Long term results of surgery for NSCLC and aortic invasion. A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Aorta involvement in NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Aortic invasion from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is a relative contraindication to surgery for oncological and technical reasons. Only a few studies have been published showing good results. Our aim was to evaluate short and long-term results of surgery for T4 NSCLC with aortic resection.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study including 47 patients (33 males and 14 females) who received a major lung resection with aortic surgery in our centers between January 2000 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 31 patients (66.0%). Induction therapy was used in 14 patients. Pneumonectomy was performed in 34 patients (72.3%). A subadventitial dissection with or without endovascular stent graft was carried out in 40 patients (85.1%), a cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 3 patients and left heart bypass in 4. Intraoperatively, two patients had bleeding (4.3%) and one ventricular fibrillation (2.1%). Twenty-three patients (48.9%) experienced at least one postoperative complication. A radical resection was achieved in 39 patients (83.0%). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality were 2.1% and 4.3%. One-, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 85.1%, 57.4% and 53.2%. Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly influenced by pathological lymph node status and R status that were independent predictive factors for poorer survival at the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic resection during surgery for NSCLC is a challenging situation. Nevertheless, oncologic outcomes may be favorable in selected cases justifying a risky procedure that should be performed in experienced hands.

Prognostic analysis of Behçet's disease with aortic regurgitation or involvement

Background

Aortic regurgitation is the most common cardiovascular damage in Chinese patients with Behçet’s disease (BD) and is usually associated with aortic disease. These patients are easily misdiagnosed, and their prognosis is poor, even after surgical treatment. This study aimed to analyse potential factors that can improve the prognosis of BD patients with aortic regurgitation and/or aortic involvement.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with diagnosed or suspected BD as well as aortic regurgitation and/or aortic involvement in our hospital from 2012 through 2017 were collected in this study. Their clinical characteristics were listed, and the diagnosis of BD was evaluated by two different criteria sets. The influences of surgical treatment and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) on their prognosis were also explored.

Results

The diagnostic positive rate of the International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease was higher than that of the International Study Group criteria (kappa value 0.31, p < 0.05), indicating that the diagnostic consistency between the criteria sets was poor. There was no significant difference in survival between patients who had undergone ≤ 1 operation and those with ≥ 2 operations. Aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with aortic root replacement had no significant effect on the incidence of reoperation or death, but IST did significantly reduce this incidence (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of reoperation or death between preoperative and postoperative IST versus postoperative IST only.

Conclusion

IST significantly improved the prognosis of BD patients with aortic regurgitation and/or aortic involvement.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-021-01567-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Optimising the mutation screening strategy in Marfan syndrome and identifying genotypes with more severe aortic involvement

Background

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a systemic connective tissue disorder with life-threatening manifestations affecting the ascending aorta. MFS is caused by dominant negative (DN) and haploinsufficient (HI) mutations of the FBN1 gene. Our aim was to identify mutations of MFS patients with high detection rate and to investigate the use of a gene panel for patients with Marfanoid habitus. We also aimed to examine correlations between genotype and cardiovascular manifestations to predict “malignant” mutations.

Methods

136 individuals were enrolled. In the first phase, next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Sanger sequencing were performed for 57 patients to screen the FBN1 gene, followed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in negative cases. For repeated negative results, NGS gene panel involving 9 genes was used. In the second phase, 79 patients were tested primarily with the same gene panel, negative samples were tested by MLPA.

Results

84 pathogenic mutations were detected, out of which 78 affected FBN1, 6 non-FBN1 mutations (2 TGFB2, 1 TGFBR2, 2 TGFBR1, 1 SMAD3) are associated with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). LDS patients had lower systemic score and they were younger, but their aortic involvement did not differ. MLPA detected 4 multi-exon deletions of FBN1 gene, which could not be identified by our first-step screening method. Aortic involvement (aortic dissection and/or dilation) did not differ significantly among HI and DN mutations (p = 0.061). Combined group of HI and DN mutations eliminating a disulphide-bonding cysteine (DN Cys) had significantly higher aortic involvement rate than DN mutations not eliminating a disulphide-bonding cysteine (DN non-Cys) (p < 0.001). Patients with DN Cys required significantly more aortic surgeries than HI and DN non-Cys mutations (p = 0.042 and p = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions

Due to the relevant number of mutations affecting genes other than FBN1, preferred approach for testing individuals with Marfanoid habitus is using a gene panel rather than single-gene analysis, followed by MLPA for negative samples. DN Cys and HI mutations should be considered as risk factors for aortic involvement. Genetic testing for patients with Marfanoid features and a systemic score under 7 is recommended, as LDS patients may have lower scores, but they may have severe cardiovascular manifestations.