Coles EC, Colita A, Momanu R, Berbec N, Ivanescu AM, Oprea M, Jardan D, Jardan C, Arghir A, Coriu D, Lupu AR. Importance of assessing cytogenetic and molecular risk factors in acute myeloid leukemia therapy.
J Med Life 2012;
5:36-43. [PMID:
31803284 PMCID:
PMC6880215]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease in clinical presentation, outcome and therapeutic response. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics are important prognostic indicators allowing the identification of distinct subtypes of AML, prognostic stratification and risk-adapted treatment. We present our experience during 5 years, in which we treated 245 patients with AML, of which we could genetically characterize 48 cases (26 females, 22 males) with a median age of 52 years. Cytogenetic analysis was performed by GTG banding on cultures of marrow cells treated with colcemid. Molecular analysis used RT-PCR performed on ABI 9700 platform in order to identify the following fusion genes: E2A-PBX1, TEL-AML1, AML1-ETO, PML-RARα, MLL-AF4, CBFC-MYH11, BCR-ABL, SIL-TAL, and MLL-AF9as well as mutations in Flt3, NPM1, WT1 genes. Fourteen patients were older than 60 years. In 12 we performed cytogenetic analysis showing 5 cases with complex karyotype, 2 normal karyotypes, 1 case of del(21), del (9), 11q- and t(3;15) respectively as well as 2 unevaluable karyotypes. These anomalies were associated with a high incidence of secondary AMLs (10/14) and with a low remission (CR) rate (5/14). Out of the 35 patients younger than 60 years, 25 were evaluated by cytogenetics showing a high incidence of favorable cytogenetic changes: 6 anomalies of chromosome 16 (5 inv (16) and 1 t (16; 16)), 3 t (15; 17), 3 cases of t (8; 21) of which 2 with additional abnormalities, 7 normal karyotypes and 1 case of 7q-, -y,-3 and respectively -8 associated with +18. In 25 cases molecular analysis was performed showing alterations in 21 patients: 6 cases with AML/ETO, 3 PML/RAR, 7 Flt3 mutations (2 associated with NPM1 mutation) as well as 1 case of isolated mutation of NPM1 and respectively WT1. CR rate was of 28/35. All cases with t (15; 17) and PML/RAR as well all cases with t (8; 21) and/or AML/ETO achieved CR. Out of the 7 cases with Flt3 mutations only 4 achieved CR including the 2 cases with associated NPM1 mutations. In our experience, genetic characteristics correlate with other prognostic markers such as age and secondary leukemia; "favorable" genetic anomalies were associated with a high CR rate; association of t (8; 21) with additional abnormalities did not influence CR rate.
Collapse