The SspB adaptor drives structural changes in the AAA+ ClpXP protease during ssrA-tagged substrate delivery

Energy-dependent protein degradation by the AAA+ ClpXP protease helps maintain protein homeostasis in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles of bacterial origin. In Escherichia coli and many other proteobacteria, the SspB adaptor assists ClpXP in degrading ssrA-tagged polypeptides produced as a consequence of tmRNA-mediated ribosome rescue. By tethering these incomplete ssrA-tagged proteins to ClpXP, SspB facilitates their efficient degradation at low substrate concentrations. How this process occurs structurally is unknown. Here, we present a cryo-EM structure of the SspB adaptor bound to a GFP-ssrA substrate and to ClpXP. This structure provides evidence for simultaneous contacts of SspB and ClpX with the ssrA tag within the tethering complex, allowing direct substrate handoff concomitant with the initiation of substrate translocation. Furthermore, our structure reveals that binding of the substrate·adaptor complex induces unexpected conformational changes within the spiral structure of the AAA+ ClpX hexamer and its interaction with the ClpP tetradecamer.

Control of Toxin-Antitoxin Systems by Proteases in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic elements composed of a noxious toxin and a counteracting cognate antitoxin. Although they are widespread in bacterial chromosomes and in mobile genetic elements, their cellular functions and activation mechanisms remain largely unknown. It has been proposed that toxin activation or expression of the TA operon could rely on the degradation of generally less stable antitoxins by cellular proteases. The resulting active toxin would then target essential cellular processes and inhibit bacterial growth. Although interplay between proteases and TA systems has been observed, evidences for such activation cycle are very limited. Herein, we present an overview of the current knowledge on TA recognition by proteases with a main focus on the major human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which harbours multiple TA systems (over 80), the essential AAA + stress proteases, ClpC1P1P2 and ClpXP1P2, and the Pup-proteasome system.

The Non-dominant AAA+ Ring in the ClpAP Protease Functions as an Anti-stalling Motor to Accelerate Protein Unfolding and Translocation

ATP-powered unfoldases containing D1 and D2 AAA+ rings play important roles in protein homeostasis, but uncertainty about the function of each ring remains. Here we use single-molecule optical tweezers to assay mechanical unfolding and translocation by a variant of the ClpAP protease containing an ATPase-inactive D1 ring. This variant displays substantial mechanical defects in both unfolding and translocation of protein substrates. Notably, when D1 is hydrolytically inactive, ClpAP often stalls for times as long as minutes, and the substrate can back-slip through the enzyme when ATP concentrations are low. The inactive D1 variant also has more difficulty traveling in the N-to-C direction on a polypeptide track than it does moving in a C-to-N direction. These results indicate that D1 normally functions as an auxiliary/regulatory motor to promote uninterrupted enzyme advancement that is fueled largely by the D2 ring.

The Intrinsically Disordered N-terminal Extension of the ClpS Adaptor Reprograms Its Partner AAA+ ClpAP Protease

Adaptor proteins modulate substrate selection by AAA+ proteases. The ClpS adaptor delivers N-degron substrates to ClpAP but inhibits degradation of substrates bearing ssrA tags or other related degrons. How ClpS inhibits degradation of such substrates is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that ClpS impedes recognition of ssrA-tagged substrates by a non-competitive mechanism and also slows subsequent unfolding/translocation of these substrates as well as of N-degron substrates. This suppression of mechanical activity is largely a consequence of the ability of ClpS to repress ATP hydrolysis by ClpA, but several lines of evidence show that ClpS's inhibition of substrate binding and its ATPase repression are separable activities. Using ClpS mutants and ClpS-ClpA chimeras, we establish that engagement of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal extension of ClpS by ClpA is both necessary and sufficient to inhibit multiple steps of ClpAP-catalyzed degradation. These observations reveal how an adaptor can simultaneously modulate the catalytic activity of a AAA+ enzyme, efficiently promote recognition of some substrates, suppress recognition of other substrates, and thereby affect degradation of its menu of substrates in a specific manner. We propose that similar mechanisms are likely to be used by other adaptors to regulate substrate choice and the catalytic activity of molecular machines.

Mitochondrial AAA proteases: A stairway to degradation

Mitochondrial protein quality control requires the action of proteases to remove damaged or unnecessary proteins and perform key regulatory cleavage events. Important components of the quality control network are the mitochondrial AAA proteases, which capture energy from ATP hydrolysis to destabilize and degrade protein substrates on both sides of the inner membrane. Dysfunction of these proteases leads to the breakdown of mitochondrial proteostasis and is linked to the development of severe human diseases. In this review, we will describe recent insights into the structure and motions of the mitochondrial AAA proteases and related enzymes. Together, these studies have revealed the mechanics of ATP-driven protein destruction and significantly advanced our understanding of how these proteases maintain mitochondrial health.

Discovery of AAA+ Protease Substrates through Trapping Approaches

Proteases play essential roles in cellular proteostasis. Mechanisms through which proteases recognize their substrates are often hard to predict and therefore require experimentation. In vivo trapping allows systematic identification of potential substrates of proteases, their adaptors, and chaperones. This combines in vivo genetic modifications of proteolytic systems, stabilized protease-substrate interactions, affinity enrichments of trapped substrates, and mass spectrometry (MS)-based identification. In vitro approaches, in which immobilized protease components are incubated with isolated cellular proteome, complement this in vivo approach. Both approaches can provide information about substrate recognition signals, degrons, and conditional effects. This review summarizes published trapping studies and their biological outcomes, and provides recommendations for substrate trapping of the processive AAA+ Clp, Lon, and FtsH chaperone proteolytic systems.

Coordinating Mitochondrial Biology Through the Stress-Responsive Regulation of Mitochondrial Proteases

Proteases are localized throughout mitochondria and function as critical regulators of all aspects of mitochondrial biology. As such, the activities of these proteases are sensitively regulated through transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms to adapt mitochondrial function to specific cellular demands. Here, we discuss the stress-responsive mechanisms responsible for regulating mitochondrial protease activity and the implications of this regulation on mitochondrial function. Furthermore, we describe how imbalances in the activity or regulation of mitochondrial proteases induced by genetic, environmental, or aging-related factors influence mitochondria in the context of disease. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which cells regulate mitochondrial function through alterations in protease activity provide insights into the contributions of these proteases in pathologic mitochondrial dysfunction and reveals new therapeutic opportunities to ameliorate this dysfunction in the context of diverse classes of human disease.

Regulated Proteolysis in Bacteria

Regulated proteolysis is a vital process that affects all living things. Bacteria use energy-dependent AAA+ proteases to power degradation of misfolded and native regulatory proteins. Given that proteolysis is an irreversible event, specificity and selectivity in degrading substrates are key. Specificity is often augmented through the use of adaptors that modify the inherent specificity of the proteolytic machinery. Regulated protein degradation is intricately linked to quality control, cell-cycle progression, and physiological transitions. In this review, we highlight recent work that has shed light on our understanding of regulated proteolysis in bacteria. We discuss the role AAA+ proteases play during balanced growth as well as how these proteases are deployed during changes in growth. We present examples of how protease selectivity can be controlled in increasingly complex ways. Finally, we describe how coupling a core recognition determinant to one or more modifying agents is a general theme for regulated protein degradation.

Effect of directional pulling on mechanical protein degradation by ATP-dependent proteolytic machines

AAA+ proteases and remodeling machines couple hydrolysis of ATP to mechanical unfolding and translocation of proteins following recognition of sequence tags called degrons. Here, we use single-molecule optical trapping to determine the mechanochemistry of two AAA+ proteases, Escherichia coli ClpXP and ClpAP, as they unfold and translocate substrates containing multiple copies of the titin^I27 domain during degradation initiated from the N terminus. Previous studies characterized degradation of related substrates with C-terminal degrons. We find that ClpXP and ClpAP unfold the wild-type titin^I27 domain and a destabilized variant far more rapidly when pulling from the N terminus, whereas translocation speed is reduced only modestly in the N-to-C direction. These measurements establish the role of directionality in mechanical protein degradation, show that degron placement can change whether unfolding or translocation is rate limiting, and establish that one or a few power strokes are sufficient to unfold some protein domains.

The Copper Efflux Regulator CueR Is Subject to ATP-Dependent Proteolysis in Escherichia coli

The trace element copper serves as cofactor for many enzymes but is toxic at elevated concentrations. In bacteria, the intracellular copper level is maintained by copper efflux systems including the Cue system controlled by the transcription factor CueR. CueR, a member of the MerR family, forms homodimers, and binds monovalent copper ions with high affinity. It activates transcription of the copper tolerance genes copA and cueO via a conserved DNA-distortion mechanism. The mechanism how CueR-induced transcription is turned off is not fully understood. Here, we report that Escherichia coli CueR is prone to proteolysis by the AAA+ proteases Lon, ClpXP, and ClpAP. Using a set of CueR variants, we show that CueR degradation is not altered by mutations affecting copper binding, dimerization or DNA binding of CueR, but requires an accessible C terminus. Except for a twofold stabilization shortly after a copper pulse, proteolysis of CueR is largely copper-independent. Our results suggest that ATP-dependent proteolysis contributes to copper homeostasis in E. coli by turnover of CueR, probably to allow steady monitoring of changes of the intracellular copper level and shut-off of CueR-dependent transcription.

Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 suggests a model for peptidase activation by AAA+ partner binding and substrate delivery

Caseinolytic peptidase P (ClpP), a double-ring peptidase with 14 subunits, collaborates with ATPases associated with diverse activities (AAA+) partners to execute ATP-dependent protein degradation. Although many ClpP enzymes self-assemble into catalytically active homo-tetradecamers able to cleave small peptides, the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enzyme consists of discrete ClpP1 and ClpP2 heptamers that require a AAA+ partner and protein-substrate delivery or a peptide agonist to stabilize assembly of the active tetradecamer. Here, we show that cyclic acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) and agonist peptides synergistically activate ClpP1P2 by mimicking AAA+ partners and substrates, respectively, and determine the structure of the activated complex. Our studies establish the basis of heteromeric ClpP1P2 assembly and function, reveal tight coupling between the conformations of each ring, show that ADEPs bind only to one ring but appear to open the axial pores of both rings, provide a foundation for rational drug development, and suggest strategies for studying the roles of individual ClpP1 and ClpP2 rings in Clp-family proteolysis.