Helicobacter pylori eradication with high-dose proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin dual therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to many antibiotics, which lowers the efficacy of eradication therapy, is increasingly prevalent. High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin dual therapy (HDDT) has been used for H. pylori eradication for years, and resistance to amoxicillin is relatively rare. Although many studies have compared the eradication rate of HDDT with that of guideline therapies, the reported efficacy of HDDT varies greatly and is inconsistent.

AIMS

This study investigated the eradication rate and adverse effects of HDDT compared with the guidelines at the time of the study.

METHODS

Several open public databases, including Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE, were searched. The results of the current literature on the eradication and adverse event rates of HDDT compared with the latest recommended first-line therapies were analysed. Notably, 14 out of the 16 included studies were conducted in Asian regions.

RESULTS

The eradication rate of HDDT was lower but not significantly different from those of control therapies (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-1.26) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. A similar trend was observed in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.47-1.63). Notably, the adverse effect risk in HDDT was significantly lower than in other therapies (I2 = 67.75%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.33-0.54, P = 0.00004). When the eradication rate of the control group was lower than 81%, HDDT was significantly better than control therapies (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.23-4.84).

CONCLUSION

HDDT used four times a day for 14 days showed better efficacy and safety than the guideline treatments for H. pylori infection in areas with high antimicrobial resistance.

Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual regimen with Saccharomyces boulardii as a rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori: Current perspectives and implications

Yu et al's study in the World Journal of Gastroenterology (2023) introduced a novel regimen of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy combined with Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) for the rescue therapy against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a pathogen responsible for peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker renowned for its rapid and long-lasting acid suppression, which is minimally affected by mealtime. Compared to proton pump inhibitors, which bind irreversibly to cysteine residues in the H+/K+-ATPase pump, Vonoprazan competes with the K+ ions, prevents the ions from binding to the pump and blocks acid secretion. Concerns with increasing antibiotic resistance, effects on the gut microbiota, patient compliance, and side effects have led to the advent of a dual regimen for H. pylori. Previous studies suggested that S. boulardii plays a role in stabilizing the gut barrier which improves H. pylori eradication rate. With an acceptable safety profile, the dual-adjunct regimen was effective regardless of prior treatment failure and antibiotic resistance profile, thereby strengthening the applicability in clinical settings. Nonetheless, S. boulardii comes in various formulations and dosages, warranting further exploration into the optimal dosage for supplementation in rescue therapy. Additionally, larger, randomized, double-blinded controlled trials are warranted to confirm these promising results.

Success of susceptibility-guided eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a region with high secondary clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance rates

BACKGROUND

Resistance to clarithromycin (CLA) and levofloxacin (LFX) of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is increasing in severity, and successful eradication is essential. Presently, the eradication success rate has greatly declined, leaving a large number of patients with previous treatment histories.

AIM

To investigate secondary resistance rates, explore risk factors for antibiotic resistance, and assess the efficacy of susceptibility-guided therapy.

METHODS

We recruited 154 subjects positive for Urea Breath Test who attended The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between July 2022 and April 2023. Participants underwent a string test after an overnight fast. The gastric juice was obtained and transferred to vials containing storage solution. Subsequently, DNA extraction and the specific DNA amplification were performed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Demographic information was also analyzed as part of the study. Based on these results, the participants were administered susceptibility-guided treatment. Efficacy was compared with that of the empiric treatment group.

RESULTS

A total of 132 individuals tested positive for the H. pylori ureA gene by qPCR technique. CLA resistance rate reached a high level of 82.6% (n = 109), LFX resistance rate was 69.7% (n = 92) and dual resistance was 62.1% (n = 82). Gastric symptoms [odds ratio (OR) = 2.782; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.076-7.194; P = 0.035] and rural residence (OR = 5.152; 95%CI: 1.407-18.861; P = 0.013) were independent risk factors for secondary resistance to CLA and LFX, respectively. A total of 102 and 100 individuals received susceptibility-guided therapies and empiric treatment, respectively. The antibiotic susceptibility-guided treatment and empiric treatment groups achieved successful eradication rates of 75.5% (77/102) and 59.0% (59/411) by the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 90.6% (77/85) and 70.2% (59/84) by the per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates of these two treatment strategies were significantly different in both ITT (P = 0.001) and PP (P = 0.012) analyses.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori presented high secondary resistance rates to CLA and LFX. For patients with previous treatment failures, treatments should be guided by antibiotic susceptibility tests or regional antibiotic resistance profile.

Comparison of vonoprazan-based with rabeprazole-based dual therapy for treatment-naive patients of Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The application of vonoprazan significantly improved the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of the 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) and 14-day rabeprazole-amoxicillin (RA) dual therapy, and to provide a more efficient, safer, and convenient dual regimen for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled study of treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to the 10-day VA group with vonoprazan 20 mg Bid plus amoxicillin 1 g Tid or the 14-day RA group with rabeprazole 10 mg Tid plus amoxicillin 1 g Tid. The effectiveness, the adverse events, and the patient compliance of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 690 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates of 10-day VA and 14-day RA dual therapy were 89.3% and 84.9% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (P = 0.088); 90.6% and 85.9% by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis (P = 0.059); 91.4% and 86.6% by per-protocol (PP) analysis (P = 0.047). Non-inferiority was confirmed between the two groups (all P < 0.001). No discernible differences were observed in adverse effects and compliance between groups. Poor compliance reduced the eradication efficacy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-day VA dual therapy was non-inferior to the 14-day RA dual therapy for H. pylori treatment-naive patients, which should be given priority in the first-line treatment. The application of vonoprazan reduced treatment course and antibiotic use. Patients' adherence was crucial for the success of eradication.

Combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin as the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled study

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) decreased gradually. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of a 14-day combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin as the first-line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection and compared them with those of the bismuth quadruple therapy. A prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed, involving patients with H. pylori infection in 6 institutions who did not receive any treatment yet. They were randomly assigned into the VA-dual group (vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d) or EACP-quadruple group (esomeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg b.i.d) for 14 days in a ratio of 1:1. At least 28 days later, the eradication rate was detected by the 13C-urea breath test (UBT). A total of 562 patients from February 2022 to September 2022 were enrolled and 316 were random. In the ITT analysis, the eradication rates of H. pylori in the VA-dual group and EACP-quadruple group were 89.9% and 81.0%, respectively, p = 0.037. In the PP analysis were 97.9% and 90.8%, p = 0.009. The different eradication rate was 8.9% (95% CI 1.2-16.5%) and 7.2% (95% CI 1.8-12.4%) in ITT and PP analyses, both lower limit of the 95%CI was still higher than the prespecified margin. In addition, the incidence of adverse events in the VA-dual group was significantly lower than that in the EACP-quadruple group (19.0% vs. 43.0%, P < 0.001). The efficacy and safety of a 14-day combination therapy of vonoprazan and amoxicillin in eradicating H. pylori are superior to bismuth quadruple therapy, and this combination significantly reduces the use of antibiotics.

Ilaprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy at high dose as a first-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection in Hainan: a single-center, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, adverse events, patient compliance, and cost of dual therapy with Ilaprazole-amoxicillin (IA) at high dose versus Ilaprazole-amoxicillin-furazolidone-bismuth (IAFB) quadruple therapy for the Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection among Chinese patients.

METHODS

200 patients who had tested positive for H. pylori and undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after being diagnosed with chronic gastritis participated in this open-label randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to Group A and Group B: the 14-day IA dual treatment group (101) and IAFB quadruple treatment group (99). The ¹³ C urea breath test was conducted to determine whether H. pylori had been eliminated 4-6 weeks after the treatment. Eradication rates, drug-related adverse events, patient compliance, and drug costs were compared between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

Eradication rates in group A were 92.1% and 94.9%, depending on the intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP), respectively, which was similar to group B (91.9% and 93.6%). There was no significant difference observed in adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.518). Interestingly, compliance was significantly higher in group A compared to the group B (P = 0.031). In addition, drug costs were significantly lower for group A in comparison to the group B.

CONCLUSIONS

IA dual therapy was found to be equally effective, safer and less costly than IAFB quadruple therapy. Therefore, these therapies can be potentially considered as first-line regimens for empirical treatment.

Effectiveness of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication depends on the treatment protocol. This study investigates the H. pylori eradication rate in Africa using the best available evidence from databases.

METHODS

Databases were searched and results were pooled together. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I² test statistics. Stata version 13 software was employed to compute the pooled eradication rate. In the subgroup analysis comparison, the finding is considered significant when the confidence intervals did not overlap.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies from 9 African countries with a total population of 2,163 were included in this study. The pooled eradication rate of H. pylori was 79% (95% CI: 75%-82%), heterogeneity (I² = 93.02%). In the subgroup analysis by study design, a higher eradication rate was reported from observational studies (85%, 95% CI: 79%-90%), compared to randomized control trials (77%, 95% CI: 73%-82%); by the duration of therapy, higher eradication rate was reported in 10-days regimen (88%, 95% CI: 84%-92%), compared to 7-days regimen (66%, 95% CI: 55%-77%); by country, the highest eradication rate was found in Ethiopia (90%; 95% CI: 87%-93%) and the lowest eradication rate was reported in Ivory Coast (22.3%; 95% CI:15%-29%); by type of H. pylori test, the highest eradication rate was reported when rapid urease test coupled with histology (88%, 95% CI: 77%-96%), and the lowest eradication rate was reported with histology alone (22.3%; 95% CI:15%-29%). Significant heterogeneity was observed with pooled prevalence (I² = 93.02%, P < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In Africa, the first-line therapy showed a variable eradication rate for H. pylori. This study demonstrates the necessity to optimize current H. pylori treatment regimens in each country, taking into account the antibiotic susceptibility. Future RCT studies with standardized regimens are warranted.

Tailored triple plus bismuth therapy based on previous antibiotic medication history for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate the role of tailored therapy based on past medication history in improving efficacy of H. pylori eradication compared to empiric therapies. The objective of this study was to determine whether tailored triple plus bismuth therapy (TBT) can achieve higher eradication rates based on previous antibiotic history than empiric TBTs.

METHODS

800 treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to four groups receiving clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- or metronidazole-containing empiric TBT and tailored TBT (clarithromycin and levofloxacin chosen based on previous macrolides and quinolones medication history). Correlation analyses were performed between past medication history and resistance or eradication rate.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of tailored TBT were significantly higher than clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- and metronidazole-containing empiric TBT in both intention-to-treat (89.5%, 80.8%, 81.5% and 81.5%) and per-protocol (95.1%, 86.7%, 86.5% and 87.8%) analyses (P<0.05). In patients with previous macrolides, quinolones or nitroimidazoles medication history, the resistance rates of corresponding clarithromycin, levofloxacin or metronidazole were significantly higher than patients without past medication history, and the eradication rates of corresponding clarithromycin- or levofloxacin-containing empiric TBT were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

Tailored TBT based on previous antibiotic history can achieve higher eradication rates than empiric TBT for first-line H. pylori eradication.

Statistical proof of Helicobacter pylori eradication in preventing metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection in an East Asian population

We conducted a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis study on the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in preventing metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection among an East Asian population. Our results showed that the eradication of this pathogen significantly reduced the risk of susceptibility to metachronous gastric cancer in these patients. However, based on the available evidence, several factors such as increasing age, severe atrophy in the corpus and antrum, and intestinal metaplasia all may increase the risk of metachronous gastric cancer in H. pylori eradicated patients.

Prevalence of antibiotic heteroresistance associated with Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heteroresistance is a general term to describe diverse responses to specific antibiotics that can occur due to infection with either multiple bacterial strains or microevolution of a single strain during chronic infection. Due to limited information regarding heteroresistance Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, the current study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of this phenomenon.

METHODS

For this study, all potential relevant studies were collected by searching international databases such as ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Embase, DOAJ, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Google Scholar. Finally, the frequency of heteroresistance H. pylori infection was measured using the event rate corresponding to 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies met our criteria; the eligible studies were related to the years 2001-2022. Our results showed that the prevalence of heteroresistance H. pylori strains was 60.1% to clarithromycin, 61.1% to metronidazole, 46.1% to levofloxacin, 3.8% to amoxicillin, and 21.1% to tetracycline. Our literature review also showed discrepancy of antimicrobial susceptibility test in strains isolated from different anatomical sites of the stomach. Heteroresistance H. pylori infection in developing countries is mostly due to infection with multiple H. pylori strains, while in developed countries it is due to microevolution of a single H. pylori strain in response to antibiotic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Heteroresistance H. pylori infection interferes with successful therapy and eventually can lead to the treatment failure. If a biopsy is taken from only one gastric site, resistant strains of H. pylori may be underestimated. Considering the role of heteroresistance H. pylori infection in treatment failure, it is very important for gastroenterologists to improve their knowledge about this fact. Regardingly, new guidelines should be developed and designed for the management and treatment of heteroresistance H. pylori infection.

Investigating the effect of quadruple therapy with Saccharomyces boulardii or Lactobacillus reuteri strain (DSMZ 17648) supplements on eradication of Helicobacter pylori and treatments adverse effects: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

Background

The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of treatment with Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus reuteri on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and Adverse effects (AEs) of the treatment.

Results

This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. And, eradication of H. pylori was reported comparing quadruple therapy include of PPI (proton pomp inhibitor), bismuth subcitrate, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin versus quadruple therapy supplemented with S. boulardii and L. reuteri DSMZ 17648. For this aim, a total of 156 patients were included in the current study; and patients positive for H. pylori infection (n = 156) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: 52 patients (Group P) received conventional quadruple therapy plus L. reuteri, 52 patients (Group S) received conventional quadruple therapy plus S. boulardii daily, for 2 weeks, and 52 patients were in the control group (Group C). At the end of the treatment period, all the subjects continued to take proton pump inhibitor (PPI) alone for 14 days, and then, no medication was given for 2 weeks again. During follow-up, gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using an evaluation scale (Glasgow dyspepsia questionnaire [GDQ]), and AEs were assessed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. As a result, all patients completed the treatment protocol in all groups by the end of the study. Additionally, eradication therapy was effective for 94.2% of subjects in Group S, 92.3% of subjects in Group P, and 86.5% of subjects in the control group, with no differences between treatment arms. In Group S, the chance of developing symptoms of nausea (OR = 2.74), diarrhea (OR = 3.01), headache (OR = 10.51), abdominal pain (OR = 3.21), and anxiety (OR = 3.58) was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

S. boulardii could significantly reduce some AEs of H. pylori eradication therapy, but effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri on these cases was not significant. It is recommended to conduct the future research with larger sample size in order to investigate the effect.

Trial registration: IRCT20200106046021N1, this trial was registered on Jan 14, 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02187-z.

The efficacy and safety of furazolidone-bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication with or without probiotic supplementation

Aim

In this clinical trial we use furazolidone-bismuth quadruple therapy with or without probiotics for H.pylori eradication.

Background

Increasing rates of eradication failure in H.pylori infection mainly due to antibiotic resistance has led to search for alternative regimens such as using novel antibiotics and/or using probiotic supplementation as conjunctive to the standard eradication regimens.

Methods

This double blind clinical trial was performed in gastrointestinal clinic of Loghman Hakim University Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients with a positive pathology test for H.pylori were enrolled to the study and received a 14 day course of furazolidone 100 mg q.i.d, bismuth 240 mg b.i.d, amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d, pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d plus either probiotic (Familact) b.i.d or placebo b.i.d. Adverse effects and adherence to therapy were evaluated at the end of the treatment course. Eradication was established by H.pylori fecal antigen test.

Results

A total of 200 patients entered the study and were randomly assigned to two groups of placebo and probiotic. There was no significant difference regarding age or gender between placebo and probiotic groups. Adherence to therapy was higher than 90% in total and not significantly different between placebo and probiotic groups. Total eradication rate was 80.5% (n=161). Eradication rate was 84% in probiotic group vs 77% in placebo group (P=0.2). Total rate of adverse effects was 30% in probiotic group vs 62% in placebo group. The most common adverse effects were abdominal pain (15% in probiotic group vs 28% in placebo group, P=0.03) followed by diarrhea (5% in probiotic group vs 12% in placebo group, P=0.1).

Conclusion

According to our results, adding probiotic to furazolidone-bismuth quadruple therapy did no increase the eradication rate significantly. However, adverse effects particularly abdominal pain was lower in the probiotic group when compared with placebo.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of probiotic-supplemented therapy on the eradication of H. pylori and incidence of therapy-associated side effects

Traditional therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remain hindered by the antibiotic resistance of the pathogen and the poor therapeutic compliance of patients. To address these issues, probiotics have been added as an adjunctive therapy. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation during standard therapy on the eradication rate of H. pylori infection and incidence of therapy-related side effects. Four online databases were searched for eligible studies without language restriction. Review Manager (REVMAN, Version 5.3) was used to perform all data analyses. Forty articles including 5792 patients met our criteria and were included in the analysis. Notably, probiotic supplementation improved the eradication rate by approximately 10% relative to the control group [odds ratio (OR), 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-2.22, P < 0.00001]. The incidence of total side effects (OR, 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70, P < 0.00001) and individual symptoms (e.g., diarrhea, vomiting and nausea, constipation, epigastric pain, taste disturbance) also decreased significantly with probiotic supplementation. No other differences in side effects were observed between the experimental and control groups. Moreover, a longer duration (≥10 days) of probiotic treatment had positive effects on both eradication rate of H. pylori and incidence of overall side effects.

Evaluation of different proton pump inhibitors combined with bismuth quadruple regimens in Helicobacter pylori eradication

To evaluate the efficacy and economics of different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) combined with bismuth quadruple regimens for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, a retrospective analysis method was used to collect Hp-positive patients who were treated with a bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (PPIs + amoxicillin + furazolidone + colloid pectin bismuth) from the outpatient department of gastroenterology in our hospital from January to June 2017. A total of 1410 patients were included in the study and divided into four groups according to different PPIs: group A (pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated capsules, 352 cases), group B (esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablets, 462 cases), group C (pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets, 392 cases) and group D (rabeprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets, 204 cases). The eradication rate of Hp and cost-saving in each group were then compared. There were no significant differences of gender (P = 0.526) and age (P = 0.366) between each Hp treatment regimen. The eradication rates of groups A, B, C and D were 91.48%, 89.83%, 86.73% and 90.69%, respectively. No statistical differences of Hp eradication rates were observed between each group yet (P > 0.05). However, the cost of group A was the lowest. In the present study, the Hp eradication rates between different PPIs regimens were similar in treating Hp infection. Nevertheless, the point in favor of pantoprazole capsules is the slightly higher Hp eradication rate and lower drug cost than other PPIs, which provides a significant evidence for the clinical medication decision in treating Hp infection.

[Dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily for 14 days for the first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;99:3781-3785. [PMID: 31874514 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.48.005]

Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety and compliance of dual therapy for the first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection through a prospective, single-center and open-label cohort study. Methods: From March 2014 to September 2018, 200 naïve patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia received 14-day dual therapy (rabeprazole 10mg and amoxicillin 500 mg, four times daily orally). Safety and compliance were assessed 1-3 days after eradication. The therapeutic outcome was determined by (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 weeks after eradication. Some patients underwent strain culture, antibiotic sensitivity testing and CYP2C19 polymorphism assay. Results: The eradication rates of dual therapy: intention-to-treat analysis 87.5% (95% confidence interval 82.5%-91.5%), modified intention-to-treat analysis 90.2% (86.1%-94.3%) and per-protocol analysis 91.0% (86.3%-94.7). 21.2% of patients had adverse reactions, the majority were mild to moderate, and only 1.5% of patients discontinued medication because of intolerance to adverse reactions. Patients with good compliance accounted for 96.0%. Variate analyses showed that poor compliance and amoxicillin resistance were the independent risk factors for eradication failure. Conclusions: 14-day dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin (four times daily) achieved good efficacy, safety and compliance for the first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

The safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy; a prospective post-marketing surveillance

Background: The safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan-based Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in routine clinical practice, and patient characteristics that influence safety and effectiveness, have not been well investigated.Methods: H. pylori-positive patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, history of endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer, and gastritis were enrolled. Patients received vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin (AMPC) 750 mg, and clarithromycin (CAM) 200-400 mg twice daily for 7 days for the first-line eradication. For the second-line eradication, vonoprazan, AMPC, and metronidazole (MTZ) 250 mg were administered. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and eradication rates were evaluated.Results: The incidences of ADRs with vonoprazan/AMPC/CAM and vonoprazan/AMPC/MTZ were 3.22% (16/497) and 1.89% (1/53), respectively. Commonly reported ADRs were diarrhea, nausea, dysgeusia, feces soft, and rash. The eradication rates of the first-line therapy and the second-line therapy were 91.24% (427/468) and 95.45% (42/44), respectively. No notable differences in ADRs and eradication rates were observed when stratified by patient demographic characteristics.Conclusion: No new safety concerns were observed, and the effectiveness of vonoprazan-based triple therapy was confirmed in routine clinical practice.Trial registration: This study is registered at the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI-153003).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing before first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial susceptibility-guided therapy before first-line treatment for infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance.

METHODS

A total of 1034 patients infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) during 2013-2014 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. 157 of 1034 (15%) patients showed resistance to two (127/1034; 12%) and to three (30/1034; 3%) antibiotics. Sixty-eight patients with dual H. pylori-resistance (clarithromycin, metronidazole or levofloxacin) were treated for 10 d with triple therapies: OAL (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and levofloxacin 500 mg b.i.d.) 43 cases, OAM (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d.) 12 cases and OAC (omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) 13 cases based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelve patients showed triple H. pylori-resistance (clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin) and received for 10 d triple therapy with OAR (omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and rifabutin 150 mg b.i.d.). Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse effects and compliance were assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat eradication rates were: OAL (97.6%), OAM (91.6%), OAC (92.3%) and OAR (58.3%). Cure rate was significantly higher in naïve patients treated with OAR-10 compared to patients who had two or three previous treatment failures (83% vs 33%). Adverse events rates for OAL, OAM, OAC and OAR were 22%, 25%, 23% and 17%, respectively, all of them mild-moderate.

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial susceptibility-guided triple therapies during 10 d for first-line treatment leads to an eradication rate superior to 90% in patients with dual antibiotic H. pylori resistance.

Comparison of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Rates of 2-Week Levofloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy, Levofloxacin-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapy, and Standard Bismuth Quadruple Therapy as a First-Line Regimen

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2-week levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy, and standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as a first-line regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

METHODS

A total of 329 patients with H. pylori infection were randomly divided into 3 groups to receive one of the following regimens: (a) levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy, RBAL (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d., bismuth subsalicylate 562 mg, b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g, b.i.d, levofloxacin 500 mg, once daily), (b) standard bismuth quadruple therapy, RBMT (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d, subsalicylate 562 mg, b.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg, t.i.d, tetracycline 500 mg, q.i.d), or (c) levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, RAL (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g, b.i.d, levofloxacin 500 mg, once daily). The primary outcome was the eradication rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of the above 3 groups using ITT analysis were RBAL 83.8%, RBMT 88.3%, and RAL 74.8% compared with 91.2, 92.5, and 79.2%, respectively, using PP analysis. The eradication rate using RBMT was significantly higher than that of RAL (p = 0.029 in ITT analysis and p = 0.017 in PP analysis). Several side effects occurred in 156 patients (54.1%) in the RBAL group, 215 (52.3%) in the RBMT group, and 56 (26.2%) in the RAL group (p > 0.05, RBAL vs. RBMT; p < 0.001, RBMT vs. RAL; p < 0.001, RBAL vs. RAL).

CONCLUSION

All bismuth-containing quadruple therapies had acceptable eradication rates, but levofloxacin-containing triple therapy was not as good as quadruple therapies. Hence, quadruple therapies should be considered the preferred first-line therapy for H. pylori infections.

Correlation of oral Helicobacter pylori infection with gastric Helicobacter pylori infection: Implications for eradication

AIM: To investigate the correlation of oral Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection with gastric H. pylori infection as well as their eradication.

METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients underwent ¹⁴C-urea breath test (¹⁴C-UBT), gastric histological examination (modified Giemsa staining) and bacterial culture to determine the presence of gastric H. pylori infection or not. HPS method was used to determine the oral H. pylori infection. Eighty-one patients with both gastric and oral H. pylori infection were selected and randomly divided into two groups to receive either regimen A (conventional quadruple therapy) or B [conventional quadruple therapy + polylysine complex mouthwash (Di beisi) to clean the mouth]. Twenty-seven patients with gastric H. pylori infection but without oral H. pylori were treated with regimen A. After treatment for 4 wk and 12 wk, ¹⁴C-UBT and HPS were used to evaluate the eradication of gastric and oral H. pylori infection.

RESULTS: In the 150 patients included, the rate of oral H. pylori infection was significantly higher in patients with gastric H. pylori infection than in those without [75.00% (81/108) vs 38.10% (16/42), χ² = 18.025, P < 0.05)]. After 4 wk of treatment with regimen A, the rate of eradication of gastric H. pylori infection was significantly lower in patients with oral H. pylori infection than in those without [60.98% (25/41) vs 88.89% (24/27), χ² = 6.300, P < 0.05)]. For regimen B, the rates of eradication of gastric and oral H. pylori infection were 90% (36/40) and 65.00% (26/40), respectively, which were significantly higher than those treated with regimen A (60.98% and 17.07%, respectively, χ² = 7.168, P < 0.05). The eradication rates for each group were similar between 12 wk and 4 wk.

CONCLUSION: Oral H. pylori infection correlates with gastric H. pylori infection, and the presence of oral H. pylori infection can reduce the H. pylori eradication rate by conventional therapy. Oral and gastric comprehensive treatment program can significantly increase the eradication rate of H. pylori infection.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori treatment: A follow-up study on clinical effects

AIM: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and common first-line treatment.

METHODS: Two gastric mucosa biopsies were taken from patients undergoing gastroscopy, one for histopathological and histological staining, and the other for H. pylori isolation, culture and identification. Cases that were positive for both culture and staining were included into a treatment group, and those staining positive only were included into a control group. The treatment group were treated based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and the control group were treated with standard first-line therapies. Both groups were treated for 10 d and H. pylori examination (bacterial culture, histological staining or ¹⁴C-Urea breath test) was conducted 4 wk after therapy. H. pylori was considered eradicated when one of the three examinations had negative results.

RESULTS: In this study, 4680 cases were included into the treatment group and 3505 cases were included into the control group. In the treatment group, quadruple therapy containing two most sensitive antibiotics was applied. In the control group, common quadruple therapy was used. Finally, H. pylori eradication rate was evaluated, which was significantly higher in the treatment group (91.18%) than in the control group (73.07%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: H. pylori treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing is significantly superior to common first-line therapy.

Seven-day triple therapy is a better choice for Helicobacter pylori eradication in regions with low antibiotic resistance

AIM: To investigate whether 7-d triple therapies are still valid in populations with low levels of resistance.

METHODS: A total of 1106 Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive patients were divided into three groups, each of which received one type of 7-d triple therapy. Therapeutic outcomes of the patients were assessed by the ¹³C-urea breath test at 8 wk after treatment. The susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics was determined by an agar-dilution method. Data analysis was performed by χ² tests.

RESULTS: The eradication rates in groups A, B and C were 90.71% (332/366), 90.46% (313/346) and 90.87% (189/208), respectively (P = 0.986). The resistance rates were 8.91% for clarithromycin, 14.78% for levofloxacin and 0% for amoxicillin. The eradication rate was significantly different between clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-resistant patients (P < 0.05) in group A. Patients whose treatment failed in group A also had a higher clarithromycin resistance rate than did successive patients (P = 0.034). However, levofloxacin resistance had no obvious influence on the eradication rate. Furthermore, three main antibiotics (clarithromycin, levofloxacin and amoxicillin) had lower DID (defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day) in this city.

CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin resistance is the main reason for the failure of 7-d triple therapy. In populations with low levels of resistance, a 7-d triple therapy is a viable choice. The choice of therapy should not be influenced by conditions in high antibiotic resistance regions.

Fourteen- vs seven-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare the efficacy of 14- and 7-d bismuth-based quadruple therapies as second-line eradication treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: Between 2004 and 2014, the medical records of 790 patients who had experienced failure of first-line proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based eradication therapy and were then treated with bismuth-based quadruple therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Those who received bismuth-based quadruple therapy [PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (PBMT)] for either 7 d or 14 d were assigned to a PBMT-7 group (n = 543) or a PBMT-14 group (n = 247), respectively. The eradication rates for both groups were determined by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. ITT analysis compared the treatment groups as originally allocated while the PP analysis including only those patients who had completed the treatment as originally allocated. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as a negative ¹³C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of eradication treatment.

RESULTS: The overall ITT eradication rate was 69.1% (546/790). Final ITT eradication rates were 67.4% (366/543; 95%CI: 63.1%-71.7%) in the PBMT-7 group and 72.8% (180/247; 95%CI: 67.4%-78.2%) in the PBMT-14 group (P = 0.028). The overall PP eradication rate was 80.0% (546/682), and the final PP eradication rates were 78.2% (366/468; 95%CI: 72.1%-84.0%) in the PBMT-7 group and 84.1% (180/214; 95%CI: 76.8%-90.8%) in the PBMT-14 group (P = 0.009). The H. pylori eradication rates in the PBMT-14 group were significantly higher than in the PBMT-7 group according to both ITT (P = 0.028) and PP analysis (P = 0.009). Compliance was similar in both groups (PBMT-7 group: 97.9%; PBMT-14 group: 96.4%). Adverse event rates were 10.7% (51/478) and 17.1% (38/222) in the PBMT-7 and PBMT-14 groups, respectively (P = 0.487).

CONCLUSION: The 14-d bismuth-based quadruple therapy is a significantly more effective second-line eradication treatment for H. pylori infection than the 7-d alternative.

Efficacy of 14-d vs 7-d moxifloxacin-based triple regimens for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of the 14-d moxifloxacin-based triple therapy for the second-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 160 patients who had experienced failure of their first-line proton pump inhibitor-based eradication therapy and subsequently received the moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as a second-line eradication treatment regimen. The patients who were treated with the moxifloxacin-based triple therapy (oral 20 mg rabeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., and 400 mg moxifloxacin q.d.) for 7 d were assigned to the RAM-7 group (n = 79) while those who took them for 14 days were assigned to RAM-14 group (n = 81). The eradication rates for both groups were determined by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. ITT analysis compared the treatment groups as originally allocated while the PP analysis including only those patients who had completed the treatment as originally allocated. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as the documentation of a negative ¹³C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of the eradication treatment.

RESULTS: The overall ITT eradication rate was 76.2% (122/160). The final ITT eradication rates were 70.8% (56/79; 95%CI: 63.3%-77.1%) in the RAM-7 group and 81.4% (66/81; 95%CI: 74.6%-88.3%) in the RAM-14 group (P = 0.034). The overall PP eradication rate was 84.1% (122/145), and the final PP eradication rates were 77.7% (56/72; 95%CI: 70.2%-85.3%) in the RAM-7 group and 90.4% (66/73; 95%CI: 82.8%-98.1%) in the RAM-14 group (P = 0.017). The H. pylori-eradication rates in the RAM-14 group were significantly higher compared with that of the RAM-7 group according to both the ITT (P = 0.034) and the PP analyses (P = 0.017). Both groups exhibited good treatment compliance (RAM-7/RAM-14 group: 100%/100%). The adverse event rates were 19.4% (14/72) and 20.5% (15/73) in the RAM-7 and RAM-14 groups, respectively (P = 0.441). Adverse events occurred in 14 of the 72 patients (19.4) in the RAM-7 group and in 15 of the 73 patients (20.5) in the RAM-14 group. No statistically significant differences (P = 0.441) were observed.

CONCLUSION: The 14-d moxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a significantly more effective second-line eradication treatment as compared to the 7-d alternative for H. pylori infection in South Korea.

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy for first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastrointestinal disease

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 14-d moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy as first-line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: From December 2013 to August 2014, 161 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection randomly received 14 d of moxifloxacin-based sequential group (MOX-ST group, n = 80) or clarithromycin-based sequential group (CLA-ST group, n = 81) therapy. H. pylori infection was defined on the basis of at least one of the following three tests: a positive ¹³C-urea breath test; histologic evidence of H. pylori by modified Giemsa staining; or a positive rapid urease test (CLOtest; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) by gastric mucosal biopsy. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as a negative ¹³C-urea breath test four weeks after the end of eradication treatment. Compliance was defined as good when drug intake was at least 85%. H. pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with drug treatment, adverse event rates, and factors influencing the efficacy of eradication therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS: The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 91.3% (73/80; 95%CI: 86.2%-95.4%) in the MOX-ST group and 71.6% (58/81; 95%CI: 65.8%-77.4%) in the CLA-ST group (P = 0.014). The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 93.6% (73/78; 95%CI: 89.1%-98.1%) in the MOX-ST group and 75.3% (58/77; 95%CI: 69.4%-81.8%) in the CLA-ST group (P = 0.022). Compliance was 100% in both groups. The adverse event rates were 12.8% (10/78) and 24.6% (19/77) in the MOX-ST and CLA-ST group, respectively (P = 0.038). Most of the adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity; there was none serious enough to cause discontinuation of treatment in either group. In multivariate analysis, advanced age (≥ 60 years) was a significant independent factor related to the eradication failure in the CLA-ST group (adjusted OR = 2.13, 95%CI: 1.97-2.29, P = 0.004), whereas there was no significance in the MOX-ST group.

CONCLUSION: The 14-d moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy is effective. Moreover, it shows excellent patient compliance and safety compared to the 14-d clarithromycin-based sequential therapy.

Efficacy of Bifidobacterium tetravaccine tablets and Jinghua Weikang capsules in eradication of Helicobacter pylori

AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of Bifidobacterium tetravaccine tablets and Jinghua Weikang capsules in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with H. pylori infection who were treated from January 2011 to December 2013 at our hospital were randomly and equally divided into three groups: A, B and C. Group A was treated with standard triple therapy, groups B and C were given Bifidobacterium tetravaccine tablets and Jinghua Weikang capsules on the basis of standard triple therapy, respectively. The clinical effects were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS: The rates of H. pylori eradication in groups B and C were higher than that in group A (82.5%, 80.0% vs 72.5%, P > 0.05), but the difference was not significant. There was also no significant difference between groups B and C (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C (37.5% vs 12.5%, 10.0%, P < 0.05), although there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Bifidobacterium tetravaccine tablets and Jinghua Weikang capsules show good clinical effects in H. pylori eradication therapy in terms of improved H. pylori eradication rate and fewer adverse reactions.

Efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis combined with PPI triple therapy in eradication of Helicobacter pylori

AIM: To observe the effect of Bacillus licheniformis in combination with PPI triple therapy on the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and improvement of clinical symptoms.

METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients who were diagnosed with erosive gastritis or peptic ulcer with H. pylori infection by gastroscopy, rapid urease method and pathological staining at our hospital were randomly divided into three groups: triple therapy group (n = 40, treated with lansoprazole 30 mg bid + amoxicillin 1.0 bid + levofloxacin 0.5 QD), quadruple therapy group (n = 40, treated with bismuth pectin 0.2 bid + lansoprazole 30 mg bid + amoxicillin 1.0 bid + levofloxacin 0.5 QD), and combination treatment group (n = 40, treated with Bacillus licheniformis 0.5 bid + lansoprazole 30 mg bid + amoxicillin 1.0 bid + levofloxacin 0.5 QD). The triple therapy and quadruple therapy groups were treated for 7 d, and the treatment group continued taking Bacillus licheniformis capsules for an additional 14 d. Patients with gastric ulcer continued taking LAN 30 mg, once daily for 5 wk, and those with duodenal ulcer continued taking lansoprazole 30 mg, once daily for 3 wk.

RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rate was significantly higher in the Bacillus licheniformis group than in the triple therapy group (85% vs 70%, P < 0.05), but showed no significant difference between the Bacillus licheniformis group and quadruple therapy group (85% vs 82.5%, P > 0.05). The clinical symptoms were improved more significantly in the Bacillus licheniformis group than in the triple therapy group (97.5% vs 75.0%, P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients showing symptom improvement between the Bacillus licheniformis group and quadruple therapy group (97.5% vs 95.0%, P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the Bacillus licheniformis group than in the triple therapy group (2.5% vs 12.5%, P < 0.05) and quadruple therapy group 2 (2.5% vs 25.0%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Bacillus licheniformis can improve the eradication rate of H. pylori, alleviate clinical symptoms and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing triple therapy.

Evaluation of the benefit of addition of clidinium C to a Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the success of H.pylori eradication therapy in patients with dyspepsia by therapeutics regimes with and without clidinium C.

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infections are reported in all parts of the world. Appropriate antibiotic therapy can treat infection. The ideal treatment regimen has not been specified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized, double blind clinical trials study, 250 patients with dyspepsia were enrolled. All patients were treated by Omeprazole, Metronidazole, Amoxicillin and Bismuth (OMAB) for two weeks. One tablet clidinium C before each meal was added to this regimen in the intervention group (A). Urea Breath Test (UBT) was carried out after 8-12 weeks after treatment for evaluation of H.pylori eradication.

RESULTS

132 patients in the intervention group (A) and 118 patients in the control group (B) were enrolled to the study. The rate of eradication in group A was significantly higher than group B (62.1% vs. 50%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The results supported the effect of clidinium C for increasing of helicobacter pylori eradication, but further studies need to be performed.

Efficacy of a therapeutic strategy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To determine the efficacy of our therapeutic strategy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and to identify predictive factors for successful eradication.

METHODS: From April 2006 to June 2010, we retrospectively assessed 2428 consecutive patients (1025 men, 1403 women; mean age 55 years, age range 18-92 years) with gastric histology positive for H. pylori infection referred to our unit for 13-C urea breath test (UBT), after first-line therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 d. Patients who were still positive to UBT were recommended a second-line therapy (PPI b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 d). Third choice treatment was empirical with PPI b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + levofloxacin 250 mg b.i.d. for 14 d.

RESULTS: Out of 614 patients, still H. pylori-positive after first-line therapy, only 326 and 19 patients respectively rechecked their H. pylori status by UBT after the suggested second and third-line regimens. “Per protocol” eradication rates for first, second and third-line therapy were 74.7% (95% CI: 72.7%-76.4%), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.1%-89.1%) and 89.5% (95% CI: 74.9%-103%) respectively. The overall percentage of patients with H. pylori eradicated after two treatments was 97.8% (95% CI: 97.1%-98.4%), vs 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8%-100%) after three treatments. The study found that eradication therapy was most effective in patients with ulcer disease (P < 0.05, P = 0.028), especially in those with duodenal ulcer. Smoking habits did not significantly affect the eradication rate.

CONCLUSION: First-line therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin produces an H. pylori eradication rate comparable or superior to other studies and second-line treatment can still be triple therapy with amoxicillin and tinidazole.

Efficacy of 8-day versus 10-day sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare the efficacy of 8-day versus 10-day sequential therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection.

METHODS: Two hundred and seventeen patients with H.pylori infection who had peptic ulcer or chronic gastritis were randomly divided into two groups: 8-d group (n = 103, received rabeprazole 10 mg plus amoxicillin 1.0 g for 4 days, and rabeprazole 10 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg and ornidazole 500 mg for another 4 days) and 10-d group (n = 114, received rabeprazole 10 mg plus amoxicillin 1.0 g for 5 days, and rabeprazole 10 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg and ornidazole 500 mg for another 5 days). All drugs were given twice daily. H.pylori infection status was compared between the two groups after completion of treatment.

RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rate was 89.3% and 91.2% (P>0.05), and per-protocol eradication rate was 92.0% and 93.7% (P>0.05) in the 8-d and 10-d group, respectively. However, the treatment cost was lower for the 8-day group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of side effects and the rate of symptomatic relief between the two groups (both P>0.05).

CONCLUSION: The 8-day sequential therapy can achieve a high H.pylori eradication and relieve the symptoms effectively, and may be used as first-line treatment for H.pylori eradication.

Sequential therapy versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of a new sequential treatment regimen versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: One hundred and two H. pylori-infected patients with chronic gastritis or peptic ulcer were randomized to receive a 10-day sequential therapy [esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg, twice daily) for the first 5 d, followed by esomeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 d] or a 14-day standard triple therapy [esomeprazole (20mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin 1000 mg, twice daily]. H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C-urea breath test or endoscopy four weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the eradication rate of H. pylori infection (90.4% vs 90.2%, P = 1.000) and the incidence of side effects (23.5 % vs 35.3%, P = 0.172) between the 10-day sequential regimen group and 14-day standard regimen group. The treatment cost was significantly lower for the 10-day sequential therapy than for the 14-day standard triple therapy (380.6 yuan vs 677.88 yuan, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The 10-day sequential treatment regimen has similar eradication rate of H. pylori infection and incidence of side effects but higher cost-efficiency compared to the 14-day standard triple therapy.

Standard triple, bismuth pectin quadruple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of standard triple, bismuth pectin quadruple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in a randomized, double-blinded, comparative clinical trial in China.

METHODS: A total of 215 H. pylori-positive patients were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into three groups: group A (n = 72) received a 10-d bismuth pectin quadruple therapy (20 mg rabeprazole bid, 1000 mg amoxicillin bid, 100 mg bismuth pectin qid, and 500 mg levofloxacin qd); group B (n = 72) received the sequential therapy (20 mg omeprazole bid, 1000 mg amoxicillin bid, in 5 d, followed by 20 mg omeprazole bid, 500 mg tinidazole bid, 500 mg clarithromycin bid, for another 5 d); group C (n = 71) received a standard 1-wk triple therapy (20 mg omeprazole bid, 1000 mg amoxicillin bid, 500 mg clarithromycin bid). After all these treatments, 20 mg omeprazole bid was administrated for 3 wk. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, 13C-urea breath test and rapid urease test at baseline and 4-6 wk after completion of treatment. Ulcer cicatrization was assessed by gastroscopy. χ² test (P < 0.05) was used to compare the eradication rates and ulcer cicatrisation rates among the three groups.

RESULTS: The eradication rate was 83.33% (60/72) in group A, 88.89% (64/72) in group B, and 80.56% (58/71) in group C. The ulcer cicatrisation rate was 86.44% (51/59) in group A, 90.16% (55/61) in group B, and 84.91% (45/53) in group C. The sequential therapy yielded a higher eradication rate and ulcer cicatrisation rate than the standard triple and bismuth pectin quadruple therapies. Statistically, the eradication rate of group B was significantly different from groups A and C (P < 0.05), but the difference of ulcer cicatrisation rate and side effects was not statistically significant among the three groups (P > 0.05). The three protocols were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: The sequential therapy has achieved a significantly higher eradication rate, and is a more suitable first-line alternative protocol for anti-H. pylori infection compared with the standard triple and bismuth pectin quadruple therapies.

Sequential therapy versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Chinese patients: a meta-analysis

AIM: To systematically review the differences in efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions between sequential therapy and standard triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection in Chinese patients.

METHODS: A search of Chinese databases was conducted by two independent reviewers to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing sequential therapy with standard 7-day and 10-day triple therapies in the treatment of H pylori infection. The patients' clinical data, study quality, H pylori eradication rate and the incidence rate of adverse reactions were compared between sequential therapy and standard 7-day and 10-day standard triple therapies in the treatment of H pylori infection. The relative risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated. The funnel plots was used to estimate publication bias.

RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 835 subjects were identified. The eradication rates of sequential therapy and standard 7-day and 10-day triple therapies were 92.0%, 73.7% and 84.5%, respectively. Pooled estimates showed superiority of sequential therapy over 7-day triple regimen with RR of 1.23 (95%CI: 1.14-1.33), and over 10-day triple regimen with RR of 1.12 (95%CI: 1.02-1.23). The incidence rate of adverse reactions was comparable between the two therapies.

CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy appears superior to standard triple therapy for eradication of H pylori infection in Chinese patients. No significant difference is noted in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two therapies.

A 10-day sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori-infected patients: an analysis of 39 cases

AIM: To determine whether the sequential therapy is better than the standard triple-drug therapy in treatment of H pyloriinfection for adults with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer.

METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with H pylori positive were randomly divided two groups. Thirty nine patients received a 10-day sequential therapy [esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg, twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by esomeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days]. Forty patients received a 7-day triple therapy [esomeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin 1000 mg, twice daily]. H pylorieradication was checked four weeks after treatment using 13C-urea breath test.

RESULTS: The eradication rate of the 10-day sequential therapy was 94.87%, and merely 77.50% for the control group. The difference between the two groups was significant (χ² = 4.97, P < 0.05). There was no difference in incidence of side effects between the two groups (χ² = 0.05, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The 10-day sequential therapy achieves a higher eradication rate than the standard triple therapy for the first time in adults. It is an effective, safe and economical option for patients and possesses great potential.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in surgical practice: A randomised trial of triple versus quadruple therapy in a rural district general hospital

AIM: To compare a lansoprazole-based triple versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication with emphasis on side effect profile, patient compliance and eradication rate at a rural district general hospital in Wales, United Kingdom.

METHODS: One hundred one patients with H pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomised to receive triple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.d. (LAC), or quadruple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d., and tetracycline chloride 500 mg q.d.s. (LMBT). Cure was defined as a negative ¹³C urea breath test 2 mo after treatment.

RESULTS: Seven patients were withdrawn after randomisation. Fifty patients were assigned to LAC group and 44 to LMBT group. The intention-to-treat cure rates were 92% and 91%, whereas the per-protocol cure rates were 92% and 97%, respectively. Side effects were common, with 56% experiencing moderate to severe symptoms in the LAC group and 59% in the LMBT group. Symptoms of vomiting, diarrhoea and black stools were significantly more common in the LMBT group. Patient compliance was 100% for triple therapy and 86% for quadruple therapy (P < 0.01). One-third of patients in both groups were still taking acid-reducing medications at six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION: One-week triple and quadruple therapies have similar intention-to-treat eradication rates. Certain side effects are more common with quadruple therapy, which can compromise patient compliance. Patient education or modifications to the regimen are alternative options to improve compliance of the quadruple regimen.

One-year follow-up study of Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with 13C-urea breath test after 3-d and 7-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy

AIM: To investigate the long-term role of a 3-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori(H pylori)-infected active peptic ulcers.

METHODS: We prospectively studied 115 consecutive patients with H pylori-infected active peptic ulcers. H pylori infection was confirmed if any two of H pylori DNA, histology, and rapid urease test were positive. Patients were assigned to either an open-labeled 3-d course of oral amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or 7-d course of oral amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Subsequently, all patients received oral rabeprazole 20 mg once daily until the 8^th wk. Three months after therapy, all patients were followed-up endoscopically for the peptic ulcer, H pylori DNA, histology, and rapid urease test. One year after therapy, H pylori infection was tested using the ¹³C-urea breath test.

RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates 3 mo after therapy were 81.0% vs 75.4% for the 3-d and 7-d groups [intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, P = 0.47] respectively, and 90.4% vs 89.6% for the 3-d and 7-d groups [per-protocol (PP) analysis, P = 0.89] respectively. The eradication rates 3 mo after therapy were 75.9% vs 73.7% for the 3-d and 7-d groups (ITT, P = 0.79) respectively, and 84.6% vs 87.5% for the 3-d and 7-d groups (PP, P = 0.68) respectively. One year after therapy, seventy-five patients returned to receive the ¹³C-urea breath test, and the eradication rates were 78.4% vs 81.6% in 3-d and 7-d groups (PP, P = 0.73) respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our study showed the eradication rates against H pylori infection 3 and 12 mo after triple therapy were not different between the 3-d and 7-d rabeprazole-based groups. Therefore, the 3-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy may be an alternative treatment for peptic ulcers with H pylori infection.