A Multimodal Cardioprotection Strategy During Cardiac Surgery: The ProCCard Study

OBJECTIVE

The ProCCard study tested whether combining several cardioprotective interventions would reduce the myocardial and other biological and clinical damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Multicenter tertiary care hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

210 patients scheduled to undergo aortic valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

A control group (standard of care) was compared to a treated group combining five perioperative cardioprotective techniques: anesthesia with sevoflurane, remote ischemic preconditioning, close intraoperative blood glucose control, moderate respiratory acidosis (pH 7.30) just before aortic unclamping (concept of the "pH paradox"), and gentle reperfusion just after aortic unclamping.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the postoperative 72-h area under the curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI). Secondary endpoints were biological markers and clinical events occurring during the 30 postoperative days and the prespecified subgroup analyses. The linear relationship between the 72-h AUC for hsTnI and aortic clamping time, significant in both groups (p < 0.0001), was not modified by the treatment (p = 0.57). The rate of adverse events at 30 days was identical. A non-significant reduction of the 72-h AUC for hsTnI (-24%, p = 0.15) was observed when sevoflurane was administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (46% of patients in the treated group). The incidence of postoperative renal failure was not reduced (p = 0.104).

CONCLUSION

This multimodal cardioprotection has not demonstrated any biological or clinical benefit during cardiac surgery. The cardio- and reno-protective effects of sevoflurane and remote ischemic preconditioning therefore remain to be demonstrated in this context.

Impact of Age on Systemic Inflammatory Profile of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Aging is associated with a chronic low-grade inflammatory state. This condition may affect the acute inflammatory response involved in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to compare the profile of a set of circulating inflammatory markers between young and older patients admitted for STEMI or AIS.

METHODS

HIBISCUS-STEMI (Cohort of Patients to Identify Biological and Imaging Markers of Cardiovascular Outcomes in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) and HIBISCUS-STROKE (Cohort of Patients to Identify Biological and Imaging Markers of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Stroke) are 2 cohort studies that enrolled patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the cardiac intensive care unit of Lyon and patients with AIS treated with mechanical thrombectomy in the Lyon Stroke Center, respectively from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified as older if they were ≥65 years and as young if they were <65 years. In both cohorts, CRP (C-reactive protein), IL (interleukin)-6, IL-8, IL-10, MCP (monocyte chemoattractant protein), sTNF-RI (soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I), sST2 (soluble form suppression of tumorigenicity 2), and VCAM-1 (vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1) were measured on serum collected at 5 time points using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A multiple logistic regression model was performed to detect an association between area under the curve of circulating inflammatory markers within the first 48 hours and older age.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients with STEMI and 164 patients with AIS were included. Of them, there were 76 (29%) and 105 (64%) older patients with STEMI and AIS, respectively. Following multivariable analysis, a high area under the curve of IL-6 and sTNF-RI, a low lymphocyte count, and a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at 24 hours were associated with older age in patients with STEMI and AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients had higher IL-6 and sTFN-RI levels within the first 48 hours associated with a lower lymphocyte count and a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at 24 hours in both cohorts.

Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence that fractional flow reserve (FFR) is effective in guiding therapeutic strategy in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond prespecified percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary graft surgery candidates.

OBJECTIVES

The FUTURE (FUnctional Testing Underlying coronary REvascularization) trial aimed to evaluate whether a treatment strategy based on FFR was superior to a traditional strategy without FFR in the treatment of multivessel CAD.

METHODS

The FUTURE trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label superiority trial. Multivessel CAD candidates were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment strategy based on FFR in all stenotic (≥50%) coronary arteries or to a traditional strategy without FFR. In the FFR group, revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) was indicated for FFR ≤0.80 lesions. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped prematurely by the data safety and monitoring board after a safety analysis and 927 patients were enrolled. At 1-year follow-up, by intention to treat, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates between groups (14.6% in the FFR group vs 14.4% in the control group; hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.36; P = 0.85). The difference in all-cause mortality was nonsignificant, 3.7% in the FFR group versus 1.5% in the control group (hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-5.18; P = 0.06), and this was confirmed with a 24 months' extended follow-up. FFR significantly reduced the proportion of revascularized patients, with more patients referred to exclusively medical treatment (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with multivessel CAD, we did not find evidence that an FFR-guided treatment strategy reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death at 1-year follow-up. (Functional Testing Underlying Coronary Revascularisation; NCT01881555).

Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: As inflammation following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is both beneficial and deleterious, there is a need to find new biomarkers of STEMI severity.

Objective: We hypothesized that the circulating concentration of the soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptors 1 and 2 (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) might predict clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.

Methods: We enrolled into a prospective cohort 251 consecutive STEMI patients referred to our hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization. Blood samples were collected at five time points: admission and 4, 24, 48 h, and 1 month after admission to assess sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 serum concentrations. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1 month.

Results: sTNFR1 concentration increased at 24 h with a median of 580.5 pg/ml [95% confidence interval (CI): 534.4–645.6]. sTNFR2 increased at 48 h with a median of 2,244.0 pg/ml [95% CI: 2090.0–2,399.0]. Both sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 peak levels were correlated with infarct size and left ventricular end-diastolic volume and inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with sTNFR1 or sTNFR2 concentration above the median value were more likely to experience an adverse clinical event within 24 months after STEMI [hazards ratio (HR): 8.8, 95% CI: 4.2–18.6, p < 0.0001 for sTNFR1; HR: 6.1, 95% CI: 2.5 –10.5, p = 0.0003 for sTNFR2]. Soluble TNFR1 was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events and was more powerful than troponin I (p = 0.04 as compared to the troponin AUC).

Conclusion: The circulating sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are inflammatory markers of morphological and functional injury after STEMI. sTNFR1 appears as an early independent predictor of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.

Kinetics and prognostic value of soluble VCAM-1 in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients

BACKGROUND

Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) is a biomarker of endothelial activation and inflammation. There is still controversy as to whether it can predict clinical outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our aim was to assess the sVCAM-1 kinetics and to evaluate its prognostic predictive value.

METHOD

We prospectively enrolled 251 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent coronary revascularization in our university hospital. Blood samples were collected at admission, 4, 24, 48 h and 1 month after admission. sVCAM-1 serum level was assessed using ELISA assay. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1-month for infarct size (IS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Clinical outcomes were recorded over 12 months after STEMI.

RESULTS

sVCAM-1 levels significantly increased from admission up to 1 month and were significantly correlated with IS, LVEF, and LV end-systolic and diastolic volume. (H48 area under curve (AUC) ≥ H48 median) were associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events during the 12-month follow-up period with a hazard ratio (HR) = 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] of ratio = 1.2-5.6, p = .02). The ability of H48 AUC for sVCAM-1 to discriminate between patients with or without the composite endpoint was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics with an AUC at 0.67 (0.57-0.78, p = .004). This ability was significantly superior to H48 AUC creatine kinase (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients, high sVCAM-1 levels are associated with a poor clinical outcome. sVCAM-1 is an early postmyocardial infarction biomarker and might be an interesting target for the development of future therapeutic strategies.

IL-10 / IL-6 serum ratio as a prognosis marker of STEMI

Introduction

IL-6 and IL-10 are two major cytokines secreted at the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI). IL-6 has a pro-inflammatory effect whereas IL-10 has anti-inflammatory effect.

Objective

Our objective was to assess the prognosis value of IL-6, IL-10 and IL-10/IL-6 ratio serum level at the acute phase of ST elevation MI (STEMI).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 247 patients admitted for acute STEMI from 2016 to 2019. Blood samples were collected at 5 time points: admission, 4, 24, 48 hours and 1 month (H4, H24, H48, M1). IL-6 and IL-10 were assessed using ELISA. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at one month for infarct size (IS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Clinical outcomes were prospectively recorded over 18 months.

Results

Patient mean age was 59±12 years. IL-6 reached a peak at H24 at 5.4 pg/mL interquartile range (IQR) [2.1–11.0] and IL-10 peaked as early as admission at 5.6 pg/mL IQR [8.7–29.3] followed by a decrease within the first month. Median IL-10/IL-6 ratio at admission was 4.2 [1.4–8.6] with a strong decrease at H24 (0.5 [0.2–1.3]). IL-6 and IL-10 levels at H24 were correlated with IS (respectively r=0.44, p&lt;0.0001, and r=0.29, p=0.0001) and inversely correlated with LVEF (respectively r=−0.42, p&lt;0.0001 and r=−0.26, p=0.0003). Patients with IL-10/IL-6 ratio ≥1 had smaller IS compared to patients with IL-10/IL-6 ratio &lt;1 (respectively 9.0% IQR [2.4–15.4] of LV versus 17% IQR [8.7–29.3] of LV, p&lt;0.0001) and they had higher LVEF (58.0% IQR [52.0–62.3] versus 49.0% IQR [41.5–56.0], p&lt;0.0001). Patients with IL-10/IL-6 ratio &lt;1 were more likely to have an adverse clinical event (MI, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause death) during the first 18 months after STEMI compared to patients with IL-10/IL-6 ratio ≥1 (HR=2.7, 95% CI [1.2–5.5], p=0.04).

Conclusion

Serum IL-10/IL-6 &gt;1 was associated with a poor outcome after STEMI and might be a valuable prognostic marker.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospices Civils de Lyon, Fédération Française de Cardiologie

Multimodal cardioprotective strategy in cardiac surgery (the ProCCard trial): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Myocardial damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery increases both morbidity and mortality. Different protective strategies dealing with either preconditioning or postconditioning or assessing a single aspect of cardioprotection have shown conflicting results. We tested the hypothesis that a multimodal approach would improve cardioprotection and limit myocardial damage following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

This study is a pragmatic multicenter (six French institutions), prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. The randomization is stratified by centers. In the study, 210 patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting will be assigned to a control or a treatment group (105 patients in each group). In the control group, patients receive total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and liberal intraoperative blood glucose management (initiation of insulin infusion when blood glucose, measured every 60 min, is greater than 180 mg/dl), as a standard of care. The treatment group receives a bundle of care combining five techniques of cardioprotection: (1) remote ischemic preconditioning applied before aortic cross-clamping; (2) maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane; (3) tight intraoperative blood glucose management (initiation of insulin infusion when blood glucose, measured every 30 min, is greater than 140 mg/dl); (4) moderate respiratory acidosis (pH 7.30) at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass; and (5) a gentle reperfusion protocol following aortic unclamping. The primary outcome is myocardial damage measured by postoperative 72-h area under the curve of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I.

DISCUSSION

The ProCCard study will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to assess the role of a bundle of care combining several cardioprotective strategies to reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03230136 . Registered on July 26, 2017. Last updated on April 17, 2019.