Systemic anticoagulation in ECMO

While unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the mainstay of anticoagulation during pediatric extracorporeal life support, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are increasingly used. In this article, we will review most recent evidence regarding utilization of both UFH and DTIs and compare their known advantages and disadvantages. We will present anticoagulation monitoring strategies during ECMO and outline the most recent Extracorporeal Life Support Organization's anticoagulation guidelines, however with the caveat that there are no true consensus recommendations for anticoagulation management in pediatric ECMO. With these updates, we will serve as the bedside clinician's refresher on common practices for anticoagulation during "routine" ECMO. We will additionally highlight special circumstances, including high risk surgical procedures during ECMO, in which adjustments in anticoagulation and/or addition of antifibrinolytic therapy might mitigate risk.

Assays to Monitor Bivalirudin

Bivalirudin (Angiomax, Angiox) is a parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) that is used for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), where heparin cannot be used due to the risk of thrombosis. Bivalirudin is also licensed for use in cardiology procedures (e.g., percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; PTCA). Bivalirudin is a synthetic analogue of hirudin found in the saliva of the medicinal leech and has a relatively short half-life of ~25 min. Several assays can be used to monitor bivalirudin; these include the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), activated clotting time (ACT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), an ecarin-based chromogenic assay, thrombin time (TT), the dilute TT, and the prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT). Drug concentrations can also be measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and clotting or chromogenic-based assays with specific drug calibrators and controls.

Measuring Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can be quantified using methods that can be performed in any clinical or research laboratory using manual or automated instrument platforms. Dabigatran etexilate, the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, can be quantified by drug-calibrated clot or chromogenic-based assays using either thrombin or ecarin as substrates. Oral direct anti-Xa inhibitors, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, can be quantified with drug-calibrated anti-Xa kits or reagents as typically used for measuring heparins (unfractionated, low molecular weight, or pentasaccharides).

Performance of various laboratory assays in the measurement of dabigatran in patients receiving therapeutic doses: a prospective study based on peak and trough plasma levels

OBJECTIVES

To study dabigatran etexilate, a new oral anticoagulant that functions as a direct thrombin inhibitor.

METHODS

This study evaluates four methods, one of which is performed in three different laboratories, and compares results against dabigatran levels measured by Boehringer-Ingelheim (Ingelheim, Germany) using mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Although routine monitoring is not required, measurement of plasma concentrations may be necessary in certain clinical situations. Routine coagulation assays such as the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and thrombin time do not reliably determine levels of dabigatran anticoagulation. Alternative assays, when calibrated with a dabigatran standard, such as the modified dilute thrombin time, ecarin clotting time, and ecarin chromogenic assay, may be appropriate, although a comparison of these methods using samples from patients taking dabigatran has not been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although results using all methods in this study demonstrate adequate correlation, measured dabigatran levels varied in a statistically significant manner, even when the same method was used by different laboratories. The clinical significance of this variation in dabigatran concentrations is uncertain.