Transanal irrigation bowel routine for people with Cauda Equina Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Neurologic bowel incontinence and dysfunction are common with Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Peristeen Anal Irrigation System (PAIS)TM in people with CES.

DESIGN

Clinical Trial.

SETTING

Spinal Cord Rehabilitation outpatient clinic at the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg.

METHODS

Twelve participants with a mean age of 46.2 years (range 34-72 years, 4 females) with CES used PAISTM bowel routine for 10 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBD) over 10 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes: Change in St. Mark's Fecal Incontinence score (SMFI), Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCC), and modified Rectal Surgeons Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score (QOL) at week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 compared to baseline, and self-rating of bowel function at baseline and 10 weeks. Additionally, colonic transit times were assessed using the radioactive markers (Sitzmarks) method.

RESULTS

Ten participants completed the study. Post-intervention primary outcome NBD score improved (p < 0.01). Secondary outcomes also improved significantly, including SMFI (p < 0.01), CCC (p < 0.01), QOL (p < 0.01), self-rating of bowel function (p < 0.01), and transit time improved by 22% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, a significant improvement was observed with the PAISTM for both primary, as well as secondary outcome measures, without any significant adverse effects. As this non-pharmaceutical method of bowel management is effective and has the potential to improve symptoms of bowel dysfunction in people with CES, it should be considered for those in which traditional methods of managing neurogenic bowel fail.

Early experience of a local pathway on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting to a UK district general hospital with suspected cauda equina syndrome

AIM

This study evaluated the impact of the Salisbury Protocol for Assessment of Cauda Equina Syndrome (SPACES) on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting with suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (sCES) within a UK district general hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing an MRI scan in our hospital, for sCES, over a 12 month period, prior to and following the introduction of SPACES, were identified. Patient's gender, age, MRI diagnosis, time from MRI request to imaging and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

In the year prior to the introduction of SPACES, 66 patients underwent MRI for sCES, out of which 10.6% had cauda equina compression (CEC), 63.5% had other spinal pathology and 25% had a normal scan. In the year after introduction of SPACES, 160 patients underwent MRI for sCES out of which 6.2% had CEC, 70.7% had other spinal pathology and 23% had a normal scan. Despite the referrals for sCES increasing by more than 2-fold following the introduction of SPACES, the median time from MRI request to scan decreased from 9.1 to 4.2 hours (p = 0.106, Mann-Whitney-U) and the number of patients transferred to the regional hub hospital decreased from 7 to 3.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of SPACES for patients with sCES resulted in a substantial reduction in waiting time for MRI and decreased the number of transfers to the regional hub hospital. Based on our early experience, we encourage other centres within the UK to introduce such a pathway locally, to improve the management of patients with sCES.

Chiropractic Management of a Symptomatic Patient Who Previously Had Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome

Objective

The purpose of this report is to describe the outcomes of chiropractic care for a patient after surgery for cauda equina syndrome.

Clinical Features

Following surgery for cauda equina syndrome caused by a herniated lumbar disc at L5/S1, a 28-year old woman presented for chiropractic care with an 18-month history of lower back pain. She had bilateral L5 and S1 dermatome pain and paraesthesia; saddle anesthesia; bilateral leg weakness in the L4, L5, and S1 myotomes; and urinary incontinence.

Intervention and Outcome

The patient received a variety of chiropractic manipulative techniques including cervical and thoracic spine manipulation, instrumented adjustments to the lumbar spine, and drop technique to the sacroiliac joints. Trigger point therapy was performed on the gluteus medius, quadratus lumborum, and piriformis muscles bilaterally. After 12 months, the patient reported a reduction in lower back and radicular leg pain, was able to reduce her use of opioid medications, and experienced improved lower limb function following chiropractic care.

Conclusion

The patient responded favorably to a course of chiropractic care for symptoms remaining after surgery for cauda equina syndrome.

The morbidity of out-of-hours surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome

BACKGROUND

There is no literature specifically addressing the morbidity of out of hours surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). Our paper rectifies this omission. This will assist the surgeon with real-time decision making with regards to timing of intervention in this rare but potentially disabling disease.

METHODS

A retrospective case series analysis. Individual cases were identified using local electronic theatre management systems in the four neurosurgical centres in Scotland in 2017. "Out of hours" surgery was defined as starting outside the times 0900-1700 Monday to Friday.

RESULTS

86 patients underwent out of hours surgery for CES in Scotland in 2017. One patient sustained a nerve root injury without new deficit, giving an overall risk of 1.2%. Four patients had the intra-operative complication of CSF leak, giving an overall risk of 4.7%. Five patients underwent early revision surgery, equivalent to a re-operation risk of 5.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity of out of hours surgery for CES is comparable to that of elective microdiscectomy. Operating out of hours for CES does not appear to have an increased risk of complications. Since increased surgical risk is not borne out by our study, this should not be used as a justification to delay operative treatment.

When infection mimics cauda equina syndrome: a cautionary tale

A 63-year-old man presented to the emergency department with low back pain, perineal and genital numbness, together with bilateral lower limb paraesthesia and urinary retention. He was admitted under the orthopaedic service for investigation of suspected cauda equina syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging of his spine did not reveal any evidence of cauda equina compression. Magnetic resonance imaging of his brain demonstrated nonspecific multiple hyperintensities in the right frontotemporal and left temporo-occipital regions. Computed tomography of his chest, abdomen, and pelvis did not identify any evidence of malignancy. Cerebrospinal fluid from a lumbar puncture showed a high leucocyte count (predominantly lymphocytes). Viral cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reaction was positive for varicella zoster virus. A diagnosis of varicella zoster virus myeloradiculitis (Elsberg syndrome) was established and the patient was treated with intravenous aciclovir. Unfortunately, the patient succumbed to a devastating intracerebral haemorrhage during his inpatient stay, probably due to vasculopathy from the underlying varicella zoster virus infection. This case describes a rare infectious mimic of cauda equina syndrome. Elsberg syndrome is an infectious syndrome characterised by bilateral lumbosacral myeloradiculitis, with varicella zoster virus being a well-recognised aetiological agent. We discuss the relevant literature in detail and identify the key, cautionary lessons learned from this case.

Operative Management of Perinatal Lumbar Disc Herniation and Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Case Series

Introduction Perinatal lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation or cauda equina syndrome is a rare clinical scenario. This case series outlines the surgical management of this clinical scenario at a national tertiary referral centre over a 10-year period Methods A retrospective review of all females who underwent discectomy / decompression for lumbar disc herniation or cauda equina syndrome in the perinatal period at a national tertiary referral centre for spine surgery over a 10-year period between January 2008 to December 2017. Results 6 cases required surgical intervention. All patients were successfully managed with surgical decompressive procedures and recovered well in the postoperative period without complication. Conclusions The principles of management remain the same in the pregnant and non-pregnant populations, although treatment options are complicated by the desire to avoid risk to the developing foetus. Surgical intervention is safe to both mother and baby and if performed promptly is associated with an excellent functional outcome.

Study on different surgical approaches for acute Lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome

To compare the long and short term effectiveness and complications of different surgical approaches for Lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome and find a better surgical method for the disease. In this study, follow up records of 144 patients received conventional laminectomy and minimally invasive decompression and fenestration 48 hours within acute injury of lumber disk protrusion combined with Cauda Equina Syndrome were analyzed. Surgical outcome immediately and 3, 6, 12, 36 months after the surgery were compared to evaluate the effectiveness two different approaches. The results indicated that there are no significant differences regarding age, sexual proportion, body mass index (BMI), visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) score as well as Frankel scores before the surgery, and significant differences VAS score as well as Frankel scores immediately after the surgery. In conclusion, minimally invasive decompression and fenestration can be of the same effectiveness and less complications comparing with the conventional laminectomy.

Serious Adverse Events and Spinal Manipulative Therapy of the Low Back Region: A Systematic Review of Cases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically search the literature for studies reporting serious adverse events following lumbopelvic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and to describe the case details.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library up to January 12, 2012, by an experienced reference librarian. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers using predefined criteria. We included cases involving individuals 18 years or older who experienced a serious adverse event following SMT applied to the lumbar spine or pelvis by any type of provider (eg, chiropractic, medical, physical therapy, osteopathic, layperson). A serious adverse event was defined as an untoward occurrence that results in death or is life threatening, requires hospital admission, or results in significant or permanent disability. We included studies published in English, German, Dutch, and Swedish.

RESULTS

A total of 2046 studies were screened, and 41 studies reporting on 77 cases were included. Important case details were frequently unreported, such as descriptions of SMT technique, the pre-SMT presentation of the patient, the specific details of the adverse event, time from SMT to the adverse event, factors contributing to the adverse event, and clinical outcome. Adverse events consisted of cauda equina syndrome (29 cases, 38% of total); lumbar disk herniation (23 cases, 30%); fracture (7 cases, 9%); hematoma or hemorrhagic cyst (6 cases, 8%); or other serious adverse events (12 cases, 16%) such as neurologic or vascular compromise, soft tissue trauma, muscle abscess formation, disrupted fracture healing, and esophageal rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review describes case details from published articles that describe serious adverse events that have been reported to occur following SMT of the lumbopelvic region. The anecdotal nature of these cases does not allow for causal inferences between SMT and the events identified in this review. Recommendations regarding future case reporting and research aimed at furthering the understanding of the safety profile of SMT are discussed.