Long-term outcome following successful endoscopic closure of tracheo-oesophageal fistulas with two cardiac amplatzer septal occluders in a patient with oesophageal cancer

Acquired tracheo-oesophageal fistulas (TEFs) are rare and challenging complications in the course of oesophageal cancer. While surgery is the only curative treatment option for TEFs many patients are not eligible for surgery. Endoscopic treatment approaches such as tracheal- and/or oesophageal- stenting are available, but associated with complications like the development of new fistulas and mucus retention. Off- label-use of cardiac amplatzer occluder devices to close TEFs has been reported in few case-reports with inconsistent short-term outcomes. We report a case of successful closure of two adjacent TEFs with two partially overlapping cardiac amplatzer occluder devices. The insertion of a 12 mm and a 9 mm device was successful and without complications. The patient tolerated the cardiac amplatzer-devices well and could resume oral food uptake after 2 months. Two years after closure, the patient remained free of symptoms suggesting complete sealing of the fistulas.

Gastroesophageal Junction and Pylorus Distensibility Before and After Sleeve Gastrectomy-pilot Study with EndoFlipTM

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric surgical intervention worldwide. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently observed after SG and is a relevant clinical problem. This prospective study investigated the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and pyloric sphincter by impedance planimetry (EndoFlipTM) and their association with GERD at a tertiary university hospital center. Between January and December 2018, patients undergoing routine laparoscopic SG had pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments of the GEJ and pyloric sphincter by EndoFlipTM. The distensibility index (DI) was measured at different volumes and correlated with GERD (in accordance with the Lyon consensus guidelines). Nine patients were included (median age 48 years, preoperative BMI 45.1 kg/m2, 55.6% female). GERD (de novo or stable) was observed in 44.4% of patients one year postoperatively. At a 40-ml filling volume, DI increased significantly pre- vs. post-SG of the GEJ (1.4 mm2/mmHg [IQR 1.1-2.6] vs. 2.9 mm2/mmHg [2.6-5.3], p VALUE=0.046) and of the pylorus (6.0 mm2/mmHg [4.1-10.7] vs. 13.1 mm2/mmHg [7.6-19.2], p VALUE=0.046). Patients with postoperative de novo or stable GERD had a significantly increased preoperative DI at 40 ml of the GEJ (2.6 mm2/mmHg [1.9-3.5] vs. 0.5 mm2/mmHg [0.5-1.1], p VALUE=0.031). There was no significant difference in DI at 40 mL filling in the preoperative pylorus and postoperative GEJ or pylorus. In this prospective study, the DI of the GEJ and the pylorus significantly increased after SG. Postoperative GERD was associated with a significantly higher preoperative DI of the GEJ but not of the pylorus.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban for Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Patients After Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Clinical end point studies on thromboprophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing bariatric surgery are lacking.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of a prophylactic dose of 10 mg/d of rivaroxaban for both 7 and 28 days after bariatric surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This assessor-blinded, phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021, with participants from 3 academic and nonacademic hospitals in Switzerland.

Intervention

Patients were randomized 1 day after bariatric surgery to 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban for either 7 days (short prophylaxis) or 28 days (long prophylaxis).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) and pulmonary embolism within 28 days after bariatric surgery. Main safety outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality.

Results

Of 300 patients, 272 (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [12.1] years; 216 women [80.3%]; mean body mass index, 42.2) were randomized; 134 received a 7-day and 135 a 28-day VTE prophylaxis course with rivaroxaban. Only 1 thromboembolic event (0.4%) occurred (asymptomatic thrombosis in a patient undergoing sleeve gastrectomy with extended prophylaxis). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were observed in 5 patients (1.9%): 2 in the short prophylaxis group and 3 in the long prophylaxis group. Clinically nonsignificant bleeding events were observed in 10 patients (3.7%): 3 in the short prophylaxis arm and 7 in the long prophylaxis arm.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, once-daily VTE prophylaxis with 10 mg of rivaroxaban was effective and safe in the early postoperative phase after bariatric surgery in both the short and long prophylaxis groups.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03522259.

Vacuum-Sponge Therapy Placed through a Percutaneous Gastrostomy to Treat Spontaneous Duodenal Perforation

Duodenal perforation is rare and associated with a high mortality. Therapeutic strategies to address duodenal perforation include conservative, surgical, and endoscopic measures. Surgery remains the gold standard. However, endoscopic management is gaining ground mostly with the use of over-the-scope clips and vacuum-sponge therapy. A 67-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency room for persistent epigastric pain, melena, and signs of sepsis. The physical assessment revealed reduced bowel sounds, involuntary guarding, and rebound tenderness in the upper abdominal quadrant. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed the suspicion of ulcer perforation. The initial laparoscopic surgical approach required conversion to laparotomy with overstitching of the perforation. In the postoperative course, the patient developed signs of increased inflammation and dyspnea. A CT scan and an endoscopy revealed a postoperative leakage and pneumonia. We placed an endoscopic duodenal intraluminal vacuum-sponge therapy with endoscopic negative pressure for 21 days. The leakage healed and the patient was discharged. Most experience in endoscopic vacuum-sponge therapy for gastrointestinal perforations has been gained in the area of esophageal and rectal transmural defects, whereas only few reports have described its use in duodenal perforations. In our case, the need for further surgical management could be avoided in a patient with multiple comorbidities and a reduced clinical status. Moreover, the pull-through technique via PEG for sponge placement reduces the intraluminal distance of the Eso-Sponge tube by shortcutting the length of the esophagus, thus decreasing the risk of dislocation and increasing the chance of successful treatment.

RefluxStopTM, a novel device to address gastroesophageal reflux disease: Short-term results

Objective

To report safety, feasibility, and patient’s functional short-term outcome of novel RefluxStop anti reflux operation.

Methods

All patients (n = 20) who received laparoscopic implantation of the RefluxStop device from September 2018 to November 2020 in a university hospital were included for retrospective analysis.

Incidence of adverse device-effects and procedure-related adverse events are reported as safety endpoints.

Feasibility was assessed reporting operation duration, rate of conversion to open surgery and technically correct position of the device by control radiography during patient’s follow up. Subjective (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) - questionnaires; after 6 weeks and every six-month thereof) and objective data (24h-pH-manometry, barium swallows and upper endoscopies) are reported as functional outcome parameters. Comparison between values at baseline versus post-procedure follow-up are performed using the paired samples T-test, if appropriate.

Results

Median follow up was 4 (1 – 22) month. Three out of 20 patients had previous upper gastrointestinal surgery (EndoStim implantation). No serious adverse device related events occurred. One patient with dysphagia required balloon dilatation at the oesophageal gastric junction 4 weeks postoperatively.

Median duration of surgery was 85 (59-188) minutes. There was no conversion to open surgery. There was significant reduction in the mean of total GERD-HRQL score at baseline compared to 6-weeks after surgery with 23.9 and 4.3 (p < 0.001) as well as at baseline and 6 month after surgery with 28.4 and 6.8 (p = 0.021), respectively. At 6 weeks follow up, all of the subjects had over 50% improvement of the GERD-HRQL score compared to baseline. One patient with acceptable device positioning developed symptom recurrence and received conversion to laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication after 10 months.

Conclusion

RefluxStop procedure seems to be a safe operation with promising short-term results. For high-level recommendation, further studies looking for long-term results and randomized comparisons to the standard anti reflux procedures like Nissen or Toupet fundoplication are required.

De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric procedure to date. However, LSG is known to worsen pre-operative and result in de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Pre-operative evaluation reveals a high percentage of silent GERD of so far unknown influence on post-operative GERD.

METHODS

Prospective data of patients undergoing primary LSG between 01/2012 and 12/2015 were evaluated. Pre-operative GERD-specific evaluation consisted of validated questionnaires, upper endoscopy, 24 h-pH-manometry, and esophagograms. Patients were followed-up with questionnaires every 6 months, upper endoscopies after 1 year and 24 h-pH-metry after 2 years. Silent GERD was defined as esophagitis grade > B and/or abnormal esophageal acid exposure in absence of symptoms. LSG was performed over a 32F bougie, hiatal hernias > 1 cm were addressed with posterior hiatoplasty. Excluded were patients with hiatal hernias > 4 cm, patients with incorrect anatomy (stenosis, fundus too large) and conversion to RYGB for early leaks.

RESULTS

222 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 32 ± 16 months, mean preoperative body mass index 49.6 ± 7.2 kg/m². 116 patients (52%) presented with post-operative GERD-symptoms, of which 85 (73%) had de novo symptoms. Of those, 48 (of 85, 56%) had no preoperative GERD and 37 (of 85, 44%) silent GERD. 57 patients (26%) had neither pre- nor post-operative GERD, 7 (3%) had silent pre-operative and no postop GERD, and in 19 patients (9%) GERD was cured with LSG. 31 patients (14%) stayed symptomatic. Of 56 patients (25%) with pre-operative silent GERD, 37 (of 54, 66%) became symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

LSG leads to a considerable rate of post-operative GERD. De novo-GERD consist of around half of pre-operative silent GERD and completely de novo-GERD. Most patients with pre-operative silent GERD became symptomatic.

Radiologic, endoscopic, and functional patterns in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard in treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resolution of GERD symptoms is reported to be approximately 85% to 90%.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patients with persistent GERD symptoms after RYGB and to identify contributing factors.

SETTING

University hospital, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data of patients evaluated for persistent GERD with a history of RYGB between January 2012 and December 2015 were reviewed. GERD was assessed with questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-impendance manometry, and barium swallow.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients, 44 (93.6%) presented with typical GERD, 18 (38.3%) with obstruction, 8 (17%) with pulmonary symptoms, and 21 (44.7%) with pain. The interval between RYGB and evaluation was a median of 3.8 years (range .8-12.6); median patient age was 36.5 years (19.1-67.2). Median body mass index was 30.3 kg/m² (20.3-47.2). Pouch gastric fistulas were seen in 2 (5.1%), enlarged pouches in 5 (10.6%), and hiatal hernias in 25 patients (53.2%). Twelve (23.4%) had esophagitis>Los Angeles (LA) grade B. Manometry was performed in 45 (95.7%) and off-proton pump inhibitor 24-hour pH-impedance-metry in 44 patients (94.6%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) had esophageal hypomotility or aperistalsis; hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was seen in 26 patients (57.8%). Increased esophageal acid exposure (>4% pH<4) was found in 27 (61.4%), an increased number of reflux episodes (>53) in 30 patients (68.2%). Symptoms were deemed as functional in 6 (12.8%).

CONCLUSION

The evaluation for persistent GERD after RYGB revealed a high percentage of hiatal hernias, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, and severe esophageal motility disorders. These findings might have an influence on hiatal hernia closure concomitant with RYGB and the role of pH manometry in the preoperative bariatric assessment.

Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Sleeve gastrectomy is increasingly used in the treatment of morbid obesity, but its long-term outcome vs the standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there are differences between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in terms of weight loss, changes in comorbidities, increase in quality of life, and adverse events.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Swiss Multicenter Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS), a 2-group randomized trial, was conducted from January 2007 until November 2011 (last follow-up in March 2017). Of 3971 morbidly obese patients evaluated for bariatric surgery at 4 Swiss bariatric centers, 217 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a 5-year follow-up period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (n = 107) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 110).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was weight loss, expressed as percentage excess body mass index (BMI) loss. Exploratory end points were changes in comorbidities and adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the 217 patients (mean age, 45.5 years; 72% women; mean BMI, 43.9) 205 (94.5%) completed the trial. Excess BMI loss was not significantly different at 5 years: for sleeve gastrectomy, 61.1%, vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 68.3% (absolute difference, -7.18%; 95% CI, -14.30% to -0.06%; P = .22 after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Gastric reflux remission was observed more frequently after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (60.4%) than after sleeve gastrectomy (25.0%). Gastric reflux worsened (more symptoms or increase in therapy) more often after sleeve gastrectomy (31.8%) than after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (6.3%). The number of patients with reoperations or interventions was 16/101 (15.8%) after sleeve gastrectomy and 23/104 (22.1%) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with morbid obesity, there was no significant difference in excess BMI loss between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years of follow-up after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00356213.

Pouch Reshaping for Significant Weight Regain after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Significant weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) occurs in around 20 % of patients in the long term. Anatomical reasons include dilatation of the gastric pouch and/or the pouch-jejunal anastomosis, leading to loss of restriction. Pouch reshaping (PR) aims at reestablishing restriction with a subsequent feeling of satiety. This study reports the outcome of PR embedded in a multidisciplinary treatment pathway.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients after PR for weight regain >30 % following RYGB in a university hospital between October 2010 and March 2016 were analyzed. Excluded were patients with PR for gastro-gastric fistulae, hypoglycemia, candy cane syndrome, and concomitant alteration of limb lengths. PR consisted in laparoscopic lateral resection of the gastric pouch, the anastomosis and the proximal 5 cm of the alimentary limb over a 32F bougie.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after PR was 48 months (range 24-60). Median BMI at PR was 39.1 kg/m² (32.7-59.1). Median operation time was 85 min (25-190), and median length of stay was 3 days (1-35). Minor complications (grade ≤ 2) occurred in seven (27 %) patients and major complications (grade ≥ 3) in four patients (15 %). Nadir BMI and %EBMIL after PR were 32.9 kg/m² and 43.3 %, reached after a median of 12 months (3-48). Comorbidities were resolved in 81 %. After 48 months, median BMI was 33.8 kg/m² (20.4-49.2) and %EBMIL was 61.4 (39.1-121.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Used selectively in a multidisciplinary treatment pathway, PR leads to prolonged weight stabilization around the previous nadir. However, its associated perioperative morbidity must not be disregarded.

Symptoms, endoscopic findings and reflux monitoring results in candidates for bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients with obesity. Diagnosing GERD is important as bariatric operations have different influence on GERD. We assessed reflux symptoms and objective findings prior to surgery.

METHODS

Work-up included esophageal symptoms quantification by VAS-scores, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and 24-h impedance-pH (imp-pH) monitoring off PPI therapy. Imp-pH was classified as abnormal if either %time pH<4 was abnormal, total number of reflux episodes was elevated or symptom index (SI) was positive.

RESULTS

Among 100 consecutive patients (68F, age 40±11years, BMI 44.9±6.9kg/m²) 54% reported heartburn and/or regurgitation, 71% had objective evidence of GERD (38% endoscopic lesions and 33% only abnormal imp-pH results). Imp-pH was superior to EGD in identifying GERD (sensitivity 85% vs. 54%, p<0.01). Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients had similar prevalence of esophageal lesions (37% vs. 39%) and abnormal imp-pH findings (68% vs. 50%). Sixty nine percent of patients with abnormal %time pH<4 had a normal number of reflux episodes.

CONCLUSION

Half of patients with obesity reported typical GERD symptoms and >70% had evidence of GERD. Poor acid clearance was the main mechanisms. Since typical reflux symptoms don't predict objective findings, endoscopy and reflux monitoring should be part of the surgery work-up especially before restrictive procedures.

Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Morbidly obese patients with excessive concomitant disease carry a significantly increased perioperative risk. Although they may benefit most from a bariatric intervention, they are often denied surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), as it is less complication-prone than other bariatric procedures, suits the needs of those patients.

OBJECTIVE

To review the short-term outcome of LSG for high-risk patients SETTING: University hospital, Switzerland.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with high perioperative risk undergoing LSG between January 2008 and December 2014 were prospectively recorded. Patients were defined as "high-risk" if they met 2 of the following criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score (ASA)>III, Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS)≥4, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) class IV, Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Severity Index (OSA-SI)≥5, renal insufficiency chronic kidney disease ≥3, liver cirrhosis, or history of life-threatening perioperative events.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 59 (54%) were male. Median age was 49 years (range: 18-69), and median BMI was 51.7 kg/m² (38.7-89.2). Median operating time was 65 minutes (27-260). Eighty-six patients (78%) were classified as ASA IV, 65 (59%) as RCRI class IV, 51 (46%) as OS-MRS≥4 and 63 (57%) as OSA-SI≥5. Eighty-nine (81%) had type 2 diabetes, 70 (64%) were under antiplatelet and or anticoagulant therapy. Four patients (4%) were converted to open. Length of stay was 5 days (1-70). Major complications occurred in 12 patients (11%), including 1 mortality (1%).

CONCLUSION

"High-risk"-patients identified using a combination of established obesity- and co-morbidity-related risk scores profit from LSG as part of a uniform treatment pathway. Given the severity of co-morbidities, LSG can be performed safely. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;X:XXX-XXX.) © 2016 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Gastric resection, short bowel syndrome, and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for development of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Reasons are multifactorial and not completely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of EPI after distal (dRYGB) and proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pRYGB) and to assess the influence of respective limb lengths.

SETTING

University hospital, Switzerland.

METHODS

The study comprised 188 consecutive patients who underwent primary dRYGB (common channel<120 cm, biliopancreatic limb 80-100 cm) or pRYGB (alimentary limb = 155 cm, biliopancreatic limb 40-75 cm) and who were followed-up for at least 2 years. Patients with a history of gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary resection (except for cholecystectomy), postoperative pregnancy, and any revision of RYGB (gastric pouch, limb lengths) were excluded. EPI was defined by clinical symptoms in combination with fecal pancreatic elastase-1<200 μg/g stool or fecal pancreatic elastase-1>200 and<500 μg/g stool and positive dechallenge-rechallenge test with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 52.2 months (range 24-120). Seventy-nine patients (42%) underwent dRYGB, and 109 (58%) underwent pRYGB. Of those, 59 (31%) patients were diagnosed with EPI after a mean 12.5±16.3 months. There was a significant difference between dRYGB and pRYGB groups in initial body mass index (dRYGB 47.1±8.1 kg/m(2) versus pRYGB 42.7±6.1 kg/m(2); P<.01), patients in Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score group C (13% versus 3%; P = .02), and prevalence of EPI (48% versus 19%; P<.01). Neither overall small bowel length nor absolute or relative limb lengths were influencing factors on EPI after dRYGB.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of EPI after dRYGB (48%) and pRYGB (19%) is of clinical importance. There was no significant difference in absolute or relative limb lengths between EPI and non-EPI groups after dRYGB.

Bilateral chylothorax following neck dissection: a case report

Background

Chylothorax is an extremely rare but potentially life-threatening complication after radical neck dissection. We report the case of a bilateral chylothorax after total thyroidectomy and cervico-central and cervico-lateral lymphadenectomy for thyroid carcinoma.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old European woman underwent total thyroidectomy and neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Postoperatively she developed dyspnoea and pleural effusion. A chylothorax was found and the initial conservative therapy was not successful. She had to be operated on again and the thoracic duct was legated.

Conclusion

The case presentation reports a very rare complication after total thyroidectomy and neck dissection, but it has to be kept in mind to prevent dangerous complications.

[Aftercare following bariatric surgery]

With the increase of patients after bariatric and metabolic surgery the long-term follow-up of this population will become a challenge. Bariatric patients require regular and life-long follow-up in order to affect the long-term achievements of this therapy in a positive way. For that reason bariatric patients should be followed in the first phase by a multidisciplinary team of the bariatric centre. Taking into account some fundamental considerations general practinioner should be involved in the care of these patients when a stable situation occured.

Effects of postbariatric surgery weight loss on adipokines and metabolic parameters: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) lead to rapid improvement in insulin sensitivity even before weight loss occurs. Adipokines are closely linked to obesity and insulin resistance. To date, it is unclear whether the different anatomic changes of the various bariatric procedures have different effects on hormones of adipocyte origin. In the present prospective, randomized study, we compared the 1-year follow-up results of LRYGB and LSG concerning weight loss, metabolic control, and fasting adipokine levels.

METHODS

Of 23 nondiabetic morbidly obese patients, 12 were randomized to LRYGB and 11 to LSG. The patients were investigated before and 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. The fasting levels of glucose, insulin, lipids, and adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, and fibroblast growth factor-21) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The body weight decreased markedly (P <.001) after either procedure (percentage of weight loss 16.4% ± 1.3%, 24.8% ± 1.7%, and 34.5% ± 2.7% after LRYGB and 13.1% ± 1.1%, 20.7% ± 1.5%, and 27.9% ± 2.6% after LSG at 2, 6, and 12 mo, respectively). The Homeostasis Model Assessment Index declined from 8.0 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 2.9 ± .2 at 12 months after LRYGB and from 7.5 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 3.3 ± .3 at 12 months after LSG. The lipid profiles were normalized. The concentrations of circulating leptin levels decreased by almost 50% as early as 1 week postoperatively and continued to decrease until 12 months postoperatively. Adiponectin increased progressively. The fibroblast growth factor-21 levels did not change over time. No difference was found between the LRYGB and LSG groups.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures led to significant weight loss associated with the resolution of the metabolic syndrome. The serum leptin levels decreased and adiponectin increased with weight loss, paralleled by improved insulin sensitivity.

[Rectal erosion caused by a prosthesis for treatment of vaginal prolapse (Prolift)]

Contexte : La place des prothèses non résorbables dans la chirurgie du prolapsus vaginal a pris beaucoup d'ampleur ces dernières années. Les complications tardives commencent à apparaître. Cas : Nous vous présentons le cas d'une érosion tardive dans le bas rectum. Pour autant que nous sachions, il s'agit de la première mention de cette complication tardive de la prothèse Prolift. Dans ce cas, il s'agit probablement d'une nécrose de décubitus attribuable à une prothèse trop longue. Conclusion : Les prothèses non résorbables sont certainement une option dans le traitement des prolapsus vaginaux; toutefois, les complications de ces implants devraient être connues et les patientes devraient être avisées des risques.