Aeromonas hydrophilia-infected nonunion of a closed tibial fracture in a healthy adolescent: A case report

Aeromonas hydrophilia can cause soft tissue infection in both immunocompromised and healthy persons. A healthy 15-year-old adolescent fell into a ditch after a scooter accident and sustained a right distal tibial shaft closed fracture, a right femoral shaft closed fracture, and a dirty laceration over the medial aspect of the distal thigh above the right knee. After empiric antibiotics and radical debridement of the contaminated wound, a femoral interlocking nail and tibial external fixator were applied. However, acute osteomyelitis later presented in his femur and tibia, and Aeromonas hydrophilia grew in cultures from the knee wound and the fracture sites. During the follow-up, his tibia became an infected nonunion, and was successfully treated with the induced membrane technique. In an otherwise healthy patient with a closed fracture, Aeromonas hydrophilia can cause acute osteomyelitis and necrotizing fasciitis by spreading from a nearby contaminated wound. Exposure to water is a risk factor for Aeromonas hydrophilia infection.

First genome sequence of Aeromonas hydrophilia novel sequence type 658 strain isolated from livestock in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

The underlying resistance mechanisms, defence systems, mobilome, virulome, clonality and global phylogenetic relationship of a novel sequence type (ST) 658 Aeromonas hydrophilia (A34a) isolated from a pig abattoir in South Africa was determined using whole-genome sequence (WGS) technology.

METHODS

Following isolation on chromogenic agar (CHROMID® CARBA SMART), microbial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using a VITEK®2 platform. Genotyping involved WGS performed with an Illumina MiSeq platform.

RESULTS

The antibiotic resistome agreed with the resistance phenotype of the isolate and included antibiotic resistance determinants for β-lactams (bla_CPHA3 and bla_OXA-724). BLASTn analysis of resistome-encoding contigs affirmed chromosomally-mediated resistance. BURST algorithmic analysis identified the novel ST658 as a satellite variant. Virulome analysis predicted virulence genes of Aeromonas whose expression are critical for establishing infection in the host. Global phylogenomic analyses showed strain A34a is closely related to two international isolates from Sri Lanka (Ae25) and the USA (RU34A), although there is little to suggest that it was imported from abroad.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on the genomic analysis of a novel ST658 A. hydrophilia, offering useful insights into its pathogenicity and global phylogenetics.

Different clinical characteristics among Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria and Aeromonas caviae monomicrobial bacteremia

This study aimed to compare the clinical presentations of Aeromonas hydrophila, A. veronii biovar sobria and A. caviae monomicrobial bacteremia by a retrospective method at three hospitals in Taiwan during an 8-yr period. There were 87 patients with A. hydrophila bacteremia, 45 with A. veronii biovar sobria bacteremia and 22 with A. caviae bacteremia. Compared with A. hydrophila and A. veronii biovar sobria bacteremia, A. caviae bacteremia was more healthcare-associated (45 vs 30 and 16%; P = 0.031). The patients with A. caviae bacteremias were less likely to have liver cirrhosis (27 vs 62 and 64%; P = 0.007) and severe complications such as shock (9 vs 40 and 47%; P = 0.009) and thrombocytopenia (45 vs 67 and 87%; P = 0.002). The APACHE II score was the most important risk factor of Aeromonas bacteremia-associated mortalities. The APACHE II scores of A. caviae bacteremias were lower than A. hydrophila bacteremia and A. veronii biovar sobria bacteremia (7 vs 14 and 16 points; P = 0.002). In conclusion, the clinical presentation of A. caviae bacteremia was much different from A. hydrophila and A. veronii biovar sobria bacteremia. The severity and mortality of A. caviae bacteremia were lower than A. hydrophila or A. veronii biovar sobria bacteremia.