Granulicatella adiacens: An uncommon diagnosis of prosthetic hip joint infection. A case report with review of the literature

•

Prosthetic hip infection caused by Granulicatella adiacens.

•

Diagnosis was achieved using broad range 16S PCR gene analysis at an early stage, after joint aspiration and culture failed to yield a pathogen.

•

Granulicatella adiacens is a nutritionally variant streptococcus (NVS).

•

Staged revision surgery together with administration of appropriate antibiotics resulted in cure.

•

Diagnosis challenging, and often delays appropriate antibiotic administration.

We report a case of prosthetic hip infection in a 79 year old man caused by Granulicatella adiacens. The diagnosis was achieved using broad range 16S PCR gene analysis at an early stage, after joint aspiration and culture failed to yield a pathogen. Staged revision surgery together with administration of appropriate antibiotics resulted in cure. Granulicatella adiacens is a nutritionally variant streptococcus (NVS). It has been increasingly reported to cause significant morbidities involving various systems. Its insidious growth due to complex growth requirements, has made its diagnosis challenging, and often delays appropriate antibiotic administration.

Revised version (INFD-D-20-00242): impact of 16S rDNA sequencing on clinical treatment decisions: a single center retrospective study

Background

PCRs targeting 16S ribosomal DNA (16S PCR) followed by Sanger’s sequencing can identify bacteria from normally sterile sites and complement standard analyzes, but they are expensive. We conducted a retrospective study in the Strasbourg University Hospital to assess the clinical impact of 16S PCR sequencing on patients’ treatments according to different sample types.

Methods

From 2014 to 2018, 806 16S PCR samples were processed, and 191 of those were positive.

Results

Overall, the test impacted the treatment of 62 of the 191 patients (32%). The antibiotic treatment was rationalized in 31 patients (50%) and extended in 24 patients (39%), and an invasive procedure was chosen for 7 patients (11%) due to the 16S PCR sequencing results. Positive 16S PCR sequencing results on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) had a greater impact on patients’ management than positive ones on cardiac valves (p = 0.044). The clinical impact of positive 16S PCR sequencing results were significantly higher when blood cultures were negative (p < 0.001), and this difference appeared larger when both blood and sample cultures were negative (p < 0.001). The diagnostic contribution of 16S PCR was higher in patients with previous antibiotic treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In all, 16S PCR analysis has a significant clinical impact on patient management, particularly for suspected CSF infections, for patients with culture-negative samples and for those with previous antibiotic treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05892-4.

Limited diagnostic possibilities for bloodstream infections with broad-range methods: A promising PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry platform is no longer available

Fast and accurate detection of causative agents of bloodstream infections remains a challenge of today's microbiology. We compared the performance of cutting-edge technology based on polymerase chain reaction coupled with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) with that of conventional broad-range 16S rRNA PCR and blood culture to address the current diagnostic possibilities for bloodstream infections. Of 160 blood samples tested, PCR/ESI-MS revealed clinically meaningful microbiological agents in 47 samples that were missed by conventional diagnostic approaches (29.4% of all analyzed samples). Notably, PCR/ESI-MS shortened the time to positivity of the blood culture-positive samples by an average of 34 hr. PCR/ESI-MS technology substantially improved current diagnostic tools and represented an opportunity to make bloodstream infections diagnostics sensitive, accurate, and timely with a broad spectrum of microorganisms covered.

Added diagnostic value of broad-range 16S PCR on periprosthetic tissue and clinical specimens from other normally sterile body sites

AIMS

Evaluation of 16S PCR in addition to the standard culture to improve the pathogen detection rate in clinical specimens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Microbiological culture and direct 16S PCR was performed on specimens from suspected prosthetic joint infection patients (cohort-1) and on tissues and fluids from other normally sterile body sites (cohort-2). Based on clinical and microbiological data, the detection rate for both methods was assessed, assuming no superiority of either 16S PCR or culture. In cohort-1, 469 specimens were obtained. Culture was positive in 170 (36·2%) specimens, 16S PCR detected 70 (41·2%) of those pathogens. Additionally, 16S PCR detected pathogens in 13 of 299 (4·3%) culture-negative specimens. In cohort-2, pathogens were cultured in 52 of 430 (12·1%) specimens and 16S PCR revealed those pathogens in 32 (61·5%) specimens. 16S PCR detected pathogens in 31 of 378 (8·2%) culture-negative specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the yield with 16S PCR was low. For cohort-1 16S PCR detected pathogens in 4·3% of culture-negative specimens, where this was 8·2% for cohort-2.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Although direct 16S PCR cannot replace culture, it may offer a valuable additional diagnostic option for detection of difficult to culture micro-organisms in culture-negative clinical specimens.

Comparison of two commercial broad-range PCR and sequencing assays for identification of bacteria in culture-negative clinical samples

BACKGROUND

Culturing has long been the gold standard for detecting aetiologic agents in bacterial infections. In some cases, however, culturing fails to detect the infection. To further investigate culture-negative samples, amplification and subsequent sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is often applied. The aim of the present study was to compare the current method used at our Department of Clinical Microbiology, based on the MicroSeq ID system (Applied Biosystems, USA) with the Universal Microbe Detection (UMD) SelectNA kit (Molzym, Germany).

METHODS

76 culture-negative samples were first processed with the MicroSeq ID analysis, where total DNA was extracted and the 16S gene amplified and sequenced with the MicroSeq ID system. Samples were subsequently processed with the UMD SelectNA analysis, where human DNA was removed during the DNA extraction procedure and the 16S gene amplified in a real-time PCR and sequenced.

RESULTS

22 of 76 samples (28.9%) were positive for bacteria with the UMD SelectNA, which was significantly more (p = 0.0055) than the MicroSeq ID where 11 of 76 samples (14.5%) were positive. The UMD SelectNA assay identified more relevant bacterial pathogens than the MicroSeq ID analysis (p = 0.0233), but also found a number of species that were considered contaminations.

CONCLUSIONS

The UMD SelectNA assay was valuable for the identification of pathogens in culture-negative samples; however, due to the sensitive nature of the assay, extreme care is suggested in order to avoid false positives.

An unusual case of seronegative, 16S PCR positive Brucella infection

Introduction:

Brucella is a zoonotic infection commonly diagnosed by isolation of the organism from blood culture or positive serological testing. It is an uncommon cause of a pyrexia of unknown origin in the United Kingdom.

Case presentation:

We describe the case of a 14-year-old girl with no history of travel who presented with pyrexia, weight loss, arthralgia, multiple splenic abscesses and a subsequent pleural effusion, the latter of which isolated a Brucella species on 16S rRNA PCR. The patient responded well to initiation of treatment for brucellosis and on repeat imaging, after 3 months, the splenic abscesses had resolved.

Conclusion:

This unique case demonstrates uncommon complications of brucellosis and the challenges of diagnosing the organism, the latter of which can be alleviated by the utilization of molecularbased technologies. This patient had a negative serology result for brucellosis, which highlights the need to interpret serology results with caution in non-endemic regions for brucellosis.

Influence of 16S ribosomal RNA gene polymerase chain reaction and sequencing on antibiotic management of bone and joint infections

INTRODUCTION

Amplification of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by analysis of generated sequences can be an important adjunct to conventional cultures.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how the results of this approach influence physicians' decisions regarding the management of bone and joint infections.

METHOD

Clinical and laboratory findings of patients seen at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia) between December 2005 and September 2009 were reviewed. Patients who had negative cultures but likely or possible bone and joint infections were further evaluated using 16S rRNA PCR. The impact of the 16S rRNA PCR result on antibiotic management was evaluated and it was assessed whether untreated patients with negative 16S rRNA PCR subsequently presented with infections, suggesting a false-negative result.

RESULT

A total of 36 patients (mean age 62 years) were reviewed. Thirty-two patients were evaluated by infectious disease consultants; of these, 20 were considered likely to have infections. Seventeen patients were admitted with suspected prosthetic joint infections. Twenty-nine patients received antimicrobial treatment before the sample for the 16S rRNA PCR assay was obtained. Of the 36 patients, 26 (72.2%) were treated appropriately with modifications to their antibiotic regimen in response to the 16S rRNA PCR assay results. Antimicrobials were discontinued for 19 patients based on negative PCR assay and, in seven patients, antibiotics were changed based on a positive result. There were no relapses among patients with negative PCR assay in whom antibiotics were discontinued.

CONCLUSION

16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR and sequencing is a valuable tool in the guidance of antimicrobial therapy for bone and joint infections.