Prevalence of co-occurring diagnoses in people exposed to alcohol prenatally: Findings from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) commonly experience co-occurring diagnoses, which are often overlooked and misdiagnosed and have detrimental impacts on accessing appropriate services. The prevalence of these co-occurring diagnoses varies widely in the existing literature and has not been examined in PAE without an FASD diagnosis.

METHOD

A search was conducted in five databases and the reference sections of three review papers, finding a total of 2180 studies. 57 studies were included in the final analysis with a cumulative sample size of 29,644. Bayesian modeling was used to determine aggregate prevalence rates of co-occurring disorders and analyze potential moderators.

RESULTS

82 % of people with PAE had a co-occurring diagnosis. All disorders had a higher prevalence in individuals with PAE than the general population with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disorder, and intellectual disability (ID) being the most prevalent. Age, diagnostic status, and sex moderated the prevalence of multiple disorders.

LIMITATIONS

While prevalence of disorders is crucial information, it does not provide a direct representation of daily functioning and available supports. Results should be interpreted in collaboration with more individualized research to provide the most comprehensive representation of the experience of individuals with PAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-occurring diagnoses are extremely prevalent in people with PAE, with older individuals, females, and those diagnosed with FASD being most at risk for having a co-occurring disorder. These findings provide a more rigorous examination of the challenges faced by individuals with PAE than has existed in the literature, providing clinicians with information to ensure early identification and effective treatment of concerns to prevent lifelong challenges.

The role of co-occurring disorders in criminal recidivism and psychiatric recovery among adults with opioid use disorder and criminal-legal involvement: A statewide retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the criminal-legal system commonly present co-occurring mental health disorders. However, evidence-based treatment for high-risk populations such as those with co-occurring disorders is often unavailable within jails and prisons. Coordination of timely and affordable access to behavioral health treatment following incarceration is critical to address the multidimensional needs of people with co-occurring needs. However, the role of co-occurring disorders among adults with OUD and criminal-legal involvement who are accessing community-based treatment is understudied.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated community and recovery outcomes among 2039 adults with OUD and criminal-legal involvement enrolled in a statewide forensic treatment initiative between October 2015 to March 2018. Using court records and clinical data, we assessed the impact of co-occurring OUD and mental health disorders on criminal recidivism and psychiatric recovery and the moderating role of co-occurring disorders on the relationship between community-based treatment and these outcomes.

RESULTS

We found that 47 % of those with OUD also had an underlying mental health disorder. Co-occurring OUD and mental health disorders predicted higher rates of recidivism during the early stages of treatment. Furthermore, group and individual therapy services were associated with lower odds of recidivism. A co-occurring disorder was an important predictor of more severe behavioral health needs when exiting community-based services and did moderate the relationship between service utilization-specifically group therapy and substance use outpatient services-and psychiatric recovery (i.e., behavioral health needs at exit).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-occurring mental health disorders are highly prevalent among adults with OUD who have criminal-legal involvement, but it appears that they can benefit from social support services in the community. Given the multidimensional needs of this high-risk population, criminal-legal stakeholders and community-based clinicians must work in tandem to develop tailored treatment plans that give individuals with co-occurring OUD and mental health disorders the best chance for success post-incarceration rather than a siloed approach to overlapping disorders.

Implementing clinical guidelines for co-occurring substance use and major mental disorders in Swedish forensic psychiatry: An exploratory, qualitative interview study with mental health care staff

INTRODUCTION

Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring mental disorders (COD) within forensic psychiatric care often suffer poor treatment outcomes and high rates of criminal recidivism, substance use, and psychiatric problems. This study aimed to describe the conditions for, and mental health care staff's experiences with, implementing integrated SUD-focused clinical guidelines, including assessment and treatment for patients with COD at a high-security forensic mental health services (FMHS) facility in Sweden.

METHODS

Study staff conducted nineteen semi-structured interviews with health care staff experienced in administering the new SUD assessment and treatment. The study conducted a thematic analysis to describe the health care staff's experiences with these guidelines and suggestions for improvement.

RESULTS

Most participants reported appreciation for the implementation of clinical guidelines with an SUD focus, an area they considered to have previously been neglected, but also noted the need for more practical guidance in the administration of the assessments. Participants reported the dual roles of caregiver and warden as difficult to reconcile and a similar, hindering division was also present in the health care staff's attitudes toward SUD. Participants' reports also described an imbalance prior to the implementation, whereby SUD was rarely assessed but treatment was still initiated. One year after the implementation, an imbalance still existed, but in reverse: SUD was more frequently assessed, but treatment was difficult to initiate.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite indications of some ambivalence among staff regarding the necessity of the assessment and treatment guidelines, many participants considered it helpful to have a structured way to assess and treat SUD in this patient group. The imbalance between frequent assessment and infrequent treatment may have been due to difficulties transitioning patients across the "gap" between assessment and treatment. To bridge this gap, mental health services should make efforts to increase patients' insight concerning their SUD, flexibility in the administration of treatment, and the motivational skills of the health care staff working with this patient group. Participants considered important for enhancing treatment quality a shared knowledge base regarding SUD, and increased collaboration between different professions and between in- and outpatient services.