Comparative immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and 4vHPV vaccine administered according to two- or three-dose schedules in girls aged 9-14 years: Results to month 36 from a randomized trial

This observer-blind study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01462357) compared the immunogenicity and safety of two doses (2D) of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (2D of AS04-HPV-16/18) vs. two or three doses of the 4vHPV vaccine [2D or 3D of 4vHPV] in 1075 healthy girls aged 9-14 years. Girls were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2D of AS04-HPV-16/18 at months (M) 0, 6 (N = 359), 2D of 4vHPV at M0, 6 (N = 358) or 3D of 4vHPV at M0, 2, 6 (N = 358). 351, 339 and 346 girls, respectively, returned for the concluding visit at M36. Superiority was demonstrated at M7 and M12; comparison of the immune response to both vaccine antigens was made between 2D of AS04-HPV-16/18 and 2D or 3D of 4vHPV at subsequent time points in the according-to-protocol immunogenicity cohort (ATP-I; N = 958 at M36) and the total vaccinated cohort (TVC: N = 1036 at M36). HPV-16/18-specific T-cell- and B-cell-mediated immune responses and safety were also investigated. At M36, anti-HPV-16/18 ELISA responses in the 2D AS04-HPV-16/18 group remained superior to those of the 2D and 3D 4vHPV groups. In the M36 TVC, geometric mean titers were 2.78-fold (HPV-16) and 6.84-fold (HPV-18) higher for 2D of AS04-HPV-16/18 vs. 2D of 4vHPV and 2.3-fold (HPV-16) and 4.14-fold (HPV-18) higher vs. 3D of 4vHPV. Results were confirmed by vaccine pseudovirion-based neutralisation assay. Numbers of circulating CD4+ T cells and B cells appeared similar across groups. Safety was in line with the known safety profiles of both vaccines. In conclusion, superior HPV-16/18 antibody responses were elicited by 2D of the AS04-HPV-16/18 compared with 2D or 3D of the 4vHPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT0146235.

Rational administration sequencing of immunochemotherapy elicits powerful anti-tumor effect

As a research hotspot, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often combined with other therapeutics in order to exert better clinical efficacy. To date, extensive laboratory and clinical investigations into the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy have been carried out, demonstrating augmented effectiveness and broad application prospects in anti-tumor therapy. However, the administration of these two treatment modalities is usually randomized or fixed to a given chronological order. Nevertheless, the pharmacological effect of drug is closely related to its exposure behavior in vivo, which may consequently affect the synergistic outcomes of a combined therapy. In this study, we prepared a lipid nanoparticle encapsulating docetaxel (DTX-VNS), and associated it with the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1 antibody (αPD-1) for the treatment of malignant tumors. To identify the optimum timing and sequencing for chemotherapy and immunotherapy, we designed three administration regimes, including the simultaneous delivery of DTX-VNS and αPD-1(DTX-VNS@αPD-1), DTX-VNS delivery before (DTX-VNS plus αPD-1) or post (αPD-1 plus DTX-VNS) PD-1 blockade with an interval of two days. Analysis from mass spectrometry, multi-factor detection and other techniques indicated that DTX-VNS plus αPD-1 initiated a powerful anti-tumor response in multiple tumor models, contributing to a remarkably reshaped tumor microenvironment landscape, which may attribute to the maximum therapeutic additive effects arise from a concomitant exposure of DTX-VNS and αPD-1 at the tumor site. By profiling the exposure kinetics of nanoparticles and αPD-1 in vivo, we defined the administration schedule with utmost therapeutic benefits, which may provide a valuable clinical reference for the rational administration of immunochemotherapy.

Iniparib administered weekly or twice-weekly in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase II randomized open-label study with pharmacokinetics

PURPOSE

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a phenotypic breast cancer subgroup with a very poor prognosis, despite standard treatments. Combined twice-weekly iniparib and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC+tw-iniparib) showed benefit over gemcitabine/carboplatin in a randomized phase II trial, and a phase III was initiated comparing these regimens. The present phase II study was initiated to compare GC+tw-iniparib with a more practical once-weekly schedule (GC+w-iniparib) in TNBC.

METHODS

Metastatic TNBC patients were randomized to receive iniparib weekly (11.2 mg/kg on days 1 and 8) or twice-weekly (5.6 mg/kg on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2 on days 1 and 8), every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Pharmacokinetics of iniparib and its two metabolites were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were randomized, 82 GC+w-iniparib and 81 GC+tw-iniparib. Demographic and baseline characteristics were well balanced. ORR was 34.1% (95% CI 23.9-44.4%) vs. 29.6% (95% CI 19.7-39.6%) and median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.2-5.7) vs. 4.3 months (95% CI 3.0-5.8) for GC+w-iniparib and GC+tw-iniparib, respectively. Safety was similar across treatment arms in terms of event severity and type. Iniparib plasma concentrations and exposure were two-fold higher with w-iniparib compared to tw-iniparib. Iniparib and its metabolites were cleared rapidly with a terminal half-life of < 1 h, without accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a doubled maximum concentration with weekly iniparib, no detectable differences in safety or efficacy were observed between the weekly and twice-weekly administration schedules in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT01045304.

Noninferiority of cetuximab every-2-weeks versus standard once-weekly administration schedule for the first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM

This study assessed whether cetuximab 500 mg/m² administered every 2 weeks (Q2W), when combined with chemotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment, was noninferior to the approved dose (400 mg/m² followed by 250 mg/m² once weekly [Q1W]) for overall survival (OS) in adults with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

This pooled analysis included patients receiving 1L treatment with cetuximab Q1W or Q2W in combination with chemotherapy from post-authorisation studies with patient-level data available to the sponsor. Baseline characteristics were adjusted with a propensity score using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Noninferiority in terms of OS was tested with a noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and rates of lung/liver metastases resection and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

OS time was noninferior in the Q2W cohort (n = 554) compared to the Q1W cohort (n = 763), with a HR after IPTW (95% confidence interval) of 0.827 (0.715-0.956) and median OS times of 24.7 (Q1W) and 27.9 (Q2W) months. There were no major differences in PFS (HR: 0.915 [0.804-1.042]). The odds ratios (ORs) after IPTW for ORR (1.292 [1.031-1.617]) and the rates of lung/liver metastases resection (1.419 [1.043-1.932]) favoured the Q2W regimen. No differences were noted in the occurrence rate of any SAE between groups; the OR after IPTW was 1.089 (0.858-1.382).

CONCLUSIONS

The cetuximab Q2W regimen was noninferior to the Q1W regimen for OS in the 1L treatment of mCRC.

A novel way to manage trastuzumab cardiotoxicity

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab is the most widely prescribed anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody. Cardiac toxicity is the only limiting toxicity of trastuzumab and it is of particular concern in patients with complete response, since the drug needs to be stopped, with a risk of disease relapse. To date, no pharmacological data on trastuzumab cardiotoxicity in patients have been made available. Here, we provide proof of concept, demonstrating that it was possible to prevent trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity by modifying the drug administration schedule.

METHODS

In this paper, we report the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer responding to trastuzumab, who developed severe cardiac toxicity twice using a 3-weekly regimen. Considering preclinical pharmacological data on trastuzumab cardiotoxicity, we hypothesized that a weekly schedule of trastuzumab with lower peaks of serum concentration could be safe while remaining efficient. With the patient's consent, we started a weekly combination of carboplatin (AUC2) and trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) with close monitoring of trastuzumab concentrations.

RESULTS

We successfully controlled the disease for an additional 6 months with relevant trough concentrations of trastuzumab of around 50 mg/L. Another important aspect is that, with this weekly schedule, we observed no cardiac toxicity, and the left ventricular ejection fraction remained stabilized, at over 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab is the most widely prescribed anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of HER2 metastatic breast cancer, and it is the only drug that has been approved for the treatment of localized HER2 breast cancer, 1-year treatment being required after surgery. In case of cardiac toxicity, particularly in women over 60 years of age, a weekly regimen with lower peaks of concentration could be an alternative to the standard 3-weekly regimen.