Risk of tuberculosis after endoscopic resection and gastrectomy in gastric cancer: nationwide population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the association between gastrectomy and endoscopic resection for gastric cancer and the subsequent tuberculosis incidence.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide matched cohort study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service from 2013 to 2019. We created two cohorts: patients who underwent gastrectomy and those who had endoscopic resection. Each patient was matched 1:1 with an unexposed individual based on index year, age, sex, income, and various comorbidities. The primary outcome was the incidence of tuberculosis during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Our study comprised 90,886 gastrectomy patients and 46,759 endoscopic resection patients. The tuberculosis incidence was significantly higher in the gastrectomy group compared to its matched non-gastrectomy group (IRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.43-1.99, p < .001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in tuberculosis incidence between the endoscopic resection group and its matched non-resection group (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.19, p = 0.627). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence also did not differ between the two groups. However, tuberculosis incidence significantly increased in the first year after endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSION

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with a higher incidence of subsequent tuberculosis, while no significant association was observed for endoscopic resection. However, tuberculosis incidence increases significantly during the first year after endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic Findings and Treatment of Gastric Neoplasms in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

PURPOSE

Gastric neoplasia is a common manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics, endoscopic features including fundic gland polyposis (FGPsis), and treatment outcomes of gastric neoplasms (GNs) in patients with FAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 35 patients diagnosed with FAP, including nine patients from four pedigrees who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), were investigated regarding patient characteristics, GN morphology, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (60.0%) had 38 GNs; 33 (86.8%) and 5 (13.2%) were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and adenoma, respectively. There were no specific patient characteristics related to GNs. Nodule-type GNs were more prevalent in patients with FGP than without (52.2% vs. 0.0%, P=0.002) in the upper body of the stomach. Conversely, depressed-type GNs were fewer in patients with FGPsis than in those without (13.0% vs. 73.3%, P<0.001). Slightly elevated-type GNs were observed in both groups (34.8% vs. 20.0%, P=0.538). Even within pedigrees, the background gastric mucosa and types of GNs varied. In total, 24 GNs were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and eight with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). EMR was selected for GNs with FGPsis because of the technical difficulty of ESD, resulting in a lower en bloc resection rate (62.5% vs. 100%, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates the necessity of routine EGD surveillance in patients diagnosed with FAP. Notably, the morphology and location of GNs differed between patients with and without FGPsis. Endoscopic treatment and outcomes require more attention in cases of FGPsis.

Some observations on Barrett esophagus and associated dysplasia

Biopsy samples from esophageal columnar metaplasia and dysplasia are commonly encountered in Western pathology practice and knowing a few pitfalls can save both pathologists and patients a great deal of anxiety. Herein we discuss criteria for Barrett esophagus, evaluation of dysplasia, and some pitfalls in reviewing endoscopic mucosal resections. Also included is a summary of suggested follow-up for patients with Barrett esophagus.