FORT-1: Phase II/III Study of Rogaratinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Selected Based on FGFR1/3 mRNA Expression

PURPOSE

Rogaratinib, an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR1-4) inhibitor, showed promising phase I efficacy and safety in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) with FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression. We assessed rogaratinib efficacy and safety versus chemotherapy in patients with FGFR mRNA-positive advanced/metastatic UC previously treated with platinum chemotherapy.

METHODS

FORT-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03410693) was a phase II/III, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with FGFR1/3 mRNA-positive locally advanced or metastatic UC with ≥ 1 prior platinum-containing regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) to rogaratinib (800 mg orally twice daily, 3-week cycles; n = 87) or chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m², paclitaxel 175 mg/m², or vinflunine 320 mg/m² intravenously once every 3 weeks; n = 88). The primary end point was overall survival, with objective response rate (ORR) analysis planned following phase II accrual. Because of comparable efficacy between treatments, enrollment was stopped before progression to phase III; a full interim analysis of phase II was completed.

RESULTS

ORRs were 20.7% (rogaratinib, 18/87; 95% CI, 12.7 to 30.7) and 19.3% (chemotherapy, 17/88; 95% CI, 11.7 to 29.1). Median overall survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.5 to not estimable) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.8 to not estimable; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.72; P = .67). Grade 3/4 events occurred in 37 (43.0%)/4 (4.7%) patients and 32 (39.0%)/15 (18.3%), respectively. No rogaratinib-related deaths occurred. Exploratory analysis of patients with FGFR3 DNA alterations showed ORRs of 52.4% (11/21; 95% CI, 29.8 to 74.3) for rogaratinib and 26.7% (4/15; 95% CI, 7.8 to 55.1) for chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, these are the first data to compare FGFR-directed therapy with chemotherapy in patients with FGFR-altered UC, showing comparable efficacy and manageable safety. Exploratory testing suggested FGFR3 DNA alterations in association with FGFR1/3 mRNA overexpression may be better predictors of rogaratinib response.

Sirolimus plus gemcitabine: a new therapeutic combination for resistant sarcomas?

Sarcomas are a rare family of heterogeneous tumors of mesenchymal origin characterized by their bad prognosis. In addition, limited active therapeutic options are available. The cytotoxic drug gemcitabine and the inhibition of the mTOR pathway have demonstrated modest activity in sarcomas as monotherapy. However, preclinical data suggest that the combination of both treatments results in enhanced antitumor activity. In vitro and in vivo experiments with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus plus gemcitabine showed dramatic results in preclinical models of sarcoma. Moreover, a Phase I study demonstrated the favorable toxicity profile of the combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. Therefore, treatment with sirolimus plus gemcitabine deserves further investigation in sarcomas.

GEIS 2013 guidelines for gastrointestinal sarcomas (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Correct diagnosis with thorough use of pathologic and molecular tools of GIST mutations has been of the foremost importance. GIST are usually (95 %) KIT positive and harbor frequent KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α-activating mutations. This deep molecular understanding has allowed the correct classification into risk groups with implications regarding prognosis, essential use in the development of targeted therapies and even response prediction to this drugs. Treatment has been evolving and an update to include lessons learned from recent trials in advanced disease as well as controversies in the adjuvant setting that are changing daily practice, is reviewed here. An effort from the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research with investigators from the group has been undertaken to launch this third version of the GIST guidelines and provide a practical means for the different disciplines that treat this complex disease.

Targeted therapies in sarcomas: challenging the challenge

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal malignancies that very often lead to death. Nowadays, chemotherapy is the only available treatment for most sarcomas but there are few active drugs and clinical results still remain very poor. Thus, there is an imperious need to find new therapeutic alternatives in order to improve sarcoma patient's outcome. During the last years, there have been described a number of new molecular pathways that have allowed us to know more about cancer biology and tumorigenesis. Sarcomas are one of the tumors in which more advances have been made. Identification of specific chromosomal translocations, some important pathways characterization such as mTOR pathway or the insulin-like growth factor pathway, the stunning development in angiogenesis knowledge, and brand new agents like viruses have lead to the development of new therapeutic options with promising results. This paper makes an exhaustive review of preclinical and clinical evidence of the most recent targeted therapies in sarcomas and provides a future view of treatments that may lead to improve prognosis of patients affected with this disease.

Risk-Adapted Treatment in Clinical Stage I Testicular Seminoma: The Third Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group Study

Purpose

To confirm the efficacy of a risk-adapted treatment approach for patients with clinical stage I seminoma. The aim was to reduce both the risk of relapse and the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy while maintaining a high cure rate.

Patients and Methods

From 2004 to 2008, 227 patients were included after orchiectomy in a multicenter study. Eighty-four patients (37%) presented no local risk factors, 44 patients (19%) had tumors larger than 4 cm, 25 patients (11%) had rete testis involvement, and 74 patients (33%) had both criteria. Only the latter group received two courses of adjuvant carboplatin, whereas the rest were managed by surveillance.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 34 months, 16 relapses (7%) have been documented (15 [9.8%] among patients on surveillance and one [1.4%] among those treated with carboplatin). All relapses occurred in retroperitoneal lymph nodes, except for one case in pelvic nodes. Median node size was 25 mm, and median time to recurrence was 14 months. All patients were rendered disease-free with chemotherapy. The actuarial 3-year disease-free survival rate was 88.1% (95% CI, 82.3% to 93.9%) for patients on surveillance and 98.0% (95% CI, 94.0% to 100%) for those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall 3-year survival was 100%.

Conclusion

With the limitations of the short follow-up duration, we confirm that a risk-adapted approach is effective for stage I seminoma. Adjuvant carboplatin seems adequate treatment for patients with 2 risk criteria, as is active surveillance for those with 0 to one risk factors. More reliable predictive factors are needed to improve the applicability of this model.

Molecular mechanisms behind the resistance of cisplatin in germ cell tumours

Cisplatin has been one of the principal chemotherapy agents for the last 30 years and is still used widely in the treatment of testicular, ovarian, lung, head and neck, bladder and several other tumours. Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a major obstacle for successful treatment. Treatment effect on germ cell tumours (GCTs) is more successful than in adults suffering from almost any other solid tumour, but resistance still appears in 20% of patients with metastatic disease. However, because of the young age of patients and few data regarding the process of becoming resistant, this situation is still a challenge. In this review we are going to analyse the published literature on cisplatin resistance in GCTs and explain the initiatives that the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (GG) is taking to try to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind this process.

Efficacy of Sequential High-Dose Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide Compared With Standard-Dose Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas

Purpose

To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and antitumor response to standard-dose doxorubicin compared with sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients with measurable advanced soft tissue sarcoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < 2, between the ages 18 and 65 years, and with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered in the study. The stratifications were: ECOG PS (0 v 1), location of metastases, and potentially resectable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (arm A) or doxorubicin at 30 mg/m2 per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by ifosfamide at 12.5 g/m2 delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles with filgastrim or pegfilgastrim support (arm B).

Results

Between December 2003 and September 2007, 132 patients were entered onto the study. Febrile neutropenia, asthenia, and mucositis were more frequent in the arm B. The interim preplanned analysis for futility allowed the premature closure. Objective responses were observed in 23.4% of assessable patients in arm A and 24.1% in arm B. PFS was 26 weeks in the arm A and 24 weeks in arm B (P = .88). Overall survival did not differ between the two therapeutic arms (P = .14).

Conclusion

Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment in fit patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent, active against metastatic melanoma. Combinations of chemotherapy and biological response modifiers have been associated with increased antitumour activity. A multicentre phase II study was performed to assess the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma. Previously untreated patients received temozolomide administered orally at a dose of 150 mg/m/day for 5 days every 4 weeks, in combination with interferon given continuously subcutaneously twice a week at a dose of 10 MU/m. Treatment continued until disease progression or for a maximum of 12 months.

RESULTS

From June 1999 to August 2002, 27 eligible patients were included in the study at six centres. Median age was 59 (28-77) years; 17 male and 10 female patients were recruited; the median Karnofsky performance score was 90 (70-100); three patients had received prior adjuvant interferon; the majority of patients had fewer than three involved sites. A total of 96 cycles were administered; there were one complete response, four partial response and five stable disease (overall response rate: 18.5%, 95% confidence interval: 6.3-38.1). All responses were seen in patients with exclusively lymph node and pulmonary disease [M1a (one patient); M1b (four patients)]. The median response duration was 6.9 months. One patient remains in complete remission at 4 years. The median time to progression and the median survival were 1.87 and 9.5 months, respectively. Haematological toxicity was neutropenia G-IV: 1, G-III: 4, thrombocytopenia G-III: 2, and anaemia G-III: 2. Predominant non-haematological toxicity was hepatotoxicity G-III: 4. Other toxicities were mild or moderate. Dose reduction was required for nine cycles of interferon, one of temozolomide and two of both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide in combination with interferon is a well-tolerated palliative regimen that has moderate activity against metastatic melanoma. Further evaluation of this regimen in comparative studies or in combination with other drugs is warranted.

Risk-Adapted Management for Patients With Clinical Stage I Seminoma: The Second Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group Study

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of a risk-adapted treatment policy for patients with stage I seminoma by using universally accepted risk criteria.

Patients and Methods

Between 1999 and 2003, 314 patients with clinical stage I seminoma after orchiectomy were prospectively included. One hundred patients (31.8%) presented no risk factors and were managed with surveillance. In contrast, 131 patients (41.7%) had tumors larger than 4 cm, 33 patients (10.5%) had rete testis involvement, and 50 patients (15.9%) had both risk factors. All the latter received two courses of adjuvant carboplatin.

Results

Chemotherapy was well tolerated, as only 17 patients (7.9%) presented grade 3 to 4 toxicity. Relapses were observed in six patients (6.0%) on surveillance and in seven patients (3.3%) treated with carboplatin (0.8% of tumors larger than 4 cm, 9.1% of those involving the rete testis, and 6.0% of patients with both risk criteria). All were located at the retroperitoneum, except for one at the spermatic cord. Median tumor size was 25 mm (range, 11 to 70 mm), and median time to relapse was 9 months (range, 4 to 28 months). All patients were rendered disease-free with chemotherapy (etoposide plus cisplatin). Median follow-up was 34 months (range, 12 to 72 months). The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rate was 93.4% for patients on surveillance and 96.2% for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall 5-year survival was 100%.

Conclusion

Adjuvant carboplatin is effective in reducing the relapse rate in patients with stage I seminoma and risk factors. A risk-adapted strategy is safe and feasible and should be considered an alternative to systematic approaches, such as irradiation, chemotherapy, or surveillance.

Salvage surgical resection after high-dose ifosfamide (HDIF) based regimens in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS): A potential positive selection bias-A study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of different factors on response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival time (OS) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS), included in three protocols with high-dose ifosfamide (HDIF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty six ASTS patients included in three consecutive phase II trials with HDIF (>10 g/m(2)), alone or in combination with doxorubicin (DX), were analyzed. Cofactors were institution, trial, gender, age, performance status, histologic type, grade of malignancy, prior radiotherapy, presence of locoregional disease, metastatic site, salvage surgery, number of organs involved, and disease-free interval.

RESULTS

By multivariate analysis performance status >0 and lack of salvage surgery correlated with a poorer survival. A good-risk and a poor-risk group were identified, with median survival time (OS) of 29, 5, and 10 months, respectively (P = 0.00001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS for 83 good-risk patients (either with PS = 0 or receiving salvage surgery) was 83, 44, and 29%, respectively, those figures being 37, 7, and 3% for 73 poor-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

The design of randomized trials in ASTS including HDIF should consider those prognostic factors as stratification variables.

Sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide for advanced soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Combinations of high-dose ifosfamide (IF; 10-12 g/m2) plus doxorubicin (DX; 50-90 mg/m2) have been administered to patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) in an attempt to improve therapeutic efficacy. Although these combination regimens appear to yield higher response rates than do standard-dose regimens, they also are associated with significant hematologic toxicity, despite the administration of hematopoietic growth factor support. As a potentially less toxic alternative, the authors designed a sequential, dose-dense schedule of DX and IF and explored its feasibility and toxicity, as well as patient compliance with the schedule, in a Phase II trial.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic ASTS were to receive DX at 30 mg/m2 per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by IF at 12.5 g/m2 delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was administered subcutaneously for 7 days beginning 24 hours after the completion of each DX or IF cycle. Additional IF cycles were allowed if an objective response was achieved.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled in the trial. Three were ineligible, 9 had locally advanced disease, and 48 had metastatic disease. At the completion of therapy, the mean dose intensities for DX and IF were 40 mg/m2 per week and 3.87 g/m2 per week, respectively. Sixty-six percent of patients completed the regimen projected by the protocol. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and stomatitis occurred in 46%, 24%, and 27% of patients, respectively. Twenty of 53 assessable patients (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25-51%) achieved objective responses, with a median time to progression of 24 weeks (95% CI, 18-30 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential administration of dose-dense DX and high-dose IF is feasible and exhibits an acceptable hematologic toxicity profile and a level of activity that is within the range described for schedules that combine high-dose IF with an anthracycline.