The immunization status of patients with IBD is alarmingly poor before the introduction of specific guidelines

INTRODUCTION

With immunosuppressive therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) becoming more aggressive, the risk of serious infections is increasing. Guidelines are currently being modified in respect to advisable immunizations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunization habits of IBD patients in daily practice before the implementation of specific guidelines.

METHODS

Hundred and two consecutive patients attending the outpatients IBD clinic at our hospital were interviewed regarding their immunization record. In addition, hepatitis B and C, HIV, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus were measured following a European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) consensus.

RESULTS

Hundred and two patients with IBD have been included; of these 72% were taking steroids, 46% azathioprine, and 23% anti-TNF medication. Nineteen percent of the study population had been vaccinated against influenza, 3% against pneumoccous pneumonia, 22% against hepatitis B, 5% against varizella, 55% against rubella/mumps/measles, and 63% against tetanus. Of those who had traveled, 9% had been vaccinated for hepatitis A and 1% for yellow fever. Reasons given for not being vaccinated were not being aware of the necessity in 45% of those questioned and being afraid in 17%. While no patient was tested positive for hepatitis B, HIV, and CMV-IgM, one female patient was tested positive for hepatitis C (antibody and PCR positive, genotype I), which was unknown at that point.

CONCLUSION

Considering the high number of our patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, the immunization record is alarmingly poor supporting the need for optimized IBD guidelines, better awareness, and patient education. In addition, the screening for chronic infections appears to be useful as suggested by the positive finding of a previously unknown hepatitis C.

Platelet hemostasis capacity in smokers. In vitro function analyses with 3.2% citrated whole blood

INTRODUCTION

Platelet function may be influenced by cigarette smoking. We therefore examined the effect of smoking on platelet hemostasis capacity (PHC) with an in vitro analyzer (PFA-100).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Healthy blood donors (n=54) were included in the study and divided into four groups: nonsmoking males (n=14), nonsmoking females (n=14), smoking males (n=12) and smoking females (n=14). For in vitro analyses, in each participant citrated blood (3.2% buffered) was tested for PHC by two cartridges coated with collagen, and additionally with epinephrine (Col/Epi) or ADP (Col/ADP). Analyses were performed within 4 h after sample taking. PHC was expressed as the time in seconds to occlude the cartridge (closure time, CT). The average CT was significantly prolonged in female smokers compared to the female nonsmoking group for both types of cartridges (Col/Epi: P=.02; Col/ADP: P=.03). No significant differences were detected comparing the CT of smoking and nonsmoking males. After pooling male and female smokers and nonsmokers, no significant differences could be found, neither for the Col/Epi cartridges nor the Col/ADP cartridges. Plaletet aggregation assays performed in parallel showed no significant differences, except a reduced aggregability in male smokers compared to male nonsmokers using epinephrine 8.0 microM/ml as activating agent (P=.01). Furthermore, smoking volunteers presented with a significantly increased fibrinogen level compared to nonsmoking volunteers (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show that in habitual smokers PHC (PFA-100) and the capability of platelets to react upon agonist stimulation in aggregation assays is not significantly influenced or increased compared to healthy nonsmokers. However, an immediate effect of cigarette smoking cannot be excluded.