Principles of Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy for Iliac VEnous Stenting (POATIVES): A national expert-based Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVE

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing venous stents has not yet reached consensus, and there are not any recommendations from published guidelines. We undertook a Delphi consensus from Chinese experts to develop recommendations regarding the preferred antithrombotic therapy in patients following venous stenting.

METHODS

The phase 1 questionnaire was comprised of three clinical scenarios of venous stenting for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and was sent to venous practitioners across China. In phase 2, the results of phase 1 were distributed to a panel of experts for evaluation along with a questionnaire encompassing a series of statements produced during phase 1. A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus on recommendations through two rounds of surveys.

RESULTS

The phase 1 questionnaire was completed by 283 respondents. In phase 2, an expert panel consisting of 28 vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists was assembled and voted 17 statements relating to antithrombotic management after venous stenting for NIVL (4 statements), DVT (6 statements), and PTS (7 statements). The majority of the statements about the antithrombotic agent selection received a high consensus strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the national Delphi consensus of Chinese experts regarding antithrombotic therapy following iliac venous stenting in three common scenarios, most of the statements could be used to guide antithrombotic management following venous stenting. Further studies are required to clarify controversial issues including the dose and duration of anticoagulants, the role of antiplatelet agents, especially in patients with NIVL.

Is medical management useful in Moyamoya disease?

Moyamoya disease (MMD), characterized by progressive internal carotid artery stenosis and collateral vessel formation, prompts cerebral perfusion complications and is stratified into idiopathic and Moyamoya syndrome subtypes. A multifaceted approach toward MMD management addresses cerebral infarctions through revascularization surgery and adjunctive medical therapy, while also navigating risks such as intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral infarction resulting from arterial stenosis and fragile collateral vessels. Addressing antithrombotic management reveals a potential role for treatments like antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, despite the ambiguous contribution of thrombosis to MMD-related infarctions and the critical balance between preventing ischemic events and averting hemorrhagic complications. Transcranial doppler has proven useful in thromboembolic detection, despite persisting challenges concerning the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic treatments. Furthermore, antihypertensive interventions aim to manage blood pressure meticulously, especially during intracerebral hemorrhage, with recommendations and protocols varying based on the patient's hypertension status. Additionally, lipid-lowering therapeutic strategies, particularly employing statins, are appraised for their possible beneficial role in MMD management, even as comprehensive data from disease-specific clinical trials remains elusive. Comprehensive guidelines and protocols to navigate the multifaceted therapeutic avenues for MMD, while maintaining a delicate balance between efficacy and safety, warrant further meticulous research and development. This protocol manuscript seeks to elucidate the various aspects and challenges imbued in managing and navigating through the complex landscape of MMD treatment.

Stroke risk management in carotid atherosclerotic disease: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the ESC Council on Stroke and the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Carotid atherosclerotic disease continues to be an important cause of stroke, often disabling or fatal. Such strokes could be largely prevented through optimal medical therapy and carotid revascularization. Advancements in discovery research and imaging along with evidence from recent pharmacology and interventional clinical trials and registries and the progress in acute stroke management have markedly expanded knowledge base for clinical decisions in carotid stenosis. Nevertheless, there is variability in carotid-related stroke prevention and management strategies across medical specialities. Optimal patient care can be achieved by (1) establishing a unified knowledge foundation and (2) fostering multi-specialty collaborative guidelines. The emergent Neuro-Vascular Team concept, mirroring the multi-disciplinary Heart Team, embraces diverse specializations, tailores personalized, stratified medicine approaches to individual patient needs, and integrates innovative imaging and risk-assessment biomarkers. Proposed approach integrates collaboration of multiple specialists central to carotid artery stenosis management such as neurology, stroke medicine, cardiology, angiology, ophthalmology, vascular surgery, endovascular interventions, neuroradiology and neurosurgery. Moreover, patient education regarding current treatment options, their risks and advantages, is pivotal, promting patient's active role in clinical care decisions. This enables optimization of interventions ranging from lifestyle modification, carotid revascularization by stenting or endarterectomy, as well as pharmacological management encompassing statins, novel lipid-lowering and antithrombotic strategies and targeting inflammation and vascular dysfunction. This consensus document provides a harmonized multi-specialty approach to multimorbidity prevention in carotid stenosis patients, based on comprehensive knowledge review, pinpointing research gaps in an evidence-based medicine approach. It aims to be a foundational tool for interdisciplinary collaboration and prioritized patient-centric decision-making.

Impact of preoperative antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this retrospective study was to assess differences in clinical outcomes between patients on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) monotherapy and patients on other antithrombotic (AT) regimens undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective isolated CABG between 2017 and 2019 at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven were eligible for this study. The primary end points were re-exploration for bleeding and postoperative blood product transfusion. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke, in-hospital myocardial infarction and duration of hospitalization. Propensity matching was used to compare outcomes of the main study groups (ASA vs other AT therapy) and subgroups of AT therapy (guideline adherence vs non-adherence).

RESULTS

A total of 1068 patients were included: 710 patients on ASA monotherapy and 358 patients on other AT regimens. In the 256 matched patients in the main study groups, using AT regimens other than ASA monotherapy was associated with increased risk of re-exploration for bleeding [6.6% vs 2.0%, P = 0.017; odds ratio (OR) 3.57 (1.29-9.83)] and increased use of blood products [37.5% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001; OR 2.35 (1.58-3.49)]. In 122 matched subgroup patients, non-adherence was associated with an increased risk of re-exploration [10.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.044; OR 3.52 (1.11-11.12)] and increased blood product use [51.6% vs 25.4%, P < 0.001; OR 3.13 (1.83-5.38)]. Secondary end points were not significantly different among the main study groups and subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative use of AT therapy other than ASA monotherapy in patients who elected CABG was associated with the increased postoperative use of blood products and risk of re-exploration for bleeding; this finding was even more pronounced in non-guideline-adherent patients.

Post-discharge antithrombotic management and clinical outcomes of patients with new-onset or pre-existing atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary stenting: Follow-up data of the MATADOR-PCI study

BACKGROUND

. Patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) do not seem to receive proper antithrombotic therapies and present high rates of adverse clinical events.

METHODS

. We analyzed the follow-up data of the prospective, nationwide MATADOR-PCI registry. We assessed the use of antithrombotic strategies and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 6 months, in patients with new-onset or pre-existing AF admitted for ACS and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

RESULTS

. Out of the 588 patients enrolled in the registry and discharged alive (287 with pre-existing and 301 with new-onset AF), data at 6 months were obtained for 579 (98.5%) patients. Compared to hospital discharge, the rate of triple antithrombotic therapy was significantly reduced (from 76.4% to 23.6% and from 53.8% to 23.6%; both p<0.0001) while dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) increased (from 11.8% to 56.3% and from 5.8% to 30.9%; both p<0.0001) at follow-up, in patients with pre-existing and new-onset AF, respectively. Among patients with a class IA indication to receive oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT), it was prescribed in 91% and 88% of patients with pre-existing and 64% and 62% of new-onset AF, at discharge and follow-up, respectively. At 6 months from discharge the overall rate of MACE was 8.4% and 7.6% (p=0.75), while NACE occurred in 10.8% vs 10.0% (p=0.74) of patients with pre-existing or new-onset AF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

. At follow-up, DAT was the most used antithrombotic strategy for both patients with pre-existing and new-onset AF with concomitant ACS. These two groups of patients presented comparable rates of MACE and NACE at 6 months.

Antithrombotic Management in Ischemic Stroke with Essential Thrombocythemia: Current Evidence and Dilemmas

Thrombotic diseases like ischemic stroke are common complications of essential thrombocythemia (ET) due to abnormal megakaryopoiesis and platelet dysfunction. Ischemic stroke in ET can occur as a result of both cerebral arterial and venous thrombosis. Management of ET is aimed at preventing vascular complications including thrombosis. Acute management of ischemic stroke in ET is the same as that in the general population without myeloproliferative disorders. However, an ET patient with ischemic stroke is at high risk for rethrombosis and is therefore additionally managed with cytoreductive therapy and antithrombotic agents. Given abnormal platelet production in ET, there is suboptimal suppression of platelets with the standard recommended dose of aspirin for cardiovascular (CV) prevention. Hence, for optimal CV protection in ET, low-dose aspirin is recommended twice daily in an arterial thrombotic disease like atherothrombotic ischemic stroke in presence of the following risk factors: age >60 years, Janus kinase2 V617F gene mutation, and presence of CV risk factors. In the presence of the same risk factors, concurrent antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy is suggested for venous thrombosis. However, increased risk of bleeding with dual antithrombotic agents poses a significant challenge in their use in cerebral venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation in presence of the above-mentioned risk factors. We discuss these dilemmas regarding antithrombotic management in ischemic stroke in ET in this case-based review of literature in the light of current evidence.

Antithrombotic therapy in ventricular assist device (VAD) management: From ancient beliefs to updated evidence. A narrative review

Platelets play a key role in the pathogenesis of ventricular assist device (VAD) thrombosis; therefore, antiplatelet drugs are essential, both in the acute phase and in the long-term follow-up in VAD management. Aspirin is the most used agent and still remains the first-choice drug for lifelong administration after VAD implantation. Anticoagulant drugs are usually recommended, but with a wide range of efficacy targets. Dual antiplatelet therapy, targeting more than one pathway of platelet activation, has been used for patients developing a thrombotic event, despite an increased risk of bleeding complications. Although different strategies have been attempted, bleeding and thrombotic events remain frequent and there are no uniform strategies adopted for pharmacological management in the short and mid- or long-term follow up. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the evidence from randomized clinical trials and observational studies with a focus on the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying bleeding and thrombosis in VAD patients and the best antithrombotic regimens available.

Evaluation of therapy management and outcome in Takotsubo syndrome

Background

To date there is no validated evidence for standardized treatment of patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Medication therapy after final TTS diagnosis remains unclear. Previous data on patient outcome is ambivalent. Aim of this study was to evaluate medication therapy in TTS and to analyze patient outcome.

Methods

Within an observational retrospective cohort study we analyzed our medical records and included 72 patients with TTS that underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) after a median of 2 days interquartile range (IQR 1–3.5). We investigated medication therapy at discharge. Medication implementation and major adverse clinical events (MACE) were prospectively evaluated after a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 6–43). Left ventricular function, myocardial oedema and late gadolinium enhancement were analyzed in a CMR follow-up if available.

Results

Antithrombotic therapy was recommended in 69 (96%) patients including different combinations. Antiplatelet monotherapy was prescribed in 28 (39%) patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended in 29 (40%) patients. Length of therapy duration varied from one to twelve months. Only in one case oral anticoagulation was prescribed due to apical ballooning with a left ventricular ejection fraction <30%. In all other cases oral anticoagulation was recommended due to other indications. ß-adrenoceptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors were recommended in 63 (88%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were prescribed in 31 (43%) patients. After a median of 2 months (IQR 1.3–2.9) left ventricular function significantly recovered (49.1% ± 10.1 vs. 64.1% ± 5.7, P < 0.001) and myocardial oedema significantly decreased (13.5 ± 11.3 vs. 0.6% ± 2.4, P = <0.001) in the CMR follow-up. The 30-day mortality was 1%. MACE rate after 24 months was 12%.

Conclusion

Although therapy guidelines for TTS currently do not exist, we found that the majority of patients were treated with antithrombotic and heart failure therapy for up to twelve months. Left ventricular function and myocardial oedema recovered rapidly within the first two months. Outcome analysis showed a low bleeding rate and a high short-term survival. Therefore, TTS patients might benefit from antithrombotic and heart failure therapy at least for the first two months.

North American Thrombosis Forum, AF Action Initiative Consensus Document

The North American Thrombosis Forum Atrial Fibrillation Action Initiative consensus document is a comprehensive yet practical briefing document focusing on stroke and bleeding risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation, as well as recommendations regarding anticoagulation options and management. Despite the breadth of clinical trial data and guideline recommendation updates, many clinicians continue to struggle to synthesize the disparate information available. This problem slows the uptake and utilization of updated risk prediction tools and adoption of new oral anticoagulants. This document serves as a practical and educational reference for the entire medical community involved in the care of patients with atrial fibrillation.