224 Malignancy associated pericardial effusion- do we need to drain them all?

On Behalf

Cardiac Team, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Background

Management of significant pericardial effusion in cancer patients is controversial. These patients have poor prognosis, and avoiding unnecessary intervention is important. Close monitoring of symptoms and echocardiogram is often a reasonable option, but inherits risk of cardiac tamponade. Whether pericardial drainage by means of percutaneous pericardiocentesis or surgical pericardiotomy could prevent future deterioration or affect survival is unknown.

Purpose

To evaluate the benefit of elective pericardial drainage in malignancy associated pericardial effusion without echocardiographic or clinical evidence of tamponade effect.

Methods

From 1st Jul 2014 to 31st Dec 2017, all patients with new onset malignancy-associated pericardial effusion with size more than 1cm were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with clinical or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade were excluded. We compared pericardial drainage versus monitoring for short-term (30-day), mid-term (90-day) and long term (1 year) survival without need for drainage.

Results

101 patients were retrospectively analyzed. 40 (39.6%) patients underwent drainage. Overall median survival free from drainage was 4 months. There were no significant difference in short-term (30-day), mid-term (90-day) and long term (1-year) survival free from drainage or mortality between treatment and monitoring group. Size of pericardial effusion did not predict mortality or future need of drainage. Chemotherapy was associated with improved 30-day mortality (RR 0.53 CI 0.32-0.87 p = 0.025) but not survival free from drainage or longer term mortality.

Conclusion

Close monitoring could be a feasible strategy in cancer patients with significant pericardial effusion without tamponade effect.

Baseline characteristics Factor Drainage (n = 40) monitoring (n = 61) p-value method of drainage pericardiocentesis alone 17 NA pericardiotomy alone 13 both 10 Male 19 (47.5%) 27 (44.3%) 0.749 mean size (cm) 1.93 2.77 <0.001 mean age 60.9 63.1 0.357 on chemotherapy 27 (67.5%) 38 (62.3%) 0.593

Abstract 224 Figure. Survival free from drainage

Profile of a homosexual in Singapore

A study was done on 40 homosexual subjects and 47 controls between the ages of 18-19 years, matched for race and age. There was no significant difference in the educational level, and family background of the 2 groups. But homosexuals had a significantly more unhappy childhood than the controls, were more often reprimanded than physically punished and were often teased by their classmates and called names. They were not overprotected or infantilized by their parents and there was no overclose relationship with their mothers. The majority mixed with effeminate boys, admired a senior person in school and about a third had a physical relationship with this person. Almost half had been molested when they were young. Less than a fifth had girlfriends. About three-quarters knew of AIDS and of these less than a fifth felt they would give up their sexual practices because of fear of AIDS. The main problems faced by the subjects were confusion about their identity, their desire to find the right partner, relationship problems and difficulties in controlling their impulses.