Impact of rectal gas on the planning target volume margin for pelvic bone and prostate matching in prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric-modulated arc therapy

We performed daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the impact of rectal gas on the movements of prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs). We aimed to determine the relationship between planning target volume (PTV) margins and rectal gas. In 30 treatments of 15 prostate cancer patients, excessive rectal gas was removed and CBCT images were analyzed. Image registration between planning CT and daily CBCT images before and after rectal gas removal was performed for pelvic bone and prostate matching. The couch movement distance between each matching was considered the prostate movement. In addition, we measured SV tip movement between each matching. The anterior-posterior movement of the prostate before rectal gas removal (3.1 ± 2.9 mm) was significantly greater than that after rectal gas removal (1.2 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.01). The left-right and superior-inferior movements were similar regardless of the presence or absence of rectal gas. The SV movement distances before and after rectal gas removal were 11.0 ± 5.8 mm and 4.6 ± 3.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in pelvic bone matching, and 8.0 ± 4.2 mm and 3.8 ± 3.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in prostate matching. After rectal gas removal, the SV position did not differ significantly between each matching. In 26 of the 30 treatments, SV movement distance in the presence of rectal gas was >6 mm, which is the minimum PTV margin at our institution. In comparison, after rectal gas removal and prostate matching, only 6 treatments demonstrated an SV movement distance of >6 mm. In the presence of rectal gas, the SVs require greater PTV margins than the prostate. Rectal gas removal should be considered if the movement distance on prostate matching is greater than the minimum PTV margin at treating institution.

Difference in VMAT dose distribution for prostate cancer with/without rectal gas removal and/or adaptive replanning

We investigated differences in the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dose distribution in prostate cancer patients treated by rectal gas removal and/or adaptive replanning. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed daily for 22 treatments in eight prostate cancer patients with excessive rectal gas, and the CBCT images were analyzed. Rectal gas removal was performed, and irradiation was delivered after prostate matching. We compared dose-volume histograms for the daily CBCT images before and after rectal gas removal. Plan A was the original plan on CBCT images before rectal gas removal. Plan B was a single reoptimized plan on CBCT images before rectal gas removal. Plan C was the original plan on CBCT images after rectal gas removal. Plan D was a single reoptimized plan on CBCT images after rectal gas removal. D₉₅ of the planning target volume (PTV) minus the rectum of Plan C (94.7% ± 6.6%) was significantly higher than that of Plan A (88.5% ± 10.4%). All dosimetric parameters of Plan C were improved by rectal gas removal compared with Plan A, regardless of the initial rectal gas volume. Dosimetric parameters of PTV minus the rectum of Plan B were significantly improved compared with Plan C. Additionally, the V₇₈ of the rectal wall of Plan B (0.2% ± 0.5%) was significantly improved compared with Plan C (3.9% ± 6.3%, p = 0.003). The dosimetric parameters of Plan D were not significantly different from Plan B. The dose distribution of prostate VMAT was improved by rectal gas removal and/or adaptive replanning. An adaptive replanning on daily CBCT images might be a better method than rectal gas removal for prostate cancer patients with excessive rectal gas.