Surgeon seniority and experience have no effect on CaP detection rates using MRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted biopsies

OBJECTIVE

To determine (i) whether urologist seniority and experience are associated with prostate cancer (CaP) and clinically significant CaP (csCaP) detection rates using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided targeted biopsies, taking multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) as the reference standard, and (ii) if cancer detection rates (CDR) differ across regions of the prostate using Dickinson's 27-sector map, regardless of seniority.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients with suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies at 1 center by 1 of 7 urologists (2 seniors and 5 juniors) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, following positive mpMRI.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 403 patients (454 lesions) aged 67.7±6.8. The combined (junior and senior) CDR was 57% for CaP and 28% for csCaP. There were no differences in CDR between junior and senior urologists for CaP (58% vs. 55%, P = 0.538) or csCaP (29% vs. 26%, P = 0.58). A general trend was observed for the learning curve, which indicated increasing CDR with urologist experience. Across the 27 sectors, combined CDR ranged between 39% and 99% for CaP and 1% to 67% for csCaP. When grouping anterior vs. posterior sectors, there were no differences in combined CDR of CaP (64% vs. 67%, P = 0.48) and csCaP (31% vs. 38%, P = 0.19) CONCLUSIONS: Urologist seniority is not associated with CDR, urologist experience tends to improve cancer detection, and CDR does not differ between the anterior and posterior regions of the prostate.

A cost-effective transperineal prostate biopsy method utilizes the original transrectal setting

PURPOSE

Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) offers an alternative to transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, TPB may result in additional disposable and capital equipment costs, which can limit implementation within urology practice. Herein, we report the initial experience of a novel TPB technique within a tertiary referral center in Taiwan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all men undergoing prostate biopsy January to October in 2021 was performed. Both biopsy techniques were performed with the same setting using the convex-convex array ultrasound probe under local anesthesia alone or with the addition of sedation using double free-hand technique. Complications within 30 days and cancer detection rate (CDR) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 118 biopsies were included for final analysis. Eleven patients received systematic biopsy with additional MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) cores with all performed via a transperineal approach. The TPB group (n = 47) and TRB group (n = 58) had similar CDR after excluding TB cores (46.8% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.675). General complication rates for TPB were significantly lower than in the TRB group (27.7% vs. 46.6%, p = 0.047). No patients undergoing TPB had infectious complications, where five episodes were recorded in the TRB group (p = 0.114).

CONCLUSIONS

TPB performed with convex-convex ultrasound probe and double free-hand technique is safe, feasible, cost-effective, and demonstrates equivalent CDR to TRB. Its use may eliminate infectious hospitalizations while minimizing the need for additional capital in the adoption of TPB.

Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients

BACKGROUND

Transrectal (TR) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and transperineal (TP) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy are the two most commonly used methods to detect prostate cancer, the detection rate of the two biopsy approaches may differ in patients with different clinical characteristics. Here we aimed to compare the prostate cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores between TR and TP prostate biopsy in patients with different clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed and compared the clinical data of 452 patients underwent TR or TP prostate biopsy in our hospital from June 2017 to September 2021. And patients were stratified according to several clinical characteristic (serum PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, T stage and ISUP grade), cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores were compared in different stratified groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, PSA level, prostate volume, and PSA density between the TR and TP groups. TR group had a higher overall cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores than TP group. Further subgroup analysis showed that TR group had a higher cancer detection rate in patients with prostate volumes 30-80 mL, and that the TR group had a higher positive rate of biopsy cores among the patients with T3-T4 stages, while TP group had a higher positive rates of biopsy cores among the patients with T1-T2 stages. There were no significant differences between the TR and TP groups for each subgroup when stratified by PSA level, PSA density and ISUP grade.

CONCLUSIONS

TR approach may have advantage in patients with prostate volumes 30-80 mL and T3-T4 stages, while TP approach may have advantage in patients with T1-T2 stages.

Preoperative MRI in breast cancer: effect of breast density on biopsy rate and yield

PURPOSE

Preoperative breast MRI is used to evaluate for additional cancer and extent of disease for newly diagnosed breast cancer, yet benefits and harms of preoperative MRI are not well-documented. We examined whether preoperative MRI yields additional biopsy and cancer detection by extent of breast density.

METHODS

We followed women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium with an incident breast cancer diagnosed from 2005 to 2017. We quantified breast biopsies and cancers detected within 6 months of diagnosis by preoperative breast MRI receipt, overall and by breast density, accounting for MRI selection bias using inverse probability weighted logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 19,324 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, 28% had preoperative MRI, 11% additional biopsy, and 5% additional cancer detected. Four times as many women with preoperative MRI underwent additional biopsy compared to women without MRI (22.6% v. 5.1%). Additional biopsy rates with preoperative MRI increased with increasing breast density (27.4% for extremely dense compared to 16.2% for almost entirely fatty breasts). Rates of additional cancer detection were almost four times higher for women with v. without MRI (9.9% v. 2.6%). Conditional on additional biopsy, age-adjusted rates of additional cancer detection were lowest among women with extremely dense breasts, regardless of imaging modality (with MRI: 35.0%; 95% CI 27.0-43.0%; without MRI: 45.1%; 95% CI 32.6-57.5%).

CONCLUSION

For women with dense breasts, preoperative MRI was associated with much higher biopsy rates, without concomitant higher cancer detection. Preoperative MRI may be considered for some women, but selecting women based on breast density is not supported by evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02980848; registered 2017.

The Effect of Supplemental Imaging on Interval Cancer Rates in Mammography Screening: Systematic Review

Supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound increases cancer detection rate (CDR) in women with standard screening mammography. Whether it also reduces interval cancer rate (ICR) is unclear. This study reviewed the evidence evaluating the effect of supplemental imaging on ICR in women undergoing screening mammography. This systematic review included studies that reported both CDR and ICR in women undergoing screening mammography alone compared to those undergoing screening mammography with supplemental imaging. Five studies (3 randomized trials) were eligible. These reported on 142,153 women undergoing mammography screening alone or mammography with supplemental imaging (3 ultrasound and 2 MRI studies). Two studies included a general screening population and 3 included special populations (young, high genetic risk and/or dense breasts). The incremental CDR for supplemental MRI was 14.2 to 16.5/1000 screens and for ultrasound was 0 to 4.4/1000 screens. Effect on ICR was variable but evidence of a reduced ICR was more consistent for studies using supplemental MRI (ICR 0.3 to 0.8 per 1000 screens) than those using ultrasound (ICR 0.49 to 1.9 per 1000 screens). The higher CDR and lower ICR with supplemental screening were associated with higher recall and biopsy rates particularly with supplemental MRI (9.5%-15.9%, up to 69/1000 screens). Cancers detected with supplemental imaging modalities were generally smaller and earlier stage. Mammography with supplemental MRI or ultrasound increases detection of cancers (versus mammography only) in some sub-groups but also increases recall and biopsy rates and may have a relatively modest effect in reducing ICR.

Association between radiologists' and facilities' characteristics and mammography screening detection of ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was, first, to measure association between radiologists and facilities characteristics and DCIS detection. Second, to assess whether those characteristics affect differently the likelihood of detection of DCIS versus invasive breast cancer. When applicable, we examined whether the identified characteristics were similarly associated with low-grade and high-grade DCIS detection.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1,750,002 digital screening mammograms (2145 screen-detected DCIS) performed in the Quebec breast cancer screening program between 2007 and 2015 inclusively. The associations between radiologists' and facilities' characteristics and (1) the DCIS detection rate, (2) the invasive detection rate, and (3) the odds of DCIS on invasive detection were assess. For statistically significant associations in the latter analysis, analyses stratified by DCIS grade were performed. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations estimates to account for correlation among mammograms was used.

RESULTS

Compared to radiologists with recall rate between 5.0 and 9.9%, radiologists with recall rate between 15.0-19.9% and ≥ 20% reached a higher DCIS detection rate, with adjusted detection ratios of, respectively, 1.33 (95% confidence interval = 1.15-1.53) and 1.43 (95% confidence interval = 1.13-1.81). Increase in radiologist' recall rate was statistically significantly associated with an increase in detection of low/intermediate-grade DCIS (P < 0.001), while not in high-grade DCIS (P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

A major determinant of DCIS detection is the radiologists' recall rate. Abnormalities referred by radiologists with higher recall rates should be identified in order to understand how to decrease recall rate while keeping an optimal DCIS and invasive detection rate.

Effect of gallbladder polyp size on the prediction and detection of gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder polyps are relatively common. Although most gallbladder polyps are benign, some are malignant. Current guidelines state that malignancy should be suspected for polyps ≥ 10 mm in diameter. We clarified the cancer detection rates in accordance with the size distribution of gallbladder polyps, and evaluated the effectiveness of the reported risk factors in predicting malignancy.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, our institutional database was searched to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign or malignant gallbladder polyps at Sada Hospital, Japan. The chi-squared test was used to analyze the risk factors for malignancy.

RESULTS

There were 227 protruding gallbladder lesions. The 206 benign polyps had a diameter of 2-21 mm, while the 21 malignant polyps were 7-60 mm. The cancer detection rates were 16.4% for lesions ≥ 10 mm, 55.9% for lesions ≥ 15 mm, and 94.1% for lesions ≥ 20 mm. Of the benign lesions, cholesterol polyps were the most frequent (50-100%) in all size ranges, even in large lesions (≥ 15 mm). The sessile lesion morphology was significantly more frequent in malignant (60%) than benign lesions (3.4%, p < 0.00001). Multiple polyps were frequently diagnosed not only as cholesterol polyps (81.1%), but also as adenomas (60%); adenomas were found as a single adenoma within other types of polyps. There were two cases of malignant small gallbladder polyps (< 10 mm); these lesions met the surgical indications of a size increase during observation or a sessile morphology.

CONCLUSIONS

The cancer detection rate increased significantly with an increase in the lesion size. Risk factors such as a sessile polyp morphology or an increase in lesion size were effective in predicting malignancy for small gallbladder polyps. It might be difficult to accurately predict the pathologic diagnoses of gallbladder polyps preoperatively, as cholesterol polyps were most frequent, even in the large size range.

Tracking Changes in Clinical Practice Patterns Following Prebiopsy Biparametric Prostate MRI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the change in clinical practice after implementation of prebiopsy biparametric MRI followed by targeted biopsy and the benefits of prebiopsy MRI based on real clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,661 patients who underwent either transrectal biopsy or prebiopsy MRI for suspected prostate cancer between October 2015 and March 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. To evaluate temporal changes in clinical practice, the study time was divided into five periods of six months. Prebiopsy prostate MRI was officially started in April 2016 in this center. Differences in practice patterns were compared among the five periods, and differences in biopsy results were compared in three groups: no prebiopsy MRI, negative MRI and positive MRI.

RESULTS

Prostate cancers were diagnosed in 463 patients. The proportion of patients who underwent prebiopsy MRI regardless of biopsy increased from 22.6% in period 1 to 84.4% in period 5 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who avoided biopsy according to MRI results increased significantly from 9.0% in period 1 to 48.1% in period 5 (P < 0.001). The prostate cancer detection rate and the number of positive cores were lower in the negative MRI group than those in the positive MRI and no prebiopsy MRI groups.

CONCLUSION

Prebiopsy MRI using biparametric MRI protocol has been well adapted to the practice and it is useful in stratifying the probability of clinically significant prostate cancer.

The effect of multiplicity of PI-RADS 3 lesions on cancer detection rate of confirmatory targeted biopsy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and managed with active surveillance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of multiplicity of prostate imaging reporting and data system assessment category 3 (PI-RADS 3) lesions on cancer detection rate (CDR) of confirmatory targeted biopsy of such lesion in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and managed with active surveillance.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a single academic institution. There were 91 men with ≥ 1 PI-RADS 3 lesion detected through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after systematic prostate biopsy in the course of management of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with active surveillance. We compared the CDRs based on targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3 lesions that occurred (1) as solitary lesions, (2) as 1 of multiple PI-RADS 3 only lesions, or (3) with ≥ 1 higher grade lesion.

RESULTS

Median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range 59.5-70.0), median prostate specific antigen was 5.95 ng/ml (interquartile range 4.30-8.83), and median prostate specific antigen density was 0.161 ng/ml² (0.071-0.194). Forty-three men had solitary PI-RADS 3 lesions, 22 had multiple PI-RADS 3 only lesions, and 26 had multiple lesions with ≥ 1 higher grade lesion. The overall CDR (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 3) based on confirmatory MRI targeted biopsy in a given PI-RADS 3 lesion in each group was 23%, 45%, and 54%, respectively (P = 0.0274). The CDRs for clinically significant disease (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) were 16%, 32%, and 35%, respectively (P = 0.1701).

CONCLUSIONS

Coexisting lesions increase the CDR of confirmatory MRI targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3 lesions in patients managed with active surveillance. Risk stratification algorithms for PI-RADS 3 lesion to guide biopsy and management decisions may consider including multiplicity of lesions.

Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of tomosynthesis imaging as a function of age for breast cancer screening.

METHODS

Screening performance metrics from 13 institutions were examined for 12 months prior to introduction of tomosynthesis (period 1) and compared to those after introduction of tomosynthesis (period 2, range 3-22 months). Screening metrics for women ages 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70+ , included rates per 1000 screens for recalls, biopsies, cancers, and invasive cancers detected.

RESULTS

Performance parameters were compared for women screened with digital mammography alone (n = 278,908) and digital mammography + tomosynthesis (n = 173,414). Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography produced significant reductions in recall rates for all age groups and significant increases in cancer detection rates for women 40-69. Largest recall rate reduction with tomosynthesis was for women 40-49, decreasing from 137 (95% CI 117-156) to 115 (95% CI 95-135); difference, -22 (95% CI -26 to -18; P < .001). Simultaneous increase in invasive cancer detection rate for women 40-49 from 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-1.9) to 2.7 (95% CI 2.2-3.1) with tomosynthesis (difference, 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.6; P < .001) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography increased invasive cancer detection rates for women 40-69 and decreased recall rates for all age groups with largest performance gains seen in women 40-49. The similar performance seen with tomosynthesis screening for women in their 40s compared to digital mammography for women in their 50s argues strongly for commencement of mammography screening at age 40 using tomosynthesis.

TRUS Biopsy Yield in Indian Population: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The reported cancer detection rate of Trans-Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsies (TRUS biopsy yield) has been around 30 percent in western countries. However it is much lower in Asian countries, including India. Hence a larger proportion of patients in India undergo unnecessary biopsies.

AIMS

To find out the cancer detection rate of TRUS biopsy (TRUS biopsy yield) in contemporary Indian population. Also, to study the positive predictive values at different serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)/PSA Density (PSAD) cut off levels and suspicious Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care institute. All symptomatic patients who underwent TRUS guided biopsy for indication of raised serum PSA level (>4 ng/ml) or suspicious DRE findings (nodule, irregularity, hard consistency, immobile rectal mucosa) from January 2012 to December 2014 were included. For serum PSA range (4-10) ng/ml, TRUS guided biopsy was done in patients with percent free/total PSA < 25. Statistical analysis used were Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman's rank correlation analysis and Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Out of the 235 patients included, 60 patients had malignancy (overall cancer detection rate= 25.53%). The cancer detection rate for PSA ranges of (4-10) and (10-20) ng/ml was as low as 5.95% and 13.16% respectively. Patients with malignant disease had significantly smaller prostate gland size than patients with benign disease (53.89 vs 63.06; p-value <0.05). On the other hand, cancer detection rate was 100% for PSA greater than 50ng/ml. The cancer detection rates were only upto 10% for PSA density ranges upto 0.25 ng/ml/cm³. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for PSA and PSAD was 0.876 and 0.884 respectively. Only one patient (0.43%) had post-biopsy complication (acute bacterial prostatitis) requiring hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

The current serum PSA and PSAD cut offs of 4 ng/ml and 0.15 ng/ml/cm³ need to be raised for Indian population to increase its positive predictive value. Prospective study validation of this finding is lacking.