A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion trial of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: SERENA-1 monotherapy results

BACKGROUND

SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Parts A and B aim to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant monotherapy and define doses for clinical evaluation. Patients and Methods Women aged 18 years or older with metastatic or recurrent ER+, HER2- breast cancer, refractory (or intolerant) to therapy were assigned 25 mg up to 450 mg once daily (QD; escalation) or 75, 150, or 300 mg QD (expansion). Safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and impact on ESR1m circulating tumor (ct)DNA levels were assessed.

RESULTS

By 9 March 2021, 108 patients received camizestrant monotherapy at 25-450 mg doses. Of these, 93 (86.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 82.4% of which were grade 1 or 2. The most common TRAEs were visual effects (56%), (sinus) bradycardia (44%), fatigue (26%), and nausea (15%). There were no TRAEs grade 3 or higher, or treatment-related serious adverse events (TRSAEs) at doses ≤150 mg. Median tmax was achieved ∼2-4 hours post-dose at all doses investigated, with an estimated half-life of 20-23 hours. Efficacy was observed at all doses investigated, including in patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor and/or fulvestrant treatment, with and without baseline ESR1 mutations, and with visceral disease, including liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Camizestrant is a next-generation oral SERD and pure ER antagonist with a tolerable safety profile. The pharmacokinetics profile supports once-daily dosing, with evidence of pharmacodynamic and clinical efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients, regardless of ESR1m. This study established 75, 150 and 300 mg QD doses for Phase 2 testing (SERENA-2, NCT04214288 and SERENA-3, NCT04588298).

A phase I trial of LXS196, a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, for metastatic uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastases (MUM) with a poor prognosis and median overall survival of approximately 1 year.

METHODS

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of the oral protein kinase C inhibitor LXS196 in 68 patients with MUM (NCT02601378). Patients received LXS196 doses ranging from 100-1000 mg once daily (QD; n = 38) and 200-400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 30).

RESULTS

First cycle dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 7/38 (18.4%) QD and 2/17 (11.8%) BID patients. Hypotension was the most common DLT, occurring at doses ≥500 mg/day, and manageable with LXS196 interruption and dose reduction. Median duration of exposure to LXS196 was 3.71 months (range: 1.81-15.28) for QD and 4.6 months (range: 0.33-58.32) for BID dosing. Clinical activity was observed in 6/66 (9.1%) evaluable patients achieving response (CR/PR), with a median duration of response of 10.15 months (range: 2.99-41.95); 45/66 had stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. At 300 mg BID, the recommended dose for expansion, 2/18 (11.1%) evaluable patients achieved PR and 12/18 (66.7%) had SD.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest manageable toxicity and encouraging clinical activity of single-agent LXS196 in patients with MUM.

Antitumor activity of lurbinectedin in combination with oral capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies showed a synergistic effect for 5-fluorouracil and lurbinectedin against solid tumors. This phase I trial evaluated a combination of capecitabine plus lurbinectedin in patients with selected advanced solid tumors. Results in patients with relapsed metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received capecitabine daily on day (D)1-D14 combined with lurbinectedin on D1, D8 or D1 every 3 weeks (q3w) intravenously, following a standard 3 + 3 escalation design and expansion at the recommended dose (RD).

RESULTS

Of the 81 enrolled patients, 28 had relapsed MBC: 20 with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors and 8 with triple-negative tumors; 3 treated in the D1,D8 schedule and 25 in the D1 schedule. The RD was capecitabine 1650 mg/m² daily on D1-D14 plus lurbinectedin 2.2 mg/m² on D1 q3w. Sixteen confirmed responses and two prolonged disease stabilizations (≥6 months) were observed [overall response rate (ORR)/clinical benefit rate (CBR) = 57%/64% at all dose levels; 47%/60% at the RD]. Twelve responses and both prolonged stabilizations occurred in HR-positive tumors (ORR/CBR = 60%/70% at all dose levels, 56%/78% at the RD). Four responses were found in triple-negative tumors (ORR and CBR = 50% at all dose levels; 33% at the RD). Myelotoxicity was reversible and manageable at the RD; most non-hematological toxicities were mild/moderate. No episodes of febrile neutropenia or severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome occurred. No major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was found between lurbinectedin, capecitabine or capecitabine metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

The capecitabine/lurbinectedin combination showed encouraging clinical activity in relapsed MBC, especially in HR-positive tumors. Toxicity was manageable at the RD. Further development is warranted in relapsed MBC.

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, in patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer: results from a phase II basket study

BACKGROUND

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, has shown preclinical antitumor activity against homologous recombination repair-deficient models and preliminary clinical activity in BRCA1/2 breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II basket multitumor trial (NCT02454972) evaluated lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in a cohort of 21 patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Patients with any hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in six patients [ORR = 28.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.3% to 52.2%] who had received a median of two prior advanced chemotherapy lines. Lurbinectedin was active in both BRCA mutations: four PRs in 11 patients (36.4%) with BRCA2 and two PRs in 10 patients (20.0%) with BRCA1. Median DoR was 8.6 months, median PFS was 4.1 months and median OS was 16.1 months. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 10 patients (47.6%), including 3 with unconfirmed response in a subsequent tumor assessment [ORR unconfirmed = 42.9% (95% CI 21.8% to 66.0%)]. Clinical benefit rate (PR + SD ≥ 4 months) was 76.2% (95% CI 52.8% to 91.8%). No objective response was observed among patients who had received prior poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (61.9%), fatigue (38.1%) and vomiting (23.8%). These AEs were mostly grade 1/2. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (42.9%: grade 4, 23.8%: with no febrile neutropenia).

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II study met its primary endpoint and showed activity of lurbinectedin in germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Lurbinectedin showed a predictable and manageable safety profile. Considering the exploratory aim of this trial as well as previous results in other phase II studies, further development of lurbinectedin in this indication is warranted.

New designs in early clinical drug development

The availability of an unprecedented massive amount of data has provided a magnificent window of opportunity for the development of new drugs. There are currently more drugs in development targeting cancer than any other disease. While this has brought us new waves of drugs, the counterpart is that with these new molecules we have different mechanisms of action, drug kinetics and dynamics, response types and toxicity profiles, which impair classical early clinical trial designs from being effective and efficient. What we once treated as a 'one-size-fits-all' homogeneous disease, has now been uncovered to be a rather heterogeneous condition with multiple targetable mutations. As this generates endless scenarios, it will be impossible to design single 'me-too' trials for every different disease, target, biomarker and agent. To overcome this, we must focus on improving early phase studies, undoubtedly the most critical step from bench to bedside. Goals include decreasing clinical development times, lowering research and development costs and optimizing decisions in advancing through the several phases with a higher degree of certainty in exchange for less failed attempts. We need more informative and, really, transformative early phase designs that seek to obtain the typical late phase objectives in a time continuum and to allow for more robust and efficient go/no-go decisions. With this in mind, different classes of drugs seem to fit with different designs, which present solutions to the different challenges that they pose after finding the maximum tolerated dose/optimum biological dose. This article reviews these concepts and designs and how they can adapt to this new reality in early phase investigation.

Abstract P5-11-01: Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. Based on preclinical and clinical data, SERDs are expected be effective in patients harboring ESR1 mutations. Biomarker analysis was performed on plasma and tumor samples from the Phase I study of GDC-0927 in metastatic breast cancer (Dickler et al, SABCS 2017) with the goal of evaluating activity in both ESR1 mutant and wildtype tumors, and to assess ER pathway modulation.

Methods: Hotspot mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, and AKT1 were analyzed in baseline, on-treatment and end of treatment plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using the BEAMing assay in patients treated at multiple dose levels of GDC-0927. A subset of samples was analyzed with Foundation Medicine's next generation sequencing ctDNA assay (FACT), which covers genomic alterations in 62 commonly altered genes. Paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies were collected to assess ER pathway modulation. ER, PR, and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression analysis was performed using Illumina's RNA Access library preparation kit followed by paired-end (2x50b, 50M reads) sequencing on the HiSeq.

Results: Baseline and on-treatment plasma samples were available for 40 patients. ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were observed in 52% and 33% of patient baseline samples, respectively (BEAMing method). Mutant allele frequencies (MAF) generally declined in the first on-treatment samples collected for both ESR1 (16 out of 21 samples) and PIK3CA (7 out of 12 samples). The majority of the reductions were greater than 95% relative to baseline. Increases in ESR1 MAFs were observed in later time-points and were not associated with any particular ESR1 mutation. There were six instances for which an ESR1 mutation was detected in an on-treatment sample that was not detected in the baseline sample, three at L536P and one each at D538G, L536H, and S463P, and four out of six with MAFs close to the limit of detection. The FACT assay also detected alterations in CDH1, NF1, PTEN, and TP53 in baseline samples. The relationship between MAF changes and clinical benefit to GDC-0927 will be presented. A predefined, experimentally-derived set of ER target genes were evaluated in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy pairs from six patients. Four of the six patients showed evidence of suppression in ER pathway activity, one patient treated at the 1000 mg dose level and three at the 1400 mg dose. The degree of pathway suppression was associated with pre-treatment pathway levels and decreases of ER and Ki67 protein levels.

Conclusions: We report here evidence of consistent reduction of ESR1 and PIK3CA ctDNA in patients treated with GDC-0927. ER pathway suppression was observed at both the transcript and protein level confirming pharmacodynamic activity of the SERD.

Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Daemen A, Chang C-W, Giltnane J, Metcalfe C, Dickler MN, Bardia A, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Liu L, Li R, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Lackner MR. Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-01.

Abstract OT2-06-04: MORPHEUS: A phase Ib/II trial platform evaluating the safety and efficacy of multiple cancer immunotherapy combinations in patients with hormone receptor–positive and triple-negative breast cancer

Background:

Cancer immunotherapy (CIT) has significantly improved overall survival across multiple tumor types, but only subsets of patients experience durable response with single-agent CIT. Combinations of CIT with targeted therapy or chemotherapy may be needed in order to target multiple cancer immune escape mechanisms simultaneously, thus providing personalized treatment options that extend clinical benefit to more patients. The MORPHEUS platform includes multiple phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early signals of safety and activity of CIT combinations. Using a randomized trial design, multiple CIT combination arms are compared with a single standard-of-care control arm. These trials have the flexibility to open new treatment arms with novel CIT combinations as they become available and to close arms that show minimal activity or unacceptable toxicity. Here we describe MORPHEUS trials in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced hormone receptor–positive (HR+BC) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 2 patient populations in need of more treatment options.

Trial design:

MORPHEUS-HR+BC (NCT03280563) will enroll patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced HR+BC who have progressed during or after first-line treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor and whose tumors do not express human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). MORPHEUS-TNBC (NCT03424005) will enroll patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced TNBC who have progressed during or after first-line treatment with chemotherapy. For both studies, key inclusion criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (stage 1) or 0-2 (stage 2) and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Key exclusion criteria include prior treatment with T-cell co-stimulating or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, and symptomatic, untreated, or actively progressing central nervous system metastases. Patients in both trials will be randomized to one of the CIT atezolizumab combination arms or a control arm (up to 5 arms in HR+BC and up to 6 arms in TNBC). Patients experiencing loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity in stage 1 may be eligible to switch to a different CIT atezolizumab combination arm in stage 2. Primary endpoints are safety measures and investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, clinical benefit rate (HR+BC) or disease control rate (TNBC) are among the secondary endpoints. Exploratory biomarkers will also be examined.

Citation Format: Yardley DA, Abu-Khalaf M, Boni V, Brufsky A, Emens LA, Gutierrez M, Hurvitz S, Im S-A, Loi S, McCune SL, Schmid P, O'Hear C, Zhang X, Vidal GA. MORPHEUS: A phase Ib/II trial platform evaluating the safety and efficacy of multiple cancer immunotherapy combinations in patients with hormone receptor–positive and triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-06-04.

Abstract P5-21-06: Alpelisib plus letrozole in estrogen receptor-Positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (aBC): Safety and preliminary efficacy analysis from a phase 1b trial

Background

Endocrine therapy is the standard first-line treatment for postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+, HER2– aBC. However, resistance eventually develops, often through dysregulation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, specifically mutations in PIK3CA, the gene encoding the p110α subunit of PI3K. The oral, selective PI3K inhibitor alpelisib and letrozole synergistically inhibits tumor growth in preclinical models of ER+ breast cancer. Alpelisib plus letrozole in pts with ER+ aBC is being investigated in arm 2 of a multi-arm, phase 1b study (NCT01872260).

Methods

Postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2− aBC received alpelisib (300 mg QD; continuous, 28 days cycle) plus letrozole (2.5 mg QD; continuous). Primary endpoints were to confirm MTD/RP2D of alpelisib plus letrozole in the escalation phase and to further characterize safety and tolerability in the expansion phase. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers.

Results

As of August 19, 2016, 56 pts had received alpelisib plus letrozole: 19 pts were enrolled in the escalation phase (designated here as previously treated group), of which, 95% of pts were previously treated for aBC and 37 pts were enrolled in the expansion phase (designated here as first-line group), of which, 81% of pts were treatment-naïve for aBC. 16 previously treated pts and 11 first-line pts (48% of all pts) have discontinued treatment. Most common reasons for treatment discontinuation in the full population were disease progression (23.2%) and adverse events (AEs) (8.9%). Median duration of exposure of combination (alpelisib plus letrozole) was 23 weeks and 12.7 weeks in previously treated and first-line groups, respectively. Most frequently reported any grade treatment-related AEs (≥20% incidence) in all pts were hyperglycemia (48.2%), diarrhea (48.2%), nausea (33.9%), and decreased appetite (28.6%). Most common, grade 3 or 4 AEs (≥3% incidence) suspected to be treatment-related in all pts included hyperglycemia (17.9%), rash (5.4%), and diarrhea (3.6%). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months in the previously treated group and was not reached in the first-line group. A summary of best overall response, overall response rate and clinical benefit rate in evaluable pts is shown in the table.

 Alpelisib+Letrozole (Previously Treated group) [N=19]Alpelisib+Letrozole (First-line group) [N=27]All subjects (N=46)Best overall response, n (%)Confirmed CR000Confirmed PR04 (14.8)4 (8.7)NCRNPD6 (31.6)9 (33.3)15 (32.6)SD8 (42.1)9 (33.3)17 (37.0)PD2 (10.5)1 (3.7)3 (6.5)Unknown3 (15.8)3 (11.1)6 (13.0)ORR (CR+PR), % (95% CI)0 (0.0-17.6)14.8 (4.2-33.7)8.7 (2.4-20.8)CBR [CR+PR+(SD/NCRNPD)], % (95% CI)36.8 (16.3-61.6)70.8 (48.9-87.4)55.8 (39.90-70.9)CBR; clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; NCRNPD; Non-CR/Non-PD; ORR; overall response rate; PD; progressive disease; SD, stable disease.

Conclusions

Based on these preliminary data, the combination of alpelisib plus letrozole had manageable safety profile in pts with ER+, HER2– aBC and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity, particularly in the first-line patient population.

Citation Format: Juric D, Gonçalves A, Hamilton E, Boni V, Mayer IA, Turri S, Wang Y, Vogl FD, Sellami D, Campone M. Alpelisib plus letrozole in estrogen receptor-Positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (aBC): Safety and preliminary efficacy analysis from a phase 1b trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-06.

Abstract PD5-10: A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER+ BC. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. ER antagonists that are efficacious against ligand-dependent and ligand-independent, constitutively active ESR1 mutant tumors may be of substantial therapeutic benefit. GDC-0927 (formerly known as SRN-927) is a novel, potent, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective ER antagonist/ER degrader (SERD) that induces tumor regression in ER+ BC patient-derived xenograft models.

Methods: A phase I dose escalation study with 3+3 design was conductedin postmenopausal women with ER+ (HER2-) metastatic BC (progressing ≥ 6 months on endocrine therapy and with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapies in the advanced or metastatic setting) to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES)-PET scans. Plasma PK samples (after single dose and at steady state), CT scans, and when feasible, pre and on-study tumor biopsies were obtained

Results: From March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2017 patients (pts) with a median age of 53 years (range 44-69) and a median number of prior therapies for MBC 4 (range 1-7) were enrolled at 3 total daily dose levels (600, 1000, 1400 mg) once daily (QD) given orally with fasting (n = 12). Increases in GDC-0927 exposure were approximately dose proportional. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were all grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea (54%, n = 7), diarrhea (46%, n = 6), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (39%, n = 5) and anemia, constipation, (each 31%, n = 4). Treatment interruption was required for 2 pts due to nausea and vomiting. Of those pts with FES-PET avid disease at baseline (9 of 12), all post-therapy scans showed complete or near complete (> 90%) suppression of FES uptake to background levels, including pts with ESR1 mutations. Evidence of reduced ER levels and Ki67 staining was observed in on-treatment biopsies. Five of 12 pts (1 at 600 mg and 4 at 1400 mg) were on study ≥ 24 weeks (CBR = 41.6 %) with the best overall response of stable disease with 1 patient (ESR1 mt+ D538G) on study for over 490 days. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no SAEs related to study drug. R2PD was 1400 mg and was selected for single arm dose-expansion which is now complete with last patient enrolled on March 17, 2017. Updated results from dose-escalation and dose-expansion will be presented at the meeting (N = 43).

Conclusions: GDC-0927 appears well-tolerated to date with PK exposure supporting QD dosing, evidence of robust PD target engagement, and encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with advanced or metastatic ER+ BC, including pts with ESR1 mutations.

Citation Format: Dickler MN, Villanueva R, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Giltnane J, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Spoerke JM, Metcalfe C, Liu L, Li R, Morley R, McCurry U, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Bardia A. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-10.

Abstract P4-22-12: Ribociclib + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC)

Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the treatment backbone for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) ABC, but efficacy is limited by ET resistance. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6–cyclin D (CCND1)–retinoblastoma (Rb) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways have been implicated in ET resistance. CDK4/6 and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors act synergistically with ET in preclinical and clinical studies of HR+ breast cancer. Ribociclib (LEE011; CDK4/6 inhibitor) + fulvestrant ± alpelisib (BYL719) or buparlisib (BKM120) in HR+, HER2– ABC is being investigated in a Phase Ib/II study (NCT02088684). Here, we present results from the ribociclib + fulvestrant combination, with intermittent and continuous ribociclib dosing.

Methods: Postmenopausal patients (pts) with HR+, HER2– ABC refractory to aromatase inhibitors received ribociclib intermittently (600 mg/day, 3-weeks-on/1-week-off; Arm A) or continuously (400 mg/day; Arm B; following Arm A safety evaluation) + fulvestrant (500 mg; Cycle 1 Day 1 and 15; subsequent cycles Day 1). Primary objective: dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) to confirm the recommended Phase II dose of ribociclib + fulvestrant. Secondary objectives: safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1); biomarkers that may correlate with response were also assessed.

Results: As of March 10, 2016, 24 pts received ribociclib + fulvestrant (Arm A, n=13; Arm B, n=11); 4 pts in Arm B were ongoing; median duration of exposure was 7.4 (Arm A) and 4.5 (Arm B) months. Median number of prior regimens: 4 (Arm A) and 3 (Arm B). Treatment discontinuation (n; Arm A, Arm B) was due to disease progression (11, 4), physician decision (1, 2), and adverse events (AEs; 1, 1). DLTs in Cycle 1 (n; Arm A, Arm B) were Grade [G] 3 pulmonary embolism (1, 0) and G3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation (0, 1). The most common G3/4 drug-related AE (Arm A, Arm B) was neutropenia (62%, 36%); 5 pts had QTcF prolongation >60 ms (n; 4, 1).

Common all-Grade drug-related AEs (>35% pts) n (%)Arm A (n=13)Arm B (n=11)Neutropenia10 (77)7 (64)Fatigue9 (69)3 (27)Nausea6 (46)5 (46)Anemia6 (46)0 (0)Reduced appetite5 (39)1 (9)

Best overall responses (BORs; n; Arm A, Arm B): partial response (PR; 3, 1), stable disease (SD; 9, 6), and neither complete response nor progressive disease (NCRNPD; non-measurable disease; 1, 4). Overall response rate: 23% (Arm A) and 9% (Arm B); disease control rate (BOR of complete response, PR, SD, or NCRNPD): 100% in both arms. Next-generation sequencing data (n; Arm A, Arm B) were available for 16 pts (7, 9): 5 pts had CCND1 alterations (PR [1, 0], SD [2, 1], and NCRNPD [0, 1]); 11 pts had PIK3CA alterations (PR [1, 0], SD [3, 4], and NCRNPD [1, 2]); 2 of these pts had both CCND1 and PIK3CA alterations (SD [1, 0] and NCRNPD [0, 1]).

Conclusions: Ribociclib + fulvestrant has a manageable safety profile and shows preliminary clinical activity in pretreated pts with HR+, HER2– ABC. Both ribociclib intermittent and continuous dosing schedules were well tolerated. Clinical responses were observed in tumors with and without CDK4/6–cyclin D–Rb and PI3K/mTOR pathway alterations.

Citation Format: Tolaney SM, Forero-Torres A, Boni V, Bachelot T, Lu Y-S, Maur M, Fasolo A, Motta M, Pan C, Dobson J, Hewes B, Chin Lee S. Ribociclib + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-12.