1
|
Yang D, King W, Aihara H, Karasik MS, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Jawaid SA, Perbtani YB, Hoffman BJ, Akki AS, Schlachterman A, Coman RM, Wang AY, Draganov PV. Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on histologic diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus visible neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:626-633. [PMID: 34906544 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data are limited on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a potential diagnostic and staging tool in Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and factors associated with change of histologic diagnosis by ESD compared with pre-ESD histology. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for BE visible neoplasia. A change in histologic diagnosis was defined as "upstaged" or "downstaged" if the ESD specimen had a higher or lower degree, respectively, of dysplasia or neoplasia when compared with pre-ESD specimens. RESULTS Two hundred five patients (median age, 69 years; 81% men) with BE visible neoplasia underwent ESD from 2016 to 2021. Baseline histology was obtained using forceps (n = 182) or EMR (n = 23). ESD changed the histologic diagnosis in 55.1% of cases (113/205), of which 68.1% were upstaged and 31.9% downstaged. The frequency of change in diagnosis after ESD was similar whether baseline histology was obtained using forceps (55.5%) or EMR (52.2%) (P = .83). In aggregate, 23.9% of cases (49/205) were upstaged to invasive cancer on ESD histopathology. On multivariate analysis, lesions in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 confidence interval, 1.1-3.9; P = .02) and prior radiofrequency ablation (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = .02) were predictors of change in histologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS ESD led to a change of diagnosis in more than half of patients with BE visible neoplasia. Selective ESD can serve as a potential diagnostic and staging tool, particularly in those with suspected invasive disease. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - William King
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael S Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Salmaan A Jawaid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brenda J Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ashwin S Akki
- Department of Pathology Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roxana M Coman
- Division of Hospital Gastroenterology, Atrium/Navicent Health, Mercer University, College of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ichkhanian Y, Assis D, Familiari P, Ujiki M, Su B, Khan SR, Pioche M, Draganov PV, Cho JY, Eleftheriadis N, Barret M, Haji A, Velanovich V, Tantau M, Marks JM, Bapaye A, Sedarat A, Albeniz E, Bechara R, Kumta NA, Costamagna G, Perbtani YB, Patel M, Sippey M, Korrapati SK, Jain R, Estremera F, El Zein MH, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Khashab MA. Management of patients after failed peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1003-1010. [PMID: 33197943 DOI: 10.1055/a-1312-0496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is highly effective for the management of achalasia, clinical failures may occur. The optimal management of patients who fail POEM is not well known. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different management strategies in patients who had failed POEM. METHODS This was an international multicenter retrospective study at 16 tertiary centers between January 2012 and November 2019. All patients who underwent POEM and experienced persistent or recurrent symptoms (Eckardt score > 3) were included. The primary outcome was to compare the rates of clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) between different management strategies. RESULTS : 99 patients (50 men [50.5 %]; mean age 51.4 [standard deviation (SD) 16.2]) experienced clinical failure during the study period, with a mean (SD) Eckardt score of 5.4 (0.3). A total of 29 patients (32.2 %) were managed conservatively and 70 (71 %) underwent retreatment (repeat POEM 33 [33 %], pneumatic dilation 30 [30 %], and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) 7 [7.1 %]). During a median follow-up of 10 (interquartile range 3 - 20) months, clinical success was highest in patients who underwent repeat POEM (25 /33 [76 %]; mean [SD] Eckardt score 2.1 [2.1]), followed by pneumatic dilation (18/30 [60 %]; Eckardt score 2.8 [2.3]), and LHM (2/7 [29 %]; Eckardt score 4 [1.8]; P = 0.12). A total of 11 patients in the conservative group (37.9 %; mean Eckardt score 4 [1.8]) achieved clinical success. CONCLUSION : This study comprehensively assessed an international cohort of patients who underwent management of failed POEM. Repeat POEM and pneumatic dilation achieved acceptable clinical success, with excellent safety profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yervant Ichkhanian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniella Assis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pietro Familiari
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, Northshore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Baily Su
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah R Khan
- Department of Medicine, Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Pavillon L Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Joo Young Cho
- CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Amyn Haji
- King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Marcel Tantau
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Jeffrey M Marks
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Eduardo Albeniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarro, Spain
| | | | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mehul Patel
- King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Megan Sippey
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Fermín Estremera
- Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarro, Spain
| | - Mohamad H El Zein
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Olaya I Brewer Gutierrez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ngamruengphong S, Ferri L, Aihara H, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Perbtani YB, Jue TL, Munroe CA, Boparai ES, Mehta NA, Bhatt A, Kumta NA, Othman MO, Mercado M, Javaid H, Aadam AA, Siegel A, James TW, Grimm IS, DeWitt JM, Novikov A, Schlachterman A, Kowalski T, Samarasena J, Hashimoto R, Chehade NEH, Lee J, Chang K, Su B, Ujiki MB, Mehta A, Sharaiha RZ, Carr-Locke DL, Chen A, Chen M, Chen YI, Pourmousavi Khoshknab M, Wang R, Kerdsirichairat T, Tomizawa Y, von Renteln D, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA, Bechara R, Karasik M, Patel NJ, Fukami N, Nishimura M, Hanada Y, Wong Kee Song LM, Laszkowska M, Wang AY, Hwang JH, Friedland S, Sethi A, Kalloo AN. Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1611-1619.e1. [PMID: 32565290 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. METHODS We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. RESULTS Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. CONCLUSIONS ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Dennis J Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Terry L Jue
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Craig A Munroe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Eshandeep S Boparai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Neal A Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amit Bhatt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Mercado
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Huma Javaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Theodore W James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John M DeWitt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Aleksey Novikov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Rintaro Hashimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Nabil El Hage Chehade
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - John Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Bailey Su
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Michael B Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Amit Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Reem Z Sharaiha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David L Carr-Locke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Alex Chen
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael Chen
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Rui Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert Bechara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Karasik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Neej J Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Norio Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Makoto Nishimura
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuri Hanada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Monika Laszkowska
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Shai Friedland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Antony N Kalloo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang D, Perbtani YB, Loeb J, Liu N, Draganov PV, Estores DE, Lauzardo M, Maurelli A, Lednicky JA, Morris JG. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the gastrointestinal tract among patients with negative nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing prior to endoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1276-E1282. [PMID: 34447876 PMCID: PMC8383081 DOI: 10.1055/a-1490-9234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The clinical significance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the stool remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 is detected via real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in the gastrointestinal tracts of patients scheduled for endoscopy and if the virus obtained from these clinical specimens could be isolated in culture. Patients and methods All patients underwent symptom screening and had negative nasopharyngeal testing for SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hours of their scheduled procedure. Study samples were collected via nasopharyngeal swab, rectal swab, and fluid from the upper gastrointestinal tract and/or colon based on their endoscopic procedure(s). Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 via rRT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens were isolated and cultured in Vero-E6 cells. Results 243 patients (mean age 63.1 years;54.3 % men) were enrolled from July 15, 2020 to September 2, 2020. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed from 242 (99.6 %) nasopharyngeal, 243 (100 %) rectal, 183 (75.3 %) upper gastrointestinal tract and 73 (30 %) colon samples. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the nasopharynx and gastrointestinal specimens in one patient (0.4 %). After a 14-day incubation period, there was no evidence of virus growth in cells incubated with any of these specimens. Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 was rarely detected in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with negative nasopharyngeal testing prior to endoscopy. No live virus was detected by culture, further highlighting that presence of viral genome on its own is not sufficient proof of infectivity. PCR-based screening provides limited insight into virus infectivity and its results should be interpreted carefully as to avoid unnecessary delays in clinical care or inadvertent risk exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Julia Loeb
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Nanlong Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - David E. Estores
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Michael Lauzardo
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Anthony Maurelli
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - John A. Lednicky
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - J. Glenn Morris
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perbtani YB, Westerveld DR, Yang DJ, Draganov PV. CYP2C19 genotype variability in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E843-E847. [PMID: 34079865 PMCID: PMC8159581 DOI: 10.1055/a-1401-9853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux is a recognized potential adverse event following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are an effective first-line therapy; although their efficacy can be affected by genotype cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) variability leading to enhanced clearance of PPIs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of CYP2C19 genotype variability in POEM patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Patients and methods This was a single-center, prospective, cohort study of consecutive POEM cases during a 7-year study period (2013-2020). Reflux symptoms were assessed with the validated gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) and objective pH testing after POEM. CYP2C19 genotype testing was obtained in all patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms, defined as an abnormal pH study and GerdQ score ≥ 8 while on PPIs twice daily. Results POEM was performed in 325 consecutive patients (48.3 % female; mean age 57 years) during the study period. Twenty patients (6.8 %) had PPI-refractory, post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux based on their GerdQ score (median 9, range 8-11) and abnormal pH studies. CYP2C19 genotype testing identified 55 % (11/20) of these patients as being rapid metabolizers. Out of these, 9 (82 %) had improvement in clinical GERD symptoms after changing to a PPI less affected by CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics. Conclusions Post-POEM, PPI-refractory GERD is rare. As shown in this study, rapid metabolizers commonly respond by changing to a PPI less affected by CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics, thereby reducing the risk of long-term consequences from GERD and unnecessary anti-reflux surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Donevan R. Westerveld
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Dennis J. Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Draganov PV, Aihara H, Karasik MS, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Jawaid SA, Westerveld D, Perbtani YB, Hoffman BJ, Schlachterman A, Siegel A, Coman RM, Wang AY, Yang D. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:2317-2327.e2. [PMID: 33610532 PMCID: PMC8783061 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Asia has been shown to be superior to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and surgery for the management of selected early gastrointestinal cancers. We aimed to evaluate technical outcomes of ESD in North America. METHODS We conducted a multicenter prospective study on ESD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada between April 2016 and April 2020. End points included rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events, factors associated with failed resection, and recurrence post-R0 resection. RESULTS Six hundred and ninety-two patients (median age, 66 years; 57.8% were men) underwent ESD (median lesion size, 40 mm; interquartile range, 25-52 mm) for lesions in the esophagus (n = 181), stomach (n = 101), duodenum (n = 11), colon (n = 211) and rectum (n = 188). En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.5%, 84.2%, and 78.3%, respectively. Bleeding and perforation were reported in 2.3% and 2.9% of the cases, respectively. Only 1 patient (0.14%) required surgery for adverse events. On multivariable analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis was associated with failed en bloc, R0, and curative resection and higher risk for adverse events. Overall recurrence was 5.8% (31 of 532) at a mean follow-up of 13.3 months (range, 1-60 months). CONCLUSIONS In this large multicenter prospective North American experience, we demonstrate that ESD can be performed safely, effectively, and is associated with a low recurrence rate. The technical resection outcomes achieved in this study are in line with the current established consensus quality parameters and further support the implementation of ESD for the treatment of select gastrointestinal neoplasms; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02989818.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael S. Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mohamed O. Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Salmaan A. Jawaid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Donevan Westerveld
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brenda J. Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Roxana M. Coman
- Division of Hospital Gastroenterology, Atrium/Navicent Health, Mercer University, College of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Andrew Y. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang D, Perbtani YB, Wang Y, Rumman A, Wang AY, Kumta NA, DiMaio CJ, Antony A, Trindade AJ, Rolston VS, D'Souza LS, Corral Hurtado JE, Gomez V, Pohl H, Draganov PV, Beyth RJ, Lee JH, Cheesman A, Uppal DS, Sejpal DV, Bucobo JC, Wallace MB, Ngamruengphong S, Ajayeoba O, Khara HS, Diehl DL, Jawaid S, Forsmark CE. Evaluating learning curves and competence in colorectal EMR among advanced endoscopy fellows: a pilot multicenter prospective trial using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:682-690.e4. [PMID: 32961243 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data on colorectal EMR (C-EMR) training are lacking. We aimed to evaluate C-EMR training among advanced endoscopy fellows (AEFs) by using a standardized assessment tool (STAT). METHODS This multicenter prospective study used a STAT to grade AEF training in C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. Cumulative sum analysis was used to establish learning curves and competence for cognitive and technical components of C-EMR and overall performance. Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying failure rates. AEFs completed a self-assessment questionnaire to assess their comfort level with performing C-EMR at the completion of their fellowship. RESULTS Six AEFs (189 C-EMRs; mean per AEF, 31.5 ± 18.5) were included. Mean polyp size was 24.3 ± 12.6 mm, and mean procedure time was 22.6 ± 16.1 minutes. Learning curve analyses revealed that less than 50% of AEFs achieved competence for key cognitive and technical C-EMR endpoints. All 6 AEFs reported feeling comfortable performing C-EMR independently at the end of their training, although only 2 of them achieved competence in their overall performance. The minimum threshold to achieve competence in these 2 AEFs was 25 C-EMRs. CONCLUSIONS A relatively low proportion of AEFs achieved competence on key cognitive and technical aspects of C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. The relatively low number of C-EMRs performed by AEFs may be insufficient to achieve competence, in spite of their self-reported readiness for independent practice. These pilot data serve as an initial framework for competence threshold, and suggest the need for validated tools for formal C-EMR training assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yu Wang
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Amir Rumman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher J DiMaio
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Antony
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Vineet S Rolston
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Lionel S D'Souza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | | | - Victoria Gomez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rebecca J Beyth
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Antonio Cheesman
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dushant S Uppal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Divyesh V Sejpal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Juan C Bucobo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olumide Ajayeoba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perbtani YB, Draganov PV, Yang D. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:777. [PMID: 33583532 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kadle N, Westerveld DR, Banerjee D, Jacobs C, Gesiotto F, Moon N, Forde JJ, Conti M, Hatamleh D, Taylor R, Brar T, Riverso M, Jawaid S, Perbtani YB, Zhang Y, Draganov PV, Beyth R, Yang D. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual colonoscopy polypectomy practices for the removal of small polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:655-662.e2. [PMID: 31669181 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is associated with higher rates of complete resection compared with cold biopsy forceps (CBF) for the removal of small polyps (4-9 mm). This study aimed to evaluate self-reported polypectomy preferences and actual practice patterns among endoscopists at an academic center and to identify factors associated with the use of CSP for small polyps. METHODS In phase A, endoscopists completed a survey evaluating preferences for polypectomy techniques. In phase B, we performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive colonoscopies with polypectomy (January 2016 to September 2018). Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify factors associated with CSP for small polyps. RESULTS Nineteen of 26 (73%) endoscopists completed the survey (phase A); 3 (15.8%) were interventional endoscopists. Most respondents indicated that they use CSP (89.5%) for small polyps and identified no reasons for choosing CBF over CSP (73.7%). In phase B, we identified 1118 colonoscopies with 2625 polypectomies for polyps ≤9 mm. Most diminutive polyps (≤3 mm) were removed with CBF (819 of 912; 90%). CBF (46.2%) was also preferentially used for removal of small polyps (n = 1713), followed by hot snare polypectomy (27.2%), and CSP (26.6%). On multivariate analysis, interventional endoscopists were associated with a higher likelihood of using CSP for small polyps (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.79; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Significant discrepancy exists between self-reported preferences and actual polypectomy practices. CBF is still preferentially used over CSP for the removal of polyps sized 4-9 mm; further strategies are needed to monitor and implement adequate polypectomy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Kadle
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Donevan R Westerveld
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Debdeep Banerjee
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Chelsea Jacobs
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Francesca Gesiotto
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Nabeel Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Justin J Forde
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mathew Conti
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Diana Hatamleh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Taylor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tony Brar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Riverso
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rebecca Beyth
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang D, Aihara H, Perbtani YB, Wang AY, Aadam AA, Tomizawa Y, Hwang JH, Zou B, Natov NS, Siegel A, Khoshknab MP, Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Khara HS, Diehl DL, Maniere T, Andrawes S, Benias P, Kumta NA, Ramay F, Kim RE, Samarasena J, Chang K, Hashimoto R, Tharian B, Inamdar S, Lan G, Sethi A, Nosler MJ, Tabash A, Othman MO, Draganov PV. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1714-E1722. [PMID: 31803823 PMCID: PMC6887644 DOI: 10.1055/a-1010-5663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Rectal lesions traditionally represent the first lesions approached during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in the West. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rectal ESD in North America. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective analysis of rectal ESD between January 2010 and September 2018 in 15 centers. End points included: rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, comparison of pre- and post-ESD histology, and factors associated with failed resection. Results In total, 171 patients (median age 63 years; 56 % men) underwent rectal ESD (median size 43 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 141 cases (82.5 %; 95 %CI 76.8-88.2), including 24 of 27 (88.9 %) with prior failed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). R0 resection rate was 74.9 % (95 %CI 68.4-81.4). Post-ESD bleeding and perforation occurred in 4 (2.3 %) and 7 (4.1 %), respectively. Covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was identified in 8.6 % of post-ESD specimens. There was one case (1/120; 0.8 %) of recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 weeks; IQR: 19-76 weeks). Older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were predictors of failed R0 resection, whereas submucosal fibrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of both failed en bloc and R0 resection. Conclusion Rectal ESD in North America is safe and is associated with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. The presence of submucosal fibrosis was the main predictor of failed en bloc and R0 resection. ESD can be considered for select rectal lesions, and serves not only to establish a definitive tissue diagnosis but also to provide curative resection for lesions with covert advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,Corresponding author Dennis Yang, MD 1329 SW 16th StreetRoom #5252GainesvilleFL 32608USA+1-352-627-9002
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Y. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Baiming Zou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Nikola S. Natov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Harshit S. Khara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David L. Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Thibaut Maniere
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrook, QC, Canada
| | - Sherif Andrawes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Petros Benias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil A. Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fariha Ramay
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raymond E. Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jason Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Rintaro Hashimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Gloria Lan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Abdalaziz Tabash
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed O. Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang D, Perbtani YB, Mramba LK, Kerdsirichairat T, Prabhu A, Manvar A, Ho S, Pannu D, Keswani RN, Strand DS, Wang AY, Quintero E, Buscaglia JM, Muniraj T, Aslanian HR, Draganov PV, Siddiqui AS. Safety and rate of delayed adverse events with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collections: a multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E1267-E1275. [PMID: 30302385 PMCID: PMC6175687 DOI: 10.1055/a-0732-502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic drainage with dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is routinely performed for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), walled-off necrosis (WON) and pseudocyst (PP). There has been increasing concern regarding delayed adverse events associated with the indwelling LAMS. Patients and methods Multicenter retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided LAMS placement for PFC from January 2010 to May 2017. Main outcomes included: (1) resolution of the PFC, (2) rate of delayed adverse events at follow-up, and (3) predictors of treatment failure and delayed adverse events on logistic regression. Results A total of 122 patients (mean age 50.9 years, 68 % male) underwent LAMS insertion for 64 WON (98.4 %) and 58 PP (98.3 %). PFC mean size was 10.6 cm. PFC resolution was significantly lower for WON (62.3 %) vs. PP (96.5 %) ( P < 0.001) on imaging at a median of 4 weeks. Stent occlusion was identified in 18 (29.5 %) and 10 (17.5 %) patients with WON and PP, respectively ( P = 0.13). There were no cases of delayed bleeding or buried stent on follow-up endoscopy. Use of electrocautery-enhanced LAMS was the only factor associated with treatment failure of WON (OR = 13.2; 95 % ci: 3.33 - 51.82, P = 0.02) on logistic regression. There were no patient, operator, or procedure-related factors predictive of stent occlusion. Conclusions EUS-guided LAMS for PFC is associated with a low incidence of delayed adverse events. While nearly all PPs resolve at 4 weeks permitting LAMS removal shortly thereafter, many WON persist, with use of electrocautery-enhanced LAMS being the sole predictor of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Lazarus K Mramba
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Tossapol Kerdsirichairat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Anoop Prabhu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Amar Manvar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
| | - Sammy Ho
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
| | - Davindebir Pannu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Rajesh N. Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Daniel S. Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Andrew Y. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Eduardo Quintero
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States
| | - Jonathan M. Buscaglia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States
| | - Thiruvengadam Muniraj
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Harry R. Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Ali S. Siddiqui
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Westerveld D, Khullar V, Mramba L, Ayoub F, Brar T, Agarwal M, Forde J, Chakraborty J, Riverso M, Perbtani YB, Gupte A, Forsmark CE, Draganov P, Yang D. Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett's esophagus: a retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E300-E307. [PMID: 29507870 PMCID: PMC5832463 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) biopsy protocol, (2) to identify predictors of practice patterns, and (3) to assess adherence to surveillance guidelines for non-dysplastic BE (NDBE). METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed for BE (June 2008 to December 2015). Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and histology results were obtained from the procedure report-generating database and chart review. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was based on operative report documentation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of practice patterns. Guideline adherent surveillance EGD was defined as those performed within 6 months of the recommended 3- to 5-year interval. RESULTS In total, 397 patients (66.5 % male; mean age 60.1 ± 12.5 years) had an index EGD during the study period. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was 27.4 % and 24.1 %, respectively. Endoscopists who performed therapeutic interventions for BE were more likely to use the Prague Criteria (OR: 3.16; 95 %CI: 1.47 - 6.82; P < 0.01) than those who did not. Longer time in practice was positively associated with adherence to Prague Criteria (OR 1.07; 95 %CI: 1.02 - 1.12; P < 0.01) but with a lower likelihood of performing systematic biopsies (OR 0.91; 95 %CI: 0.85 - 0.97; P < 0.01). More than half (55.6 %) of patients with NDBE underwent surveillance EGD sooner (range 1 - 29 months) than the recommended interval. CONCLUSION Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in BE is low. Operator characteristics, including experience with endoscopic therapy for BE and time in practice predicted practice pattern. Future efforts are needed to reduce variability in practice and promote high-value care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donevan Westerveld
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Vikas Khullar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Lazarus Mramba
- Statistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fares Ayoub
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Tony Brar
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mitali Agarwal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Justin Forde
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joydeep Chakraborty
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael Riverso
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Anand Gupte
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Chris E. Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Riverso M, Perbtani YB, Shuster JJD, Chakraborty J, Brar TS, Agarwal M, Zhang H, Gupte A, Chauhan SS, Forsmark CE, Draganov PV, Yang D. Carbon dioxide insufflation is associated with increased serrated polyp detection rate when compared to room air insufflation during screening colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E905-E912. [PMID: 28924598 PMCID: PMC5597937 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) have been increasingly recognized as precursors of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of carbon dioxide insufflation (CO 2 I) vs. room air insufflation (AI) on serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) and to identify factors associated with SPDR. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-center retrospective cohort study of 2083 screening colonoscopies performed with AI (November 2011 through January 2013) or CO 2 I (February 2013 to June 2015). Data on demographics, procedure characteristics and histology results were obtained from a prospectively maintained endoscopy database and chart review. SPDR was defined as proportion of colonoscopies in which ≥ 1 SSA, TSA or hyperplastic polyp (HP) ≥ 10 mm in the right colon was detected. Multi-variate analysis (MVA) was performed to identify predictors of SPDR. RESULTS A total of 131 histologically confirmed serrated polyps (129 SSA, 2 TSA and 0 HP ≥ 10 mm) were detected. SPDR was higher with CO 2 I vs. AI (4.8 % vs. 1.4 %; P < 0.0001). On MVA, CO 2 I was associated with higher SPDR when compared to AI (OR: 9.52; 95 % CI: 3.05 - 30.3). Both higher body mass index (OR 1.05; 95 % CI:1.02 - 1.09) and longer colonoscope withdrawal time (OR 1.11; 95 % CI: 1.07 - 1.16) were also associated with higher SPDR. CONCLUSION CO 2 I is associated with higher SPDR when compared to AI during screening colonoscopy. While the mechanism remains unknown, we speculate that the favorable gas characteristics of CO 2 compared to room air results in improved polyp detection by optimizing bowel insufflation. These findings suggest an additional reason to prefer the use of CO 2 I over AI during colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Riverso
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Jonathan J. D. Shuster
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Joydeep Chakraborty
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Tony S. Brar
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Mitali Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Han Zhang
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Anand Gupte
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Shailendra S. Chauhan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | | | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Corresponding author Dennis Yang, MD Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of Florida1329 SW 16th Street, Suite 5251Gainesville, FL 32608+1-352-627-9002
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang D, Perbtani YB, An Q, Agarwal M, Riverso M, Chakraborty J, Brar TS, Westerveld D, Zhang H, Chauhan SS, Forsmark CE, Draganov PV. Survey study on the practice patterns in the endoscopic management of malignant distal biliary obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E754-E762. [PMID: 28791325 PMCID: PMC5546911 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is a common practice. Controversy persists with regard to its role in resectable MDBO, the optimal technical method and type of stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the treatment of MDBO among endoscopists with varying levels of experience and practice backgrounds. METHODS Electronic survey distributed to members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). The main outcome measures included practice setting (academic vs. community), volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs), reasons for endoscopic drainage in MDBO, and technical approach. RESULTS A total of 335 subjects (54 % community-based endoscopists) completed the survey. Most academic physicians (69 %) reported performing ≥ 150 ERCPs annually compared to 18.8 % of community physicians ( P < 0.001). In aggregate, 13.1 % of respondents performed ERCP in resectable MDBO because of surgeon preference or as the standard of care at their institution. The use of metal vs. plastic stents in MDBO varied based on practice setting. Routine sphincterotomy for MDBO was more common among community (78 %) vs academic endoscopists (61.1 %) ( P < 0.001). Over half (58 %) of the subjects avoided covering the cystic duct take-off during stenting MDBO if there was a gallbladder in situ. CONCLUSION There is significant variability in practice patterns for the treatment of MDBO. In spite of the recent ASGE guideline recommendations, some patients with resectable MDBO still undergo preoperative ERCP. Current clinical practices are not clearly supported by available data and underscore the need to increase adherence to gastrointestinal societal recommendations and an evidence-based approach to standardized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,Corresponding author Dennis Yang, MD Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of Florida1329 SW 16th StreetSuite 5251GainesvilleFL 32608USA+1-352-627-9002
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Qi An
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mitali Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael Riverso
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Tony S. Brar
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Han Zhang
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haito-Chavez Y, Inoue H, Beard KW, Draganov PV, Ujiki M, Rahden BHA, Desai PN, Pioche M, Hayee B, Haji A, Saxena P, Reavis K, Onimaru M, Balassone V, Nakamura J, Hata Y, Yang D, Pannu D, Abbas A, Perbtani YB, Patel LY, Filser J, Roman S, Rivory J, Mion F, Ponchon T, Perretta S, Wong V, Maselli R, Ngamruengphong S, Chen YI, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Ismail A, Pieratti R, Kumbhari V, Galdos-Cardenas G, Repici A, Khashab MA. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in 1826 Patients: An International Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112:1267-1276. [PMID: 28534521 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is still debated since comprehensive analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with the procedure in large multicenter cohort studies has not been performed. To study (1) the prevalence of AEs and (2) factors associated with occurrence of AEs in patients undergoing POEM. METHODS Patients who underwent POEM at 12 tertiary-care centers between 2009 and 2015 were included in this case-control study. Cases were defined by the occurrence of any AE related to the POEM procedure. Control patients were selected for each AE case by matching for age, gender, and disease classification (achalasia type I and II vs. type III/spastic esophageal disorders). RESULTS A total of 1,826 patients underwent POEM. Overall, 156 AEs occurred in 137 patients (7.5%). A total of 51 (2.8%) inadvertent mucosotomies occurred. Mild, moderate, and severe AEs had a frequency of 116 (6.4%), 31 (1.7%), and 9 (0.5%), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sigmoid-type esophagus (odds ratio (OR) 2.28, P=0.05), endoscopist experience <20 cases (OR 1.98, P=0.04), use of a triangular tip knife (OR 3.22, P=0.05), and use of an electrosurgical current different than spray coagulation (OR 3.09, P=0.02) were significantly associated with the occurrence of AEs. CONCLUSIONS This large study comprehensively assessed the safety of POEM and highly suggests POEM as a relatively safe procedure when performed by experts at tertiary centers with an overall 7.5% prevalence of AEs. Severe AEs are rare. Sigmoid-type esophagus, endoscopist experience, type of knife, and current used can be considered as predictive factors of AE occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yamile Haito-Chavez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Burkhard H A Rahden
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Wìrzburg, Germany
| | | | - Mathieu Pioche
- Université de Lyon and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, E Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Bu Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amyn Haji
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Payal Saxena
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Manabu Onimaru
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Valerio Balassone
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Nakamura
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Hata
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Davinderbir Pannu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ali Abbas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Lava Y Patel
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Jorg Filser
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Wìrzburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Roman
- Université de Lyon and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, E Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jerome Rivory
- Université de Lyon and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, E Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Francois Mion
- Université de Lyon and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, E Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Université de Lyon and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, E Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Silvana Perretta
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vivien Wong
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Majidah Bukhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gulara Hajiyeva
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amr Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Renata Pieratti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gerson Galdos-Cardenas
- The International Health Department-Global Disease Epidemiology and Control-The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Perbtani YB, Riverso M, Shuster JJ, Chakraborty J, Brar TS, Agarwal M, Zhang H, Gupte A, Chauhan SS, Forsmark CE, Draganov PV, Yang D. Does carbon dioxide insufflation impact adenoma detection rate? A single-center retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E1275-E1279. [PMID: 27995188 PMCID: PMC5161121 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims: Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been associated with reduced post-procedural pain and improved patient satisfaction when compared to air insufflation (AI). The effect of CO2 insufflation (CO2I) on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) remains unclear. The aims of this study are to compare ADR in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy with AI vs. CO2I and identify predictors of ADR. Patients and methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 2,107 patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at the University of Florida Hospital between November 2011 and June 2015. Patient demographics, procedural parameters, and histology results were retrospectively obtained from a prospectively maintained colonoscopy database. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of ADR. Results: A total of 2107 colonoscopies (644 with AI and 1463 with CO2I) were analyzed. Overall ADR was 27.8 %. There was no significant difference in ADR between AI (27.6 %) vs. CO2I (27.8 %) (P = 0.93). Method of insufflation (AI vs. CO2I) was not significantly associated with ADR (OR 0.9; 95 % CI:0.7 - 1.2). Older age (OR: 1.02; 95 % CI: 1.001 - 1.03 per year increase), male gender (OR 1.48; 95 % CI: 1.17 - 1.87), and longer scope withdraw time (OR 1.13; 95 % CI: 1.1 - 1.16 per minute) were associated with a higher ADR. Fellow involvement was negatively associated with ADR (OR 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.47 - 0.77). Conclusion: ADR was similar between patients who underwent screening colonoscopy with AI vs. CO2I. While CO2I has been associated with improved patient comfort and post-procedural recovery time, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that this method of luminal distention enhances ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Michael Riverso
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Jonathan J. Shuster
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Joydeep Chakraborty
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Tony S. Brar
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Mitali Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Han Zhang
- Department of Medicine, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Anand Gupte
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Shailendra S. Chauhan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | | | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States,Corresponding author Dennis Yang,
MD Division of Gastroenterology, University of
Florida1329 SW 16th Street, Suite
5251Gainesville, FL 32608United
States+1-352-273-9474+1-352-627-9002
| |
Collapse
|