Fixed in the neck or pushed back into the thorax?-Impact of cervical anastomosis position on anastomosis healing

Background

Cervical anastomotic leakage remains a great challenge for thoracic surgeons in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the factors affecting cervical anastomosis healing, the surgical technique is the key controllable element. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy, especially those controllable surgical factors.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy in the past eight years in West China Hospital was performed. Patients with cervical anastomotic leakage were assigned to leakage group (LG) while the left was enrolled in the none-leakage group (NLG). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage.

Results

A total of 518 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In the baseline comparison, the difference in fixation of anastomosis in the neck, anastomosis mode, diabetes, and hypertension between the LG and NLG reached statistically significant. Moreover, the statistical difference of cervical fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The cervical anastomosis fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension are independent risk factors of gastroesophageal cervical anastomotic leakage.

Oblique conformal anastomosis decreased the risks of cervical anastomotic leakage after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of the original oblique conformal anastomosis presented in this research in reducing the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak after performing totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE).

METHODS

The esophagus and stomach of 27 fresh pigs, termed the esophagogastric model, were used to simulate human esophagogastric organs for this study's in vitro experimental objectives. Nine esophagogastric models of similar weight were divided into three groups. Esophagogastrostomy with circular-stapled end-to-side anastomosis was performed. A tension gauge was used to pull the anastomosis, and the tension at which anastomotic leakage occurred was recorded. Furthermore, a retrospective assessment of 539 patients who underwent TMIE was conducted to analyze the influencing factors of cervical anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

Experiments on the esophagogastric models showed a higher fracture strength of oblique conformal anastomosis than that of conventional anastomosis (F2,18 = 40.86, P < 0.05), which was associated with a lower incidence of cervical anastomotic leakage (X2 = 9.0260, P = 0.0027). Retrospective analysis of 539 esophageal cancer patients who underwent TMIE showed that in contrast to conventional anastomosis, oblique conformal anastomosis was an independent protective factor against cervical anastomotic leakage (P = 0.0462, OR = 0.5872, 95% CI = 0.3497-0.9993).

CONCLUSION

Oblique conformation anastomosis was stronger and involved a more prominent reduced risk of cervical anastomotic leakage than conventional anastomosis after TMIE.