Design, Synthesis, and Molecular Docking Studies of Some New Quinoxaline Derivatives as EGFR Targeting Agents

The synthesis of some new quinoxaline derivatives (IVa-n) and their structure determination using 1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectral analysis was described herein. The in vitro anti-cancer activity of the these compounds (IVa-n) revealed that the compound1-((1-(4-bromophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-2-(tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (IVd) has shown promising activity, whereas, compounds 1-((1-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-2-(tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (IVa), 1-(tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)-2-((1-(m-tolyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (IVb), 1-((1-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-2-(tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (IVh) and 1-((1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-2-(tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)pyrazolidine-3,5-dione (IVi) exhibited good to moderate activity against four human cancer cell lines such as HeLa, MCF-7, HEK 293T, and A549 as compared to the doxorubicin. Predominantly, the compound displayed excellent activity over HeLa, MCF-7, HEK 293T, and A549 with IC50 values of 3.20 ± 1.32, 4.19 ± 1.87, 3.59 ± 1.34, and 5.29 ± 1.34 μM, respectively. Moreover, molecular docking studies of derivatives (IVa-n) on EGFR receptor suggested that the most potent compound strongly binds to protein EGFR (pdbid:4HJO) and the energy calculations of in silico studies were also in good agreement with the obtained IC50 values.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1134/S1068162022030220.

Organo NHC catalyzed aqueous synthesis of 4β-isoxazole-podophyllotoxins: in vitro anticancer, caspase activation, tubulin polymerization inhibition and molecular docking studies

We present, for the first time, the organo-N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of 4β-O-propargyl podophyllotoxin (1) with in situ aromatic nitrile oxides to afford regioselective 4β-isoxazolepodophyllotoxin hybrids (6a-n) in benign aqueous-organic media. Preliminary anticancer activity results showed that compound 6e displayed superior activity against MCF-7, HeLa and MIA PaCa2 human cell lines compared with podophyllotoxin. Compounds 6j and 6n showed greater activity against the MCF-7 cell line than the positive control. Caspase activation studies revealed that compound 6e at 20 μg ml-1 concentration had greater caspase 3/7 activation in MCF-7 and MIAPaCa2 cells than podophyllotoxin. Furthermore, in vitro tubulin polymerization inhibition studies revealed that compound 6e showed comparable activity with podophyllotoxin. Finally, in silico molecular docking studies of compounds 6e, 6j, 6n and podophyllotoxin on α,β-tubulin (pdb id 1SA0) revealed that compound 6n showed excellent binding energies and inhibition constants compared with podophyllotoxin.

Design, synthesis, in silico molecular docking, and ADMET studies of quinoxaline-isoxazole-piperazine conjugates as EGFR-targeting agents

In this paper, we report the synthesis of quinoxaline-isoxazole-piperazine conjugates. The anticancer activity was evaluated against three human cancer cell lines, including MCF-7 (breast), HepG-2 (liver), and HCT-116 (colorectal). The outcomes of the tested compounds 5d, 5e, and 5f have shown more potent activity when compared to the standard drug erlotinib. In a cell survivability test (MCF-10A), three potent compounds (5d, 5e, and 5f) were evaluated against the normal breast cell line, although neither of them displayed any significant cytotoxicity with IC50 values greater than 84 μM. Furthermore, the compounds 5d, 5e, and 5f were tested for tyrosine kinase EGFR inhibitory action using erlotinib as the reference drug and compound 5e was shown to be more potent in inhibiting the tyrosine kinase EGFR than sorafenib. In addition to this, molecular docking studies of compounds 5d, 5e, and 5f demonstrated that these compounds had more EGFR-binding interactions. The potent compounds 5d, 5e, and 5f were subjected to in silico pharmacokinetic assessment by SWISS, ADME, and pkCSM. While the compounds 5d, 5e, and 5f followed Lipinski, Veber, Egan, and Muegge rules without any deviation.