[Clinical differences between transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and hypertensive heart disease]

INTRODUCTION

A significant percentage of patients eventually diagnosed with cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (TTRA) was previously diagnosed with hypertensive heart disease (HHD), since both conditions usually present with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and ventricular hypertrophy. Our objectives were to evaluate the clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic differences, and to analyse whether there exists a differential prognosis between these two nosological entities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients with HHD for whom a cardiac scintigraphy with 99mTc-diphosphonate (GDPD) and a free light chains test in blood and urine were ordered for ATTR screening in our centre, in the period between 2016 and 2021. Those diagnosed with other types of amyloidosis were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were analyzed: 33 were finally diagnosed with TTRA and 39 with CHTA. Patients with TTRA had higher levels of ultrasensitive troponin I (TnI-US) and N-terminal brain natriuretic propeptide (NT-ProBNP); in electrocardiography (ECG) they presented a pseudo-infarction pattern more frequently as well as conduction disturbances; in echocardiography (TTE) they presented a higher degree of ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular dysfunction and worse diastolic function parameters, with elevated filling pressures. In the 4-year follow-up, the ATTR group showed greater need for pacemaker (PCM), with no evidence regarding mortality, development of atrial fibrillation (AF), or more admissions for heart failure (HF).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, patients with TTRA showed clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic differences compared to patients with HHD, with increased risk of need for PCM.

Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the PRACTICA study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is a frequent cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to determine the prevalence of ATTR-CA among HFpEF patients in a multicenter nationwide study.

METHODS

Consecutive ambulatory or hospitalized patients aged ≥ 50 years with HFpEF and left ventricle hypertrophy ≥ 12mm were studied at 20 Spanish hospitals. Screening for cardiac amyloidosis was initiated according to the usual clinical practice of each center. Positive scintigraphs were centrally analyzed.

RESULTS

422 patients were included, of whom 387 underwent further screening for cardiac amyloidosis. A total of 65 patients (16.8%) were diagnosed with ATTR-CA, none below 75 years. There was an increase of prevalence with age. Of them, 60% were male, with a mean age of 85.3±5.2 years, mean left ventricle ejection fraction of 60.3±7.6% and a mean maximum left ventricle wall thickness of 17.2 [12-25] mm. Most of the patients were New York Heart Association class II (48.4%) or III (46.8%). Besides being older than non-ATTR-CA patients, ATTR-CA patients had higher median NT-proBNP levels (3801 [2266-7132] vs 2391 [1141-4796] pg/mL; P=.003). There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of ATTR-CA by sex (19.7% for men and 13.8% for women, P=.085). A ∼7% (4/56) of the patients exhibited a genetic variant (ATTRv).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter nationwide study found a prevalence of 16.8%, confirming that ATTR-CA is a significant contributor to HFpEF in male and female patients with left ventricle hypertrophy and more than 75 years.

Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in elderly patients diagnosed with heart failure

OBJECTIVE

There is increased interest in studying ATTR-CA, a pathology that primarily affects patients of geriatric age and is frequently underdiagnosed. We aim to establish the prevalence of ATTR-CA in a cohort of patients with a history of HFpEF and to describe its characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study. Patients ≥75 years, clinical history of HFpEF, atrial dilation ≥34ml/m² and left ventricular wall thickening >13mm, were included. Demographic and analytical parameters were collected, and a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed, along with a transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac scintigraphy. Finally, telephone follow-up was carried out at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

50 patients were recruited, mean age 86±6 years, 54% women. Age and functional class (I-II vs. III-IV) were factors associated with presenting with ATTR-CA. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to admission of 5.2 months (confidence interval [CI] 95% 0-10.9), while in those with negative scintigraphy, it was 12.2 months (95% CI 11.7-12.8); log-rank: p=0.064. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to the combined endpoint (death and readmission) of 1.9 months (95% CI 0-6.1), and patients with negative scintigraphy of 11.9 months (95% CI 11.7-12); log-rank: p=0.027.

CONCLUSIONS

ATTR-CA appears to be a prevalent etiology in elderly patients within the spectrum of HFpEF. Patients with a diagnosis of ATTR-CA had a shorter time to admission for HF and the combined event of death and admission than patients with a negative result on scintigraphy.