Comparison of Immature Platelet Fraction and Factors Associated with Inflammation, Thrombosis and Platelet Reactivity Between Left and Right Atria in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Recent trials found poor temporal relationship between atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes and strokes. Thus, stroke in AF patients probably involves more mechanisms than cardiac embolism. We compared factors of inflammation, thrombosis and platelet reactivity between left (LA) and right atria (RA) and femoral vein (FV) in patients with AF.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from patients undergoing AF-ablation from the FV, RA and LA for neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), immature platelet fraction (IPF) and count (IPC), CD40 ligand, P-selectin and E-Selectin. IPF was measured by an autoanalyzer; CD40 ligand, P-selectin, and E-Selectin were measured by ELISA and NLR was calculated from complete blood counts.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were included (age 65±10y, 63% male, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 2.8±1.8, LA volume index 40±24 mL/m², 63% paroxysmal AF). There was no difference between FV, RA and LA regarding NLR and CD40 ligand. Factors associated with platelets activity: P-selectin, IPC and IPF% were higher in RA vs LA (60.3 IQR 49.0-76.4 ng/ml vs. 59.3 IQR 49.0-74.7, respectively, p=0.03 for P-selectin, 7.5 IQR 5.2-10 103/μL vs. 7.1 IQR 5-9.8, p<0.01 for IPC, and 3.6 IQR 2.7-5.0 % vs. 3.6 IQR 2.6-4.8, p<0.01 for IPF%). Similar trends were for E-selectin (41.2 IQR 31.1-51.2 ng/mL vs. 38.7 IQR 27.9-50.4 p=0.09). Similar significant differences were found in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASC≥2 but not in patients with low score.

Conclusions

Patients with AF, especially those with CHA₂DS₂-VASc≥2, have higher markers of thrombogenicity in RA compared to LA. There was no difference in inflammatory properties between the atria.

Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common clinical entity, with a mechanism that appears to involve endothelial dysfunction of the cardiac microcirculation. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are bone marrow derived cells that are able to differentiate into functional endothelial cells and participate in endothelial surface repair.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the level and function of EPCs in patients with HFpEF compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and control subjects.

METHODS

We enrolled 21 patients with HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%, age 74.5 ± 9.9 years, 43% men, 48% diabetes), 20 patients with HFrEF (LVEF < 40%, age 70 ± 11.5 years, 90% men, 60% diabetes), and 11 control subjects with cardiovascular risk factors (age 53.3 ± 6.1years, 90% men, 64% diabetes). Circulating EPC levels were evaluated by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), CD34, and CD133 by flow-cytometry. EPCs colony forming units (CFUs) were quantified after 7 days in culture.

RESULTS

The proportion of cells that co-expressed VEGFR-2 and CD34 or VEGFR-2 and CD133 was similar among the HFpEF and HFrEF groups, and significantly lower than in the control group. The number of EPC-CFUs was also similar among the two heart failure groups and significantly lower than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HFpEF, like HFrEF, have significant reduction in EPC level and function.

Measurements of immature platelet fraction and inflammatory markers in atrial fibrillation patients - Does persistency or ablation affect results?

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with platelet hyperactivity and a higher proportion of immature platelets. We aimed to examine whether immature platelet fraction (IPF) and inflammatory markers differ between AF types and whether they are affected by ablation.

METHODS

A prospective study included patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AFL). We excluded patients with hematologic, inflammatory, or acute coronary states. Blood samples for IPF, white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected at baseline, within one-hour postablation in those undergoing ablations, and the day after ablation. IPF was measured by an autoanalyzer (Sysmex 2100 XE).

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were included (paroxysmal AF-63, persistent AF-36, AF and AFL-7, AFL alone-5), (Mean age 67.7 ± 12.8 years, 54.8% male, CHA₂ D₂ -VASC₂ 3.2 ± 1.8). Seventy-two patients underwent ablation (cryoballoon AF ablation-60, AFL radiofrequency ablation-5, both-7). There was no difference between paroxysmal and persistent AF regarding baseline markers. There was a significant change in the following parameters after ablation: WBC (baseline 6.9 ± 2.0, 1-h post 8.0 ± 2.4, and 1-day post 9.0 ± 2.8 ×10⁹ /L), NLR (2.9 ± 2.2, 3.0 ± 2.4, 4.2 ± 2.9, respectively), and CRP (3.6 ± 3.7, 3.6 ± 3.5, 12.4 ± 9.0 mg/L, respectively) (P < .05 for all). However, there were no differences in immature platelet count (8.6 ± 4.8, 8.5 ± 4.9, 8.4 ± 5.2 ×10⁹ /L) or IPF (4.6 ± 3.2, 4.7 ± 3.3, 4.9 ± 3.6%) from baseline to postablation (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

AF persistency does not affect IPF and inflammation. In patients undergoing cryoablation of AF, there is a postablation inflammatory process; however, platelet activation is probably not affected.