The addition of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to the protein/creatinine ratio in multiple pregnancy: Post-hoc analysis of the PREPARE cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive accuracy of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off 38 in addition to the standard-of-care spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (PCr) for multiple pregnancies in women with suspected pre-eclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the occurrence of pre-eclampsia in one and four weeks after presentation with suspected pre-eclampsia. Test characteristics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on pre-eclampsia development in one and four weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-three multiple pregnancies with suspected pre-eclampsia between 20 and 37 weeks gestation were included for analysis. Women who eventually developed pre-eclampsia had a significantly higher PCr (34.0 vs. 16.5, p = 0.015), sFlt-1 (17033 vs. 5270 pg/ml, p = 0.047) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (99 vs. 25, p = 0.033) at baseline. Furthermore, PCr ≥ 30 and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 was respectively seen in 1/16 (6.3 %) and 3/16 (18.8 %) of the women who did not develop pre-eclampsia. For predicting pre-eclampsia within one week the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio sensitivity was 75.0 % [95 % CI 19.4-99.4] and the negative predictive value 93.8 % [73.0-98.8], while no pre-eclampsia developed when PCr was < 30. Consequently, the combination of these tests did not lead to an improvement in test characteristics, with non-significant differences in positive predictive value (50.0 % [29.5-70.5] versus 80.0 % [37.3-96.4]) compared to PCr alone for pre-eclampsia development in one week.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to standard-of-care spot urine PCr measurements, this study has not been able to demonstrate that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off 38 is of added value in the prediction of pre-eclampsia in multiple pregnancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (NL8308).

OP0091 EXPANSION OF MYELOPEROXIDASE (MPO)-SPECIFIC IgM B CELLS IN ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY (ANCA)-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background

ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are characterized by recurrent, chronic small vessel inflammation and deleterious organ damage. The main targets of ANCA are myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3). ANCA, B cells and the complement system are crucial to AAV pathogenesis, as evidenced by the clinical benefit of B cell depletion with rituximab and, more recently, the C5a receptor antagonist avacopan. While ANCA in serum have been studied extensively, phenotypic and functional characteristics of the underlying B cell responses remain largely unknown.

Objectives

To develop a flow cytometry-based technique for identifying MPO-specific B cells in the circulation of MPO-positive AAV patients in order to characterize this B cell response and its potential contribution to disease pathogenesis.

Methods

Human neutrophil-derived MPO was conjugated to two different fluorochromes and used to identify MPO-specific B cells by flow cytometry. An antigen-specific staining protocol was developed and validated using MPO- and PR3-specific hybridoma cells. MPO-specific B cells were phenotypically characterized and isolated from the peripheral blood of AAV patients by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and cultured as single cells. MPO-specificity was confirmed by ELISA on culture supernatants. B cell receptor (BCR) sequences were obtained from MPO-positive clones by full length ARTISAN-PCR and Sanger sequencing. MPO-specific IgG and IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were produced to validate specificity and to examine their ability to activate complement. Finally, MPO-positive AAV patient plasma and plasma depleted of IgG or IgM was tested in in vitro complement assays.

Results

The newly developed, differential antigen labelling approach successfully identified MPO-specific but not PR3-specific hybridoma cells. Subsequently, we detected MPO-specific B cells in the circulation of MPO-positive AAV patients at a frequency of up to 1:1000 B cells. FACS sorting and single cell culture yielded an enrichment of MPO-specificity of ~80%. Notably, the majority of isolated, MPO-specific B cells (60-95%) displayed an IgM memory phenotype, which corresponded to the presence of anti-MPO IgM in plasma. The remainder of the MPO-specific cells were mainly IgG memory B cells and few naive cells. BCR sequencing revealed a polyclonal IgM response with diverse V-gene usage, consisting of both germline and highly mutated clones. Generation of mAb (n=5) confirmed MPO specificity by inhibition ELISA for both germline and somatically mutated clones. Interestingly, anti-MPO IgM mAb showed a high capacity for complement factor deposition upon MPO binding. MPO-specific complement assays with IgG- and IgM-depleted patient plasma showed that anti-MPO IgM activated complement much more efficiently than anti-MPO IgG.

Conclusion

We demonstrate the direct ex-vivo identification, isolation and characterization of MPO-specific B cells in human AAV. Intriguingly, we observed a remarkable expansion of MPO-specific, IgM-expressing memory B cells in patients. This so far unrecognized, active IgM-compartment may be clinically relevant, as both mAb and plasma-derived polyclonal MPO-specific IgM strongly activated complement, a pathway thought to play a central role in AAV. Next to these novel insights into autoreactive B cell biology in AAV, our findings now provide new opportunities for studying auto-reactive B cell responses in different clinical phases of AAV, amongst which active disease, remission and (imminent) flares.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

POS0186 VOCLOSPORIN FOR LUPUS NEPHRITIS: RESULTS OF THE TWO-YEAR AURORA 2 CONTINUATION STUDY

Background

Voclosporin (VCS), a novel calcineurin inhibitor, was approved in the US in January 2021 for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis (LN) in combination with background immunosuppressive therapy. The Phase 3 AURORA 1 study showed that the addition of VCS to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and low-dose steroids in patients with LN significantly increased rates of complete renal response at 52 weeks.

Objectives

Here we report the results of the completed continuation study, AURORA 2, which assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of VCS compared to placebo in patients with LN receiving treatment for an additional 24 months following completion of the AURORA 1 study

Methods

Key inclusion criteria for the parent AURORA 1 study included a diagnosis of biopsy-proven active LN (Class III, IV, or V ± III/IV), proteinuria ≥1.5 mg/mg (≥2 mg/mg for Class V) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients who completed AURORA 1 and who elected and were eligible to enter AURORA 2 continued on the same blinded therapy as at the end of AURORA 1 (either VCS or placebo twice daily in combination with MMF and low-dose steroids). Safety and tolerability were monitored, and eGFR, serum creatinine (SCr), and urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) were also assessed.

Results

In total, 116 and 100 patients in the VCS and control arms enrolled in AURORA 2, with 92 (79.3%) and 73 (73.0%) patients in each respective arm receiving treatment to the end of AURORA 2. There were no unexpected safety signals in the VCS arm compared to control, with similar rates of serious adverse events reported in both arms (VCS [18.1%] vs. control [23.0%]; Table 1). Eight patients in each arm experienced serious adverse events of infection; serious coronavirus infections were observed in 2 patients in the voclosporin arm and 5 patients in the control arm. There were 4 and 2 adverse events by preferred term of renal impairment reported in the VCS and control arms, respectively, none of which were considered serious, and no reports of acute kidney injury by preferred term in either arm. There were no deaths in the VCS arm during AURORA 2; four deaths were reported in the control arm (pulmonary embolism [n=1], coronavirus infection [n=3]). Mean eGFR and SCr levels remained stable through the end of AURORA 2. The difference between the VCS and control arms in LS mean change from baseline in eGFR was 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 4 weeks following study drug discontinuation (Figure 1). The mean reductions in UPCR observed in patients treated with VCS in AURORA 1 were maintained in AURORA 2 with no increase in UPCR noted at the follow-up visit 4 weeks after study drug discontinuation.

Table 1.

Overall Summary of Adverse Events

Control(n=100)Voclosporin(n=116)n (%)n (%)Any AE80 (80.0)100 (86.2) Renal Impairment2 (2.0)4 (3.4) Acute Kidney Injury00Treatment-related AE21 (21.0)28 (24.1)Serious AE23 (23.0)21 (18.1)Serious Treatment-related AE2 (2.0)1 (0.9)AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation17 (17.0)11 (9.5)Death4 (4.0)0Treatment-related Death00Figure 1.

LS Mean eGFR over Time

Conclusion

Voclosporin was well-tolerated over 3 years of treatment with no unexpected safety signals detected. Further, eGFR remained stable throughout the study period, and the significant and meaningful reductions in proteinuria achieved in AURORA 1 were maintained. These data provide evidence of a long-term treatment benefit of VCS in patients with LN.

Includes adverse events starting on or after the first dose of study drug in AURORA 2 up to 30 days after the last dose and all events of death reported during study follow-up. Adverse events were aggregated by System Organ Class and Preferred Term and coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 20.0. AE, adverse event.

Disclosure of Interests

Amit Saxena Speakers bureau: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Consultant of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Y.K. Onno Teng Consultant of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chris Collins Shareholder of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Nicole England Shareholder of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Henry Leher Shareholder of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals

POS0185 BELIMUMAB DISRUPTS MEMORY B-CELL TRAFFICKING IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Background

Belimumab (BEL), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against B-cell activating factor (BAFF), is the first approved biological agent for patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN).1 BEL inhibits primary humoral immune responses by depleting naïve B cells that are dependent on BAFF for their survival while secondary humoral immune responses by memory B cells (MBCs) remain intact. Indeed, some studies reported an increase of circulating MBCs following neutralisation of BAFF.2-4 So far, these effects of BEL on the MBC compartment in SLE patients have not been investigated.

Objectives

This study aimed to establish the dynamics of circulating MBCs in patients with SLE treated with BEL and to perform an in-depth analysis of the impact of BEL on the MBC compartment.

Methods

First, a retrospective meta-analysis was performed by pooling individual patient MBC flow cytometry data from 1245 patients with SLE treated with BEL 10 mg/kg IV or placebo (PBO) from four randomised clinical trials (NCT00071487, NCT00410384 [BLISS-76],3NCT01632241 [EMBRACE],5NCT01649765 [PLUTO]6). Second, extensive B-cell subset phenotyping was performed prospectively by employing high-sensitivity flow cytometry (HSFC) based on EuroFlow protocols7 in patients with active SLE (from the BLISS-BELIEVE trial [NCT03312907])8 and with severe SLE/LN (from the SynBioSe-2 trial [NCT03747159])9 treated with BEL. Additionally, in-depth characterisation of surging MBCs in circulation was performed by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq).

Results

By comparing BEL-treated with PBO-treated patients with SLE, a substantial increase in circulating MBC counts was established 4 weeks after BEL initiation, gradually returning to baseline by Week 52. The increase of MBCs was most prominent in BEL-treated patients with higher SLE disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index >9), serologically active patients (dsDNA positive and/or low complement levels) and with younger age (below 18 years). HSFC established that the increase was non-specific and observed in a broad range of MBC subclasses peaking as early as 2 weeks after BEL initiation. Subsequent scRNA-seq analysis of the emerging MBCs revealed a non-proliferating phenotype with a prominent decrease in activation status. In these circulating MBCs, a large amount of migration and adhesion genes were downregulated suggesting that the accumulation of MBCs following BEL treatment was related to their impaired cell-cell adhesion, disrupting cell-trafficking and preventing extravasation.

Conclusion

After initiation of BEL treatment, a substantial increase of circulating MBCs was firmly established and was most notable in patients with severe, serologically active SLE/LN. The surge of circulating MBCs appeared to be associated with disrupted lymphocyte trafficking of MBCs, thereby suggesting a new potential therapeutic mechanism of BEL on MBCs in SLE. These findings have important implications to our understanding and consequent improvement of B-cell targeted treatment strategies in patients with active SLE and LN, as MBC accumulation in circulation might allow for more efficient targeting of the B-cell compartment.

References

[1]GlaxoSmithKline. Benlysta US prescribing information. 2021

[2]Wallace DJ, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2009;61(9):1168–78

[3]Furie R et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2011;63(12):3918–30

[4]Stohl W et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2012;64(7):2328–37

[5]Ginzler E et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022;74(1):122–3

[6]Dimelow R et al. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2021;10(6):622–33

[7]Blanco E et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;141(6):2208–19

[8]Teng YKO et al. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e025687

[9]ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03747159. Accessed January 19 2022

Acknowledgements

This analysis of the GSK Study 205646 was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Editorial support was provided by Nicholas Thomas, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd. UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK. The EuroFlow-based HFSC was technically supported by Alita van der Sluijs and Sandra de Bruin and data acquisition was performed at the Flow cytometry Core Facility of Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NL.

Disclosure of Interests

Eline J. Arends: None declared, Mihaela Zlei Grant/research support from: GSK (flow cytometry studies for GSK BLISS-BELIEVE study NCT03312907), Christopher M. Tipton: None declared, Jasna Cotic Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Zgjim Osmani: None declared, Fenna de Bie Grant/research support from: GSK (flow cytometry studies for GSK BLISS-BELIEVE study NCT03312907), Sylvia Kamerling: None declared, Andre van Maurik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Richard Dimelow Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Yun Irene Gregan Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Norma Lynn Fox Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Ton Rabelink: None declared, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Ignacio Sanz Consultant of: Yes. GSK, BMS, Janssen, Kyverna, Jacques J.M. van Dongen Consultant of: BD Biosciences and Cytognos (fees for LUMC), Grant/research support from: GSK (flow cytometry studies for GSK BLISS-BELIEVE study NCT03312907), Cees van Kooten: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, KezarBio, Grant/research support from: GSK

OP0281 PHARMACODYNAMIC EFFECT OF SEQUENTIAL BELIMUMAB (BEL) AND RITUXIMAB (RTX) THERAPY IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE): THE PHASE 3, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED BLISS-BELIEVE STUDY

Background

BEL is approved for active SLE and lupus nephritis (adults only). Despite failed trials,1 RTX remains in the SLE treatment armamentarium. Sequential BEL and RTX therapy offers a promising strategy to target B cells by distinct but complementary mechanisms.

Objectives

To assess the pharmacodynamic effects of BEL and a single RTX cycle on immunologic biomarkers in adults with SLE.

Methods

In this 104-week (wk) study (NCT03312907), all pts with active SLE received subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/wk for 52 wks. Pts were randomised to receive intravenous (IV) RTX 1000 mg at Wks 4 + 6 (BEL/RTX), IV PBO at Wks 4 + 6 (BEL/PBO), or continued treatment with standard therapy (BEL/ST). For BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO pts, a 52-wk treatment-free observational phase followed the 52-wk treatment phase; BEL/ST pts continued to receive BEL for 104 wks. Changes from baseline (BL) in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels, and counts of total B cells (CD19+) and B-cell subsets (CD20+; naïve; memory; activated B-cells), were analysed.

Results

292 pts received ≥1 study treatment dose (BEL/PBO n=72; BEL/RTX n=144; BEL/ST n=76). For pts assessed at Wk 52, reductions from BL in anti-dsDNA levels were seen in all 3 groups with a significant difference between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO (p=0.0495). C3/C4 levels increased from BL to Wks 52 and 104 in all groups, with trends for greater increases with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO (Table 1). At Wk 52, total B cells and most B-cell subsets decreased in all 3 groups (Table 1), with significant differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO (p<0.0001 for all). During the observation period, repopulation of total CD19+ B cells (comprising mostly of naïve CD20+CD27-) towards BL levels by Wk 104 was most evident with BEL/RTX, while low circulating CD20+CD27+ memory B cell levels remained relatively unchanged (Table 1).

Table 1.

Absolute changes in biomarkers for treatment phase completers*

Median (25th, 75thpercentile)Change from BLAt Wk 52At Wk 104BEL/PBOBEL/RTXBEL/STBEL/PBOBEL/RTXBEL/STn=54n=102n=58n=24n=44n=50Anti-dsDNA (IU/ml)-9 (-83, 1)-51 (-155, -3)-5 (-61, 0)-9.5 (-197, 2)-55 (-329, -2)-6.5 (-57, -1)C3 (md/dl)8.5 (-8, 21)15† (0, 30)1‡ (-6, 11)6 (-5.5, 19.5)11 (-7, 27)7.5 (-5, 23)C4 (md/dl)2 (0, 5)4† (2, 9)2‡ (-1, 4)1.5 (-1.5, 4.5)3 (0, 8)3 (1, 5)B cells and B-cell subsets (cells/ml)n=48n=93n=55n=20n=40n=47CD19+-57,570 (-120,810, -5861)-95,313 (-193,946, -44,240)-57,399 (-152,403, -12,562)-41,343 (-105,789, 23,819)-11,932 (-77,822, 45,773)-48,783 (-151,528, -15,603)CD20+-58,112 (-110,681, -3126)-93,482 (-189,567, -42,636)-57,428 (-147,094, -3590)-40,773 (-95,658, 25,547)-3986 (-75,942, 49,021)-45,110 (-143,321, -15,063)Naïve CD20+CD27--60,929 (-112,623, -15,316)-61,405 (-152,261, -28,496)-62,477 (-142,009, -16,191)-22,210 (-72,131, 28,335)6941 (-62,669, 67,355)-51,254 (-142,712, -14,736)Activated CD95+-5012 (-12,701, 278)-9991 (-17,900, -5560)-3895 (-10,068, -1347)-3834 (-13,274, 1490)-5821 (-11,216, -233)-5641 (-14,810, -3341)Memory CD20+CD27+9,586 (1500, 30,983)-15,076 (-42,880, -6376)5532 (-146, 14,393)-13,927 (-24,816, -3064)-11,534 (-25,646, -2958)-1229 (-8466, 7300)

*Excluded from analysis: all pts who discontinued the investigational product before Wk 52 and BEL/ST pts if discontinued before Wk 104, and BEL/PBO and BEL/RTX pts who re-started BEL after Wk 53; †n=101; ‡n=57.

Conclusion

An improvement in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels was generally observed across all 3 treatment groups with greater reductions in anti-dsDNA antibodies following BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO and BEL/ST. We believe that BEL induced a pharmacodynamic window for subsequent RTX treatment for a marked reduction in circulating memory B cells and other B-cell subsets. Our findings underscore the need for better understanding of the bridge from pharmacodynamic to clinical outcomes, given that BEL/RTX did not show an improvement in disease control over BEL/PBO.1

References

[1]Aranow C, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73 (suppl 10).

Acknowledgements

This analysis of the GSK Study 205646 was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Medical writing support was provided by Nicholas Thomas, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd. UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK.

Disclosure of Interests

Y.K. Onno Teng Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, KezarBio, Otsuka, Vifor Pharma, Grant/research support from: GSK, Vifor Pharma, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Andre van Maurik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Kenneth L Clark Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Norma Lynn Fox Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Yun Irene Gregan Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, James Groark Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Robert Henderson Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Josephine Ocran-Appiah Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Don Shanahan Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paul-Peter Tak Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Cynthia Aranow Consultant of: BMS, Kezar, GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK

POS0680 BELIMUMAB ADD-ON THERAPY MOBILISES MEMORY B CELLS INTO THE CIRCULATION OF PATIENTS WITH SLE

Background:

Belimumab (BLM), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against B-cell activating factor (BAFF), is the first approved biological agent for patients with active severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). There is clinical evidence that combining BLM with B cell depleting therapy can ameliorate disease activity in severe, refractory SLE patients1. Although BLM is a B cell directed therapy and has been shown to significantly decrease total B cells, flow cytometry observations suggest a rapid increase of circulating memory B cells (MBC)2.

Objectives:

To investigate dynamics of B-cell subsets in SLE patients treated with or without BLM, with a focus on assessing MBC characteristics.

Methods:

Extensive B cell subset phenotyping was performed by high-sensitivity (HS) flow cytometry (acquisition of 107 leukocytes; per EuroFlow protocols3) on samples from active LN or SLE patients with major organ involvement treated with standard of care (SOC) consisting of high dose steroids and mycophenolate mofetil combined with or without the addition of BLM. MBC gene expression profiles were characterized with single-cell RNA and V(D)J sequencing (ScRNA-SEQ).

Results:

By employing HS flowcytometry, we established that the absolute increase in circulating MBC in SLE and LN patients was significant for patients who initiated BLM (Figure 1). The increase was observed in a broad range of MBC subsets (Unswitched, IgG1+, IgG2+, IgA1+, IgA2+) at 2 and 4 weeks following initiation of BLM treatment. This rise in MBC could hypothetically be attributed to either proliferation of blood MBC, BLM induced migration of tissue-resident MBCs or BLM related retention of tissue-destined MBC in the blood. ScRNA-SEQ analysis of cell cycle gene-expression was performed and established in both groups a non-proliferating phenotype [in approximately ~94%] of MBC post-treatment, including absence of MKI67 as active proliferation marker. Clonal diversity analysis comparing week 2 with baseline revealed an unexpected decrease of the largest MBC clones in BLM, whereas no change in clonality was observed with SOC alone. Together these data indicate that proliferation is unlikely to be responsible for the observed increase in MBC by BLM. Furthermore, a clear difference was found in gene-expression levels between both treatment groups: BLM was responsible for the upregulation of 72 vs 10 genes in SOC, likewise 162 vs 32 genes were downregulated. Most importantly, a significant downregulation of the migration genes SELL (CD62L), CCR7, ITGB1, RAC2 and ICAM2, were specifically seen in BLM treated patients. This may reflect disrupted lymphocyte trafficking, preventing MBCs from transmigrating from the blood into tissue owing to reduced migration molecules, or preventing MBCs from being retained at the tissue level owing to reduction in tissue adhesion proteins.

Conclusion:

The addition of BLM to SOC significantly increases MBCs in patients with SLE independently of proliferation, accompanied by a strong modulation of gene expression, including reduced expression of migration markers pointing towards disrupted lymphocyte trafficking. These data may have important implications for improving treatment strategies in patients with LN or severe SLE, as a deeper depletion of autoreactive MBCs could be established by adding B-cell-depleting therapy after the initiation of BLM.

Figure 1.

Change in pre-germinal center and memory B cell counts from baseline to week 4 of patients with SLE or LN treated with SOC (n=8) or SOC+BLM (n=11).

References:

[1]Arends EJ et al. Long-term effects of combined B cell immunomodulation with rituximab and belimumab in severe, refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: 2-year results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Jun 27 gfaa117.

[2]Stohl W et al. Belimumab reduces autoantibodies, normalizes low complement levels, and reduces select B cell populations in patients with SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2328-2337.

[3]Blanco et al, Age-associated distribution of B and plasma cell subsets in peripheral blood - J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018 141 2208-2219.

Disclosure of Interests:

Eline J. Arends: None declared, Mihaela Zlei: None declared, Christopher M. Tipton: None declared, Zgjim Osmani: None declared, Sylvia Kamerling: None declared, Ton Rabelink: None declared, Ignacio Sanz: None declared, Jacques J.M. van Dongen Paid instructor for: BD Biosciences: Educational Services (fees for LUMC), Consultant of: BD Biosciences and Cytognos (fees for LUMC), Grant/research support from: GSK (flow cytometry studies for GSK BLISS-BELIEVE study NCT03312907), Cees van Kooten: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Consultant of: Aurinia provided financial compensation for consultancy, Grant/research support from: GSK provided belimumab for free for the Synbiose-2 clinical trial and provided an unrestricted grant to conduct the study.

AB0667 A PROSPECTIVE STUDY INTO COVID-19 LIKE SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT IMMUNE MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES OR IMMUNOMODULATING DRUGS

Background:

Patients with an immune mediated inflammatory disorder or post solid organ transplantation (IMIDT), are at risk for infectious complications especially if they are treated with immunosuppressive drugs (imeds). There is still great uncertainty whether these IMIDT patients are more susceptible to COVID-19 than controls, and/or should be advised to avoid taking their immunosuppressive treatment.

Objectives:

To evaluate whether patients with IMIDT are more at risk for CLS than controls.

Methods:

The IENIMINI study is a prospective cohort study in patients with IMIDT and controls (healthy or no IMIDT) who were identified based on the registration database of the Leiden University Medical Center. Over time, participants registered COVID-like symptoms (CLS) as they occurred, and filled in additional questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were done to identify variables associated with having CLS.

Results:

Of the 8670 individuals approached, 2110 with IMIDT and 1067 controls agreed to participate. In March and April, 454 (22%) of IMIDT patients and 242 (23%) of controls recorded to have CLS, mostly mild with a median (IQR) duration of seven (3-14) days in the IMIDT group and six days (4-11) in the control group. Eleven (5%) of the IMIDT patients with immunosuppressive medication (imed), 6 (3%) of IMIDTs without imed and 2 (1%) of controls were hospitalized with CLS (p=0.04). In May and June, fewer episodes overall were recorded. Being female (OR 1.45 95%CI 1.15;1.82), having a lung disease (OR 1.50 95%CI 1.20;1.88) and wearing a face mask (OR 1.42 95%CI 1.13-1.77) were independently associated with a higher risk, while higher age (OR 0.96 95%CI 0.96;0.97) and having an IMIDT with immunosuppressive medication use (OR 0.68 95%CI 0.51;0.91) were independently associated with a lower risk (see Table 1). Similar results were found after data imputation.

Table 1.

Univariate & multivariate analysis of variables associated with having CLS or not (OR with 95% CI)

n0UnivariateMultivariate*Sex, female25461.89 (1.58;2.25)1.45 (1.15;1.82)BMI23910.99 (0.97;1.01)1.00 (0.98;1.03)Age25460.97 (0.96;0.97)0.96 (0.96;0.97)IMIDT without imed†25461.00 (0.82;1.23)0.94 (0.72;1.24)IMIDT with imed †25460.79 (0.65;0.97)0.68 (0.51;0.91)Smoking (current)24631.35 (1.02;1.78)1.05 (0.74;1.50)Physical contact with family**22201.47 (1.22;1.78)1.22 (0.98;1.53)Visiting other people (not family)22051.26 (1.05;1.51)0.96 (0.77;1.20)Wearing a face mask21961.46 (1.20;1.76)1.42 (1.13;1.77)Close contact (at work)21801.65 (1.34;2.03)1.27 (0.97;1.66)Self-reported Diabetes Mellitus23810.69 (0.50;0.96)0.89 (0.58;1.36)Self-reported lung disease23961.30 (1.09;1.54)1.50 (1.20;1.88)Self-reported heart disease23990.85 (0.69;1.04)1.09 (0.83;1.43)Daily alcohol use24160.84 (0.71;1.00)1.20 (0.96;1.50)Influenza vaccination***24150.71 (0.60;0.84)0.96 (0.76;1.21)Solid organ transplantation25460.74 (0.54;1.03)0.79 (0.47;1.35)Good adherence to lockdown rules22451.17 (0.41;3.29)2.46 (0.65;9.38)Use of oral corticosteroids25460.84 (0.66;1.06)1.44 (0.95;2.20)Working outside the house24351.39 (1.16;1.68)0.92 (0.71;1.20)

Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CI= confidence intervals; CLS=Covid like symptoms; IMIDT= with immune mediated inflammatory disorders or transplant organ; n0=number of observations; OR=odds ratio.

* number of observations: 1835

** physical contact specified as ‘holding/shaking hands, hugging etcetera’

*** in autumn 2019

† control group = reference group

Conclusion:

Between March and July 2020, IMIDT patients, whether or not taking imeds, did not show an increased risk of reported COVID-like symptoms compared to controls. Continuing immunosuppressant drugs as long as not ill, while following the Dutch COVID rules, appears to be safe.

Disclosure of Interests:

Lotte van Ouwerkerk: None declared., Andrea van der Meulen Speakers bureau: Dr. van der Meulen reports personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Galapogos, grants from Nestle, grants from Norgine, outside the submitted work., Grant/research support from: Dr. van der Meulen reports personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Galapogos, grants from Nestle, grants from Norgine, outside the submitted work., Maarten Ninaber: None declared., Y.K. Onno Teng: None declared., Thomas Huizinga: None declared., Cornelia Allaart: None declared.

MO251HIGHLY SENSITIVE FLOW CYTOMETRIC DETECTION OF RESIDUAL B-CELLS AFTER RITUXIMAB IN ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS PATIENTS*

Background and Aims

B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) is an effective treatment for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients. Nevertheless, relapses are frequent after RTX, often preceded by B-cell repopulation suggesting that residual autoreactive B-cells persist despite therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to identify minimal residual autoimmunity (MRA) in the B-cell compartment of AAV patients treated with RTX.

Method

EuroFlow-based highly-sensitive flow cytometry (HSFC) was employed to study B-cell and plasma cell (PC) subsets in-depth in AAV patients before and after RTX treatment. Additionally, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of these RTX-treated AAV patients were cultured and in vitro stimulated with CpG, IL-2, and IL-21 to induce antibody-secreting cells (ASC). (ANCA)-IgG was measured in these supernatants by ELISA.

Results

By employing EuroFlow-based HSFC, we detected circulating CD19+ B-cells at all timepoints after RTX treatment, in contrast to conventional low-sensitive flow cytometry. Pre-germinal center (Pre-GC) B-cells, memory B-cells and CD20+CD138− plasmablasts (PBs) were rapidly and strongly reduced, while CD20−CD138− PrePC and CD20-CD138+ mature (m)PCs were reduced slower and remained detectable. Both memory B-cells and CD20− PCs remained detectable after RTX. Serum ANCA-IgG decreased significantly upon RTX. Changes in ANCA levels strongly correlated with changes in naive, switched CD27+ and CD27− (double-negative) memory B-cells, but not with plasma cells. Lastly, we demonstrated in vitro ANCA production by AAV PBMCs, 24 and 48 weeks after RTX treatment reflecting MRA in the memory compartment of AAV patients.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that RTX induced strong reductions in circulating B-cells, but never resulted in complete B-cell depletion. Despite strongly reduced B-cell numbers after RTX, ANCA-specific memory B-cells were still detectable in AAV patients. Thus, MRA is identifiable in AAV and can provide a potential novel approach in personalizing RTX treatment in AAV patients.

FC 034SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A 6-MONTH OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION

Background and Aims

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), occurring in up to 40% of patients (pts) with SLE over their disease course, and resulting in 10–20% of pts progressing to end-stage kidney disease.1-3 The BLISS-LN (GSK Study BEL114054; NCT01639339) study demonstrated that the addition of intravenous (IV) belimumab (BEL) to standard therapy (ST) in pts with active LN significantly improved renal responses over 2 years compared with ST alone.4 Here we present additional safety and efficacy data from the 6-month open-label (OL) extension phase of BLISS-LN.

Method

In this OL phase, eligible completers of the Phase 3 BLISS-LN study (those who received BEL or placebo [PBO] through Week 100 and completed Week 104 assessments) received BEL 10 mg/kg IV plus ST every 28 days for 24 weeks. Endpoints at OL Week 28 included: safety; Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR; defined as urine protein:creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; eGFR no more than 20% below OL baseline value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy); Complete Renal Response (CRR; defined as uPCR &lt;0.5; eGFR no more than 10% below OL baseline value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy); uPCR; eGFR; the proportion of pts with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score &lt;4; Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI); and corticosteroid use. Analyses were based on observed data and summarised relative to the OL baseline (last available value measured prior to dosing on or before the date of the first OL treatment dose).

Results

Of 257 pts (57.4 % of pts in BLISS-LN double-blind [DB] study) screened and enrolled, 255 pts were treated (safety population: 123 pts switched from PBO to BEL; 132 pts remained on BEL). In total, 254 pts were included in the efficacy analyses (PBO to BEL: 122 pts; BEL to BEL: 132 pts). Mean (standard deviation) age was 35.9 (10.3) years.

In total, 3.5% of pts withdrew from the OL phase, mainly due to adverse events (AE; 2.0%). Overall, 168/255 (65.9%) pts experienced ≥1 AE (76/123 [61.8%] PBO to BEL pts; 92/132 [69.7%] BEL to BEL pts); 49/255 (19.2%) pts had ≥1 treatment-related AE (25/123 [20.3%] PBO to BEL pts; 24/132 [18.2% ] BEL to BEL pts); 15/255 (5.9%) pts had ≥1 serious AE (5/123 [4.1%] PBO to BEL pts; 10/132 [7.6%] BEL to BEL pts); and 1 death was reported in the PBO to BEL group.

The proportion of patients achieving PERR and CRR increased from OL baseline to OL Week 28 in both groups (Table). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) for uPCR and eGFR were maintained from OL baseline through to OL Week 28 (Table).

The proportion of SLEDAI score &lt;4 responders in BEL to BEL group tended to increase from OL baseline to OL Week 28, and decrease in the PBO to BEL group (Table). SDI worsening (change &gt;0) was experienced by 7 (2.9%) pts (4 [3.3%] PBO to BEL; 3 [2.5%] BEL to BEL) compared with OL baseline.

There was no appreciable change in the number of patients receiving average daily prednisone-equivalent doses of ≤5 mg or ≤7.5 mg from OL baseline to OL Week 28 (Table).

Conclusion

BEL was well tolerated as an add-on to ST, with no new safety signals. Efficacy among pts with LN randomised to BEL during the DB phase was maintained during the OL phase.

Study funding

GSK. Editorial assistance (GSK-funded): Olga Conn, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd., part of Fishawack Health, UK.

MO257BELIMUMAB ADD-ON THERAPY MOBILIZES MEMORY B CELLS INTO CIRCULATION OF SLE PATIENTS

Background and Aims

Belimumab (BLM), a recombinant human IgG-1λ monoclonal antibody directed against B-cell activating factor (BAFF), is the first approved biological agent for patients with active severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). There is clinical evidence that combining belimumab with B cell depleting therapy can ameliorate disease activity in severe, refractory SLE patients. Although BLM is a B cell directed therapy and has been shown to significantly decrease total B cells, flow cytometry observations suggest a rapid increase of circulating memory B cells. The present study investigated the dynamics of B cell subsets in patients treated with or without BLM, with a special focus on the memory compartment in order to assess the characteristics of these memory B cells.

Method

We first performed extensive B cell subset phenotyping by high sensitivity flowcytometry according to the Euroflow protocol on whole blood from active lupus nephritis or SLE patients with other major organ involvement treated with standard of care (SOC) consisting of high dose steroids and mycophenolate mofetil combined with or without the addition of BLM. Next we characterized memory B cell gene expression profiles with single-cell RNA and V(D)J sequencing (ScRNA-SEQ).

Results

By employing high sensitivity flowcytometry, we established that the absolute increase in circulating memory B cells in SLE and LN patients was significant for patients who initiated BLM but not for patients treated with standard of care (Figure 1). The increase was observed in a broad range of memory B cell subsets (Unswitched, IgG1+, IgG2+, IgA1+, IgA2+) at 2 and 4 weeks following initiation of BLM treatment. This rise in memory B cells could hypothetically be attributed to either proliferation or homeostatic modulation of tissue-resident memory B cells causing a release into the circulation. ScRNA-SEQ cell cycle gene-expression was performed and established in both groups a non-proliferating phenotype [in approximately ∼94%] of memory B cells post-treatment, including absence of MKI67 as active proliferation marker. Additionally, BLM treatment did not result in an increased, and even in a severe reduction of the largest memory B cells clones after two weeks. In contrast, no change in clonality was seen after treatment with SOC. Together these data indicate that proliferation is not likely to be responsible for the observed increase in memory B cells by BLM. Furthermore, a clear difference was found in gene-expression levels between both treatment groups: BLM was responsible for the upregulation of 72 vs 10 genes in SOC, likewise 162 vs 32 genes were downregulated. Most importantly, a significant downregulation of the migration genes SELL (CD62L), CCR7, ITGB1, RAC2 and ICAM2, were specifically seen in BLM treated patients, possibly reflecting disrupted lymphocyte trafficking preventing memory B cells to either transmigrate into tissue or be retained at the tissue level.

Conclusion

The addition of BLM compared to standard of care in SLE patients leads to an increase of memory B cells in the circulation which appeared independent of proliferation. The process was accompanied with a strong modulation of gene-expression levels including a reduced expression of migration markers pointing towards disrupted lymphocyte trafficking. Altogether, these data could have important implications to further improve treatment strategies in severe SLE or lupus nephritis patients, for instance by establishing a deeper depletion of (autoreactive) memory B cells by the addition of rituximab after the initiation of belimumab.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in pregnancy: A literature review

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is indicated as a treatment for a wide array of diseases, extensively addressed in the Guidelines of the American Society for Apheresis. In pregnancy, TPE is an uncommon event and application is largely based on extrapolation of efficacy and safety in a non-pregnant population. This review intends to describe the currently available experience of TPE in pregnancy to help clinicians recognise indications during pregnancy and to support current guideline recommendations with literature-based experiences. In order to identify the clinical indications for which TPE is applied in pregnant women, we performed a literature search including studies till November 2019, without a start date restriction. Data extraction included medical indication for TPE and safety of TPE in pregnant women. 279 studies were included for analysis. Nowadays, TPE is predominantly applied for thrombotic microangiopathies, lipid disorders and a variety of autoimmune diseases. The application of TPE during pregnancy remains largely empiric and relies on individual case reports in the absence of high-quality studies and definitive evidence-based guidelines. Safety profile of TPE during pregnancy appears to be comparable to application of TPE in non-pregnant patients. In conclusion, based on the limited evidence that we found in literature with a high risk of publication bias, TPE procedures can be used safely during pregnancy with the appropriate preparation and experience of a multidisciplinary team.

LB001EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A PHASE 3, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background and Aims

Belimumab (BEL), an anti-B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) monoclonal antibody, is approved in patients (pts) ≥5 years of age with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Post hoc analyses of pooled renal outcomes data from two Phase 3 SLE studies showed favourable trends of greater reduction in proteinuria, haematuria, pyuria and lower renal flare rates in BEL-treated pts vs placebo (PBO).1 This is the largest study in acute lupus nephritis (LN) to date that evaluated efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL plus standard therapy (ST) in pts with active LN.

Method

BLISS-LN is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study (GSK study BEL114054, NCT01639339); eligible pts (≥18 years) with autoantibody-positive SLE and active, biopsy-proven LN (classes III, IV and/or V) were randomised (1:1) to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV or PBO, plus ST. Randomisation was stratified by induction regimen: high dose corticosteroids [HDCS] plus either cyclophosphamide (CyC), followed by azathioprine + low dose corticosteroids (LDCS), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), followed by MMF + LDCS. Primary endpoint: primary efficacy renal response (PERR; defined as urine protein creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] no more than 20% below pre-flare value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Week (Wk) 104. Key secondary endpoints: complete renal response (CRR; defined as uPCR &lt;0.5; eGFR no more than 10% below pre-flare value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Wk 104; PERR at Wk 52; risk of renal-related event (defined as end-stage renal disease/doubling of serum creatinine/renal worsening/renal disease-related treatment failure) or death at any time up to Wk 104. Other endpoints: PERR and CRR at Wk 104 by induction regimen; proportions of pts with baseline uPCR ≥0.5 with uPCR shift to &lt;0.5 while on study.

Results

Overall, 448 pts were randomised (efficacy: 223/treatment group; safety: 224/treatment group); 118 pts received CyC induction and 328 MMF induction; 278 (62.3%) completed the treatment.

At Wk 104, 43.0% BEL and 32.3% PBO pts achieved PERR (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.55 [1.04, 2.32], p=0.0311); 30.0% BEL and 19.7% PBO pts achieved CRR (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.74 [1.11, 2.74], p=0.0167). Over 104 weeks, more BEL than PBO pts achieved CRR at each visit (Figure 1A). PERR at Wk 52 was achieved by 46.6% BEL and 35.4% PBO pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.59 [1.06, 2.38], p=0.0245).

The risk of a renal-related event or death was 49% lower with BEL than PBO (HR [95%CI] 0.51 [0.34, 0.77]; p=0.0014) at any time point during the study. Overall, 15.7% of BEL and 28.3% of PBO pts experienced a renal-related event or death.

When analysed by induction regimen, PERR at Wk 104 was achieved by 33.9% BEL and 27.1% PBO CyC-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.52 [0.66, 3.49], p=0.3272), and by 46.3% BEL and 34.1% PBO MMF-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.58 [1.00, 2.51], p=0.0501). CRR at Wk 104 was achieved by 18.6% BEL and 18.6% PBO CyC-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.07 [0.41, 2.78], p=0.8843), and by 34.1% BEL and 20.1% PBO MMF-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 2.01 [1.19, 3.38], p=0.0085).

Proportions of pts with uPCR shift from ≥0.5 at baseline to &lt;0.5 while on study (calculated post hoc) are presented in the Figure 1B.

Overall, 95.5% BEL and 94.2% PBO pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 25.9% BEL and 29.9% PBO pts had ≥1 serious AE; 13.8% BEL and 17.0% PBO pts had serious infections; 12.9% pts in each group had ≥1 AE resulting in study treatment discontinuation; on-treatment fatal AEs were reported in 1.8% BEL and 1.3% PBO pts.

Conclusion

BEL demonstrated improved renal responses vs PBO in pts with active LN, with a safety profile consistent with previous BEL trials.

OP0164 BLISS-LN: A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS

Background:

Lupus nephritis (LN), a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), affects nearly 70% of patients (pts) in high-risk groups. To preserve renal function, LN requires fast and effective treatment. Despite medical advances, progression rates at 15 years to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remain >40% for pts with diffuse proliferative LN. Belimumab (BEL), approved in pts aged ≥5 years with active SLE, improved renal parameters in pts with baseline renal involvement in apost hocanalysis of Phase 3 trials data.

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL vs placebo (PBO), plus standard therapy (ST), in pts with active LN.

Methods:

BLISS-LN is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, PBO-controlled, 104-week study (GSK Study BEL114054,NCT01639339). Adults with SLE and biopsy-proven LN (class III, IV, and/or V) were randomised (1:1) to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV or PBO, plus ST. Primary endpoint: Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR); defined as urine protein creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] within 20% of the pre-flare value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Week (Wk) 104. Key secondary endpoints: Complete Renal Response (CRR; defined as uPCR <0.5; eGFR within 10% of the pre-flare value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Wk 104; PERR at Wk 52; time to renal-related event (defined as ESRD/doubling of serum creatinine/renal worsening/renal disease-related treatment failure) or death. Other endpoints: time to PERR/CRR sustained through Wk 104; SLEDAI-S2K score <4 points at Wk 104; safety.

Results:

Overall, 448 pts were randomised (efficacy: 223/group; safety: 224/group). Significantly more BEL (43%) than PBO (32.3%) pts achieved PERR at Wk 104 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32; p=0.0311). More BEL than PBO pts achieved key secondary and other efficacy endpoints (Table).

Overall, 214 (95.5%) BEL and 211 (94.2%) PBO pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 58 (25.9%) BEL and 67 (29.9%) PBO pts had ≥1 serious AE; 29 (12.9%) pts in each group had ≥1 AE resulting in study treatment discontinuation; 4 (1.8%) BEL and 3 (1.3%) PBO pts developed on-treatment fatal AEs.

Conclusion:

In the largest LN study to date, data from BLISS-LN demonstrate that BEL plus ST significantly improves LN renal responses compared with ST alone with a favourable safety profile.

Study funding: GSK.

Table.Endpoint, n (%)PBO(n=223)BEL(n=223)OR/HR (95% CI) vs PBOp-valueCRR at Wk 104*44 (19.7)67 (30.0)OR 1.74(1.11, 2.74)0.0167PERR at Wk 52*79 (35.4)104 (46.6)OR 1.59(1.06, 2.38)0.0245Time to PERR throughWk 104†72 (32.3)96 (43.0)HR 1.46(1.07, 1.98)0.0157Time to CRR throughWk 104†44 (19.7)67 (30.0)HR 1.58(1.08, 2.31)0.0189Time to renal-related event or death†63 (28.3)35 (15.7)HR 0.51(0.34, 0.77)0.0014SLEDAI-S2K score <4 points at Wk 104*41 (18.4)62 (27.8)OR 1.76(1.11, 2.78)0.0164

*PBO and BEL columns represent the n (%) responders

†Data presented as n (cumulative incidence)

Disclosure of Interests:

Richard Furie Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Brad H Rovin Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Frederic Houssiau Grant/research support from: UCB, Consultant of: GSK, Zahir Amoura Grant/research support from: GSK, Roche, Consultant of: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Mittermayer Santiago: None declared, Gabriel Contreras Grant/research support from: Genentech, Merck, Consultant of: Genentech, Merck, Ana Malvar Consultant of: GSK and Roche, chi chiu mok: None declared, Amit Saxena Consultant of: GSK, AZ, BMS, Xueqing Yu: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Carly Barnett Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Susan Burriss Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Yulia Green Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Christi Kleoudis Shareholder of: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Employee of: Parexel, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

THU0304 CLINICAL PRACTICE VARIATION BETWEEN ACADEMIC AND NON-ACADEMIC CENTERS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANCA ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS IN THE NETHERLANDS

Background:

ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) is a complex, rare systemic autoimmune disease with an estimated prevalence of 5-18 patients per 100.000 individuals worldwide. Managing a low prevalent disease can be challenging which is reflected in clinical practice variation.

Objectives:

This study investigated clinical practice variation of the care for AAV patients in the Netherlands.

Methods:

In a nationwide online survey, AAV patients were selected from academic and non-academic centers. Within centers, patients were eligible when they had a confirmed diagnosis of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (eGPA) according to the treating physician. There were no exclusion criteria. In each center a comparable number of patients was included. Data capture encompassed a wide set of variables on diagnosis, management and outcomes.

Results:

From December 2018 to November 2019, 230 AAV patients were recruited in 6 non-academic and 3 academic hospitals (120 vs 110 patients respectively). Differences in clinical diagnoses (GPA, MPA and eGPA) were observed between non-academic and academic centers (p=0.05), which was mainly caused by a higher number of MPA patients in non-academic centers. The year of diagnosis was comparable (median 2013 [2009-2016], p=0.150). The median follow up since diagnosis was 4.8 years [1.8-9.6] with a median in-hospital time-to-diagnosis of 13 days [2-50]. Patients were diagnosed at a mean age of 63 years (±11.18) in non-academic centers and 53 years (±16.92) in academic centers (p<0.001). Besides steroids, oral cyclophosphamide was the most preferred drug (54%) for induction therapy, whereas rituximab was given significantly more often as (part of the) induction therapy in patients treated in academic centers compared to patients in non-academic centers (27% vs 8%, p<0.001). In non-academic centers pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis was prescribed significantly less (76% vs 91%, p=0.003). Also, screening for Staphylococcus aureus carriership was significantly less (17% vs 68%, p<0.001). With respect to mortality and co-morbidity, 22 patients (10%) died, 100 patients (44%) had at least one infection and 24 patients (10%) suffered from at least one malignancy. We observed no significant differences on these endpoints between academic and non-academic centers.

Conclusion:

The present study highlights important practice variation in the management of AAV between academic and non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. A high proportion of patients is treated with oral cyclophosphamide as induction therapy while rituximab is increasingly used in academic centers. Rates of mortality, infections and malignancies were not different. Altogether, this study raises awareness into the variation of management for AAV patients and allows the identification of areas for improvement of clinical care for Dutch AAV patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ebru Dirikgil: None declared, Abraham Rutgers: None declared, Sander Tas: None declared, Cornelis A. Verburgh: None declared, Darius Soonawala: None declared, A. Elisabeth Hak: None declared, Hilde H.F. Remmelts: None declared, Daphne IJpelaar: None declared, Gozewijn D. Laverman: None declared, Jacob M. van Laar Grant/research support from: MSD, Genentech, Consultant of: MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, BMS, H.J. Bernelot Moens: None declared, Peter Verhoeven: None declared, Willem Jan W. Bos: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis

OP0163 2019 UPDATE OF THE JOINT EUROPEAN LEAGUE AGAINST RHEUMATISM AND EUROPEAN RENAL ASSOCIATION–EUROPEAN DIALYSIS AND TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS

Background:

Up to 40% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients develop kidney disease, which represents a major cause of morbidity.

Objectives:

To update the 2012 EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods:

We followed the EULAR standardised operating procedures for the publication of treatment recommendations. Delphi-based methodology led to 15 questions for systematic literature review (SLR), which was undertaken by three fellows.

Results:

The changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and management of end-stage-kidney-disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5-0.7gr/24h with [near-]normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2-3g/day, or mycophenolic acid at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500mg x6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3-0.5mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1g/24h despite renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations.

Conclusion:

The updated recommendations intend to inform rheumatologists, nephrologists, patients, national professional societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about the treatment of LN based on most recent evidence.

Disclosure of Interests:

Antonis Fanouriakis Paid instructor for: Paid instructor for Enorasis, Amgen, Speakers bureau: Paid speaker for Roche, Genesis Pharma, Mylan, Myrto Kostopoulou: None declared, Kim Cheema: None declared, Hans-Joachim Anders: None declared, Martin Aringer Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Ingeborg Bajema Consultant of: GSK, John N. Boletis Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Paid instructor for: GSK, Abbvie, UCB, Enorasis, Eleni Frangou: None declared, Frederic Houssiau Grant/research support from: UCB, Consultant of: GSK, Jane Hollis: None declared, Alexandre Karras: None declared, Francesca Marchiori: None declared, Stephen Marks: None declared, Gabriela Moroni: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Ioannis Parodis: None declared, Manuel Praga: None declared, Matthias Schneider Grant/research support from: GSK, UCB, Abbvie, Consultant of: Abbvie, Alexion, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Lilly, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Vladimir Tesar: None declared, Maria Trachana: None declared, Ronald van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arthrogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Vertex, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex, Alexandre Voskuyl: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Bernadette van Leeuw: None declared, George Bertsias Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: Novartis, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Dimitrios Boumpas: None declared

A Dutch consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of several guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), clinical routine practice will only improve when an implementation strategy is in place to support clinical decision making and adequate implementation of guidelines. We describe here an initiative to establish national and multidisciplinary consensus on broad aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of AAV relevant to daily clinical practice in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary working group of physicians in the Netherlands with expertise on AAV addressed the broad spectrum of diagnosis, terminology, and immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive treatment, including an algorithm for AAV patients. Based on recommendations from (inter)national guidelines, national consensus was established using a Delphi-based method during a conference in conjunction with a nationally distributed online consensus survey. Cut-off for consensus was 70% (dis)agreement.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight professionals were involved in the Delphi procedure to assess consensus on 50 statements regarding diagnosis, treatment, and organisation of care for AAV patients. Consensus was achieved for 37/50 statements (74%) in different domains of diagnosis and treatment of AAV including consensus on the treatment algorithm for AAV.

CONCLUSION

We present a national, multidisciplinary consensus on a diagnostic strategy and treatment algorithm for AAV patients as part of the implementation of (inter)national guideline-derived recommendations in the Netherlands. Future studies will focus on evaluating local implementation of treatment protocols for AAV, and assessments of current and future clinical practice variation in the care for AAV patients in the Netherlands.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Adults With Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

Childhood‐onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe, lifelong, multisystem autoimmune disease. Long‐term outcome data are limited. This study was undertaken to identify clinical characteristics and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) of adults with childhood‐onset SLE.

Methods

Patients participated in a single study visit comprising a structured history and physical examination. Disease activity (scored using the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI‐2K]), damage (scored using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]), and HRQoL (scored using the Short Form 36 Health Survey) were assessed. Medical records were reviewed.

Results

In total, 111 childhood‐onset SLE patients were included; the median disease duration was 20 years, 91% of patients were female, and 72% were white. Disease activity was low (median SLEDAI‐2K score 4), and 71% of patients received prednisone, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and/or other disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs. The vast majority of new childhood‐onset SLE–related manifestations developed within 2 years of diagnosis. Damage such as myocardial infarctions began occurring after 5 years. Most patients (62%) experienced damage, predominantly in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, and renal systems. Cerebrovascular accidents, renal transplants, replacement arthroplasties, and myocardial infarctions typically occurred at a young age (median age 20 years, 24 years, 34 years, and 39 years, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that damage accrual was associated with disease duration (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, P < 0.001), antiphospholipid antibody positivity (OR 3.56, P = 0.026), and hypertension (OR 3.21, P = 0.043). Current HCQ monotherapy was associated with an SDI score of 0 (OR 0.16, P = 0.009). In this cohort, HRQoL was impaired compared to the overall Dutch population. The presence of damage reduced HRQoL scores in 1 domain. High disease activity (SLEDAI‐2K score ≥8) and changes in physical appearance strongly reduced HRQoL scores (in 4 of 8 domains and 7 of 8 domains, respectively).

Conclusion

The majority of adults with childhood‐onset SLE in this large cohort developed significant damage at a young age and had impaired HRQoL without achieving drug‐free remission, illustrating the substantial impact of childhood‐onset SLE on future life.

Diagnosing and treating antiphospholipid syndrome: a consensus paper

INTRODUCTION

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the occurrence of venous and/or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy-related morbidity, combined with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or a lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Large, controlled, intervention trials in APS are limited. This paper aims to provide clinicians with an expert consensus on the management of APS.

METHODS

Relevant papers were identified by literature search. Statements on diagnostics and treatment were extracted. During two consensus meetings, statements were discussed, followed by a Delphi procedure. Subsequently, a final paper was written.

RESULTS

Diagnosis of APS includes the combination of thrombotic events and presence of aPL. Risk stratification on an individual base remains challenging. 'Triple positive' patients have highest risk of recurrent thrombosis. aPL titres > 99th percentile should be considered positive. No gold standard exists for aPL testing; guidance on assay characteristics as formulated by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis should be followed. Treatment with vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) with INR 2.0-3.0 is first-line treatment for a first or recurrent APS-related venous thrombotic event. Patients with first arterial thrombosis should be treated with clopidogrel or VKA with target INR 2.0-3.0. Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants is not recommended. Patients with catastrophic APS, recurrent thrombotic events or recurrent pregnancy morbidity should be referred to an expert centre.

CONCLUSION

This consensus paper fills the gap between evidence-based medicine and daily clinical practice for the care of APS patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of C3 glomerulopathy in a center of expertise

C3 glomerulopathy is a rare renal disease that has been distinguished as a renal disease for about 10 years. It is caused by an excessive activation of the alternative complement pathway in the circulation, which leads to deposition of complement factor C3 in glomeruli. It is diagnosed based on clinical presentation, histological patterns in a kidney biopsy and tests of the complement pathways. It can closely resemble immune complexmediated glomerulonephritis and postinfectious glomerulonephritis. Renal failure develops in up to half of all patients within 10 years after presentation. A curative treatment is not available. Treatment relies on renoprotective measures, occasional immunosuppressive medication and experimental novel complement inhibitors. Because the disease is rare, its care and cure are concentrated in centers of expertise. Here we provide an overview of the state-ofthe-art diagnosis and treatment of C3 glomerulopathy in a center of expertise in the Netherlands.

Suppression of bone turnover by B-cell depletion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The role of B cells in inflammatory bone formation and resorption is controversial. We investigated this in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with rituximab, a B-cell depleting antibody. We found a significant suppression in bone turnover, possibly a direct effect or as a consequence of a reduction in inflammation and disease activity.

INTRODUCTION

RA is the most prevalent inflammatory joint disease, in which B cells play an important role. However, the role of B cells in bone turnover is controversial and RA subjects treated with rituximab, a B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, provide an ideal model for determining the role of B cells in inflammatory bone resorption.

METHODS

Serum from 46 RA patients, collected pre- and post-rituximab therapy, was analysed for biomarkers of bone turnover (procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide [P1NP], osteocalcin, β-isomerised carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen [βCTX] and osteoprotegerin [OPG]).

RESULTS

A significant decrease in bone resorption was observed 6 months after rituximab (median change βCTX -50 ng/L, 95%CI -136, -8 p < 0.001, this equates to -37%; 95%CI -6, -49), mirrored by a reduction in disease activity. Similarly, there was a significant increase in P1NP, a marker of bone formation (median change P1NP 5.0 μg/L, 95%CI -1.0, 11.2, p = 0.02; 13%; 95%CI -3, 39), but no significant change in osteocalcin or OPG levels. The percentage change from baseline of βCTX in a subgroup of patients (not on prednisolone or bisphosphonate) was significantly correlated with the percentage reduction in DAS28 score (r (s) = 0.570, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we have found that B-cell depletion increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption in RA patients; this may be a direct effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively, and be at least partially explained by the decreased inflammation and disease activity.

Efficacy of intraarticular infliximab in patients with chronic or recurrent gonarthritis: a clinical randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraarticular infliximab compared with intraarticular methylprednisolone in patients with gonarthritis.

METHODS

In 23 patients with recurrent gonarthritis despite previous intraarticular corticosteroid therapy, a total of 41 intraarticular injections (20 infliximab and 21 methylprednisolone) were performed in 28 knees. Initial therapy was randomly assigned, and crossover therapy was eligible within 3 months. The clinical effect was assessed during 6 months of followup. The primary outcome was event-free survival, defined as the time after treatment until local retreatment was performed and/or nonimprovement of the knee joint score. Adverse effects were recorded during followup.

RESULTS

All patients treated with intraarticular infliximab had an insufficient response. In contrast, 8 of the 21 intraarticular methylprednisolone injections were effective (P = 0.004). Between groups, no differences in the patients' age, disease duration, number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or previous intraarticular methylprednisolone were observed. Reported adverse effects were not related to therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with intraarticular infliximab injection was not effective in patients with a chronically inflamed knee joint. Intraarticular injection with methylprednisolone was superior despite previous intraarticular corticosteroid therapy. Further investigation is needed to provide these patients with a better alternative.

Residual inflammation after rituximab treatment is associated with sustained synovial plasma cell infiltration and enhanced B cell repopulation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effects of rituximab treatment in relation to immunological effects of rituximab on tissue-derived B lineage cells and repopulation of circulating B cells.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with 2x1000 mg rituximab and assessed clinically at 4, 12, 18 and 24 weeks using a 44-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS(44)). Synovial biopsies were analysed with immunohistochemistry at baseline and 12 weeks after treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analysed by high sensitivity flow cytometry at all timepoints.

RESULTS

In this study, a cohort of patients was dichotomised according to those who achieved a low disease activity score (DAS(44)<2.4: LoA group) and those with persistent disease activity (DAS(44)>2.4: HiA group) at any time after rituximab treatment. At baseline, the low activity (LoA) group had significantly lower DAS(44) scores (median 3.33, range 2.84 to 4.23) than the high activity (HiA) group (median 3.73, range 3.03 to 5.23; p = 0.022) and significantly less histological inflammation in synovium (median 6.7, range 1 to 15 vs 16.6, range 4 to 22; p = 0.036). DAS(44) scores before and after rituximab treatment were associated with synovial infiltration of CD79a+ CD20- B cells, morphologically resembling plasma cells. Following treatment with rituximab, the LoA group had significantly reduced repopulation of circulating pre-switched IgD+ B cells (median 0.044%, range 0.002 to 0.66 vs 0.45%, range 0.07 to 9.47; p = 0.006) and post-switched CD27+ B cells (median 0.17%, range 0.04 to 0.39 vs 0.67, range 0.08 to 2.05; p = 0.005) compared to the HiA group.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that a low disease activity state following rituximab was associated with reduced infiltration of CD79a+ CD20- plasma cells in synovium and reduced B cell repopulation.

Targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: Focus on rituximab

B-cell depletion is a new strategy for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the past years, several studies have proven the efficacy of anti-CD20 mediated B-cell depletion with rituximab (Mabthera((R))) in RA patients who failed TNF-blocking therapy. The important role of B-cells in the pathogenesis of RA is deducted from the specific detection of autoantibodies in RA and infiltration of B-cells and plasma cells in inflamed synovium. Pharmacological studies in RA patients treated with rituximab showed that half-life was approximately 3 weeks leading to a 6- to 8-month period of B-cell depletion in peripheral blood. Rituximab treatment led to significant improvements in disease activity of RA patients and the current review summarizes the results from phase III, randomized clinical trials that have been performed. Lastly, data on safety and quality of life are summarized. Although relatively low numbers of RA patients have been treated and long-term data are lacking, current data thus far suggest a relatively good safety profile for rituximab. Future studies will need to focus on predicting responsiveness to rituximab, investigating efficacy of re-treatment with rituximab and extending data on safety and patient-focused outcomes.

Long-term followup of health status in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a new treatment for patients with severe, refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The present study was undertaken to assess the health status of patients with severe RA over a long-term followup period after treatment with HDC + HSCT.

METHODS

Health status and utility scores were assessed in 8 patients before and after treatment with HDC + HSCT. Patients were followed up for 5 years posttransplantation. Health status was assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the RAND-36 version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey, and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). Utility scores were calculated using the EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire and the SF-36-derived utility index (called the SF-6D), from which quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived.

RESULTS

Most measures of health status improved compared with baseline in the first 2 years posttransplantation, notably HAQ and AIMS scores and scores on the functional status, general health, and health change summary scales of the RAND-36 version of the SF-36. Utility scores derived from the EQ-5D questionnaire and the SF-6D also increased significantly after transplantation. This was reflected in the 0.28 QALYs gained compared with baseline. For a putative 50-year-old RA patient with a life expectancy of 20 years, a threshold analysis revealed that HDC + HSCT yielded more QALYs than conventional therapy when treatment-related mortality (TRM) was <2.8%.

CONCLUSION

HDC + HSCT temporarily increased the functionality and health status of patients with severe, refractory RA. With a reported TRM of 1.3%, HDC + HSCT can be considered a realistic treatment option for patients with severe RA.