Upper extremity venous thrombosis in hospitalized patients: A prospective epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

The frequency of upper extremities vein thrombosis (UEVT) is rising with the increasing use of endovenous devices. These thromboses are particularly common among hospitalized patients. The epidemiology and risk factors for UEVT are poorly understood in a hospitalized population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of UEVT in hospitalized patients and study thrombosis risk factors according to their location.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of patients hospitalized in a university hospital with clinical and Doppler ultrasound (DUS) assessment of the upper extremities.

RESULTS

Of the 400 patients included, 91(22.8 %) had UEVT including 8 (8.8 %) proximal thrombosis, 32 (35.2 %) arm venous thrombosis and 51 (56.0 %) forearm venous thrombosis; 7 (7.7 %) patients with UEVT had a concomitant symptomatic pulmonary embolism. In this population of hospitalized patients, 40 (10 %) had proximal or arm thrombosis and 51 (12.8 %) forearm thrombosis. All patients with UEVT had a venous catheter and 63 (69.2 %) of UEVT patients had therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation at the time of DUS evaluation. In multivariate analysis, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) OR 3.71 [1.90; 7.91] (p < 0.001); MID line OR 3.58 [1.46; 8.91] (p = 0.005) and infection disease OR 2.21 [1.26; 4386] (p = 0.005) were associated with UEVT. Central venous catheter OR 66.24 [12.64; 587.03] was associated with proximal UEVT and MID line OR 12.61 [4.64; 35.77] (p < 0.001) with arm UEVT. Forearm UEVT were associated with PIVCOR 10.71[3.14; 67.37] (p = 0.001); infectious disease OR 2.87 [1.48; 5.60] (p = 0.002), iron infusion OR 3.11 [1.23; 7.47] and hospitalization for postpartum OR 4.37 [0.97; 18.06] (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

One in 5 hospitalized patients suffers from UEVT. Proximal venous thrombosis is uncommon. The presence of a catheter and hospitalization for infection are the factors most frequently associated with UEVT.

Catheter-related bloodstream infection due to biofilm-producing Capnocytophaga sputigena

•

Capnocytophaga sputigena is a rare pathogen with diverse clinical presentations.

•

We report a case of catheter-related C. sputigena bloodstream infection.

•

C. sputigena clinical isolates can form biofilms in vitro.

•

Biofilm development by Capnocytophaga species may potentiate disease pathogenesis.

Capnocytophaga sputigena is a facultatively-anaerobic bacterium that is part of the human oropharyngeal microflora. Although C. sputigena bacteremia is uncommon, systemic infections have been reported in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. We report a case of catheter-related bloodstream infection by C. sputigena and highlight its enhanced biofilm-forming capacity in vitro.

Overlooked guide wire: a multicomplicated Swiss Cheese Model example. Analysis of a case and review of the literature

Objectives: Central venous catheter (CVC) implementation is now usual in emergency department. The most common complications are misplacement, bleeding, pleural perforation, thrombosis and sepsis. Forgetting a guide wire in the patient's body after catheterization is an underestimated complication of this procedure; only 76 cases are described. Even if the majority of patients remained asymptomatic, severe complications can happened even years later. This article's aim is to identify the sequence of elements that led to the event occurrence and to suggest recommendations of good practice to minimize complications related to central catheter placement.Method: After reviewing all the complications related to central venous catheterization and their frequencies, we analyse from a case report and a review of the literature the sequence of elements that led to the medical error. We use an Ishikawa diagram to show our results and the links between them.Results: Our Ishikawa diagram shows that material, human resources, procedural and radiological involvement factors are the main elements on which we can act to reduce the complications rate after central venous catheterization. We advocate for the establishment of standardized procedures before, during and after the technical gesture.Conclusions: Because of human nature, errors will always be possible when taking care of a patient. However, we propose good practice recommendations to avoid the repetition of a forgetting guide wire after central venous catheterization.

Successful percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Fractured catheter as a foreign body in situ is a rare complication after port catheter placement. We report a single center's experience on percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter and treatment techniques.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter from Jan 2010 to Dec 2018 were retrospectively collected. A total of 10 patients (8 females and 2 males) were enrolled in this study. Procedures were performed within 1 day after diagnosis. Two methods of retrieval were considered, direct retrieval by gooseneck snare and guide wire as media to retrieve were used in the procedure.

RESULTS

All the fractured catheters in 10 patients were successfully retrieval by 2 methods, direct retrieval by gooseneck snare(n = 6) and guide wire as media of retrieval(n = 4). The time interval between port catheter implantation and discovery of catheter fracture was 36.50 ± 42.99(ranged 1 to 146) days. The operation time was 24.10 ± 8.32(ranged 10 to 36) minutes. No immediate procedure related or 1 month follow-up complications occurred in all the 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter is a simple and safe procedure, which maybe recommended as the first choice for patients with fractured port catheter in situ.

Comparison of heparinized saline and 0.9% sodium chloride for maintaining central venous catheter patency in healthy dogs

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether heparinized saline (HS) would be more effective in maintaining the patency of central venous catheters (CVCs) in dogs compared to 0.9% sodium chloride. This was a prospective randomized blinded study conducted at a University Veterinary Teaching Hospital.

Methods

A total of 24 healthy purpose-bred dogs were randomized into two groups: a treatment and a control group. A CVC was placed in the jugular vein of each dog. Each dog in the treatment group had their CVC flushed with 10 IU/mL HS, while dogs in the control group had their CVC flushed with 0.9% sodium chloride every 6 h for 72 h. Immediately prior to flushing, each catheter was evaluated for patency by aspiration of blood. The catheter site was also evaluated for phlebitis, and a rectal temperature was obtained in each dog every 6 h. Prothrombin (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) times were evaluated prior to the administration of any flush solution. Results were then compared to values obtained 72 h later.

Results

All CVCs in both groups were patent after 72 h, which was demonstrated by aspiration of blood and ease of flushing the catheter. Two CVCs in the 0.9% sodium chloride group had a negative aspiration at hour 12 and 36, respectively. One CVC in the HS group had a negative aspiration at hour 18. Signs of phlebitis occurred in three dog: two in the 0.9% sodium chloride group and one in the HS group. No dog was hyperthermic (>103 °F). Two catheters were inadvertently removed by dogs in the HS group during the study. There were no significant differences in catheter patency, incidence of phlebitis, or incidence of negative aspirations between both groups. aPTT and PT values remained within the normal reference range for all dogs in both groups. Ultimately, 0.9% sodium chloride was as effective as 10 IU/mL HS in maintaining the patency of CVCs for up to 72 h in healthy dogs. Further evaluation in clinical patients is warranted.

Fluid resuscitation in Ebola Virus Disease: A comparison of peripheral and central venous accesses

INTRODUCTION

Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) causes severe diarrhoea and vomiting, leading to dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities. Treatment remains supportive and often requires intravenous (IV) access. IV catheters are difficult to insert and maintain in this context. Our primary objective was to compare peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) for volume resuscitation in patients with EVD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study between January and March 2015 at the Conakry Healthcare Workers Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU). The primary judgement criterion was the ratio of the daily infused volume of fluids to the prescribed volume (DIV/PV).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were admitted. Twenty-eight PVCs and 8 CVCs were inserted. CVCs had a longer survival time (96 ± 34 hours versus 33.5 ± 21 hours, P<0.001). The mean DIV/PV was higher for the CVCs (0.95±0.08 versus 0.7 ± 0.27, P<0.001), as well as the number of days with full administration of prescribed IV fluids (71.2% versus 34.1%, P=0.002).

DISCUSSION

Inserting CVCs is a safe and reliable way of obtaining IV access in ETUs, provided adequately trained personnel are available. CVCs optimize fluid infusion compared to PVCs. Further studies comparing fluid management strategies in EVD are necessary.