Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome misclassification in an academic health system

PURPOSE

Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS) is a complex autoimmune disorder that includes a combination of laboratory criteria and clinical events (thrombosis, pregnancy complications). Accurate classification is essential, as APS patients may have limited oral anticoagulant options and requires indefinite anticoagulation. The prevalence of inaccurate APS misclassification is unknown. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients in an academic health-system who formally met APS criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included any patient within the University of Utah Health system who had an International Classification of Diseases-10 code for APS, between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020. Manual chart review was performed to assess the appropriateness of the APS classification by laboratory and clinical criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 184 patients identified, 59 (32.1 %) formally met APS criteria, while 69 (37.5 %) did not meet criteria. The remaining 56 (30.4 %) patients lacked enough information in their medical records to decide on appropriateness of APS classification. The most prevalent reason for inappropriate APS classification in the 69 patients identified was incorrect interpretation of lab values as positive (62; 89.9 %), followed by lack of repeat confirmation testing (32; 46.4 %).

CONCLUSION

The results of this single-center study indicate that only one-third of patients with presumed APS met classification criteria. This was predominantly due to incorrect collection or interpretation of APS laboratory data. One-third had insufficient medical record data to determine APS classification, which impairs clinical decision-making. This suggests more education or implementation of anticoagulation stewardship is needed to ensure accurate APS classification and proper management of anticoagulation therapy.

Comparison of medical documentation between pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics and physician-led anticoagulation clinics: A retrospective study

Background and objectives

High-quality documentation is critical in medical settings for providing safe patient care. This study was done with the objective of assessing the standard of medical records in anticoagulation clinics and investigating the distinctions between notes written by pharmacists and physicians.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records (EHRs) was performed on patients who received anticoagulation and were observed at anticoagulation clinics from October to December 2020. Patients were monitored in two anticoagulation clinics, one administered by pharmacists and the other by physicians. The quality of the documentation was assessed using a score, and the note was assigned one of five categories according to its score: very good, good, average, poor, and very poor. The data was analyzed using Stata/SE 13.1. P value<0.05 was considered significant in all analytical tests.

Results

A total of 331 patients were included. While 160 patients (48.3%) were followed by the physician-led clinic, 171 (51.6%) were by the pharmacist-led clinic. The average age of the patients was 54 ± 15. 60.73% of them were female, and 90.3% of them were Saudi nationals. Warfarin was the most widely used anticoagulant (70%), followed by rivaroxaban (15.7%). Compared to physicians, pharmacists demonstrated very strong documentation (54% vs. 18%). The examination of the variables considered in the study revealed that physicians had significantly less drug-drug interaction documentation (17 vs. 71 times) or drug-food interaction documentation (23 vs. 71 times) than pharmacists. In terms of follow-up frequency, pharmacists were found to adhere to the clinic protocol (150 times) more frequently than physicians (104 times). However, there was no significant difference in therapeutic plan documentation between the two groups. (p = 0.416).

Conclusion

Pharmacists were more comprehensive in their documentation than physicians in anticoagulation clinics. Unified clinic documentation can ensure consistent documentation within EHRs across all disciplines.

Effect of increased time in the therapeutic range on atrial fibrillation outcomes within a centralized anticoagulation service

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacy anticoagulation services have improved the quality of anticoagulant therapy and are associated with lower rates of bleeding and thromboembolism compared to usual care. Several studies have found that higher time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) during warfarin therapy is associated with better warfarin outcomes. However, whether increasing TTR over time within an established anticoagulation service is associated with further reduction in bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation conducted at an integrated healthcare delivery system with a centralized, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service. Clinical outcomes (clinically-relevant bleeding, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality) and TTR were compared between two distinct time periods: 1/1/2006 through 12/31/2007 (control group) and 1/1/2012 through 12/31/2013 (observation group) with regression modeling to adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

There were 3641 and 4764 patients in the control and observation groups, respectively. The mean age was 74.3 years and 54.4% of the cohort was female. Mean TTR was higher in the observation group (70.5% vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001). The composite outcome of clinically-relevant bleeding, thromboembolism and all-cause mortality occurred in 4.6% and 3.6% of the control and observation groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.87). Individual rates of stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality were each lower in the observation group (both p < 0.05) while clinically-relevant bleeding was not significantly different (p = 0.256).

CONCLUSION

Increased TTR within a clinical pharmacy anticoagulation management service was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcomes of bleeding, thromboembolism and death in a large atrial fibrillation population receiving warfarin.

Transition of stable patients from traditional anticoagulation clinic services to telephonic management

Background Outpatient warfarin dosing and monitoring with telephonic anticoagulation management (TAM) could be an effective alternative to other more labor intensive management models. Objectives To evaluate the time in therapeutic range (TTR) and number of extreme INR values (<1.5 or >4.5) of a telephonic system of warfarin management for stable patients who currently utilized traditional anticoagulation management services (AMSs). Method A retrospective, observational cohort with three groups (1) patients transitioned from an office-based anticoagulation clinic to TAM, (2) patients continuously enrolled in office-based AMS, (3) patients continuously managed by usual physician care without specialized anticoagulation services (UPC). Data was collected for six months before and six months after transition. Results All groups demonstrated decreased TTR from baseline to active phase, with the TAM and AMS groups showing similar magnitude of reduction (-10.61 and -12.66% respectively) but UPC group producing a greater drop (-20.08%). The TAM and AMS groups had similar rates of extreme INR levels; UPC had higher numbers of extreme INRs in three of the four measurements. Conclusion Stable patients transitioned from office-based anticoagulation clinic to a telephonic model of management performed equally as well as those who continued traditional enrollment.

Implementation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in daily practice: the need for comprehensive education for professionals and patients

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. NOACs do not require routine coagulation monitoring, creating a challenge to established systems for patient follow-up based on regular blood tests. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are required to cope with a mixture of patients receiving either a vitamin K antagonist or a NOAC for the same indications, and both professionals and patients require education about the newer drugs. A European working group convened to consider the challenges facing HCPs and healthcare systems in different countries and the educational gaps that hinder optimal patient management. Group members emphasised the need for regular follow-up and noted national, regional and local variations in set-up and resources for follow-up. Practical incorporation of NOACs into healthcare systems must adapt to these differences, and practical follow-up that works in some systems may not be able to be implemented in others. The initial prescriber of a NOAC should preferably be a true anticoagulation specialist, who can provide initial patient education and coordinate the follow-up. The long-term follow-up care of patients can be managed through specialist coagulation nurses, in a dedicated anticoagulation clinic or by general practitioners trained in NOAC use. The initial prescriber should be involved in educating those who perform the follow-up. Specialist nurses require access to tools, potentially including specific software, to guide systematic patient assessment and workflow. Problem cases should be referred for specialist advice, whereas in cases for which minimal specialist attention is required, the general practitioner could take responsibility for patient follow-up. Hospital departments and anticoagulation clinics should proactively engage with all downstream HCPs (including pharmacists) to ensure their participation in patient management and reinforcement of patient education at every opportunity. Ideally, (transmural) protocols for emergency situations should be developed. Last but not least, patients should be well-informed about their condition, the treatment, possible risk scenarios, including the consequences of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, and the organisation of follow-up care.