Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungals against invasive isolates of Cryptococcus species worldwide: Global antifungal antimicrobial testing leadership and surveillance program, 2010-2020

This study examined the geographic distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungals against Cryptococcus isolates. Data were collected on the MICs of specific antifungals (amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) against various Cryptococcus species for the period 2010 to 2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database. Cryptococcus isolates were collected from samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients hospitalized in different regions worldwide. We applied the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) of antifungals against various Cryptococcus species to distinguish wild-type (WT) from non-WT Cryptococcus isolates. A total of 395 isolates of Cryptococcus species cultured from blood (n = 201) or CSF (n = 194) were analyzed. C. grubii (n = 270), C. neoformans (n = 111), and C. gattii (n = 11) were the three predominant species causing bloodstream infections (BSI) or meningitis/meningoencephalitis (MME). The proportion of MICs above the ECV (1 mg/L) for amphotericin B among C. neoformans isolates was significantly lower than that among C. gattii isolates (MICs >0.5 mg/L; P < 0.001), as evaluated using the chi-square test. For most isolates of the three predominant Cryptococcus species, the MICs of new triazoles were ≤0.25 mg/L. The MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B in the BSI/MME-causing Cryptococcus isolates collected from patients hospitalized in the Asia-Western Pacific region and Europe were significantly lower (i.e., the distributions were more leftward) than those in North America and Latin America. Ongoing monitoring of MIC data for important antifungals against cryptococcosis is crucial.

Candida lusitaniae MICs to the echinocandins are elevated but FKS-mediated resistance is rare

MIC values were generated for caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin against 106 isolates of C. lusitaniae, and these values were compared to established epidemiologic cutoff values. The majority of isolates were wild type both by MIC value as well as by FKS1 hotspot sequencing. Although C. lusitaniae isolates have MIC values to the echinocandins that are elevated compared to other common species, with regard to known mechanisms of resistance to the echinocandins, isolates with MIC values at or below the epidemiological cutoff values of 0.5 and 1 μg/mL for micafungin and anidulafungin, respectively, should be considered wild type.