Diana RB, Carlos CC, Marle DG, Santiago J. [From the Principle of Beneficence to the Principle of Autonomy. Assessment of Patients' Mental Competency in the General Hospital].
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr 2012;
41:395-407. [PMID:
26573502 DOI:
10.1016/s0034-7450(14)60013-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2012] [Accepted: 05/02/2012] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Refusing a medical procedure is a valid way of exercising every patient's right to autonomy. From the legal point of view, autonomy is based on the right to privacy. In recent decades the legal right to self-determination has gradually expanded and today patients in full possession of their mental faculties, have the moral and legal right to make their own decisions and these decisions take precedence over physician and family. Often liaison psychiatrists are called in to assess the mental competence of patients in the general hospital.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the psychiatrist's role in evaluating these patients.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The assessment of a patient's ability to decide and self-determine is a common clinical problem in general hospitals. Evaluation of these patients requires a proper understanding of the philosophical, ethical, and legal issues that guide the appropriate treatment of these complex clinical problems.
Collapse