Investigation of dairy cow performance in different udder health groups defined based on a combination of somatic cell count and differential somatic cell count

Mastitis is still the costliest disease in milk production. In particular, its subclinical form, which may spread unnoticeably within a herd, is a major challenge. Somatic cell count (SCC) is broadly used as an indicator for mastitis and thus the basis for udder health management programmes, e.g. through dairy herd improvement (DHI) testing. Since recently, differential somatic cell count (DSCC, representing the combined proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and lymphocytes as a percentage of total SCC) is available in addition. Our study was aimed to investigate dairy cow performance in four newly defined udder health groups (UHG) based on SCC and DSCC results from DHI testing. In total, 961,835 test-day results generated in Austria, China, Estonia, Germany, and Spain between January 2019 and March 2020 were available for data analyses. Cows were categorised into four UHG depending on test day SCC and DSCC results (UHG A: healthy/normal, ≤200,000 cells/mL and ≤65 %; B: suspicious, ≤200,000 cells/mL and >65 %; C: mastitis, >200,000 cells/mL and >65 %; D: chronic/persistent mastitis, >200,000 cells/mL and ≤65 %). Linear mixed effect models were used to compare the performance of cows between the UHG based on the parameters milk weight, energy-corrected milk, fat, protein, lactose, and estimated milk value. Highest performance was found for cows in UHG A and ranged between 21.4 (Austria) and 38.3 kg per cow and day (Spain). Interestingly, cows in group B were significantly less productive (0.9-2.4% less daily milk production) compared to those in group A. Cows in groups C (6.0-9.8% less daily production compared to group A) and D were, as expected, even less productive with a particularly significant drop for cows in group D (17.5-38.5% less daily production). These trends could be observed in all countries involved in this study. Proportions of cows in the four different UHG differed between countries, changed slightly within countries depending on season, differed depending on parity and days in milk, and were seen to vary hugely between herds. In conclusion, this study demonstrates changes in performance of dairy cows depending on their udder health status as defined based on the combination of SCC and DSCC. In particular cows in UHG B and D are of interest as they cannot be identified working with SCC only. Nevertheless, the actual udder health management measures that could be taken based on the new UHG still require further investigation.

Evaluation of the new differential somatic cell count parameter as a rapid and inexpensive supplementary tool for udder health management through regular milk recording

Mastitis, particularly in its subclinical form, is the costliest disease in milk production causing substantial financial losses to the dairy industry, impairing animal welfare, and one of the main reasons for treating dairy cows with antimicrobials. Somatic cell count (SCC) is broadly used as an indicator for mastitis or intramammary infection (IMI) and is the basis for udder health management programmes, e.g., through monthly dairy herd improvement (DHI) testing. While SCC shows the total number of cells in milk, the new Differential SCC (DSCC) shows also the combined proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and lymphocytes as a percentage of the total SCC. In this study, we investigated the test characteristics of DSCC as a new supplementary indicator for mastitis screening. We collaborated with 11 herds totalling 969 dairy cows and collected metered DHI samples once a month over four months. The IMI status was assessed through analysis of aseptic composite hand-stripped samples using culture and followed by species identification using MALDI-ToF. The pathogens detected were categorised as 'no', 'minor', 'major', or 'other' pathogens. The results of our study showed that the DSCC parameter was significantly associated with the IMI status and the cow's parity but not with days in milk or test-day milk weight. On the other hand, SCC was associated with all these four factors. DSCC counts were significantly higher in samples of cows with IMI caused by major pathogens as compared to cows with no IMI or IMI by minor or other pathogens. SCC alone, DSCC alone, and the combination of DSCC and SCC were further compared based on test characteristics using exemplary cut-offs. For example, working with a cut-off of 200,000 cells/ for SCC alone compared to working with the combination of DSCC of 65 % and/or 200,000 cells/mL to classify cows as infected by major pathogens, the sensitivity increased from 78 % to 92 % and the specificity decreased from 87 % to 66 %. With the combination, the positive predictive value changed from 52 % to 34 %, and the negative predictive value stayed at the same level (96 % vs 98 %). In summary, our study provides first insights on test characteristics of the DSCC parameter used in combination with the well-established SCC for monitoring udder health using DHI testing. This combination opens up the possibility to further improve udder health monitoring programmes (e.g., improved identification of IMI caused by major pathogens) but more work on the subject is needed.