Risk factors for fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Analysis of the European cohort in the real-world GAIN study

OBJECTIVE

To better understand drivers of disease progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), we assessed clinical and sociodemographic markers of fibrosis progression in adults with NASH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Physician-reported patient demographics and clinical characteristics were utilised from the real-world Global Assessment of the Impact of NASH (GAIN) study. Factors associated with likelihood of fibrosis progression since NASH diagnosis were identified using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Overall, 2349 patients in Europe from the GAIN study were included; mean age was 54.6 years and 41% were women. Significant covariates included age, years since diagnosis, employment status, fibrosis stage at diagnosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, liver transplant and liver biopsy at diagnosis. Risk of progression was 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.12-1.20; p<0.001) times higher for each additional year since NASH diagnosis and 5.43 (2.68-11.37; p<0.001) times higher when physicians proposed a liver transplant at diagnosis. Compared with full-time employed patients, risk of progression was 1.77 (1.19-2.60; p=0.004) times higher for unemployed patients and 3.16 (1.30-7.63; p=0.010) times higher for those unable to work due to NASH.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease duration, NASH severity and presence of other metabolic comorbidities could help to assess risk of progression in patients with NASH.

Pediatric patients with lysosomal acid lipase deficiency

Lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) deficiency is a rare, autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the LIPA gene, which produces cholesteryl ester and triglyceride accumulation predominantly in hepatocytes, adrenal glands, and gastrointestinal tract. We describe two new cases occurring in siblings, aged 5 and 7 years, who presented with hepatomegaly, dyslipidemia, and abnormal liver function. Percutaneous liver biopsy revealed portal inflammation, hypertrophic Kupffer cells with a foamy appearance and microvesicular steatosis with fibrosis. Immunostaining for lysosomal markers, cathepsin D and LAMP1 reflected the lysosomal nature of the lipid vacuoles. After enzymatic confirmation, enzyme replacement therapy was initiated for both siblings. Follow-up transaminase levels and lipid profiles showed a notable decrease in AST and ALT and a slight increase in HDL cholesterol. It is crucial to increase awareness of this rare condition among clinicians and pathologists. The expression of lysosomal markers around the lipid vacuoles might help diagnose LAL deficiency in pediatric patients.

Considerations for optimizing Wilson's disease patients' long-term follow-up

Wilson's disease is a sistemic genetic disease caused by the excessive accumulation of copper. The first and main involvement is in the liver, which can range from mild and transient elevation of transaminases to the onset of an overt cirrhosis or acute liver failure. It is known that up to 20-30% of these patients may evolve to liver cirrhosis during follow-up. In clinical practice, liver fibrosis is assessed mainly by using indirect and non-invasive tools (laboratory tests, liver elastography, ultrasound), similar to other prevalent chronic liver diseases. However, despite the fact that liver elastography is a valuable tool in general hepatology, the evidence of its usefulness and accuracy in Wilsońs disease is scarce. This review summarizes the available scientific data and their limitations in Wilson's disease.

Concordance between hepatic biopsy and the APRI index (Ast to Platelet Ratio Index) for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with autoimmune liver disease

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

It has been proposed that non-invasive methods may replace liver biopsy for the diagnosis of tissue damage in patients with autoimmune liver disease (ALD). The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic performance and degree of concordance between the APRI index and liver biopsy for diagnosing cirrhosis in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a cohort of patients with ALD, the value of the APRI index and liver biopsy results were determined according to the METAVIR score. The AUC and the degree of concordance between an APRI value >2 and a METAVIR score of F4 were evaluated as markers of liver cirrhosis, through a kappa statistic.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients (age 51 ± 13 years) were included. The most common autoimmune liver diseases were primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (40%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (24.3%) and AIH-PBC overlap syndrome (32.9%). Cirrhosis was confirmed by biopsy in 16 patients (22.9%). 15 patients (21.4%) had an APRI index >2 (Cirrhosis) and only six met both criteria. The AUC of the APRI was 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.88). The degree of concordance between the tests was low for an APRI cut-off point >2 (kappa 0.213; 95% CI 0.094-0.332), as well as for cut-off points >1.5, >1 and >0.5 (kappa 0.213, 0.255, 0.257, respectively) CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there is little concordance between APRI and liver biopsy for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with ALD. It should therefore not be used as a single diagnostic method to determine cirrhosis.

[Biochemical, serological and virologic follow-up in patients with chronic untreated hepatitis B virus infection: inactive carrier, chronic HBeAg-negative and immune-tolerant hepatitis]

Biochemical, serological and virologic follow-up is necessary for patients with chronic untreated HBV infection while the infection persists. For patients who are inactive carriers, follow-up helps detect reactivation or loss of HBsAg. After the loss of HBsAg, follow-up is not recommended unless the patient requires immunosuppressive therapy. For patients with chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis with normal ALT levels and a viral load between 2000 and 20,000 IU/mL, follow-up is required to assess the progression of the disease. For patients who are immune-tolerant, follow-up helps assess the spontaneous seroconversion of HBeAg.

[Biomarkers for liver fibrosis: advances, advantages and disadvantages]

Liver cirrhosis in Mexico is one of the most important causes of death in persons between the ages of 25 and 50 years. One of the reasons for therapeutic failure is the lack of knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that cause liver disorder and make it irreversible. One of its prevalent anatomical characteristics is an excessive deposition of fibrous tissue that takes different forms depending on etiology and disease stage. Liver biopsy, traditionally regarded as the gold standard of fibrosis staging, has been brought into question over the past decade, resulting in the proposal for developing non-invasive technologies based on different, but complementary, approaches: a biological one that takes the serum levels of products arising from the fibrosis into account, and a more physical one that evaluates scarring of the liver by methods such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography; some of the methods were originally studied and validated in patients with hepatitis C. There is great interest in determining non-invasive markers for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, since at present there is no panel or parameter efficient and reliable enough for diagnostic use. In this paper, we describe the biomarkers that are currently being used for studying liver fibrosis in humans, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the implementation of new-generation technologies and the evaluation of their possible use in the diagnosis of fibrosis.