Investigation on pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in Chinese adult renal transplant patients

AIMS

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in Chinese renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Thirty-one renal transplant patients (17 male, 14 female) receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1.0 g twice daily were included in this study. A pharmacokinetic study was performed during an interval in dosing after steady state had been reached within 2 months after transplantation. The plasma MPA concentration were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after the administration of a single dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with 3P97 software. SAS software was used for statistical analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine limited sampling approaches.

RESULTS

The mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12)) were 19.67 +/- 8.21 microg ml(-1) and 52.16 +/- 12.50 microg h ml(-1), but there was large variability in these pharmacokinetic parameters. Regression analysis between each plasma concentration and AUC for the limited sampling strategy of MMF therapeutic drug monitoring demonstrated that each of the concentrations at 0.5, 1, 4 and 10 h was positively correlated with AUC (r = 0.60, P = 0.0004; r = 0.60, P = 0.0003; r = 0.61, P = 0.0003; r = 0.64, P = 0.0001, respectively). The combined use of these four samples explained over 90% of the variance in the total (nine-point) AUC(0-12). A formula was obtained for the assessment of MPA AUC based on four samples: MPA AUC = 12.61 + 0.37 x C(0.5) + 0.49 x C(1) + 3.22 x C(4) + 8.17 x C(10).

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese renal transplant patients had higher median AUCs than caucasians and African-Americans. As in other studies, there was large interindividual variability. A limited four-point AUC was in good agreement with the 12-h AUC and provided the basis of a predictive formula.

Limited Sampling Strategy for the Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve in Adult Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), the oral prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), is increasingly used in liver transplantation and plays a central role in the immunosuppressive regimen in liver transplantation. To study pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA in the clinical setting, limited sampling strategies have been investigated for the estimation of MPA areas under the curves (AUCs). Thirty-eight adult patients undergoing liver transplant (31 males, seven females) receiving 1.0 g MMF twice daily and concomitant tacrolimus provided a total of 72 pharmacokinetic profiles. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the algorithms for limited sampling strategies. Twenty-eight one-, two-, three-, and four-sampling estimation models were fitted (r = 0.288-0.964) to all the profiles using linear regression and were used to estimate MPA AUC0-12h comparing those estimates with the corresponding AUC0-12h values calculated with the linear trapezoidal rule, including all 10 timed MPA concentrations. The four-point estimates at C1h, C2h, C6h, and C8h resulted in the best correlation between estimated AUC and true AUC when using the formula AUC = 6.03 + 0.89C1h + 1.94C2h + 2.24C6h + 4.64 C8h (r = 0.911). Bland and Altman analysis revealed good agreement between estimated AUC and AUC from the full profile. This limited sampling strategy provides an effective approach for estimation of full MPA AUC0-12h in patients undergoing liver transplant receiving concomitant tacrolimus therapy.

Evaluation of the practicability of limited sampling strategies for the estimation of mycophenolic acid exposure in Chinese adult renal recipients

The immunosuppressive potential of mycophenolic acid (MPA) correlates well with MPA exposure [area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)]. Monitoring MPA AUC is important and helpful for maintaining the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil while minimizing its side effects, but full MPA AUC monitoring is laborious, cost prohibitive, and impractical. Limited sampling strategies have been proposed as an alternative method for estimating MPA exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practicability of different limited sampling strategies for the estimation of MPA exposure. A total of 56 pharmacokinetic profiles from 53 adult renal recipients were used to evaluate the practicability of 10 published models. Standard correlation and linear regression analysis were used to compare the estimated MPA AUCs and corresponding full MPA AUCs, and the percentage of profiles for which prediction error fell within +/-20% was also used to assess the practicability of these models. Agreement between the estimated MPA AUCs and full MPA AUCs was further tested by Bland and Altman analysis. The model, based on four sampling time points, used the formula AUC = 12.61 + 0.37 x C0.5 + 0.49 x C1 + 3.22 x C4 + 8.17 x C10, was superior to all other evaluated models, with the highest coefficient of determination (r = 0.88), a low percentage prediction error (2.79%), and good agreement according to Bland and Altman analysis. Prediction errors of 87.5% (49/56) of profiles were within 20%, which was the highest of all the models. This algorithm can be reliably used for estimating MPA exposure in adult renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine as concomitant immunosuppressant. Another model based on the formula AUC = 8.22 + 3.16 x C0 + 0.99 x C1 + 1.33 x C2 + 4.18 x C4 also has acceptable predictive performance, and it may also be practical, especially in outpatient settings, in view of its distribution of time points.