Impact of selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility testing results for urinary tract infections in the outpatient setting: A prospective controlled before-after intervention study

OBJECTIVES

The use of selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) results is a recommended antimicrobial stewardship strategy to improve the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions. We conducted a large, pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, controlled (selective reporting versus complete reporting) before-after intervention study to assess the impact of selective reporting of AST results for Escherichia coli-positive urine cultures on the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics carrying a higher risk of selection of resistance (i.e., amoxicillin-clavulanate, third-generation cephalosporins, and quinolones) in the outpatient setting. We also looked for possible unintended clinical consequences of the intervention leading to consultations and/or hospitalisations.

METHODS

We compared two groups of laboratories located in a French region. We collected data from the health insurance databases before (2017) and after the implementation of the intervention (2019). The primary outcome was the prescription proportions of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

RESULTS

We included 42,956 Escherichia coli-positive urine cultures with AST. The decrease of the proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions between 2017 and 2019 was significantly higher for selective reporting of AST, attributable to a decrease in the prescription proportion of third-generation cephalosporins (- 8.5% for selective reporting versus - 0.1% for complete reporting, p < 0.001). This impact was more marked for targeted therapy and female patients. Requests from clinicians for the complete reporting of AST results were infrequent (1.2% of all the selective AST results reported in 2019). No unintended consequences were observed.

CONCLUSION

The results showed a positive impact of the selective reporting of AST results, but room for improvement is still important.

REGISTRATION AT CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT03612297.

Clinical and Organizational Impacts of Medical Ordering Settings on Patient Pathway and Community Pharmacy Dispensing Process: The Prospective ORDHOSPIVILLE Study

During the dispensing process of medical orders (MOs), community pharmacists (CPs) can manage drug-related problems (DRPs) by performing pharmacist interventions (PIs). There is little evidence that the PI rate is higher with MOs from hospitals (MOHs) than ambulatory (MOAs) settings, and their impact on the patient and community pharmacy is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare the MOH and MOA PI rates. The secondary objective was to describe PIs and their clinical and organizational impacts on patient and community pharmacy workflow. A total of 120 CPs participated in a prospective study. Each CP included 10 MOH and 10 MOA between January and June 2020. DRP and PI description and clinical and organizational impacts between MOH and MOA were assessed and compared. We analyzed 2325 MOs. PIs were significantly more frequent in MOH than in MOA (9.7% versus 4.7%; p < 0.001). The most reported PI was the difficulty of contacting hospital prescribers (n = 45; 52.2%). MOHs were associated with a longer dispensing process time and a greater impact on patient pathway and community pharmacy workflow than MOAs. Lack of communication between hospital and primary care settings partly explains the results. Implementation of clinical pharmacy activities at patient discharge could alleviate these impacts.

Antibiotic stewardship in French nursing homes: a 2019 regional survey

Background

Antibiotic resistance is a growing issue in nursing homes (NHs). Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes can reduce antibiotic use in NHs, but few studies have assessed to what extent they are implemented in NHs.

Objectives

To describe ABS current practices and describe the opinion of NH stakeholders regarding ABS and opportunities for improvement in one French region.

Methods

We invited by e-mail the medical and nurse coordinators of all NHs of the Grand Est region, France, to participate in our survey in 2019. The online questionnaire included 35 questions covering four topics: NH characteristics, current ABS practices, attitudes towards ABS and opinions on strategies to promote ABS. A score evaluating implementation of core ABS elements was calculated using the current ABS practice responses.

Results

Out of 417 NHs, 75 (18%) participated in our survey. The three most implemented ABS activities were antibiotic consumption monitoring (65%), antibiotic plan documentation (56%) and antibiotic prescription guide distribution (54%). Audit and feedback, training sessions or identification of a local ABS leader ranged from 13% to 29%. Participants positively perceived ABS and most suggestions to improve ABS programmes in NH, with maximal interest in training, audit and feedback interventions. The median score for implementation of core ABS elements was 3.3 (IQR = 2.3–5.4; theoretical range 0–11), and the score distribution was not associated with any NH characteristic.

Conclusions

While there is still room for improvement, NHs had a positive attitude towards ABS strategies. Some regional and national initiatives to promote ABS in NHs exist and should be actively promoted.

[Barriers and enablers to pharmacist-led medication review in community pharmacy: A prospective study in Grand Est, France]

Since 2018, French community pharmacists are involved in pharmaceutical care program performing medication review (MR). Near graduated pharmacy students from two faculties of pharmacy were assigned to implement and perform 3 MR in order to identify enablers and barriers of the implementation of MR by community pharmacists. Among 179 MR performed by 117 pharmacists during 5 months, they reported 3 main barriers: the time spending to initiate and perform all steps in MR (lack of time), patients recruiting, and compensation by health care system. Communications initiatives to patients and health professionals in primary care could facilitate patient MR adhesion. Simplification of administrative approach and optimization of software will be welcome and useful in order to reinforced MR implementation and leading.