Molecular Insights into the Architecture of the Human SMC5/6 Complex

A family of Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) complexes is essential for key cellular processes ensuring proper cohesion, condensation and replication. They share a common SMC-kleisin architecture allowing them to embrace DNA. In SMC5/6, the NSE1 and NSE3 KITE and NSE4 kleisin subunits form a stable subcomplex that binds DNA and regulates essential processes. In addition, NSE5 and NSE6 subunits associate with the core SMC5/6 complex and recruit it to DNA repair sites. The architecture of the SMC5/6 complex is crucial for its proper functioning, and mutations within the human SMC5/6 subunits result in severe syndromes. Therefore, we aimed to analyze interactions within the human SMC5/6 complex and determine its detailed architecture. Firstly, we analyzed different parts of SMC5/6 by crosslinking and MS/MS analysis. Our data suggested domain arrangements of hNSE1-hNSE3 and orientation of hNSE4 within the hNSE1-hNSE3-hNSE4 subcomplex. The crosslinking and electron microscopic analysis of the SMC5/6 core complex showed its rod-like architecture with juxtaposed hSMC5-hSMC6 arms. Additionally, we observed fully or partially opened hSMC5-hSMC6 shapes with the hNSE1-hNSE3-hNSE4 trimer localized in the SMC head domains. To complete mapping of the human SMC5/6 complex architecture, we analyzed positions of hNSE5-hNSE6 at the hSMC5-hSMC6 arms. We showed that hNSE6 binding to hNSE5 and the coiled-coil arm of hSMC6 is mediated by a conserved FAM178 domain, which we therefore renamed CANIN (Coiled-coil SMC6 And NSE5 INteracting) domain. Interestingly, hNSE6 bound both hSMC5 and hSMC6 arms, suggesting that hNSE6 may lock the arms and regulate the dynamics of the human SMC5/6 complex.

A combined immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometric approach to determine deltaNp63-interacting partners

Expression of p63 is essential for the formation of epidermis and other stratifying epithelia. Moreover p63 is highly expressed in several epithelial cancers and is involved in tumourigenesis and controlling chemo-sensitivity. The identification of p63 interacting partners is essential for understanding the complex network of gene regulation managing epithelial development and could also help to reveal signalling pathways participating in UV-damage response in human skin. We used a proteomic approach to identify proteins that interact with deltaNp63. Proteins were isolated by immunoprecipitation with deltaNp63 specific antibody and analysed by mass spectrometry. We identified 23 proteins as potential deltaNp63 binding partners that were not present in negative control samples. These results will be evaluated using other methods.

Proteomic profiling of human embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reveals a risk of transfer of proteins of bovine and mouse origin

BACKGROUND AIMS

Microvesicles (MV) shed from the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells, including human embryonic stem cells (hESC), contain proteins, lipids and RNA and serve as mediators of cell-to-cell communication. However, they may also contain immunogenic membrane domains and infectious particles acquired from xenogenic components of the culture milieu. Therefore, MV represent a potential risk for clinical application of cell therapy.

METHODS

We tested the ability of hESC and their most commonly used feeder cells, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF), to produce MV. We found that hESC are potent producers of MV, whereas mitotically inactivated MEF do not produce any detectable MV. We therefore employed a combined proteomic approach to identify the molecules that constitute the major components of MV from hESC maintained in a standard culture setting with xenogenic feeder cells.

RESULTS

In purified MV fractions, we identified a total of 22 proteins, including five unique protein species that are known to be highly expressed in invasive cancers and participate in cellular activation, metastasis and inhibition of apoptosis. Moreover, we found that hESC-derived MV contained the immunogenic agents apolipoprotein and transferrin, a source of Neu5Gc, as well as mouse retroviral Gag protein.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that MV represent a mechanism by which hESC communicate; however, they also serve as potential carriers of immunogenic and pathogenic compounds acquired from environment. Our results highlight a potential danger regarding the use of hESC that have previously been exposed to animal proteins and cells.