Joustra V, van Sabben J, van der Does de Willebois E, Duijvestein M, de Boer N, Jansen J, van der Bilt J, Lameris W, Bemelman W, Buskens C, D'Haens G. Benefit of risk-stratified prophylactic treatment on clinical outcome in post-operative Crohn's disease.
J Crohns Colitis 2022;
17:318-328. [PMID:
36124739 PMCID:
PMC10069621 DOI:
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac139]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
While immediate post-operative treatment has shown effectiveness in reducing endoscopic post-operative recurrence (POR), evidence regarding the clinical benefit is limited. We compared rates of clinical POR in Crohn's disease (CD) patients receiving immediate prophylactic treatment with patients receiving endoscopy-driven treatment.
METHODS
We retrospectively collected data from 376 consecutive CD patients that underwent an ileocecal resection with anastomosis between 2007 and 2018 with at least 3 years of follow-up at 3 sites. Subsequently, high- and low-risk patients categorized by established guidelines who underwent endoscopy within 12 months postoperatively were grouped according to a prophylactic- or endoscopy-driven approach and compared for incidence and time till endoscopic- and clinical POR.
RESULTS
Prophylactic treatment reduced rates of- and time till endoscopic POR within 1 year in high-risk (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, p=0.04, NNT=5) but not low-risk (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.32-2.56, p=0.85) patients. Conversely, no significant differences in clinical POR within 3 years between prophylactic- and endoscopy-driven low-risk (HR 1.17, 95%CI 0.41-3.29, p=0.75) and high-risk patients were observed (HR 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p=0.82, NNT=22). However, a large numerical albeit not statistical significant difference in 3 year clinical POR (28.6% vs. 62.5%, p=0.11) in a subset of high-risk patients with ≥3 or more ECCO-defined risk factors was observed, indicating a cumulative effect of having multiple risk factors.
CONCLUSION
Our observations favor step-up treatment guided by early endoscopic evaluation with prophylactic treatment reserved for carefully selected high-risk patients in order to avoid potential overtreatment of a significant number of patients.
Collapse