereas cutaneous manifestations were negatively associated. Cardiac compromise, SDI scores ≥1 and anti-La positivity at disease onset were predictive of their subsequent occurrence, whereas cutaneous manifestations were protective. They independently contributed to a decreased survival in these patients.

Early discoid lupus erythematosus protects against renal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: longitudinal data from a large Latin American cohort

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine whether early discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) would be a protective factor for further lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

We studied SLE patients from GLADEL, an inception longitudinal cohort from nine Latin American countries. The main predictor was DLE onset, which was defined as physician-documented DLE at SLE diagnosis. The outcome was time from the diagnosis of SLE to new lupus nephritis. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted to examine the association of DLE onset with time to lupus nephritis.

Results

Among 845 GLADEL patients, 204 (24.1%) developed lupus nephritis after SLE diagnosis. Of them, 10 (4.9%) had DLE onset, compared to 83 (12.9%) in the group of 641 patients that remained free of lupus nephritis (hazard ratio 0.39; P = 0.0033). The cumulative proportion of lupus nephritis at 1 and 5 years since SLE diagnosis was 6% and 14%, respectively, in the DLE onset group, compared to 14% and 29% in those without DLE ( P = 0.0023). DLE onset was independently associated with a lower risk of lupus nephritis, after controlling for sociodemographic factors and disease severity at diagnosis (hazard ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.71).

Conclusions

Our data indicate that DLE onset reduces the risk of further lupus nephritis in patients with SLE, independently of other factors such as age, ethnicity, disease activity, and organ damage. These findings have relevant prognosis implications for SLE patients and their clinicians. Further studies are warranted to unravel the biological and environmental pathways associated with the protective role of DLE against renal disease in patients with SLE.

Late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in Latin Americans: a distinct subgroup?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the characteristics of patients who developed late onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the GLADEL (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus) cohort of patients with SLE.

METHODS

Patients with SLE of less than two years of disease duration, seen at 34 centers of nine Latin American countries, were included. Late-onset was defined as >50 years of age at time of first SLE-related symptom. Clinical and laboratory manifestations, activity index (SLEDAI), and damage index (SLICC/ACR- DI) were ascertained at time of entry and during the course (cumulative incidence). Features were compared between the two patient groups (<50 and ≥50) using descriptive statistics and hypothesis tests. Logistic regression was performed to examine the association of late-onset lupus, adjusting for other variables.

RESULTS

Of the 1480 patients included, 102 patients (6.9 %) had late-onset SLE, 87% of which were female. Patients with late-onset SLE had a shorter follow-up (3.6 vs. 4.4 years, p < 0.002) and a longer time to diagnosis (10.1 vs. 5.8 months, p < 0.001) compared to the younger onset group. Malar rash, photosensitivity, and renal involvement were less prevalent while interstitial lung disease, pleural effusions, and sicca symptoms were more frequent in the older age group (p > 0.05). In multivariable analysis, late onset was independently associated with higher odds of ocular (OR = 3.66, 95% CI = 2.15-6.23), pulmonary (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.01-4.11), and cardiovascular (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.04-2.98) involvement and lower odds of cutaneous involvement (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.21-0.80), number of cumulative SLE criteria (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.97), use of cyclophosphamide (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.24-0.95), and anti-RNP antibodies (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.20-0.91). A Cox regression model revealed a higher risk of dying in older onset than the younger-onset SLE (OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.2-5.6).

CONCLUSION

Late-onset SLE in Latin Americans had a distinct disease expression compared to the younger-onset group. The disease seems to be mild with lower cumulative SLE criteria, reduced renal/mucocutaneous involvements, and less use of cyclophosphamide. Nevertheless, these patients have a higher risk of death and of ocular, pulmonary, and cardiovascular involvements.

The impact of rural residency on the expression and outcome of systemic lupus erythematosus: data from a multiethnic Latin American cohort

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to examine the role of place of residency in the expression and outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a multi-ethnic Latin American cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SLE patients (< two years of diagnosis) from 34 centers constitute this cohort. Residency was dichotomized into rural and urban, cut-off: 10,000 inhabitants. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory and mortality rates were compared between them using descriptive tests. The influence of place of residency on disease activity at diagnosis and renal disease was examined by multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1426 patients, 122 (8.6%) were rural residents. Their median ages (onset, diagnosis) were 23.5 and 25.5 years; 85 (69.7%) patients were Mestizos, 28 (22.9%) Caucasians and 9 (7.4%) were African-Latin Americans. Rural residents were more frequently younger at diagnosis, Mestizo and uninsured; they also had fewer years of education and lower socioeconomic status, exhibited hypertension and renal disease more frequently, and had higher levels of disease activity at diagnosis; they used methotrexate, cyclophosphamide pulses and hemodialysis more frequently than urban patients. Disease activity over time, renal damage, overall damage and the proportion of deceased patients were comparable in rural and urban patients. In multivariable analyses, rural residency was associated with high levels of disease activity at diagnosis (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.57) and renal disease occurrence (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.00-3.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Rural residency associates with Mestizo ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status and renal disease occurrence. It also plays a role in disease activity at diagnosis and kidney involvement but not on the other end-points examined.

Validation of the Spanish, Portuguese and French versions of the Lupus Damage Index questionnaire: data from North and South America, Spain and Portugal

We have previously developed and validated a self-administered questionnaire, modelled after the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI), the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ), which may allow the ascertainment of this construct in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients followed in the community and thus expand observations made about damage. We have now translated, back-translated and adapted the LDIQ to Spanish, Portuguese and French and applied it to patients followed at academic and non-academic centres in North and South America, Portugal and Spain while their physicians scored the SDI. A total of 887 patients (659 Spanish-speaking, 140 Portuguese-speaking and 80 French-speaking patients) and 40 physicians participated. Overall, patients scored all LDIQ versions higher than their physicians (total score and all domains). Infrequent manifestations had less optimal clinimetric properties but overall agreement was more than 95% for the majority of items. Higher correlations were observed among the Spanish-speaking patients than the Portuguese-speaking and French-speaking patients; further adjustments may be needed before the Portuguese and French versions of the LDIQ are applied in community-based studies. The relationship between the LDIQ and other outcome parameters is currently being investigated in a different patient sample.

Metabolic syndrome in Argentinean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

The objective was to determine the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Argentina, to assess the factors associated to it, and to compare the results with a control group with non-inflammatory disorders. The study included 147 patients with SLE and 119 controls. MS was defined according to criteria by the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI) Scientific Statement. Demographic characteristics, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SDI) were assessed as well as administration, maximum dose and cumulative dose of prednisone and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). MS prevalence was 28.6% (CI 95%: 21.4-36.6) in patients with SLE and 16% in controls (P = 0.0019). Patients with SLE presented higher arterial hypertension frequency compared with controls (43 vs 25%, P = 0.007). When comparing lupus patients with MS (n = 41) and without MS (n = 106), no significant differences were observed regarding duration of the disease, SLEDAI or cumulative prednisone dose. Cumulative damage was associated independently with MS (OR 1.98; P = 0.021), whereas HCQ use was found to be protective (OR 0.13; P = 0.015). Patients with lupus presented higher MS prevalence than controls with non-inflammatory disorders, and occurrence of arterial hypertension was also higher. MS was associated with cumulative damage; the use of HCQ showed to be protective against presence of MS.

Lung cavitation in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Pulmonary complications of primary antiphospholipid syndrome are common and diverse, with thromboembolic events counting as the most frequent manifestation. We present the case of a female patient with a diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome, pulmonary thromboembolism and infarction followed by lung cavitation.