[Evolution of the rate of episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries since the last recommendations of 2018]

OBJECTIVES

There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department.

METHODS

Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery.

RESULTS

We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.

[National survey about the practice of episiotomy within French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVE

The main endpoint was to perform a survey about the practices of episiotomy into a CNGOF (National College of French Obstetricians and Gynecologists) members population.

METHODS

In November 2018, it was proceeded to a national survey from CNGOF members thanks to an online questionnaire. We collected prospectively: the answerer's characteristics, the rate of episiotomy and its systematics indications for spontaneous and operative delivery, the habits of the practitioners for the section and the reparation, the modalities of women's information and the data entered into the medical record.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty nine CNGOF members answered to the survey. They were 69% to declare performing less than 10% of episiotomy in case of spontaneous vertex delivery. The most frequent systematic indication of episiotomy was the personal history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (more than 30% of answerers). Systematic episiotomy was less frequent in case of vacuum assisted operative delivery compared to forceps (OR=0.18 [0.08-0.37]) or spatulas (OR=0.28 [0.12-0.59]). Most of practitioners (94%) declared performing mediolateral episiotomies, 64% declared cutting with an equal or more than 45° angle and 50% declared using a resorbable continuous suture technique for the reparation. Half of the answerers (46%) indicated that they inform et collected women's consent before performing an episiotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Several practices, women's information, section angle and the reparation technique are subject to change by the latest 2018 CNGOF guidelines about perineal protection.

[Perineal risk and obstetrical protection: A survey with birth professionals]

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to evaluate the practices declared by birth professionals in the Lorraine region about perineal obstetric protection (any perineal tear combined). The secondary objective was to evaluate prevention measures performed in practice by birth professionals according to the perineal risk subjectively estimated for each obstetric situation.

METHODS

This is a practice survey conducted through an anonymous questionnaire distributed to birth professionals (gynecologists, interns, midwife and midwife student) in October 2016. Topics covered concerned maternal, obstetric and fetal risk factors associated with perineal (1st to 4th degrees) lesions and the associated protective measures. A descriptive analysis of the data collected was conducted.

RESULTS

One hundred and five professionals answered the questionnaire. The identified risk factors were consistent with those highlighted in the literature. Other factors, not known as associated with perineal risk, were cited by professionals (smoking, phototype). If the professional perceived a significant perineal risk, they more frequently practiced an episiotomy (15% vs. 0%, P<0.001) or considered that the delivery should be performed by an obstetrician (34% vs 8%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This evaluation shows that birth professionals know the main risk factors for perineal injury. On the other hand, they easily use perineal protection maneuvers (episiotomy for example) without real demonstrated effectiveness.

[Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF Clinical Practice Guidelines (short version)]

INTRODUCTION

The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to analyse all of the interventions during pregnancy and childbirth that might prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and postnatal pelvic floor symptoms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

These guidelines were developed in accordance with the methods prescribed by the French Health Authority (HAS).

RESULTS

A prenatal clinical examination of the perineum is recommended for women with a history of Crohn's disease, OASIS, genital mutilation, or perianal lesions (professional consensus). Just after delivery, a perineal examination is recommended to check for OASIS (Grade B); if there is doubt about the diagnosis, a second opinion should be requested (GradeC). In case of OASIS, the injuries (including their severity) and the technique for their repair should be described in detail (GradeC). Perineal massage during pregnancy must be encouraged among women who want it (Grade B). No intervention conducted before the start of the active phase of the second stage of labour has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of perineal injury. The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). In instrumental deliveries, episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (GradeC). When an episiotomy is performed, a mediolateral incision is recommended (Grade B). The indication for episiotomy should be explained to the woman, and she should consent before its performance. Advising women to have a caesarean delivery for primary prevention of postnatal urinary or anal incontinence is not recommended (Grade B). During pregnancy and again in the labour room, obstetrics professionals should focus on the woman's expectations and inform her about the modes of delivery.

[Fetal expulsion: Which interventions for perineal prevention? CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The objective for all obstetricians and midwifes who intervene during the release of the fetal presentation is to prevent at best the perineal lesions. This work consisted in analyzing the literature, researching and evaluating interventions that reduce this perineal risk during the release.

METHODS

A keyword search for each medical intervention during the expulsion phase was conducted by selecting studies assessing perineal risk. Interventions during pregnancy and during delivery before the expulsion phase were specifically addressed in other sections of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Firstly, the degree of perineal stretching during the second stage of labour does not appear to be a risk factor for OASIS, postpartum incontinence, or sexual disorders (LE3) and that a substantial stretching of the perineum is not an indication of episiotomy (Professional consensus). Then, manual control of the expulsion of the fetus at the end of the second stage of labour and support of the posterior perineum during this time appear to reduce the rate of OASIS (LE3). The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported manually to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). There is no recognised benefit to episiotomy in normal deliveries (LE1); the liberal practice of episiotomy results in fewer intact perineums than its restrictive practice, and the latter does not result in increasing the number of cases of OASIS. No evidence indicates that an episiotomy for women with a breech presentation, twin pregnancy, or posterior position prevents OASIS (LE3). Indication for episiotomy during delivery depends on individual risk factors and obstetric conditions (Professional consensus). It is recommended that the indication for episiotomy be explained and the woman's consent received before its performance. The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). The liberal practice of episiotomy to prevent OASIS is not recommended for women with a breech presentation, twin pregnancy, or posterior position (GradeC). Episiotomy during an instrumental delivery appears to be associated with a reduction of the risk of OASIS (LE3). The vacuum extractor appears to induce fewer cases of OASIS than other instruments (LE3). Episiotomy may be indicated in instrumental deliveries to avoid OASIS (GradeC). Training in perineal protection in obstetrics is recommended (Grade B). In operative vaginal deliveries when several instruments can be used, a vacuum extractor is preferentially recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). When forceps or spatulas are used, it is preferable that they be withdrawn just before cephalic deflexion so that the fetal head is not "capped" with these instruments at birth (Professional consensus). Couder's maneuver, which consists of lowering the forearm during the release of the fetal shoulders, appears to decrease the rate of second-degree perineal tears and increase the rate of intact perineum (LE3).

CONCLUSION

Manual control of the expulsion and perineal support reduce the risk of perineal injury. There is no benefit to episiotomy in normal delivery, nor in special cases such the breech presentation for example. On the other hand, in case of instrumental delivery, an episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (GradeC), and it is recommended if it is possible to use the ventouse preferentially. The Couder's maneuver seems to reduce the rate of 2^nd degree perineal lesions (LE3). Finally, training in perineal obstetric protection is recommended (Grade B).

[Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and vacuum-assisted delivery at term in primiparas]

OBJECTIVES

Operative Vaginal Delivery (OVD) is subject to a risk of perineal tears especially of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) that are associated with more complications and impaired quality of life. The main objective of this study was to compare the rate of OASIS in primipara at term with fetus in cephalic presentation depending on the type of delivery: OVD using vacuum extractor and spontaneous delivery.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2014 including all primipara who delivered vaginally at term, a single and living fetus in cephalic presentation. Perineal lesions were classified according to the WHO classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of OASIS.

RESULTS

3552 patients were included: 2496 spontaneous deliveries (SD) and 1056 OVD (29.72 %). There were twenty sphincter tears (0.56 %): 7 in SD group (0.28 %) and 13 in OVD (1.23 %), P<0.0001, OR=5.10 [2.00; 12.99]. Other risk factors associated with OASIS in univariable analysis were: maternal age (≥30 years), duration of expulsive efforts (≥20min) and a birth weight≥4000g.

CONCLUSION

In these patients, the risk of OASIS in case of AI increases by a factor of 5;10. The high rate of AI in these patients exposes them to a real risk of OASIS. However, the proportion of OASIS in this group remains lower than those reported in the literature and is barely higher than the national overall rate, despite a very restrictive policy of the use of episiotomy.

[Anal incontinence and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, epidemiology and prevention]

Our main objectives were to identify risk factors, methods for early diagnosis, and prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), using a literature review. The main risk factors for OASIs are nulliparity, instrumental delivery, posterior presentation, median episiotomy, prolonged second phase of labor and fetal macrosomia. Asian origin, short ano-vulvar distance, ligamentous hyperlaxity, lack of expulsion control, non-visualization of the perineum or maneuvers for shoulder dystocia also appear to be risk factors. There is a risk of under-diagnosis of OASIs in the labor ward. Experience of the accoucheur is a protective factor. Secondary prevention is based on the training of birth professionals in recognition and repair of OASIs. Primary prevention of OASIs is based on training in the maneuvers of the second phase of labor; if possible, instrumental extractions should be avoided. Mediolateral episiotomy may have a preventive role in high-risk OASIs deliveries. A robust predictive model is still lacking to allow a selective use of episiotomy.

[Can the rate of episiotomy still be lowered? Status update in PACA region (south of France)]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate professional practices relative to episiotomies in the Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur (PACA) region by analysing their incidence in maternity hospitals, by type and by sector of activity. Following this, to analyse maternal and obstetric characteristics associated with episiotomies and the occurrence of perineal tears in Marseille's university hospitals (CHU).

METHODS

Data were extracted from the database for the period from 1st January 2012 to 31 December 2014. The sample included 41 maternity hospitals: 13 private and 28 public. Twenty of the maternity hospitals were level 1, 15 were level 2, and 2 were level 3 (Nice and AP-HM).

RESULTS

In the PACA region, 176,573 patients gave birth by vaginal delivery. The incidence of episiotomy over the 3 years was 21.6% (0.50% - 76.13%) with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence between 2012 and 2014 (P<0.001). There was a significant difference by sector (P<0.001) and level (P<0.001) of maternity hospitals. In the Marseille CHU, 21.6% of women had an episiotomy (66.4% in primiparas - 33.6% in multiparous) and 43% had perineal tears (62.3% in primiparas - 37.7% in multiparous). After multivariate analysis, gender, weight of the newborn, presentation, gestational age, and mode of delivery were shown to be factors significantly associated with occurrence of episiotomy and occurrence of perineal tear (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in the incidence of episiotomy was observed in the PACA region from 2012 to 2014, associated with a wide variation in rates depending on the maternity hospitals, their types and their sectors.

[Assessment of restrictive episiotomy use and impact on perineal tears in the Burgundy's Perinatal Network]

OBJECTIVES

To analyse episiotomy and perineal tears rates in Burgundy after French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) guidelines in 2005.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Multicenter retrospective study, between 2003-2005 (period 1) et 2012-2014 (period 2), conducted on singletons vaginal deliveries, in cephalic presentation from 37 weeks. We compared the episiotomy rate (ER), and perineal lesions in normal deliveries (ND) and instrumental deliveries (ID) between the two periods.

RESULTS

A total of 74,268 women were included. The overall ER significantly decreased from 35.8 to 16.7% (P<0.01), without increasing third degree perineal tears (0.73% vs. 0.66%) or fourth degree (0.14% vs 0.14%). First degree perineal tears rose (42.1% vs 17.6%, P<0.001), second degree decreased (13.5% vs 20.5%, P<0.001). ER decreased whatever the level of motherhood, healthcare ward, vaginal delivery type, or the instrument used.

CONCLUSION

Our study found a strong impact in Burgundy of the French guidelines for the practice of restrictive episiotomy for both ND and for ID without increasing sphincter tears and in decreasing spontaneous morbidity.

[The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: What inventory?]

Since its creation, the practice of episiotomy has evolved, being influenced by several factors. Various stances on its use were stated, until the eventual reduction of this practice, as suggested by numerous practical guides. In 2005, the National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in France published its French Guidelines for Clinical practice in this area. Today, it seems appropriate to focus on the evolution of the use of episiotomy, ten years after the publication of these recommendations. The authors propose a literature review, browsing through all the available epidemiological data in France related to episiotomy, recording all national statistics and some local trends, as there are regional specificities. This review allows to follow the overall evolution of the practice of episiotomy in France between 1981 and 2014, and to identify territorial disparities. Finally, in the specific context of the practice of episiotomy in French gynecological and obstetrics field, the authors conclude it by considering the possible evolution of this surgical practice, as well as, the Clinical Practice Recommendations related to it.

[Predictive factors of 2-month postpartum anal incontinence among patients with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of short-term postpartum anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study including every patient with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury between January 2006 and December 2012 in one tertiary maternity unit. Patients were interviewed and examined at 2-month postpartum. Anal incontinence was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms: flatus incontinence, faecal incontinence and faecal urgency.

RESULTS

Among 17,110 patients who delivered vaginally during period study, 134 (0.8%) presented an anal sphincter injury. Postpartum obstetrical data were available for 110 of them. Among those patients, 50 women (45.5%) had at least one symptom of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum and 8 (7.3%) had faecal incontinence. Only maternal age and second stage duration were significantly associated with anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury. The degree of sphincter damage at delivery (IIIa, b, c, IV) was not associated with the risk of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and second stage duration were the only risk factor for anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury in this study. High prevalence of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is observed no matter what is the degree of anal sphincter damage. Our results highlight the importance to diagnose all obstetrical anal sphincter injuries whatever the degree of damage.