The inferior performance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT as a diagnostic and theranostic biomarker in [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE refractory well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the potential of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT as an alternative diagnostic and theranostic tool in well-differentiated NETs refractory to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy.

METHODS

Patients who received at least two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy for metastatic NETs and progressed under treatment were included. All patients had performed [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 3 weeks. The number of PET-positive lesions related to NETs and tumor sites was documented. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to compare SUVmax levels of tracers and the number of detected metastases.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (7 male, 5 female) who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. Ten patients had grade 1-2 NET of various origins, and two had paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. One hundred ninety-eight of 230 lesions (86%) were SSTR positive with a median SUVmax of 16.6 (2.2-76.5), and 88 of 230 lesions (38.2%) were [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 positive with a median SUVmax of 5.1 (2.3-21). Median SUVmax level and detected number of tumors were significantly higher in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (p=<0.001). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was completely (n:2) or almost completely (n:3) negative in 5 (42%) patients. Two (17%) patients had flip-flop SSTR/FAPI uptake in tumors. In four patients (33%), tumor uptake or the number of PET-positive lesions was inferior in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. In only one patient (8%), tumor uptakes were higher in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. Low-dose [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 dosimetry was performed on the FAPI-dominant patient; absorbed radiation doses per GBq were 1.26 Gy, 0.36 Gy, 0.32 Gy, and 0.2 Gy for kidneys, liver, spleen, and total body, respectively. The mean absorbed dose per GBq was 0.33 Gy for liver mass and 0.41 Gy for metastatic lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results demonstrated that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT mainly failed in well-differentiated NETs refractory to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy and had a limited role as an alternative diagnostic or theranostic agent. Further investigations with a larger patient population are required to determine the impact of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on NETs.

Oncologic Staging with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Demonstrates a Lower Rate of Nonspecific Lymph Node Findings Than 18F-FDG PET/CT

Nonspecific lymph node uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is a significant pitfall for tumor staging. Fibroblast activation protein α expression on cancer-associated fibroblasts and some tumor cells is less sensitive to acute inflammatory stimuli, and fibroblast activation protein-directed PET may overcome this limitation. Methods: Eighteen patients from our prospective observational study underwent 18F-FDG and 68Ga fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT scans within a median of 2 d (range, 0-22 d). Lymph nodes were assessed on histopathology and compared with SUV measurements. Results: On a per-patient basis, lymph nodes were rated malignant in 10 (56%) versus 7 (39%) patients by 18F-FDG PET/CT versus 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scans, respectively, with a respective accuracy of 55% versus 94% for true lymph node metastases. Five of 6 (83%) false-positive nodes on the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were rated true negative by the 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scans. On a per-lesion basis, tumor detection rates were similar (85/89 lesions, 96%). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher accuracy for true nodal involvement and therefore has the potential to replace 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for cancer staging.

Head-To-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. FDG PET/CT has limited diagnostic performance in the detection of peritoneal metastasis (PM). Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) targets tumor stroma, leading to high accumulation across cancer types. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performances of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT in detecting PM on the basis of studies providing head-to-head comparisons between the two tests. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through July 2022 to identify studies reporting head-to-head comparison of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for detection of PM. The reference standard was classified as histopathology for all patients or as a combination of histopathologic, clinical, imaging, laboratory, and follow-up information (multidisciplinary reference standard). A random-effects statistical model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performances of the tests in patient-based and lesion-based analyses. The QUADAS-2 and QUADAS Comparative tools were used to assess study quality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Eleven studies were included. Patient-based analysis was reported in nine studies including 340 patients, and lesion-based analysis was reported in four studies including 222 lesions. The pooled sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly higher than that of FDG PET/CT in patient-based analysis (98.2% [95% CI, 96.1-100.0%] vs 55.9% [95% CI, 33.9-77.9%]) and lesion-based analysis (99.9% [95% CI, 99.5-100.0%] vs 27.3% [95% CI, 11.2-43.4%]). Eight studies were rated at high risk of bias in the reference standard domain because the multidisciplinary reference standard was not sufficiently explained and may have included one of the two index tests, which would have artificially increased sensitivity. In three studies specificity was reported as 100.0% for both tests; these studies were considered at uncertain risk of bias in the patient selection domain because patients with benign peritoneal conditions may have been excluded, resulting in underestimation of potential false-positive results. CONCLUSION. The current evidence suggests excellent sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the detection of PM in comparison with poorer sensitivity of FDG PET/CT. However, most included studies had high risk of bias. Further studies are needed to more convincingly characterize true- and false-positive results. CLINICAL IMPACT. The sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT may be substantially greater than that of FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of PM, facilitating surgical planning and candidate selection.