1
|
Dufies M, Giuliano S, Ambrosetti D, Claren A, Ndiaye PD, Mastri M, Moghrabi W, Cooley LS, Ettaiche M, Chamorey E, Parola J, Vial V, Lupu-Plesu M, Bernhard JC, Ravaud A, Borchiellini D, Ferrero JM, Bikfalvi A, Ebos JM, Khabar KS, Grépin R, Pagès G. Sunitinib Stimulates Expression of VEGFC by Tumor Cells and Promotes Lymphangiogenesis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas. Cancer Res 2017; 77:1212-1226. [PMID: 28087600 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Revised: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Sunitinib is an antiangiogenic therapy given as a first-line treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). While treatment improves progression-free survival, most patients relapse. We hypothesized that patient relapse can stem from the development of a lymphatic network driven by the production of the main growth factor for lymphatic endothelial cells, VEGFC. In this study, we found that sunitinib can stimulate vegfc gene transcription and increase VEGFC mRNA half-life. In addition, sunitinib activated p38 MAPK, which resulted in the upregulation/activity of HuR and inactivation of tristetraprolin, two AU-rich element-binding proteins. Sunitinib stimulated a VEGFC-dependent development of lymphatic vessels in experimental tumors. This may explain our findings of increased lymph node invasion and new metastatic sites in 30% of sunitinib-treated patients and increased lymphatic vessels found in 70% of neoadjuvant treated patients. In summary, a therapy dedicated to destroying tumor blood vessels induced the development of lymphatic vessels, which may have contributed to the treatment failure. Cancer Res; 77(5); 1212-26. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeva Dufies
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Sandy Giuliano
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
- Biomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
| | - Damien Ambrosetti
- Central Laboratory of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France
| | - Audrey Claren
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Papa Diogop Ndiaye
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Michalis Mastri
- Center for Genetics and Pharmacology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Walid Moghrabi
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Marc Ettaiche
- Statistics Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Julien Parola
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Valerie Vial
- Biomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
| | - Marilena Lupu-Plesu
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Alain Ravaud
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - John M Ebos
- Center for Genetics and Pharmacology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Khalid Saad Khabar
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Renaud Grépin
- Biomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
| | - Gilles Pagès
- University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a synthesis regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after neurosurgery. DATA EXTRACTION A Medline search was performed to identify publications about frequency, risk factors, prevention and treatment of PONV in adults and children, after neurosurgery. DATA SYNTHESIS After neurosurgery, the estimated frequency of nausea is around 50% and around 39% for vomiting. After neurosurgery; PONV risk factors are female sex and infratentorial surgery. Children older than two years are at higher risk for PONV. To reduce baseline risk factors, it is recommended to use propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, to avoid nitrous oxide and to use hydration (20 ml/kg of crystalloids before induction). For PONV prophylaxis, ondansetron and droperidol may be given, using one drug for a moderate risk patient and both drugs for a high-risk patient. Droperidol should not be used in children as a first choice therapy because of an increased risk of extrapyramidal symptoms. Dexamethasone has not been evaluated after neurosurgery. Metoclopramide has no clinically relevant effect for PONV. Especially in neurosurgery, after occurrence of PONV, it is recommended to rule out a possible triggering factor that should need specific treatment. A global management of PONV is proposed, based on the administration of the same drugs given at half the doses used for prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Audibert
- Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital central, 29, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, CHU Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|