[Prostate cancer boost using high-dose-rate brachytherapy: impact of the learning curve on the dosimetry]

PURPOSE

To analyse the influence of the learning curve on dosimetric data for high-dose-rate brachytherapy prostate cancer boost.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2009 to May 2012, after a first course of external beam radiation therapy (46Gy/23 fractions), 124 patients underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost using Plato™ (Nucletron, an Elekta company, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The impact of the learning curve on the dosimetric quality of the prostate implant was assessed. The dosimetric data have been analysed: clinical target volume (CTV), D90 (dose to 90 % of CTV), D100, V100 (part on the CTV receiving 100 % of the dose), V150, V200 and DHI (dose non-homogeneity index). The doses delivered to 0.1, 1 and 2 cm(3) of the rectum and urethra were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period (39 months), a significant reduction of V150 (P<0.001), V200 (P<0.001), D0.1rectum (P<0.001), D1rectum (P<0.001), D2rectum (P<0.001), D0.1urethra (P<0.001), and D1urethra (P<0.002) was observed associated with a significant degradation of the D90 (P<0.001) but not significant for the V100 (P=0.29) and the D100 (P=0.3).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the dosimetric quality of high-dose-rate brachytherapy prostate implant is significantly improved during the learning curve period.

[Organization and prerequisites for the delegation of dosimetry tasks]

The planning of irradiation treatments is a task of medical physics, based on the appropriate calculations of a dose distribution from radiation beams, virtually set up on a simulation software. This task is at the centre of the chain of treatment preparation: between the contouring phase and the objective definition, which are specialties of the radiation oncologist, and the joint validation of the treatment plan by the physician and the physicist. Historically, this task has been performed by the medical physicist, but can be delegated to other professionals, especially radiation technologists. The evolution of the techniques and procedures tends to a specialization of the skilled workers toward this new work of dosimetry specialist or treatment planning technician. In this paper, the training, relational and organizational aspects will be described to explain how the delegation of the tasks, in the context of treatment plan preparation between professionals can be set up with the highest level of quality and security for the patient treatment and with the respect of legal obligations and requirements of each profession.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases: Optimizing the dosimetric parameters

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATc_Eclipse®), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATnc_Eclipse®), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATnc_Elements®). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm³.

RESULTS

Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATnc_Elements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATnc_Eclipse® or VMATnc_Elements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA.

[Dosimetric and toxicity comparison of IMRT and 3D-CRT of non-small cell lung cancer]

PURPOSE

Although three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) remains the gold standard as a curative treatment for NSCLC when surgery is not possible, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used routinely. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical (immediate toxicities) and dosimetric impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT in the treatment of locally advanced (stages IIIA to IIIC) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy, while IMRT in lung cancer was implemented in the radiotherapy department of the Jean-Perrin Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2015 and October 2019, 64 patients treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy were retrospectively included. Thirty-two received 3D-CRT and 32 IMRT. The radiotherapy prescription was 66Gy in 33 fractions of 2Gy.

RESULTS

IMRT has improved coverage of target volumes (V95 increased by 14.81% in IMRT; P<0.001) without increasing doses to OARs and reducing dysphagia (RR=0.67; P=0.027). Low doses to the lung were not significantly increased in IMRT (pulmonary V5 increased by 7.46% in IMRT).

CONCLUSION

Intensity modulated radiotherapy, compared with the standard RC3D technique, improve the coverage of target volumes without increasing the dose to the OARs. It also improves the immediate tolerance of the treatment by reducing the number of dysphagia.

[Measurement of out-of-field dose to the uterus during proton therapy of the head and neck]

The decision to irradiate during pregnancy is based on a risk benefit compromise of two kinds: maternal risk and fetal risk. The aim of this work is to determine the foetal risk, and uterine dose measurement in proton therapy. Foetal exposure during treatment is linked to two sources: the treatment phase, and the repositioning phase. An Alderson-Rando anthropomorphic ghost (170cm, 74kg) was positioned on the table in the treatment position. A tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC), adapted to the analysis of complex radiation fields (neutron and photonics), was used to determine the irradiation related to the treatment phase. An AT1123 radiation survey meter was used to measure photons generated by X-ray radiation. I dosimetry was proposed using radio-photoluminescent dosimeters, allowing for a daily check of the dose received in the uterus. The treatment phase produces higher uterine doses than the positioning phase, but these remain very low. The equivalent dose received in the uterus for the entire treatment is estimated at 840 μSv. Using a methodology for measuring the out-of-field dose with pencil beam scanning proton therapy, the foetal dose in the first trimester was well below the acceptance dose of 100 mGy determined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

[Primary lymphoma of the skull: Case report and literature review]

Primitive lymphomas of the bone are exceptional tumors, representing 4% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The location at the skull remains the rarest. We report the case of a 56 year old patient with lytic lesions in the skull of a small cell lymphoma B, treated with primary chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in arctherapy with a dose of 30Gy in 15 fractions. With a follow-up time of 18 months after the end of treatment, the patient has no sign of disease evolution.

[Predictive factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis after irradiation of head and neck cancers]

The identification of the different risk factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) must be done before and after the management of patients with head and neck cancer. Various clinical criteria for this severe radiation-induced complication are related to the patient (intrinsic radiosensitivity, malnutrition associated with thin weight loss, active smoking intoxication, microcapillary involvement, precarious oral status, hyposalivation) and/or related to the disease (oral cavity, large tumor size, tumor mandibular invasion). Therapeutic risk factors are also associated with a higher risk of ORN (primary tumor surgery, concomitant radio-chemotherapy, post-irradiation dental avulsion, preventive non-observance with the absence of stomatological follow-up and daily installation of gutters fluoride and, non-observance curative healing treatments). Finally, various dosimetric studies have specified the parameters in order to target the dose values distributed in the mandible, which increases the risk of ORN. An mean mandibular dose greater than 48-54Gy and high percentages of mandibular volume receiving 40 to 60Gy appear to be discriminating in the risk of developing an ORN.

Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing versus respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy via four-dimensional computed tomography-based volumetric-modulated arctherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to use respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy (RT) to reduce side effects and to compare dosimetric factors with free-breathing planning in patients with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Simulation images were obtained in 10 respiratory phases with free breathing using four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scanner. Planning target volume (PTV) was created with 5mm margins in each direction of the internal target volume delineated using the maximum intensity projection. A volumetric arc treatment (VMAT) plan was created so that the prescribed dose would cover 98% of the PTV. Target volumes for the free-breathing VMAT plan were created according to ICRU Reports 62 and the same prescribed dose was used.

RESULTS

Patients were evaluated during January 2020. Median 63Gy (59.4-64) RT was administered. Median PTV volumes were 173.53 and 494.50cm3 (P=0.008) and dose covering 95% of PTV volume was 62.97 and 60.51Gy (P=0.13) in 4D-CT based and free-breathing VMAT plans, respectively. The mean and V50 heart dose was 6.03Gy (vs. 10.36Gy, P=0.043) and 8.2% (vs. 33.9%, P=0.007), and significantly lower in 4D-CT based VMAT plans and there was also found a non-significant reduction for other risky organ doses.

CONCLUSION

Ten patients treated with respiratory motion-managed RT with 4D-CT based VMAT technique. It was observed that PTV did not increase, the target was covered with 95% accuracy, and with statistical significance in heart doses, all risky organ doses were found to be less.

Deep learning applied to dose prediction in external radiation therapy: A narrative review

Over the last decades, the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in medical fields has skyrocketed. Well known for their results in segmentation, motion management and posttreatment outcome tasks, investigations of machine learning and deep learning models as fast dose calculation or quality assurance tools have been present since 2000. The main motivation for this increasing research and interest in artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning is the enhancement of treatment workflows, specifically dosimetry and quality assurance accuracy and time points, which remain important time-consuming aspects of clinical patient management. Since 2014, the evolution of models and architectures for dose calculation has been related to innovations and interest in the theory of information research with pronounced improvements in architecture design. The use of knowledge-based approaches to patient-specific methods has also considerably improved the accuracy of dose predictions. This paper covers the state of all known deep learning architectures and models applied to external radiotherapy with a description of each architecture, followed by a discussion on the performance and future of deep learning predictive models in external radiotherapy.

Dosimetric impact of iodinated contrast agent on planning CT for volumetric-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancers requires accurate delineation of target volumes and organs at risk. Iodinated contrast agents enhance visualization, but their impact on dose distribution remains a concern. Traditionally, dosimetry is performed on non-contrast CT scans to minimize dose calculation discrepancies. This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of planning directly on contrast-enhanced CT scans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve patients with head and neck cancers (oral cavity, oropharynx, pharyngolarynx, ethmoid, thyroid) treated using volumetric-modulated radiation technique were included. Target and organs at risk delineation and dose calculation were performed on contrast-enhanced CT scans and subsequently transferred to non-contrast CT scans without renormalization. Prescribed doses for high-risk planning target volume were 60 to 70Gy, for low-risk planning target volume 54Gy, in 30 to 33 fractions. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning was performed on Eclipse® (version 15.6), with simultaneous integrated boost, using the AAA dose calculation algorithm. Dosimetric variations in organs at risk and planning target volumes were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean variations of mean dose for organs at risk mandible, larynx, parotid glands, and pharyngeal constrictor muscle ranged from 0.02Gy (0.10 %) to 0.16Gy (0.38 %). Mean D2 % variations for spinal canal, brainstem, brachial plexus, and carotid arteries ranged from 0.05Gy (0.17 %) to 0.16Gy (0.46 %). None of the variations for organs at risk were found to be statistically or clinically significant. For planning target volumes, variations in coverage by the 95 % isodose of the prescribed dose were always less than 1 %. The maximum variation of maximum dose was a decrease of 0.6Gy, representing 0.8 %.

CONCLUSION

Performing volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning directly on contrast-enhanced CT scans leads to minimal dosimetric variations (less than 1 %) compared to non-contrast CT scans. This approach could streamline clinical workflows by eliminating the need for dual CT acquisitions and optimizing treatment preparation.

[Experimental determination of correction factors of four detectors used in small field radiotherapy]

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to determine experimentally the correction factors [Formula: see text] for four active commercial dosimeters: two microchambers and two diode detectors based on the output factor measured with radiochromic film for a radiotherapy linear accelerator equipped with circular cones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially, a radiochromic film dosimetry measurement protocol with an accuracy of 2% was developed to approach the "reference output factor". Afterwards, the corrective factors of four detectors were determined for two ionization chambers (PinPoint PTW 31016 3D, Micropoint Extradin A16) and two diodes (PTW T60017 Diode, PTW-60019 Micro-Diamond). These measurements were carried out under conical BrainLAB^® collimators defining circular fields with diameters equal to 7.5mm, 10mm, 12.5mm, 15mm, 17.5mm, 20mm, 25mm, 30mm, 35mm and 45mm of a 6MV X-ray beam generated by the ClinaciX linear accelerator (Varian^®). These factors are weakly dependent on the type of accelerator, whether the model and the collimation type. This allowed their comparisons with those published for the same type of detector and for an accelerator with the same index of beam quality.

RESULTS

The correction factors obtained experimentally were comparable in maximum deviation of 1.9% with published ones of the works using the same type of detector (mark and model) and an accelerator delivering the same beam quality for the same field size at the measurement point.

CONCLUSION

The measurement protocol using the EBT3 film, which was used as a passive dosimeter to determine the "reference output factor", was validated by comparing measured and published data of active detector correction factors.

[Combination of internal and external beam radiotherapy]

External beam radiation therapy and internal vectorized radiation therapy are two types of radiotherapy that can be used to treat cancer. They differ in the way they are administered, and the type of radiation used. Although they can be effective in treating cancer, they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and their combination could be synergistic. Preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy have mainly used radiolabelled antibodies, whose bone marrow toxicity remains the limiting factor in increasing the administered activities. The use of small radioligands in clinical trials has shown to be better tolerated and more effective, which explains their rapid development. The results of preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy appear heterogeneous, making it impossible to determine an ideal therapeutic sequencing scheme, and complicating the transposition to clinical studies. The few clinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy available to date have demonstrated feasibility and tolerability. More work remains to be done in the fields of dosimetry and radiobiology, as well as in the sequencing of these two irradiation modalities to optimize their combination.

["Optimizing Imaging and Dose-Response in Radiotherapies" XVIth workshop organised by the Cancéropôle Grand-Ouest's "Vectorisation, Imagerie, Radiothérapies" network - 4-7 October 2023, Erquy, France]

The sixteenth edition of the international workshop organized by "Tumour Targeting & Radiotherapies" network of the Cancéropôle Grand-Ouest focused on the problem of optimizing the dose-effect relationships of internal and external radiotherapy, using a variety of innovations from different disciplines, such as technological and imaging advances, vectorization, artificial intelligence, modeling and combined therapies.

A multidisciplinary view of flash irradiation

The delivery of ultra-high dose rates of radiation, called flash irradiation or flash-RT, has emerged as a new modality of radiotherapy shaking up the paradigm of proportionality of effect and dose whatever the method of delivery of the radiation. The hallmark of flash-RT is healthy tissue sparing from the side effects of radiation without decrease of the antitumor efficiency in animal models. In this review we will define its specificities, the molecular mechanisms underlying the flash effect and the ongoing developments to bring this new modality to patient treatment.