Early detection of gastric cancer using global, genome-wide and IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC DNA methylation in endoscopic biopsies

Clinically useful molecular tools to triage gastric cancer patients are not currently available. We aimed to develop a molecular tool to predict gastric cancer risk in endoscopy-driven biopsies obtained from high-risk gastric cancer clinics in low resource settings.

We discovered and validated a DNA methylation biomarker panel in endoscopic samples obtained from 362 patients seen between 2004 and 2009 in three high-risk gastric cancer clinics in Lima, Perú, and validated it in 306 samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas project (“TCGA”). Global, epigenome wide and gene-specific DNA methylation analyses were used in a Phase I Biomarker Development Trial to identify a continuous biomarker panel that combines a Global DNA Methylation Index (GDMI) and promoter DNA methylation levels of IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC.

We observed an inverse association between the GDMI and histological progression to gastric cancer, when comparing gastritis patients without metaplasia (mean = 5.74, 95% CI, 4.97−6.50), gastritis patients with metaplasia (mean = 4.81, 95% CI, 3.77−5.84), and gastric cancer cases (mean = 3.38, 95% CI, 2.82−3.94), respectively (p < 0.0001). Promoter methylation of IRF4 (p < 0.0001), ELMO1 (p < 0.0001), CLIP4 (p < 0.0001), and MSC (p < 0.0001), is also associated with increasing severity from gastritis with no metaplasia to gastritis with metaplasia and gastric cancer.

Our findings suggest that IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC promoter methylation coupled with a GDMI>4 are useful molecular tools for gastric cancer risk stratification in endoscopic biopsies.

[Serologic prevalence of HCV antibodies in health personnel in Peru]

In Peru, new cases of asymptomatic HCV infection are reported with certain frequency in patients with or without antecedents of blood transfusion. Although serologic screening has improved notoriously in the last years, there is still a population of polytransfused patients with high HCV risk (e.g. hemodialyzed patients), making up a major reservoir. Based on this premise, we decided to study the risk of the health worker population in Peru as another major HCV risk group. A total of 2,769 health workers from 7 Public Hospitals and 2 Private Hospitals in the City of Lima and from 7 Public Hospitals in 4 major/main cities of Peru (Chiclayo, Trujillo, Arequipa, and Cusco) were studied. All those workers, who due to their area of work had higher contact with blood and/or blood derivatives (Surgery, ICU, Traumatology, Gynecology, Gastroenterology, Hemodialysis and Laboratories-Blood Banks) were studied. The studied population accounts for 30% of the total health worker population in these services. All serums underwent the EIA-3 test (HCV-Cobas-Core, Lab. Roche, USA). The positive results were confirmed by RT-HCV (Ampiclor, Roche). The positive serums were confirmed by PCR and the positive results with high viral load underwent HCV genotyping (AMPICLOR-Roche Diagnostic, IGEN Diagnostic USA). Of the 2,769 health workers studied in Peru, 32 were positive for HCV antibodies (1.16% of the total number). Lima showed a prevalence slightly higher than the provinces: 26 out of 2,112 vs. 6 out of 657, or 1.23% vs. 0.91%, respectively. The higher risk is assumed by professional with higher level of contact with blood: 2 physicians (Hemodialysis), 5 nurses (HD) and Lab-Blood Bank technicians. The physicians and nurses share the same risk. If we segregate Lima from provinces, it can be seen that the highest risk is in Lima (1.34% compared to 1.07% in provinces). There is a major risk in health workers and the figures are slightly above those that were suspected for Peru (between 0.4 and 1.0). Finally, we can conclude that the group with the highest HCV risk among health workers is the group specialized in hemodialysis, followed by laboratory (1.79%), surgery (1.40%), and gastroenterology (0.8%). This is the first report at national level of HCV sero-prevalence in Peru.

Shoulder arthralgia: case study of the Occupational Medicine clinic of Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

Introduction

Shoulder pain is ranked as the third most common musculoskeletal complaint in clinical practice. It is estimated that 65 to 70% of these occurrences are due to rotator cuff injuries. A significant number of rotator cuff syndrome cases are work related.

Objectives

To evaluate the success or failure of therapeutic and administrative procedures for workers treated at an occupational medicine outpatient clinic.

Methods

This study analyzed the medical reports of 142 workers treated for shoulder pain between January 2015 and December 2019. To homogenize the information, medical record review was necessary in some cases.

Results

Rotator cuff syndrome was diagnosed in 84% of the cases after imaging exams. Conservative treatment was recommended for 88% of these patients and 58% required subsequent surgical treatment. Regarding rehabilitation, 51% of the patients were able to return to work and 49% returned to the same job function.

Conclusions

Diagnosing rotator cuff syndrome requires clinical and occupational history assessment, as well as imaging examinations, and the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were similar to magnetic resonance imaging. Removal from work and its risks must be an integral part of treatment. Upon returning to work, the rehabilitation and reintegration process should involve activities that will not worsen the injury.