Efficacy and safety of oritavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oritavancin (ORI) versus comparators for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) based on available clinical studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from database inception to 28 July 2020 to identify clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of ORI and comparator antibiotics for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Primary efficacy outcome, investigator-assessed clinical cure, lesion size reduction ≥20%, additional post-treatment antibiotics, and 30-day emergency room (ER) visits and readmission were assessed as efficacy outcomes. Adverse events (AEs) and mortality were assessed as safety outcomes. I² statistic was calculated for heterogeneity, and a fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for estimation of the risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 9213 patients from two randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. ORI was statistically non-inferior to control agents in all efficacy and safety outcomes. Moreover, ORI significantly reduced the occurrence of 30-day readmission (RR = 0.42; P = 0.0004) and drug-related AEs (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, ORI also had a lower rate of 30-day ER visits in the outpatient setting (RR = 0.34; P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

ORI was not inferior to comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Meanwhile, it showed advantages in reducing the rate of readmission and drug-related AEs. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are required to further confirm the efficacy and safety of ORI. [Trial registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020201942].

Antimicrobial stewardship in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: An international Delphi consensus

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this survey was to identify a set of actions aimed to improve the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) and the implementation of some principles of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in this setting.

METHODS

A list of 76 statements for which there was a lack of clarity were generated by an expert panel and were validated by a group of experts. The questionnaire was administered to 112 experts in infectious diseases or microbiology. Participants were asked to vote on a list of statements. An agreement threshold of 66% was required to reach consensus.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 responders participated in the survey. Positive consensus was reached on the fact that ABSSSIs represent a significant cause of infection in the emergency department, are frequently associated with increased hospital stay and are mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The panellists strongly supported collection of samples from purulent infections by needle aspiration as well as collection of blood cultures in the presence of signs/symptoms of systemic infection. The importance of source control and prompt adequate microbiological documentation, the objective to reduce the length of hospital stay, the choice of a narrow-spectrum antibiotic and the role of new therapeutic options (e.g. long-acting drugs) in improving compliance also reached a positive consensus.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi survey provides useful indicators for the implementation of AMS principles in the clinical management of ABSSSI and offers interesting elements of discussion about the barriers existing in Europe for optimal implementation of AMS programmes.

Current and future trends in antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections

In 2013 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued recommendations and guidance on developing drugs for treatment of skin infection using a new definition of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (ABSSSI). The new classification includes cellulitis, erysipelas, major skin abscesses and wound infection with a considerable extension of skin involvement, clearly referring to a severe subset of skin infections. The main goal of the FDA was to better identify specific infections where the advantages of a new antibiotic could be precisely estimated through quantifiable parameters, such as improvement of the lesion size and of systemic signs of infection. Before the spread and diffusion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in skin infections, antibiotic therapy was relatively straightforward. Using an empiric approach, a β-lactam was the preferred therapy and cultures from patients were rarely obtained. With the emergence of MRSA in the community setting, initial ABSSSI management has been changed and readdressed. Dalbavancin, oritavancin and tedizolid are new drugs, approved or in development for ABSSSI treatment, that also proved to be efficient against MRSA. Dalbavancin and oritavancin have a long half-life and can be dosed less frequently. This in turn makes it possible to treat patients with ABSSSI in an outpatient setting, avoiding hospitalization or potentially allowing earlier discharge, without compromising efficacy. In conclusion, characteristics of long-acting antibiotics could represent an opportunity for the management of ABSSSI and could profoundly modify the management of these infections by reducing or in some cases eliminating both costs and risks of hospitalization.