Chang-Sotomayor M, Llorens Bellés V, Latasiewicz M, Torras-Sanvicens J, Blanco-Domínguez I, Sabater-Cruz N, Sainz-de-la-Maza M, Bosch-Mestres J, Palma-Carvajal F. Comparison of two methods for obtaining and transporting corneal samples in suspected infectious keratitis.
J Fr Ophtalmol 2020;
43:477-483. [PMID:
32444133 DOI:
10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.010]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to compare two alternative methods of collecting and transporting media for the diagnosis of corneal ulcers, as not all clinical settings have conventional culture materials and transport media available.
METHODS
In this open-label, prospective, comparative, and randomized study, patients with clinical suspicion of infectious keratitis with high risk of loss of vision had corneal specimens collected using two methods and transport media: Eswab scraping with Amies transport medium and 23-gauge needle scraping in BACTEC Peds broth. The order of each collection method was randomized. The samples were processed by standard methods, comparing the positivity frequencies for both by parametric and nonparametric tests, according to normality criteria.
RESULTS
Corneal infiltrates from 40 eyes of 40 patients were analyzed. Culture positivity rate was 50% for Eswab and 35% for 23-gauge needle (P=0.258). The overall growth rate of the two methods combined was not higher than with the swab alone. The results obtained with a swab were not influenced by the collection sequence (P=0.112); however, the positivity rate was significantly higher when the sample taken with the needle was performed first (P=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS
The single sample Eswab method of collection and transportation for the diagnosis of high risk corneal ulcers is a valid alternative and can be used in cases in which, for various reasons, there is no access to the full set of traditional culture materials.
Collapse