Combining Clinical and Molecular Data to Predict the Benefits of Carmustine Wafers in Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of carmustine wafers (CWs) in the management of high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The data from our monoinstitutional series was compared with studies reported in the literature. Special emphasis was placed on the evaluation of side effects and the analysis of extent of resection and molecular profile as risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implantation of CWs into the resection cavity during HGG treatment to deliver localized chemotherapy, followed by the Stupp protocol, remains debated in a clinical setting, largely due to the lack of appropriate phase III studies. Given the high expense and poorly characterized side effects associated with CW treatment, identification of patients most likely to benefit from this therapy could be clinically relevant. CWs may represent an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with HGG that exhibit complete tumor resection and harboring a methylated MGMT promoter. Our investigation showed a much larger group of patients exhibiting long-term survival (> = 36 months), strongly supporting a potential survival benefit conferred via CW treatment. The pre-surgical definition of the MGMT promoter status could be of clinical use in identifying "good responders" to CW implantation.

Carmustine wafer implantation for high-grade gliomas: Evidence-based safety efficacy and practical recommendations from the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery

There is a growing body of evidence that carmustine wafer implantation during surgery is an effective therapeutic adjunct to the standard combined radio-chemotherapy regimen using temozolomide in newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade glioma patient management with a statistically significant survival benefit demonstrated across several randomized clinical trials, as well as prospective and retrospective studies (grade A recommendation). Compelling clinical data also support the safety of carmustine wafer implantation (grade A recommendation) in these patients and suggest that observed adverse events can be avoided in experienced neurosurgeon hands. Furthermore, carmustine wafer implantation does not seem to impact negatively on the quality of life and the completion of adjuvant oncological treatments (grade C recommendation). Moreover, emerging findings support the potential of high-grade gliomas molecular status, especially the O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase promoter methylation status, in predicting the efficacy of such a surgical strategy, especially at recurrence (grade B recommendation). Finally, carmustine wafer implantation appears to be cost-effective in high-grade glioma patients when performed by an experienced team and when total or subtotal resection can be achieved. Altogether, these data underline the current need for a new randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of a maximal safe resection with carmustine wafer implantation followed by the standard combined chemoradiation protocol stratified by molecular status in high-grade glioma patients.

Outcome of patients affected by newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery assisted by 5-aminolevulinic acid guided resection followed by BCNU wafers implantation: a 3-year follow-up

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the association of BCNU wafers implantation and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Clinical and surgical data from patients who underwent 5-ALA surgery followed by BCNU wafers implantation were retrospectively evaluated (20 patients, Group I) and compared with data of patients undergoing surgery with BCNU wafers alone (42 patients, Group II) and 5-ALA alone (59 patients, Group III). Patients undergoing 5-ALA assisted resection followed by BCNU wafers implantation (Group I) resulted long survivors (>3 years) in 15 % of cases and showed a median PFS and MS of 11 and 22 months, respectively. Patients treated with BCNU wafers presented a significantly higher survival when tumor was removed with the assistance of 5-ALA (22 months with vs 18 months without 5-ALA, p < 0.0001); these data could be partially explained by the significantly higher CRET achieved in patients operated with 5-ALA assistance (80 % with vs 47 %% without 5-ALA). Moreover, patients of Group I showed a significant increased survival compared with Group III (5-ALA without BCNU) (22 months with vs 21 months without BCNU wafers, p = 0.0025) even with a comparable CRET (80 % vs 76 %, respectively). The occurrence of adverse events related to wafers did not significantly increase with 5-ALA (20 % with and 19 % without 5-ALA) and did not impact in survival outcome. In conclusion, our experience shows that on selected ndGBM patients 5-ALA technology and BCNU wafers implantation show a synergic action on patients' outcome without increasing adverse events occurrence.

Current status of local therapy in malignant gliomas--a clinical review of three selected approaches

Malignant gliomas are the most frequently occurring, devastating primary brain tumors, and are coupled with a poor survival rate. Despite the fact that complete neurosurgical resection of these tumors is impossible in consideration of their infiltrating nature, surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapeutics, including radiation therapy and chemotherapy, is still the current standard therapy. Systemic chemotherapy is restricted by the blood-brain barrier, while methods of local delivery, such as with drug-impregnated wafers, convection-enhanced drug delivery, or direct perilesional injections, present attractive ways to circumvent these barriers. These methods are promising ways for direct delivery of either standard chemotherapeutic or new anti-cancer agents. Several clinical trials showed controversial results relating to the influence of a local delivery of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with both recurrent and newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. Our article will review the development of the drug-impregnated release, as well as convection-enhanced delivery and the direct injection into brain tissue, which has been used predominantly in gene-therapy trials. Further, it will focus on the use of convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of patients with malignant gliomas, placing special emphasis on potential shortcomings in past clinical trials. Although there is a strong need for new or additional therapeutic strategies in the treatment of malignant gliomas, and although local delivery of chemotherapy in those tumors might be a powerful tool, local therapy is used only sporadically nowadays. Thus, we have to learn from our mistakes in the past and we strongly encourage future developments in this field.