Clinical significance of mirror lesions in lower extremity arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of bilateral peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patterns.

BACKGROUND

No prior study has evaluated the clinical significance of symmetrical lesion patterns, particularly the coexistence of same-level significant plaques in both lower extremities ("mirror lesions").

METHODS

We conducted a single-facility, primary data analysis involving 225 patients with symptomatic PAD.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent of the patients had bilateral lesions: 14.2% had femoropopliteal, 38.7% had infrapopliteal, and 27.1% had both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions. The lesions were found in the exact same arteries bilaterally in 24.9% of the patients, while 26.7% had a local mirror pattern limited to the femoropopliteal (13.7%) or infrapopliteal (12.9%) arteries. Having a lesion in an artery was a risk factor for occlusive disease of the corresponding artery on the other side. Patients presenting with critical limb ischemia (CLI) had a history of resting pain (17%), ulceration/gangrene (13%), or prior amputation (26%) of the contralateral limb. Patients with significant bilateral disease had unilateral false-negative ABI results in 11.6% of the cases. The arterial Doppler study results were unilaterally false-negative in 19.6% and bilaterally false-negative in 2.8% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with known peripheral arterial disease need to have both limbs fully evaluated and monitored, even in cases with negative screening results. Mirror angiographic imaging is common and often accompanied by symptoms of claudication. Unilateral ischemia is a strong risk factor for contralateral disease. Patients with CLI are at high risk for occlusive lesions of the nonindex limb.

Long term outcomes in diabetic patients treated with atherectomy for peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes has increased significantly in well-developed countries during the last decade and it continues to grow. Diabetes increases the risk of restenosis in patients treated percutaneously for peripheral artery disease. The present study sought to compare outcomes of atherectomy treatment in diabetic (DM) vs. non-diabetic (nDM) patients suffering from peripheral artery disease.

METHOD

Between 2008 and 2012, 204 revascularization atherectomy procedures were performed on arteries of the lower extremities. The endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation and death. The type of atherectomy (excisional-soft plaque, orbital-calcified plaque, with active aspiration - with a thrombus) was left to operator discretion.

RESULTS

This study contains 132 DM (66% male, age 68 ± 11.2 years) and 72 nDM (63% male, age 75 ± 11.3 years) subjects. DM were younger but had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (DM: 91% vs. nDM: 62%, p < 0.0001) and end-stage renal disease (DM: 22% vs. nDM: 2.5%, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in critical limb ischemia between the groups (DM: 21% vs. nDM: 12%, p = = 0.13). Mean time of follow-up was 384 and 411 days in DM and nDM, respectively (p = 0.43). There were no significant differences in TLR (DM: 15.2% vs. nDM: 22.2%, p = 0.249), amputations (DM: 3.0% vs. nDM: 1.5%, p = NS) or death rates (DM: 2.2% vs. nDM: 2.7%, p = NS). Kaplan-Mayer analysis showed no significant differences between the groups in the time to TLR, amputation or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque modification with adjusted atherectomy appears to have similar outcomes in diabetic as well as in non-diabetic patients. Nonetheless, a randomized study would be warranted to confirm the findings of the current study.