Effects of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin on vascular function in patients with chronic heart failure

AIMS

Impairment of vascular function contributes to the progression of chronic heart failure (HF) by increasing the afterload. Treatment with selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improves the prognosis of HF, but the precise mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of empagliflozin on vascular function in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In an investigator initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical study, patients with HF NYHA II-III and an ejection fraction of 49% or less were randomized 2:1 to receive empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for 3 months. A total of 74 patients (15% female), aged 66 ± 9 years, with a mean ejection fraction of 39 ± 8% and a median NTproBNP of 558 pg/mL (IQR 219-1051 pg/mL), were included. Vascular parameters such as central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), central pulse pressure (cPP), forward (FPH), and reflected pressure pulse height (RPH) decreased under resting conditions after 1 and 3 months (1 month: cSBP -6.4 ± 8.3 mmHg, P < 0.001, cPP -3.0 ± 6.6 mmHg, P = 0.004, FPH -2.5 ± 4.5 mmHg, P = 0.001, RPH -1.6 ± 3.0 mmHg, P = 0.001; 3 months: cSBP -4.6 ± 8.4 mmHg, P = 0.001, cPP -3.1 ± 4.8 mmHg, P < 0.001, FPH -1.7 ± 3.7 mmHg, P = 0.004, RPH -1.4 ± 2.5 mmHg, P = 0.001) in patients treated with empagliflozin (n = 45). In accordance, cSBP and cPP decreased in patients with empagliflozin treatment under 24 h ambulatory conditions after 1 and 3 months (1 month: cSBP -4.8 ± 10.1 mmHg, P = 0.003, cPP -2.0 ± 5.7 mmHg, P = 0.026; 3 months: cSBP -4.7 ± 9.0 mmHg, P = 0.002, cPP -2.1 ± 6.4 mmHg, P = 0.044). In the placebo group, there was no significant change after 1 and 3 months. The decrease in cSBP under resting conditions (-5.7 ± 2.4 mmHg, P = 0.019) after 1 month and in cSBP (-6.0 ± 2.6, P = 0.027) as well as in pulse wave velocity (-0.5 ± 0.2 m/s, P = 0.021) under 24 h ambulatory conditions after 3 months was greater in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an improvement of vascular function after treatment with empagliflozin that indicates decreased afterload of the left ventricle and may contribute to the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibition in HF.

Combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin improves blood pressure and vascular function in type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Preserved vascular function represents a key prognostic factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but data on vascular parameters in this patient cohort are scarce. Patients with T2DM often need more than one drug to achieve optimal glucose control. The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of two combination therapies on vascular function in subjects with T2DM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, randomized study included 97 subjects with T2DM. Subjects were randomized to either the combination therapy empagliflozin (E) 10 mg with linagliptin (L) 5 mg once daily or metformin (M) 850 or 1000 mg twice daily with insulin glargine (I) once daily. At baseline and after 12 weeks, subjects had peripheral office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement and underwent vascular assessment by pulse wave analysis under office and ambulatory conditions. Office, 24-h ambulatory and central BP as well as pulse pressure (PP) decreased after 12 weeks of treatment with E + L, whereas no change was observed in M + I. There were greater decreases in 24-h ambulatory peripheral systolic (between-group difference: -5.2 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.004), diastolic BP (-1.9 ± 1.0 mmHg, P = 0.036), and PP (-3.3 ± 1.0 mmHg, P = 0.007) in E + L than M + I. Central office systolic BP (-5.56 ± 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.009), forward pressure height of the pulse wave (-2.0 ± 0.9 mmHg, P = 0.028), 24-h ambulatory central systolic (-3.6 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.045), diastolic BP (-1.95 ± 1.1 mmHg, P = 0.041), and 24-h pulse wave velocity (-0.14 ± 0.05m/s, P = 0.043) were reduced to a greater extent with E + L.

CONCLUSION

Beyond the effects on glycaemic control, the combination therapy of E + L significantly improved central BP and vascular function compared with the classic combination of M + I.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT02752113.

Is vascular remodelling in patients with chronic heart failure exaggerated?

BACKGROUND

Vascular remodelling of large arteries increases afterload of the left ventricle. The aim of this study was to analyse whether vascular remodelling and function under laboratory and 24-hour ambulatory conditions is impaired in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) independently of cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this monocentric cross-sectional observational study, 105 patients with CHF and an ejection fraction ≤49% (CHF+) were compared to 118 subjects without CHF (CHF-). After adjustment for age, gender, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity and smoking, vascular function and structure parameters, as assessed by pulse wave analysis (SphygmoCor) and the UNEX EF device, respectively, between the CHF+ and the CHF- group differed for resting pulse wave velocity (PWV) (P = 0.010), 24-h ambulatory PWV (P = 0.011), central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) (P = <0.001), 24-h ambulatory cSBP (P = <0.001), resting central augmentation index (P = 0.002), and brachial intima-media thickness (P = 0.022). In CHF+ patients, higher levels of NT-proBNP, taken as a marker for the severity of CHF, were related to a higher PWV (r = 0.340, P = <0.001), a higher cSBP (r = 0.292, P = 0.005), and a trend to higher central pulse pressure (cPP) (r = 0.198, P = 0.058), higher 24-h brachial PP (r = 0.322, P = 0.002), and 24-h total peripheral resistance (s = 0.227, P = 0.041) after full adjustment for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

In CHF+ patients we observed augmented vascular remodelling and functional impairment compared with CHF- patients independently of cardiovascular risk factors, age, and gender, and the extent of vascular remodelling and impairment was related to the severity of CHF.