Grandjean Lapierre S, Bedwani S, DeBlois F, Fortin A, Zamorano Cuervo N, Zerouali K, Caron E, Morency-Potvin P, Gagnon S, Nguissan N, Arlotto P, Hardy I, Boutin CA, Tremblay C, Coutlée F, de Guise J, Grandvaux N. Clinical Evaluation of In-House-Produced
3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Testing.
Viruses 2021;
13:1752. [PMID:
34578334 PMCID:
PMC8473445 DOI:
10.3390/v13091752]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
3D-printed alternatives to standard flocked swabs were rapidly developed to provide a response to the unprecedented and sudden need for an exponentially growing amount of diagnostic tools to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the anticipated shortage, a hospital-based 3D-printing platform was implemented in our institution for the production of swabs for nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal sampling based on the freely available, open-source design provided to the community by University of South Florida's Health Radiology and Northwell Health System teams as a replacement for locally used commercial swabs. Validation of our 3D-printed swabs was performed with a head-to-head diagnostic accuracy study of the 3D-printed "Northwell model" with the cobas PCR Media® swab sample kit. We observed an excellent concordance (total agreement 96.8%, Kappa 0.936) in results obtained with the 3D-printed and flocked swabs, indicating that the in-house 3D-printed swab could be used reliably in the context of a shortage of flocked swabs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on autonomous hospital-based production and clinical validation of 3D-printed swabs.
Collapse